As we reported these acoustic devices were used against protesters in Canberra on Saturday. Cairnsnews spoke to one protester, an ex-serviceman from RAAF who said the technology is basic but effective which made him unwell and left him dizzy with ringing ears.

The operators in the video above warns getting too close the sonic blaster, which can emit more than 150 decibels, can shatter eardrums.

In the video below Aussie Cossack asks individual police officers if they will give a young girl some ear plugs to protect her from the debilitating sound waves. It seems the officers are deaf and mute. Maybe its their earplugs and masks? How did they get a job with ACT or Australian Federal police? We can guess.

Share Everywhere !

Shares

By cairnsnews

From the land of Australians

15 thoughts on “Defeat Long Range Acoustic Device easily”
  1. To maggoo…Yep. Have a look at the pics and article by David Hiscox on XYZ News. Beyond horrifying.

  2. The people are waking up realizing there was never any pandemic but a coup.

    They want to transform our democracies into a totalitarian shithole lie China.

    The only solution is to fight against them. The peaceful protests don’t work, the proof in Canada and France.

    People are still on te old mindset hoping the criminals who infiltrated our governments long ago and their thugs in the ‘police’ and army will respect our rights and the constitutions.

    They are destroying our rights and they mock our constitutions. The cops who enforce that are criminals and should be treated as such.

    They are at war against us, forcing people to inject poison in their bodies to kill and enslave them (vax passport and bio weapons). This is war crimes, this is genocide, this is enslavement.

    CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.

  3. Dear Editor and readers….If you haven’t viewed this already please do. Sorry I can’t post the link. Graphic evidence in article by David Hiscox of XYZ News: ‘Australian Federal Police Used Sound Weapon……….’

  4. Doesn’t the Crimes Act make it a gaolable offence to interfere with one’s right to political protest by bombarding them with electronic weaponry? Weaponry is unjustified unless it is to protect persons or quell violence.

    Where are the treacherous politicians who are supposed to be “protecting” us? They didn’t have to go far, all they needed to do was step outside. But obviously it was still too far for them.

  5. Ed: Some privacy blocker settings in Firefox or in some of its extensions prevent a video from showing up and being seen on the site.

  6.   It is impossible to reach 150 decibels from a broadcast device — you
    might get that high from the blast coming from an explosion.

     I was in charge of noise pollution control Branch in NSW in year 1979
    (then again in 1988) and I studied the acoustics component of the Master
    of Engineering degree.

     Sound or noise is a wave oscillating between a positive pressure then
    a negative pressure at the frequency of the sound – i.e.
    positive/negative being above/below normal atmospheric pressure.

     You cannot get a negative pressure so negative that it goes below
    zero, which is a perfect vacuum; therefore a sound wave from a broadcast
    device is in practicality limited to about 120 decibels by memory.

      I have been in a disco measuring noise (oh well, some people called
    it rock music) at about 116 dB(A) and my stomach and insides were churning.
      Noise levels above about 118 dB(A) have never to my knowledge ever
    been measured as coming from a loudspeaker or other broadcast device.
         ( also when one talks about “decibels”, it is meaningless unless
    one specifies the type i.e. dB(A), or dB Lin, or dB(C) and/or the
    frequency range)

     The noise from a blast explosion is not a symmetrical wave, but a net
    pressure wave moving forwards, so its intensity of positive pressure
    could be much higher, but one still cannot get negative pressures below
    zero.

      regards, Lex Stewart

  7. All this is for our heath ?
    Pushing elderly people on the ground !
    Peper spraying Australian citizens !
    Shooting Australian citizens !
    Using LRAD on Australian Citizens !
    I think the government needs to start answering some questions to why anti terrorism police are deployed on peaceful Australian Citizens 🤔

  8. Title of the post is “Defeat Long Range Acoustic Device easily”…

    How, exactly ????????????????

Leave a Reply

Discover more from cairnsnews.org

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading