Climate debate has always been political and un-scientific
Letter to the Editor
You want to know why “net zero” is utterly ridiculous? Because CO2 does not warm the planet.
Here’s how you can be sure.
CO2 absorbs outgoing longwave infrared radiation (heat) as photons at 14.8 microns frequency (Planck’s Law).
The temperature of absorption at 14.8 microns is -80 degrees Celsius (Wien’s Displacement Law).
Minus 80 degrees Celsius is 95 degrees lower than average surface temperature.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics shows heat doesn’t flow from cold zones to hotter zones.
CO2 cannot “trap heat.” It merely delays outgoing infrared photons momentarily so high up in the atmosphere it’s irrelevant.
Atmospheric CO2 is contingent upon seawater temperature (Henry’s Law).
Only the sun has the energy to heat 1.335 billion cubic kilometres of water.
To control Earth’s climate you must control the sun.
The “climate debate” is now and always has been political and anti-scientific.
Peter Campion
Tolga
Posted on December 12, 2021, in ALP, Climate Change and tagged CO2, Henry's law. Bookmark the permalink. 14 Comments.
Cairns News 
Here is something interesting was fisical Currency like a promissory notes like its an IOU which would then be backed by Gold. Would that mean the Reserve Banking Cartel has been committing Treason at the highest level. Which would have to mean that printing money is illegal and maybe the entire world is Bankrupt. Where is all the World’s Gold then is there any Country in the World still using Gold as a Commodity 🤔🤔🤔
Hearing a lot about Cryptocurrency are there any of them using Gold to trade their Cryptocurrency with? Bitcoin uses Fiscal Currency when that gets wiped out how will Bitcoin or any Cryptocurrency survive then.
Will the Elites when introduce their Cryptocurrency will it be tied in with the Digital Vaccine Passport and everyone taken the Experimental jab will be used for labour and paid by Cryptocurrency which would mean the Vaccinated will be like Gold for backing of Cryptocurrency. Am I on the right track here? Even though maybe not relevant to this topic just Old Kodger brought up that interesting fact.
LikeLike
Bingo! Nice one, old kodger! Right on the money!
LikeLike
Take the money out of the argument and see if it survives.
LikeLike
I have also noticed after a Bushfire with so much carbon that the trees and the ground flourish in Green at a quick fashion which shows nature flourishes with more Co2 not less. Also Green Houses use plenty of Co2 for growth. It’s amazing the evidence is clear Mother Nature can cope with or with out man and woman being around.
LikeLike
The Greenies are really the Brownies, because with the slight increase of CO2 in the atmosphere, that vegetation on the marginal fringes are more effectively able to use the moisture they have because their stomata aren’t so open for so long to gain the CO2 needed for growth.
Consequently the greening index is increasing, and the Brownies are opposed to that.
We live in confusing times!
LikeLike
CO2 (carbon dioxide) is plant food and it’s a natural product from most living beings, stupids. Earth’s vegetation and agriculture depend on it and plants manufacture Oxygen from it, an essential gas we can use more of, not less! The irony of it all! The Greens fighting to keep the world from being greener. lol
Run along, stupids, try going after CO (carbon monoxide) and real pollutants instead, assuming you know the difference. lol
LikeLike
You need to read Ian Plimer “NOT FOR GREENS” there used to be Volcanoes everywhere spewing all kinds of stuff the Earth Was at it’s Greenest then……..cars are not an issue……Greed is the issue!
LikeLike
“Only the sun has the energy to heat 1.335 billion cubic kilometres of water.”
It isn’t just the sun. Globally humans produce a lot of heat from both power generation and devices that consume energy. Heat generated from the inneficiencies of cars, power plants (petro/gas/coal/, nuclear, solar) drilling for oil/ fracking, manufacturing, industrial processing, etc . . There are around 1 billion cars on earth.
Petrol engines, and power generation plants are horribly innefficient. i will leave you look it up, but to use an example;
eg if a car (petrol) engine has 30% efficiency (too generous and highly unrealistic to use a general steady state theoretical peak efficiency figure, but anyhow), 70% of the engine is pretty much converted to heat. That is before vehicle drivetrain losses Also, cars require HEAPS and HEAPS of energy to make.
Global daily oil figures might be a better way of a ball park energy consumption against a nominated inneficiency figure in each sector of energy use/ energy generation.
The way i look at it, all this heat gets transfered to the moisture in the air, and that eventually comes down as rain. That means some level of heat transfer to our environment, and the oceans. What about science looking at the LEVEL of the planets natural ability to release that heat outside the earth in terms of surface area, IN RELATION to the total quantity of heat humans generate? Then it becomes a matter of degrees, and how relevant is that degree.
LikeLike
Egg zackery
LikeLike
hi – the WORLD climate authority has told us …. since 1884 the TEMP of the world has risen by 0.08% !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HOW SICK we are of ALL THESE LIARS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOOK at what Jesus wrote about them in John 8: 44 ” You will not listen to My message – because you are from your father the Devil ; and it is your desire to practise the LUSTS of your father. He was himself a MURDERER from the FIRST, and stands NOT by the TRUTH – because THERE IS NO TRUTH IN HIM ! When he speaks falsehood, he speaks in his own way [ they have their own codes ] for he is A LIAR and THE FATHER OF SUCH . ……..”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LikeLike
Peter your spot on that Climate Change can never happen, you can only clean the Environment. In regards to the Sun what if the Sun is not as big you think nor the Earth rotates around the Sun.
I’m more believing that the Earth is indeed Flat and finally found the proof the stars revolve around the Earth Clockwise and they move during the Equinox. I have been following the same group of Stars that appear on the South Horizon for 6 months the same place and time and during the Winter Equinox appear same place just 6 hours later doing the same orbit. Everything moves around the Flat Earth and no one can get to the edge because the Earth is even bigger than we have been taught to believe. If the Earth rotates around the Sun no chance get to see the same stars and the same dimension and brightness same place just different times during the Equinoxes and moving in clockwise direction if the earth did that means also turns in a circle and America ends up near the bottom too. Watch this Documentary it really makes you think goes for 5 hours the most in-depth thinking how the Earth is truly Flat.
Here are the stars Im talking about
https://postimg.cc/21kZTWn0
https://postimg.cc/Zv6dsFfM
There is so much we have been conned with not only just the Covid 19 Narrative Plandemic.
LikeLike
“To control Earth’s climate you must control the sun.”
Correct, that’s why the Illuminati are in charge of the program. They reckon the sun shines out of their arses.
LikeLike
Apart from the fact that science does not support the claims of the Anthropogenic Global Warming proponents, the very fact that they have to resort to stifling debate, deplatforming and censoring scientists, adjusting and misrepresenting the data, indoctrinating children, lying and badgering should be enough to tell us they’re being disingenuous.
LikeLike
If very ordinary me knew this a decade ago, I see no excuse for educated people to also not know this. Likewise, believing the mRNA jab narrative, will attract a horrible way of dying that will elicit no sympathy from me, except for those victims who also support freedom of choice.
I must have written a hundred articles over the past twenty years, warning people to eradicate BELIEF from their minds. Consider all evidence; weigh up all logic, but never believe.
Belief is the adoption of an attitude or position, DESPITE the evidence. it is no coincidence that this action pretty much defines insanity.
The evidence shows that mankind’s worst enemy is BELIEF… a door that opens over the abyss.
LikeLike