Dodgy AEC has always the most corrupt of all bureaucracies, changing rules midway


AustraliaOneParty_Official, [18/05/2022 8:55 PM]

Today I received the following report from the Stanhope Gardens Leisure Centre Polling Place:

“I just went to vote at the Stanhope Gardens Leisure Centre and officials are telling people voting just 1 above the line (for the Senate) will not be counted; that they have changed the rules for this election. Scrutineers will not count it.”

This advice is at variance with the guidance on page 38 of the current Scrutineers Handbook available on line from the AEC website.

How is it possible for the AEC to change the rules after the voting has been in progress for a week and a half?

I believe the majors are attempting to steal the senate by gaining quotas by forcing preferences from the electors and secondly that some in the AEC might be facilitating the theft after the writ had already been issued.

This is not legal. At the least it is vote fraud and at worst it is criminal.

Vote only 1 above the line in the Senate as per page 38 of the Scrutineers Handbook 2022.

Authorised by Riccardo Bosi Independent Candidate for Greenway, Perfection Ave, Stanhope Gardens NSW 2768


from Geoff McGeorge

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on May 19, 2022, in AEC and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 5 Comments.

  1.  while this story is correct, the word ‘corrupt’ in the heading is
    inappropriate to the story.

     The AEC’s mistake is a minor issue, committed by an ignorant or poorly
    trained official at one polling booth.

     The word “corrupt” can be very much proved by me, based on more
    information in my possession than my attached shocking Submission of 20
    Sept 2019 to the Parliamentary Committee and to the AEC.

     best wishes, Psephologist Lex Stewart


  2. Betty Mac… totally agree vote BELOW the line… some good freedom parties are there.. including Lindsay Temple, Independent, who is for A1 party. Do not number any major party boxes below the line please.

    And read what is on the form itself.. it will tell you what to do.. if in doubt, go on the AEC site and do a dummy run – it will then tell you if what you did was valid or not.

    We can’t afford to get it wrong… do some homework if you have not voted yet.


  3. I am totally confused! This leading comment is confusing!

    Voting for only one above the line was for the 2019 election, it has been changed.
    I am sure many others will be confused.Play it safe if voting Above the line, and place 6.
    My advice is ignore all that and vote for 12 good people in minor parties BELOW the line.
    This election is fast developing into the farce of all times
    If the scrutineers’ handbook says to ONLY VOTE 1 above the line ,it is at odds with the government’s Official Guide to the 2022 Election which says, in bold letters.
    ‘You need to NUMBER AT LEAST 6 BOXES.’
    There needs to be an investigation into the corrupt AEC.


  4. Well there is a how to vote section on the AEC and anyone can do a practice run on either paper… It says that you must number ALL boxes (or at least 6) above the line, placing a 1 in your first choice… and it says that on the actual Senate paper as well. It does not say mark only one box. I wanted to make sure I got it right, and even did the dummy run on there to be sure. Aren’t people reading the instructions on the ballot papers?

    Personally I voted the 12 below the line on the White Paper because I wanted to vote for the freedom parties. I made my own list and took it there with me.


  5. I am bewildered by government bureaucrats continually changing the rules for their own political future and advantage.Its corrupt I am so sick of
    them and their dishonesty we can’t even have a a fare and honest election with out them changing the election law when voting has already begun.
    We can’t rely on the judicial system to judicature over this matter.
    Corruption at the highest level is the new norm.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: