The Voice referendum has nothing to do with the misnomer, ‘Uluru statement from the heart’. It has been United Nations policy since 2012
National Human Rights Action Plan 2012
A C H I E V I N G A J U S T A N D S E C U R E S O C I E T Y
Each section begins with a short summary of
the major measures being undertaken, followed
by a descriptive table setting out the relevant
priority area, a detailed description of the action,
the agency or jurisdiction undertaking it, and a
performance indicator and/or timeline.
In developing this Action Plan, the Australian
Government engaged the community more
extensively than it has in the past. Workshops
with NGOs were convened around Australia and
submissions were sought on a scoping paper,
the Baseline Study and an exposure draft of the
Action Plan. An independent web presence was
also established. Discussions were held with
state and territory governments on actions they
are undertaking within their own jurisdictions.
Input was received from Victoria, South Australia,
Tasmania, the Northern Territory and the Australian
Capital Territory. New South Wales, Queensland
and Western Australia elected not to contribute.
The Action Plan prioritises Australian Government
actions, taking into account available resources
and focusing on practical outcomes. Australian
governments already have in place a range of
programs and laws to strengthen human rights
protections and improve opportunities for all
Australians. This Action Plan sets out these major,
ongoing strategies. The Action Plan also contains
actions the Australian Government has initiated
in the course of developing the Action Plan.
These include:
• work to lay the foundations for the launch
of a National Disability Insurance Scheme,
which will provide people with disability with
access to care and support services they need
over the course of their lifetime, including
funding of $1 billion for the first stage from the
Australian Government
• establishing a new National Children’s
Commissioner within the Australian Human
Rights Commission
• ratifying the Optional Protocol to the Convention
Against Torture
• investigating ways that the justice system can
address the needs of people with a mental
illness and/or cognitive disability (including
intellectual disability and acquired brain injury)
• undertaking a review of reservations under the
seven core international human rights treaties
the $3.7 billion Living Longer Living Better
aged care reform package to create a flexible
and seamless system that provides older
Australians with more choice, control and
easier access to a full range of services, where
they want it and when they need it
• reviewing federal legislation for any barriers to
older people participating in productive work
• an Act of Recognition acknowledging the
unique and special place of Australia’s First
Peoples, as an important step towards holding
a successful referendum to change the
constitution to recognise Indigenous people.
• working with the states and territories on the
regulation of sterilisation of women and girls
with disability
• ensuring accessible communications for people
with disability in the event of an emergency.
• implementing the National Anti-Racism
Partnership and Strategy, led by the Australian
Human Rights Commission, and
The Australian Government will lodge this new
National Human Rights Action Plan with the United Nations.
• ensuring accessible communications for people
with disability in the event of an emergency.
The Plan sets out a monitoring
arrangement that involves progress reporting to
coincide with the Australian Government’s next
Universal Periodic Review report planned for 2015
“The United Nations is Zionism. It is the super government mentioned many times in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, promulgated between 1897 and 1905.” – Henry Klein, New York, Jewish Lawyer, in Zionism Rules the World, 1948.
“The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.” – Henry Ford in the New York World, February 17th, 1921.
“In the desires of a terrible and formidable sect, you have only reached the first stages of the plans it has formed for that general Revolution which is to overthrow all thrones, all altars, annihilate all property, efface all law, and end by dissolving all society.” – Abbé Barruel (1797) writing on the Anti-Christian Conspiracy.
“Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread in one form or another all over Europe and the whole world, as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality and whose object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.” – British Government White Paper, Russia No. 1 (1919).
“Anti-Communism is Anti-Semitism.” Jewish Voice, July – August 1941.
“Some may call it Communism, but I call it what it is: Judaism.” Rabbi Stephen Weiss.
“Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a Jew or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or Hebrew.” Jewish Almanac 1980.
The Jews are of Esau (Edom, Edomites) from Idumea, and therefore not of Israel or Judah; Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925, vol. 5, page 41.
I have my hopes pretty much squashed as I saw today in the middle of Bondi Junction in the walking-no cars part that at least 6 people were there pushing the people walking by to vote for yes – with 6 signs standing around – they were quite pushy….
Unfortunately, there has been a long history of books trying to warn the public of impeding doom and then other sections of the community (like the deep state) in this instance taking this well detailed work and using it as manual to ensure that this is the best way to gain the desired outcome. I’m not sure of what this book is titled, but the two books that come to mind is George Orwell’s 1984 and Audius Huxley’s Brave New World. Both were intended to be warnings and yet both seem to be used as manuals by the Left Wing Socialists. Yes, remember, Big Brother is watching you, but some of us don’t care anymore.
Australian soldiers gave their lives in defending Australia. All that is needed now is a “yes” vote to give it away. Lest We Forget.
Albo the communist says: “The United Nations will control all land in Australia”
https://www.larryhannigan.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Did-Albo-really-say.mp4
https://www.larryhannigan.com.au/2023-10-04th-still-trying-to-follow-the-movie-plot/
WATCH: How American Imperialism Works [in 5 Minutes]
Wrong Kind of Green Mar 22, 2023 Whiteness & Aversive Racism
https://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2023/03/22/watch-how-american-imperialism-works-in-5-minutes/
”
Wow Bliskitt
Thanks for that great post.
Ed this should be it’s own article.
”
ABSOLUTELY!
Wow Bliskitt
Thanks for that great post.
Ed this should be it’s own article.
And an interesting article by Dr David Barton, Dec 2022 Quadrant.
From article:
“In 1983, as a naïve youth worker and concerned by what I had been reading since the early 1970s about what was happening with Aborigines in Alice Springs, I moved there to see what I could do to help. All told, I spent six years in Central Australia, leaving both depressed and convinced that the situation could never be fixed. One thing that bothered me then and still does is the constant calls for ‘self-determination’, not so much by Aborigines but by whitefella activists, some I later learned to be card-carrying members of the Communist Party and others who now hold senior positions in academia and the bureaucracy.
The contemporary definition of ‘Aboriginal self-determination’ is not about fitting in with the mainstream, of integrating or assimilating, but of splitting from mainstream Australia. Meanwhile, the rest of us get to pay for it whilst the rent seekers contribute very little to the community and Aboriginal lives, including those of children, continue to be ruined.
Assimilation is an anathema to progressives, who prefer ‘integration’ as the term de rigueur — but they are essentially the same thing. Aborigines need to learn to fit in, be a part of, what we have known to be Australian culture for the last 200-plus years and, indeed, most of them have done just that. (So why the special treatment, benefits and funding, you may well ask? That’s a topic for another conversation.)
None of this means Aborigines need to lose their culture – far from it. Unfortunately, much of what passes for Aboriginal ‘culture’ today is an invention of the last 50 years. Fortunately, much authentic Aboriginal culture of the past has vanished. The gruesome initiations, genital mutilation, inflicted cicatrices, burns, ritual spearings, sorcery and payback murders have by and large disappeared. Nevertheless, inter-tribe clan grievances often remain, as can be seen at some football indigenous matches, both on the field and amongst the spectators. Even though these encounters can still become violent, at least those conflicts are mostly played out with a football, not spears and clubs.
Meanwhile, the Aboriginal Industry is chock full of ill-informed urban myth-makers and illusionists, this caste of urgers and deluded pretenders giving rise to the patronising insistence on the uniqueness of ‘Aboriginal knowledge’ about everything from agriculture and fish farms (a lá Bruce Pascoe), water and fire management (a lá ‘cultural burning’) to Aboriginal ‘art’, ‘fashion’ and even ‘astronomy’, and not to mention Ernie Dingo and Richard Walley’s thoroughly overdone ‘Welcome to Country”. This is mostly snake oil fakery, an effort to convince contemporary Australians that the Aborigines of old were something they clearly were not. Worse, histories and observational accounts of early Aboriginal life and culture are vanishing from library shelves, replaced by the anti-white post-modern dogma of ‘invasion, colonisation and inter-generational trauma’. It is unusual today to find any history book about Aborigines in a secondary or tertiary institution that is more than fifteen years old. This is cultural censure and erasure happening right under our noses. We are all the poorer for it, black and white alike.
Meanwhile, the recent invention, exaggeration, distortion and misrepresentation of the alleged ‘frontier wars’ serves as a made-to-order replacement ‘history’ intended to raise the status of Aboriginal people and degrade that of settlers. It is yet another bill of goods, a distorting sham, being hawked by a power-grabbing activist elite in whose interest it is to falsify and distort our history. The goal, need it be said, is an attempt to paint a genocidal racism as Australia’s original sin.
I, too, would like more self-determination in my own life, too, but I am constrained by the laws of the land. Unfortunately, self-determination for many people who today identify as Aboriginal is taken to mean the normal rules — keeping children in school, eschewing clan and domestic violence — aren’t thought to fully apply. This is nowhere more apparent than on the troubled streets of Alice Springs. ‘Self-determination’ means ‘we’ll do what we like and you can pay for it’. Self-determination’ is about colonising and taking control, accepting all that whitefellas have to offer while offering nothing in return. Self-determination is about undermining whitefella institutions, judiciaries, organisations and bureaucracies. Self-determination is about enculturated white people who, on the strength of what may be a mere speck of indigenous DNA, now identify exclusively as Aboriginal, thereby giving themselves an economic and social leg-up. For the activist cadre it always was and always will be about money, power and control, all underscored by the notion that members of one race enjoy a preeminent ascendency over all other Australians.
More examples of ‘self-determination’ can be found in the ban on climbing Ayers Rock (Uluru), Mt Warning (Wollumbin), Mt Gillen, and many Grampians climbs, all for ill-defined or unexplained ‘cultural’ reasons’. After much outcry, consideration is now being given to re-opening the Mt Warning climb, but only for those who pay a fee and are escorted by indigenous guides. More rent-seeking, what a surprise! Australian place names are also rapidly being overwritten with (most likely made-up) Aboriginal names (eg: K’gari, once known as Fraser Island). All of this is about claims to ownership, to ‘sovereignty’. These changes should not be mistaken for deference to Aboriginal culture; it’s no more nor less than an insidious takeover. What we are experiencing here is cultural guerrilla warfare, the picking off one target after the other. Don’t believe it? Look no further that what has happened in New Zealand.
Self-determination is not about ‘closing the gap’, nor Aborigines ‘having a voice’ — all of that can be achieved without a change to the Constitution. Indeed, the $35+ billion currently spent on Aboriginal affairs and the 11-plus current Aboriginal members of parliament are more than enough to fulfil both aims. The Voice referendum is purely and simply about the drive towards Aboriginal sovereignty, which can only be achieved by changing the nation’s foundational document and charter.
Under the Albanese government, self-determination means the coming referendum, whose barely concealed intention is to divide Australia along lines of race. To achieve this ignoble end, the federal government is stacking the deck via its Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Amendment Bill 2022, which states
The Bill will also allow the Commonwealth to fund educational campaigns to promote voters’ understanding of referendums and the referendum proposal.
At the same time, in a joint media release issued on December 11, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus, Special Minister of State Don Farrell, Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney, and Pat Dodson, special envoy for reconciliation and implementing the Uluru Statement:
To support community education, the Government proposes to temporarily lift a funding restriction in the Act, to enable funding of educational initiatives to counter misinformation.
The entire media release is worth reading. But what is hiding in plain sight, is the Albanese government’s intention to de-facto fund and promote the ‘Yes’ campaign whilst hamstringing ‘No’ advocates. Anything the No campaign says can and will be construed as “misinformation”. We have seen this already with the appalling attacks by Noel Pearson and Marcia Langton’s on Jacinta Price. Brace for much more of that — and wonder, too, if the bile and attempts at character assassination are a foretaste of an empowered Voice?
To make an informed self-determination at the referendum’s ballot box, ordinary Australians must have full access to both sides of the argument, pro and con, which the Albanese government has already legislated to ensure this won’t happen. Meanwhile, Australians are subjected to a daily and massive pro-Yes propaganda barrage by the taxpayer-funded ABC and SBS. If Australians prove slow on the uptake, allow ourselves to be persuaded by the government’s nakedly rigged ‘information’ offensive and vote Yes despite changes to the Constitution having yet to be revealed, it will be too late!
In what is clearly not a ‘conspiracy theory’, the entire game plan is laid out in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), co-authored by Mick Dodson, brother of Labor’s Special Envoy for Reconciliation and the Implementation of the Uluru Statement from the Heart Senator Pat Dodson, and ratified by the Rudd Government in 2009. Do you see what they’re doing here?
In addition, the Australian Human Rights Commission has in 2021 called upon the federal Government to “develop a national program to implement UNDRIP and schedule it to the definition of human rights in the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 (Cth)”2 This, too, is a major part of what the ‘Voice’ is all about. It’s another path to the same goal.
Labor and their confident, conceited acolytes would have us believe that support for the Yes vote is a lay down misère. It is beholden upon the rest of us — those who care about Australia as a whole rather than advancing the narrow interests of one group only — to contest the creation of a separate and sovereign Aboriginal nation on the Australian continent, for that is where the ‘Voice’ will take us. Once embedded in the Constitution, such an internal ‘sovereign nation’ will be impossible to dismantle. Despite Albanese &Co’s efforts to promote one side of the debate and suppress the other, this is the threat and the message all Australians must hear.
Dr David Barton is a proud Celtic and Anglo-Saxon man with a long generational family history in Australia. He lives in Central Victoria.”
Link here: https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/aborigines/2022/12/always-was-always-will-be-about-power/
Share and share.
Hi Ed
Thanks for pointing that document out. I had a quick peruse. I wonder how many of their other desired outcomes have been successful. Once again an amazing amount of money allocated (not all to indigenous just to clarify).
More from the document;
“The Australian Government will continue to strengthen native title arrangements by:
• considering possible reforms to promote leading practice in native title agreements and the governance of native title payments
• providing ongoing resources (including
$82 million in 2011–12) to support the ongoing capacity and operations of native title claimant representative bodies
• establishing a new research scholarship for native title representative bodies to increase the skills and retention of research staff, and
• committing $1.4 million over three years
for a native title anthropologist grants program to attract a new generation of junior anthropologists and encourage senior anthropologists to remain.”
“The Australian Government is working towards recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Constitution. In December 2010, the Australian Government appointed an Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians to consider, consult and advise on how best to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Constitution.
The Australian Government received the Expert Panel’s report, Recognising Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander Peoples in the Australian Constitution, on 19 January 2012, including recommendations for changes to the Constitution.
“On 15 February 2012, the Australian Government announced $10 million to help build public awareness and community support for the recognition of the First Australians in our Constitution. This important work is being led by Reconciliation Australia, supported by a reference group of business and community leaders. The funding will support community groups and activities and give Australians the opportunity to learn more about constitutional recognition.
On 20 September 2012, the Australian Government announced it will be introducing a Bill into the Parliament by the end of 2012 to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as a step towards a successful referendum.”
“The Australian Government will continue to address the significant level of housing needs in remote Indigenous communities through its
$5.5 billion investment in the National Partnership on Remote Indigenous Housing. Since the commencement of the National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing on
1 January 2009, 1401 new houses have been completed and 4676 houses have been rebuilt and refurbished nationally (as at 30 June 2012).
The Social Housing Initiative provides $5.238 billion for new construction over three and a half years, from 2008–09 to 2011–12. A further $400 million was allocated over two years from 2008–09 to 2009–10 to undertake repair and maintenance work that benefited existing social housing dwellings. Of the over 16,400 dwellings for which tenant data is available (at 30 June 2012), over 2200 (14 per cent) went to Indigenous people.
The National Partnership Agreement on Social Housing provided $400 million to build around 1950 new dwellings. The increased supply of housing will contribute to reducing homelessness and improving outcomes for homeless and Indigenous Australians. As at 30 June 2012, over 1800 dwellings had been completed. Of the over 1800 dwellings for which tenant data is available, over 1200 went to Indigenous people.”
“The Stronger Futures in the Northern Territory legislation complements a 10-year Australian Government commitment to work with Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory to build strong, independent lives, where communities, families and children are safe and healthy. Stronger Futures in the Northern Territory is a $3.4 billion investment and responds directly to what Aboriginal people told the Australian Government was important to them. The Australian Government is working with Aboriginal people in both big and small communities to support more local jobs, tackle alcohol abuse and encourage kids to go to school, as well as provide basic services, including health, education and police.”
Just a few snippets from that one document. Why do they need the “VOICE”?Where has all this money gone and what are the outcomes (other than ongoing) of listening to the Aboriginal communities as they state herein?
See whole document here: https://www.aph.gov.au/-/media/Committees/Senate/committee/humanrights_ctte/Aus_Human_Rights_Framework/Nat_HR_Action_Plan_2012.pdf?la=en&hash=A548EBFAC08B582773D0AE3015B5CA8F6355F68C