by Jim O’Toole
Senator in exile, Rodney Culleton, after being locked in battle with the corporate Australian legal system since 2016, has filed an action in the High Court of the United Kingdom to have his expulsion from the senate overturned.
Culleton said yesterday he was excited the High Court had accepted his Constitutional argument in the first step to overturn the Australian High Court direction he be thrown out of the senate because of bankruptcy.
“I have never been bankrupt,” he said.
A single judge of the Federal Court issued sequestration orders against Culleton in 2017 freezing his assets in spite of a 21 day stay of proceedings being granted by the Federal Court.
Vexatious litigant and Perth businessman Dick Lester claimed Culleton owed him $200,000 over a failed sale contract on land, a claim pursued hotly by Culleton but he says Federal Court Judge Michael Barker failed to follow court rules, ignored all due process and did not look at his affidavits.
“When I was sworn-in as a senator on August 30, 2016, I swore allegiance to Queen Elizabeth 2 of the United Kingdom, making an oath to uphold the law.
“I did not swear allegiance to the fictitious Queen of Australia.
“This ceremony was witnessed by the Governor General and his deputy.
“It should be noted the Commonwealth Constitution Act of Australia 1900, (UK) remains in force and cannot be repealed by an Australian Government.
“The High Court of Australia does not have the jurisdiction to throw senators or members out of Parliament. Either House has the only jurisdiction under s47 of the Constitution to deal with a Member’s qualification.
“The Constitution is everyone’s contract but we can’t get a remedy in Australian star chambers which don’t recognise the Constitution.”
The HCA has long drawn criticism from those being refused a hearing on Constitutional matters, with litigants claiming the court is not functioning as a Chapter 3 court as required by the Constitution.
Culleton gave the example of any senator or MHR who files an action in the HCA. It is unlawful for the court to hear any evidence relating to parliamentary procedures under s16 (iii) of the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987, he said.
“As a result they threw out my Motion 163 without having jurisdiction because they are not sitting as a Chapter 3 court operating under the proper Crown.
“There is no such thing as the ‘Queen of Australia’.
Culleton has asked the Law Lords of the Queens Bench to examine his request to debate his senate Motion 163 of 2016 which the Solicitor General filed in the HCA.
The statement of agreed facts filed in the HCA by the Solicitor General states a NSW Magistrate, in Culleton’s absence could not imprison him for the alleged theft of a $7 truck key from his own truck.
This matter could have, if imprisoned, disqualified Culleton from the senate under s44 of the Constitution.
“Motion 163 of 2016 was a requirement passed by the House announcing that Attorney General George Brandis’ referral of November 7, 2016 to the HCA is faulty and that there needs to be further investigation into that faulty action, originally orchestrated by former Senators Parry and Brandis, which was never passed by any procedure of law, ,” Mr Culleton said.
He said the senate could not lawfully vote on Brandis’ December 7 motion at the time because there were insufficient senators present to form a Quorum under s22 of the Constitution and the relevant material was withheld from the chamber by Senator Brandis and Senator Pauline Hanson.
Culleton’s legal team remains in London until a hearing date is set by the full bench.
What blows me away is the fact that culleton is ignorant of jurisdiction. Firstly he was/is a member of a corporation registered with the SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION. It operates under law of the sea, commerce, Admiralty/ maritime law, or rules and regulations for members of that society. It has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with the Law of the Land, or natural law, known as the Constitution for the Commonwealth of Australia, the actual land mass designated by geographical borders declaring the extent of its land and soil, except for the fact it is what is described as a ‘Government Services Corporation’. It is contracted to provide designated services for the people of Australia, the land, not the corporation.None of our so called representatives are in their correct Office, not even culleton who obviously doesn’t understand, but makes out he does. Government is there to protect the Peoples’, life, freedom and property. That’s it. It is not there to control the peoples’ lives, freedom and cause their private property to be owned by foreign entities. The Peoples’ Constitution is the highest law for the Land, which basically is ‘ do no harm’ All this other gobblygook is controlled by allegiance to a foreign entity, which is basically, treason. Wake up culleton, stop going into a foreign jurisdiction looking for remedy. We, the People of Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania and West Australia are Sovereign. Do u understand?
Great move, about time we recognised the Australian Constitution 1901 as being the best friend of the Australian people, it gives us protection against the pretend laws todays politicians keep serving up.
Rod and his team are here to awaken Australians to the real law, the law the judges are afraid of the Constitution.
As an example the Constitution guarantees free access to the waters of our rivers.
Dont believe me, read it yourself. Section 100.
Well done lads. Go hard
Hope not, Eon. About time all the government and judicial corruption in Australia was exposed. Good on him, I hope he gets a fair hearing!
And then what, he gets back in the Senate with all of them other grubs, that will not provide them my consent as its not mandatory to be governed by any of these fools in either house, Rod Culleton included.
There is such an animal as Private International Law and we do have to have a few commercial skills that are not required to get into the Parliament of Senate.
They will probably take his money and waste his time.