Pic The Australian
By Peter Gargan, Constitutional Analyst
Letter to Angus Taylor, Member for Hume
The election in under two weeks must be postponed, to restore the Rule of Law and the Law of the Constitution and Commonwealth. Both major parties are under fire, and the one that offers a way out of the fraud and corruption riddled system exposed to you, by this correspondence should galvanise you to act promptly to get it postponed. The Common Informers ( Parliamentary Disqualification Act 1975. repeals S 46 Constitution and breaches S 77 (i,) Constitution. The Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948, and Australian Citizenship Act 2007. Both kill the King and with him our Christian heritage replacing it with communism.
In my opinion it is time for some honesty and integrity to be installed in the Government of the Commonwealth. Based upon my research, I am of the opinion that the Commonwealth Electoral Commissioner is a liar and a not yet convicted criminal. He is conducting an election to elect “citizens” to the Parliament of the Commonwealth in absolute contumelious disrespect to the collective will of the “courts judges and people” of the Commonwealth expressed in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 and Constitution confirmed in the “Voice Referendum”.
The Parliament of the Commonwealth is the ultimate court, the judges in it are elected, by the people of the Commonwealth as Subjects of the King they like him are bound by the Statute 1 Will and Mary [1688] ( Coronation Oath) C 6.
I am also of the opinion that the Australian Labor Party Government is a puppet of the New World Order and has been white-anting the Constitution since 1948. The Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948, and Australian Citizenship Act 2007 fall foul of S 128 Constitution. So too the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 as amended. And also the Common Informers ( Parliamentary Disqualification) Act 1975. S 77 (i.) Constitution prohibits it. All alter the Constitution materially.
S 34 Constitution is absolutely clear so is S 128: There are certain things the Parliament of the Commonwealth is not allowed to do. The words ”’Until the Parliament otherwise provides’ is a qualified power. It is not unlimited. It has no power to abolish the King. It has no power to instill pagan values on the population at large, and call it THE LAW.
SECT 34
Until the Parliament otherwise provides, the qualifications of a member of the House of Representatives shall be as follows:–
(i.) He must be of the full age of twenty-one years, and must be an elector entitled to vote at the election of members of the house of Representatives, or a person qualified to become such elector, and must have been for three years at the least a resident within the limits of the Commonwealth as existing at the time when he is chosen:
(ii.) He must be a subject of the Queen, either natural-born or for at least five years naturalized under a law of the United Kingdom, or of a Colony which has become or becomes a State, or of the Commonwealth, or of a State.
SECT 128
Mode of altering the Constitution.
This Constitution shall not be altered except in the following manner:–
The proposed law for the alteration thereof must be passed by an absolute majority of each House of the Parliament, and not less than two nor more than six months after its passage through both Houses the proposed law shall be submitted in each State and Territory to the electors qualified to vote for the election of members of the House of Representatives.
But if either House passes any such proposed law by an absolute majority, and the other House rejects or fails to pass it or passes it with any amendment to which the first-mentioned House will not agree, and if after an interval of three months the first-mentioned House in the same or the next session again passes the proposed law by an absolute majority with or without any amendment which has been made or agreed to by the other House, and such other House rejects or fails to pass it or passes it with any amendment to which the first-mentioned House will not agree, the Governor – General may submit the proposed law as last proposed by the first-mentioned House, and either with or without any amendments subsequently agreed to by both Houses, to the electors in each State and Territory qualified to vote for the election of the House of Representatives.
When a proposed law is submitted to the electors the vote shall be taken in such manner as the Parliament prescribes. But until the qualification of electors of members of the House of Representatives becomes uniform throughout the Commonwealth, only one-half the electors voting for and against the proposed law shall be counted in any State in which adult suffrage prevails.
And if in a majority of the States a majority of the electors voting approve the proposed law, and if a majority of all the electors voting also approve the proposed law, it shall be presented to the Governor – General for the Queen’s assent.
No alteration diminishing the proportionate representation of any State in either House of the Parliament, or the minimum number of representatives of a State in the House of Representatives, or increasing, diminishing, or otherwise altering the limits of the State, or in any manner affecting the provisions of the Constitution in relation thereto, shall become law unless the majority of the electors voting in that State approve the proposed law.
In this section, “Territory” means any territory referred to in section one hundred and twenty-two of this Constitution in respect of which there is in force a law allowing its representation in the House of Representatives.
Common Informers ( Parliamentary Disqualification) Act 1975.
S4
Penalty for sitting when disqualified
(1) Any person who, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, has sat as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives while he or she was a person declared by the Constitution to be incapable of so sitting shall be liable to pay to any person who sues for it in the High Court a sum equal to the total of:
(a) $200 in respect of his or her having so sat on or before the day on which the originating process in the suit is served on him or her ; and
(b) $200 for every day, subsequent to that day, on which he or she is proved in the suit to have so sat.
(2) A suit under this section shall not relate to any sitting of a person as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives at a time earlier than 12 months before the day on which the suit is instituted.
(3) The High Court shall refuse to make an order in a suit under this Act that would, in the opinion of the Court, cause the person against whom it was made to be penalized more than once in respect of any period or day of sitting as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives
SECT 4
Suits not to be brought under section 46 of the Constitution
On and after the date of commencement of this Act, a person is not liable to pay any sum under section 46 of the Constitution and no suit shall be instituted, continued, heard or determined in pursuance of that section.
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900
SECT 75
Original jurisdiction of High Court.
In all matters–
(i.) Arising under any treaty:
(ii.) Affecting consuls or other representatives of other countries:
(iii.) In which the Commonwealth, or a person suing or being sued on behalf of the Commonwealth, is a party:
(iv.) Between States, or between residents of different States, or between a State and a resident of another State:
(v.) In which a writ of Mandamus or prohibition or an injunction is sought against an officer of the Commonwealth:
the High Court shall have original jurisdiction.
SECT 76
Additional original jurisdiction.
The Parliament may make laws conferring original jurisdiction on the High court in any matter–
(i.) Arising under this Constitution, or involving its interpretation:
(ii.) Arising under any laws made by the Parliament:
(iii.) Of Admiralty and maritime jurisdiction:
(iv.) Relating to the same subject-matter claimed under the laws of different States.
SECT 77
With respect to any of the matters mentioned in the last two sections the Parliament may make laws–
(i.) Defining the jurisdiction of any federal court other than the High Court:
This is absolute corruption at its very worst. As the cartoon in The Australian today says: Its curtains.
Wolter Joosse you stated, “ The Judiciary is awarded for upholding the fake republic by way of being able to reclaim their payee taxes”.
I’ve recently been given similar information with no supporting evidence.
Wolter do you know where actual evidence supporting the judiciary reclaiming their taxes can be found. Thanks in advance.
Guns, guns, guns,
Without guns, they know you can do nothing.
Better learn how to make weapons quickly, as you are going to need them.
With respect, Peter Gargan, I thought that you were better acquainted in the area of constitutional law, but it appears I was mistaken. The Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth 1900 was a contract between [some of the selected few inhabitants, namely property owners and those who would be elected to govern them. All people enjoy sovereignty, which means they are the highest authority in matters of themselves. A constitution is a contract with a duration of 99 years. This is Universally accepted to be the lifespan of a human being, taken from the time that he/she is capable to self-reason. This is globally accepted the age of 16. Recently, Australia reduced it from 18 to 16 years to fall within global conformity. In 1999, the Australian people were mandated to vote at a referendum to become a Republic. In truth and reality, our politicians were fully aware that the Constitution Act 1900 was to expire and with it their power and control. For at least 2 years prior the Australian people were being prepared for a ‘yes’. But shock and horror they returned a ‘NO’ vote to every question in the referendum. What now? The people were returned to the natural law. But governments were not accepting the ‘NO’ vote and carried on regardless. One of the first things they did was to gut the Crimes Act 1914 and remove most of the crimes they had now committed, including treason. The Electoral Act now reads that it is compulsory for every Australian ‘CITIZEN’ to vote at elections. However, an Australian ‘CITIZEN’ does not and cannot exist in law. At the final Constitutional Convention 1898 in Melbourne, Dr John Quick raised a motion seeking to insert an Australian citizen as a subsection to s.51 (xix) Naturalization. This motion had been fully debated but the Convention had voted against it on the grounds that we were subjects of Her Majesty. Hence, it would require the consent of the Australian people following a National Referendum for an Australian citizen to become a legal entity recognized under our constitution. The Judiciary is awarded for upholding the fake republic by way of being able to reclaim their payee taxes
DICTATORSHIP by TAXATION By MAJOR C. H. DOUGLAS A speech delivered in the Ulster Hall, Belfast, on Tuesday, November 24, 1936.
https://dn721901.ca.archive.org/0/itemsdouglas-ch-dictatorship-by-taxation/Douglas%20CH%20-%20Dictatorship%20by%20Taxation.pdf/
“……….All the preceding arguments lead up to, and are, in fact, dependent upon the proposition that the production of real wealth —that is to say, all the things which money can buy — is entirely separate from the production of the money with which to buy them, and that in taxing anyone but a banker we are merely increasing the value of the bankers’ monopoly of money-making.
It is, fortunately, not nowadays necessary to develop this argument at any great length, since the facts are not in dispute in any responsible circles. The Encyclopaedia Britannica in its article on money, volume 15, states, “Banks lend by creating credit. They create the means of payment out of nothing”; or, as the Chairman of the Midland Bank puts it, “The amount of money in circulation varies only with the action of the banks.”
Since our civilization is a money civilization, and none of us can carry on our daily pursuits without the possession of money, it is obvious, in the first place, that this situation places us ultimately at the disposal of the banks, and that increased taxation by lessening the amount of money at our disposal increased this hold that the banks have upon us………..……”
AI law and personal AI lawyer apps are the future and the only way to bring total honesty and fairness back to the courts. The removal of all those disgusting types of individuals that have ruled over it for centuries, always beyond reproach or even being questioned if they act corruptly is step one. The current ongoing TGA mRNA/GMO DNA contamination challenge is a classic example of that along with the judges that all threw out the class actions against the lock-downs and shots to side with the Government mandates. That’s enough proof of their ilk.
Why else are judges getting nervous and banning early signs of Ai already?
It is so much superior and fairer than them in every way times one hundred.
The old archaic elite only legal system has got to go, judges deposed and AI mediated law take over all of it. It would be affordable to all and totally without the human bias. It will still require oversight and strict protocols but that’s the easy part. ‘Lawyers’ can learn coding or run the brothels they frequent or maybe even better get a job that doesn’t involve human beings. They do not qualify.
The article headline is – “… Restore ‘Rule of Law’ before having federal election…”
Perhaps we could amend that title to something like – “… Introduce ‘Rule of Law’ before having federal election…”
… because let’s be brutally honest here, folks, “Rule of Law” is such a NOVEL concept, we might even say an ALIEN concept, here in the Tyranny Down Under that we like to call Australia.
We are governed by media and they will roll out some character speaking loudly with an affected Danish sort of accent who will just tell us how it is, until the next time. They are protected by our laziness, dumbness and cluelessness. We are back in the dream time not yet quite realising what has happened.
No Australian citizen is eligible to sit in parliament because we are all subjects of a foreign power – Pandemic treaties, the Jewish foreign owned RBA, the United Nations and if “THE VOICE” referendum was affirmed, Aboriginals.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS
OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
PROTOCOL No. 20
TYRANNY OF USURY
32. “So long as loans were internal the GOYIM only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich, but when we bought up the necessary person in order to transfer loans into the external sphere, all the wealth of States flowed into our cash- boxes and all the GOYIM began to pay us the tribute of SUBJECTS”.
Rothschilds Reserve Bank of Australia is a foreign ADI. A “foreign ADI” means a body corporate that: (a) is a foreign corporation within the meaning of paragraph 51(xx) of the Constitution; and (b) is authorised to carry on banking business in a foreign country; and (c) has been granted an authority under section 9 to carry on banking business in Australia. Prior to 1959 the Commonwealth issued and printed its own money and had control of the printing of money.
However after the 1959 Reserve Bank Act, the Reserve Bank was established as a stand alone independent foreign ADI, which took over the printing of money and lent the money it printed to the Commonwealth at interest.
[Section 44 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution comes to mind]
Under section 44 of the Constitution those subject to foreign power are ineligible to sit in parliament.
“Any person who:
“is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is …………..”
Then in contradiction to the Constitution the Ju diciary through the court system have made it law that dual citizenship is legal thus accommodating the dual citizen Jews and others in parliament.
The UN wants to control everything and every aspect of our lives:
The UN, a Trojan Horse to world tyranny
h ttps://rforresistance.wordpress.com/2024/11/28/the-un-a-trojan-horse-to-world-tyranny/
Dual Citizenship Australia – All You Need to Know
Can You Have Dual Citizenship In Australia?
Yes, absolutely! Anyone can have dual citizenship in Australia if the native country also allows dual citizenship. In regards to dual citizenship, from April 4, 2002, the Australian court removed all restrictions (under Australian Law). The Government recognised dual Citizenship on that day. Even before this date, Australians could be dual citizens in certain special circumstances.
h ttps://australiantranslationservices.com.au/dual-citizenship-australia/
After 21 years at the Bar, I have no trust in the judiciary ever following any principle of the ‘Rule of Law’.
https://gumshoenews.com/review-of-australian-law-and-its-decline/
Just to add to the confusing mess —
A definition of Crown –
A corporate entity and its subsidiaries formed during the 19th Century that usurped the monarch and commonwealth public acts by assuming the role of government and administration, including claiming ownership of previous public property and rights.
