National Action Plan for Health Security to subvert Commonwealth Constitution

by Alison Ryan

There is a pdf available from link below which shows Australia’s NAPHS planning matrix with 66 recommendations intended to “muscle-up” the IHR, and culminate in a WHO Global Pandemic Treaty for Preparedness and Response. This pdf is a warning, showing that the UN organisation is dangerous for us now and future generations.

The Australian Government Department of Health
in collaboration with the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources,
state and territory governments and other partners
Implementation of the recommendations
from the Joint External Evaluation of
IHR Core Capacities

The Foreword includes:

“This document, Australia’s National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS), represents a
commitment to take action to strengthen our defences against acute public health threats. It was developed in response to the (66) recommendations from Australia’s Joint External Evaluation (JEE) of the implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) conducted from 24 November to 1 December 2017.”

“The WHO-led international team of experts that assessed our country’s capabilities took a great amount of time and careful consideration to supply us with suitable recommendations to further strengthen our already strong capacities. These recommendations are now prioritised for action across the five year time period of the NAPHS.”

“The Department of Health (Health) will oversee implementation of the NAPHS, but it is
important to note that the plan is not only a responsibility of the health sector. Realisation of the NAPHS depends on partnerships extending to many other sectors, including organisations involved in food safety, agriculture, chemical and radiation safety, security and border agencies.”

“All levels of government, private organisations and research institutions, and the general
community have a part to play in the NAPHS. Given the dual responsibility for many priorities,
Health and the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources (Agriculture) will partner in
overseeing the governance and delivery of the NAPHS.”

“Maintaining connections to our international partners, including the WHO and the World
Organisation for Animal Health and our fellow Member States, is also central to strengthening
global health security. It is in the best interests of the global community, and a moral imperative, to build the capacities of other countries to respond to public health threats.
We are confident that this NAPHS provides a solid framework for the coordination of efforts to
continue to improve Australia’s already robust capacities to prevent, prepare for, detect and
respond to public health threats.”

Signed by:
Professor Brendan Murphy, Chief Medical Officer
Dr Mark Schipp, Chief Veterinary Officer

Acknowledged in this pdf are the contributors listed below:
•The staff within the Australian Government.
• State and territory governments and the expert committees and organisations across
• The following WHO entities: the JEE Secretariat of the WHO, WHO Health
Emergencies Programme, the Western Pacific Regional Office and the Country Health
Emergency Preparedness and IHR Department at WHO Headquarters.
• The governments of Canada, China, Finland, Japan, New Zealand and the United States
of America for providing technical experts to Australia’s JEE.
• The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the World
Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) for their contribution of experts and expertise to
Australia’s JEE.

As mentioned in the Foreword, “The NAPHS is embedded in existing plans, mechanisms and governance structures.”

“The 66 recommendations from Australia’s JEE can be found in the Appendix: Planning Matrix”, see pages 12-30, covering these 19 areas: National Legislation Policy and Financing, IHR Coordination Communication and Advocacy, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), Zoonotic Diseases, Food Safety, Biosafety and Biosecurity, Immunisation, National Laboratory System, Real Time Surveillance, Reporting, Workforce Development, Preparedness, Emergency Response Operations, Link Public Health and Security Authorities, Medical Countermeasures and Personnel Deployment, Risk Communication, Points of Entry, Chemical Events, and Radiation Emergencies.

The NAPHS states it relies on:
– Country Ownership (The Australian Government leads and coordinates the NAPHS, its progress and implementation, to ensure that all activities align with national plans, strategies and guidelines)
– Human Rights Principles
– Community Engagement
– Partnerships and Collaboration
– WHO Partnership (The NAPHS upholds Australia’s long-standing partnership with the WHO
– Alignment with Other Strategies:
– Evidence-led
– Continuous Improvement

This pdf is available from: Department of Health | Australia’s Joint External Evaluation of International Health Regulations Implementation

More info:
Australia’s health security to be put to the test | Health Portfolio Ministers

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on April 13, 2022, in covid mandate, Covid vaccines, Covid-19, WHO and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 11 Comments.