http://one-evil.org/lexica/en/define/corporate.html
And for evidence that Australia is a Corporation owned by the Crown City of London –
h ttp://www.911oz.com/vbulletin/archive/index.php/t-4157.html
h ttp://openeye.99k.org/The%20Crown.html
WHO OR WHAT CONSTITUTES THE CROWN
The modern world of so-called Western Civilization began at the end of the 17th century with the blossoming of the British Empire. The underpinnings of that empire actually began several hundred years earlier with the establishment of the City of London, which is now an 800-year old corporation that controls finance and philosophy for an entity called the Crown. This entity is the creator and controller of the Bank of England and the US Federal Reserve. They also control the World Bank, the IMF and associated cartels. The crown identity is kept most secret. The Crown/Bank of England assumed control of the United States during the Roosevelt administration (1901-1909) when its agent J.P. Morgan took over 25% of American business. The Queen of England pays taxes and has to seek permission for entry into The Crown City of London
Acts Interpretation Act 1901
16 References to the Sovereign
In any Act references to the Sovereign reigning at the time of the passing of such Act, or to the Crown, shall be construed as references to the Sovereign for the time being.
It only takes one social worker to change a lightbulb but first the lightbulb must want to change ..
Our dumb politicians want to gear up for war with Russia and China. Forget about voting and start digging your own grave.
How did the people in the richest nation on earth become the poorest and most indebted? Why does a house cost 10 million $, and young CCP (driving Bentleys on P plates) snap it up in cash!
Way beyond restoration as we are replaced. Look around, if one in ten workers is local, realise it’s way past selections.
These days our cities are unrecognisable, we’ve become strangers in the places of our youth and enemies of those in power. To think that men or women will save us is the biggest lie.
No Australian citizen is eligible to sit in parliament because we are all subjects of a foreign power – Pandemic treaties, the Jewish foreign owned RBA, the United Nations and if “THE VOICE” referendum was affirmed, Aboriginals.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS
OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
PROTOCOL No. 20
TYRANNY OF USURY
32. “So long as loans were internal the GOYIM only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich, but when we bought up the necessary person in order to transfer loans into the external sphere, all the wealth of States flowed into our cash- boxes and all the GOYIM began to pay us the tribute of SUBJECTS”.
Rothschilds Reserve Bank of Australia is a foreign ADI. A “foreign ADI” means a body corporate that: (a) is a foreign corporation within the meaning of paragraph 51(xx) of the Constitution; and (b) is authorised to carry on banking business in a foreign country; and (c) has been granted an authority under section 9 to carry on banking business in Australia. Prior to 1959 the Commonwealth issued and printed its own money and had control of the printing of money.
However after the 1959 Reserve Bank Act, the Reserve Bank was established as a stand alone independent foreign ADI, which took over the printing of money and lent the money it printed to the Commonwealth at interest.
[Section 44 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution comes to mind]
Under section 44 of the Constitution those subject to foreign power are ineligible to sit in parliament.
“Any person who:
“is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is …………..”
Then in contradiction to the Constitution the Ju diciary through the court system have made it law that dual citizenship is legal thus accommodating the dual citizen Jews and others in parliament.
The UN wants to control everything and every aspect of our lives:
The UN, a Trojan Horse to world tyranny
https://rforresistance.wordpress.com/2024/11/28/the-un-a-trojan-horse-to-world-tyranny/
Dual Citizenship Australia – All You Need to Know
Can You Have Dual Citizenship In Australia?
Yes, absolutely! Anyone can have dual citizenship in Australia if the native country also allows dual citizenship. In regards to dual citizenship, from April 4, 2002, the Australian court removed all restrictions (under Australian Law). The Government recognised dual Citizenship on that day. Even before this date, Australians could be dual citizens in certain special circumstances.
https://australiantranslationservices.com.au/dual-citizenship-australia/
[…] Go to Source on cairnsnews.org Follow altnews.org on Telegram Please donate now! 00 […]
Nothing will change until the gallows are erected and the capital punishment begins!
[…] Source link […]
That is much better. Sick of the stories that ignore all of this corruption. Something not mentioned is that all serving and former members of parliament are corporate employees of a belligerent occupying corporate government and all are clearly guilt of Misprision of Treason for failing to inform the public as well as taking no measures to correct these wrongs against we the people.
The media is just ‘state media’, like communist China or Russia had, for ignoring, on purpose, all this corruption and treason. It really is that bad, the COLLUSION to hide the truth from you and I. The media must come down, charges laid.
Lets also get back our common law and BURN THE STRAWMAN! (The birth certificate)
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]