  1. “How do we overthrow Australia’s WEF tyrants without getting arrested in the process?”

    There is no WE in Australia that overthrows anything. The only thing WE do is going to some fake polls to elect the same fake politicians already selected in a crooked and locked up hamster wheel. That is how Australia’s history of “OVERTHROWING” works.

    In regards to arrests. The Australian “Federal” police knows each single patriot/dissident that has dropped a critical “Anti Australian” comment. Uploaded videos of truth or corruption from rebellious citizens that have been posted online are well known to “sheriffs of the law”. The internet and Bill Gates “open windows” or ALL of today’s Linux products are wonderful tools any “protectors” of national security will leech upon. Privacy and democracy comes within the same package as slavery.

    If any of the “living room activists” knew of the funny things your computer does behind ones back and one is not aware of, no one would use the internet of things as it is done on a daily basis.

    Daily checks on personal data usage (downloads & UPLOADS) are highly recommended. Especially those “transactions” done when the computer idles, all updates are turned off and no browser or email is used.

    Opera and Brave browsers beside the “trusted” Microsoft windows partners are no exemptions.

    “Automated UPDATES” that can not be turned off by the user is part of the whole global package while the “Aussie” police has all the legal rights to abolish personal PRIVACY of citizens (and if necessary change facts) for the sake of NATIONAL SECURITY. Same applies for phones that are smarter than their owners.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I always watch Max Igan’s Crowhouse videos and in his last video, 12 April, 2022, he was talking about ATAGI, the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation.

    It is part of the Australian Government Department of Health.

    Click to access atagi-advice-on-use-of-sedation-for-covid-19-vaccination_1.pdf

    According to Max:
    “ATAGI is recommending that people are sedated for their jabs if they are showing a little bit of anxiety or they don’t want to be jabbed or whatever.

    “Or perhaps they could be jabbed while they are sedated for an unrelated case. So basically, if you are in a car accident or whatever or if you are under sedation for anything in a hospital and you are sedated for any reason, they are saying it is now acceptable to hit you right with the COVID jab while you are sedated and not tell you about it.

    “This is setting a whole new precedent, this is next level evil, folks. Opportunistic vaccination during unrelated procedures.”

    Watch his video and fast forward to the 13:30 minute re ATAGI:

    His video at the 15:25 minute mark is showing horrific footage of Shanghai where people are committing suicide by jumping out of windows of high-rise buildings.


  3. Our govt. have already signed us over to WHO.Morrison betrayed us months ago.


  4. The National Action Plan for Health Security 2009 – 2017 which I read on the gov’t website stated that 8 core capabilities were to be monitored by the UN / WHO under the IHR – International Health Regulation monitoring process. Eight. Biohazard is only one.

    For signatory nations there is an entire checklist of achievements that must be ‘in order’ to get the green tick in terms of ‘points of entry for IHR designated hazards’

    The NAPforHS is the manual for IHR core capabilities 101. The state premiers all signed off on it. There 7 more exercises of communist restructuring and core capabilities to go according to the original document.

    My surmise is that when the UN got the required number of signatory nations, the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board convened. 2019 the GPMB came out with their executive summary “A World at Risk” before they ran the first Exercise on ‘pandemic’ – namely the Corona Hoax of 2020 – the Board outsourced that to the WEF and the WEF ran it through Event 201 Oct 2019. Global Vaxx was always a key objective.

    This is Global thing. Lest we get the idea that only the evil, satanic, globalist Western nations are driving this, the Chinese CDC counterpart sits on that Board and the Russian Federation is on record with its commitment to universal vaccination. That is why their troops are forcibly vaccinating Ukrainians who are fleeing the country.

    All that Valdai palaver about the RF being anti-vaxx is just part of their hybrid warfare against the West. Within the Federation, they have the full set of GPMB CoVID policies and mandatory vaxx.


  5. Any Australian politician who signs a Treaty inconsistent with our Australian Constitution must be dismissed and tried for TREASON against the Australian People and State!

    No ifs or buts about it.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. Here’s a question, hypothetical I suppose, because it forms the plot of another novel I am writing… How do we overthrow Australia’s WEF tyrants without getting arrested in the process?

    Liked by 2 people



    Application of Acts in coastal sea

    Coastal sea of Australia

    (1) An Act is taken to have effect in, and in relation to, the coastal sea of Australia as if that coastal sea were part of Australia.

    (2) A reference in an Act to Australia, or to the Commonwealth, is taken to include a reference to the coastal sea of Australia.

    Coastal sea of external Territory

    (3) An Act that is in force in an external Territory is taken to have effect in, and in relation to, the coastal sea of the Territory as if that coastal sea were part of the Territory.

    (3A) A reference in an Act to all or any of the external Territories (whether or not one or more particular Territories are referred to) is taken to include a reference to the coastal sea of any Territory to which the reference relates.


    (4) In this section, coastal sea :

    (a) in relation to Australia, means:
    (i) the territorial sea of Australia; and

    (ii) the sea on the landward side of the territorial sea of Australia and not within the limits of a State or internal Territory;

    and includes the airspace over, and the sea-bed and subsoil beneath, any such sea; and

    (b) in relation to an external Territory, means:

    (i) the territorial sea adjacent to the Territory; and

    (ii) the sea on the landward side of the territorial sea adjacent to the Territory and not within the limits of the Territory;

    and includes the airspace over, and the sea-bed and subsoil beneath, any such sea.

    No wonder then that a celebration is being held in Rio –

    “Sat 16 June – THEME: Oceans Day
    10:00-11:00 Renewing our political commitments: Perspectives on Rio+20
    11:00-12:15 Scaling up integrated governance of the oceans
    12:15-13:30 Lunch: Celebrating 10 Years of the Global Ocean Forum, and the 30th Anniversary of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea

    Our politicians have surrendered Australian sovereignty to the United Nations therefore under section 44 of the Constitution are illegible to sit in parliament being subject to a foreign power.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. 1666 and ‘The Law of Reversal’ – the law of the land versus Rothschilds law of the sea

    The satanic law of reversal Sabbatai Zevi & Jacob Frank …
    First published on June 3rd, 2021. Rick Miracle Report: The satanic law of reversal Sabbatai Zevi & Jacob Frank – Copy. Here’s a video I watched in 2014. Proof, a Satanic, Kabbalah Jewish Rabbi said he was the Mosiah in 1666! Except, he preached the opposite of Gods Ten Commandments!

    I downloaded the following despite the warning that it might be dangerous (for them probably)

    We are deemed to be a vessel upon the sea

    Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects
    for the Cestui Que Vie Act 1666. (See end of Document for details)
    Cestui Que Vie Act 1666
    1666 CHAPTER 11 18 and 19 Cha 2
    C1 Short title “The Cestui que Vie Act 1666” given by Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c. 62), Sch. 2 C2 Preamble omitted in part under authority of Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c. 62), Sch. 1 C3 Certain words of enactment repealed by Statute Law Revision Act 1888 (c. 3) and remainder omitted under authority of Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c. 62), s. 3 . 2: Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 (c. 11 …×775.png.webp

    The Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 – Prepare For Change

    London in 1666, during the black plague and great fires of London, Parliament enacted an act behind closed doors, called Cestui Que Vie Act 1666. The act being debated was to subrogate the rights of men and women, meaning all men and women were declared dead, lost at sea/beyond the sea. (back then operating in Admiralty law, the law of the sea, so lost at sea). The state (London) took custody …


  9. Absolute criminals – opposed at any and all cost!

    Liked by 1 person

  1. Pingback: National Action Plan for Health Security to subvert Commonwealth Constitution – debtstop

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: