In this open interview about homeowners protecting themselves during a home invasion by criminals intent on causing harm to the occupants, any means of defence would be in accordance with common law.
Not so say the innumerable lawyers in the Queensland Parliament, past and present. A home owner must only use equal force against an armed intruder and he would most likely be charged whatever defence he makes.
Robbie Katter explains how his proposed law changes would work.
What if the 15 year old intruder has a large machete, which is a standard weapon of criminals in Victoria? What if the home occupant is over 60? Is he expected to defend himself with a steak knife? In the heat of the moment the owner does not have the luxury of deciding what is equal force.
A baseball bat would be a perfect choice but a firearm would give the home defender a much better chance of survival. What will he use? A gun of course, provided it was readily available.
Then he will find himself charged with murder or manslaughter to save his and his family’s lives. The result? In and out of court for years and he would have to sell his home to pay for it.
This is the conundrum the unintelligent lawyers of the LNP are unable to grasp. Castle Law would fix this uncertainty and keep the owner out of court.
Unfortunately LibLab is more concerned about keeping the redundant two party system in place, and themselves in a job.
The home invasion in the video was posted in January 2026. What if this elderly Gold Coast home owner had a a gun handy? He only had to produce it and these cowards would have floated. No shots needed. Where is the LNP government now?
Another thing to do too is to hide a pistol in every room of your house, so if you hear an intruder wherever you are you won’t be caught flat-footed.
A silencer is probably not a bad idea. You would have to dispose of the body yourself. Not that hard.
Watch out for the surveillance cameras though.
‘Occupational hazard’ – if a roofer falls off a roof, occupational hazard, if a hot spark lands in the boot of a welder, occupational hazard. If a thief gets cut in half with a shotgun by the homeowner, occupational hazard.
Wild West but no guns allowed, oh dear, owned politicians to blame again, I think the general strategy of the politicians is, you allow the politicians to get you killed and the state takes all your property then redistributes it to the owned politicians and their owners
If four agro youths end up in your dining room they would see killing you as an option if you cared to resist as you are their witness. So if I entered someone’s property to rob them I too would need the machete bit to intimidate, maim or kill. If sharp its designed to hack through branches with ease so the human arm would not fair well. If it struck a major artery you may also bleed out and die before any help arrived. It also now appears the 40k penalty is only for homeowners judging by the criminals let off. Considering the machete lethality a baseball bat might help but against four one of them is going to get it off you.
If you had a firearm good luck unlocking the separate ammo and then the gun in time as the rules are designed exactly for that to protect the police, not you. Not to mention doing the rock paper scissors game first which rules it out entirely. As its do or die I think killing one is fair enough if you wanted to live and despite the martyrdom good for society. Meanwhile lock all your gates, put wifi security cams on house access points for fair warning, its all we’ve got.
to add to my last post…The system we live under consistently and persistently, bit by bit, takes away what it cannot actually lawfully take away through our just our ignorance, which our education system/media is designed to keep, of that which is our inalienable rights. We have the inalienable right to self defense, whatever the politicians, lawyers and courts PRETEND in their games of trickery and deceit. It is only in the eyes of God shall your righteousness be truly judged, by no one else can that be done.
I’ve had my home invaded…They want you to wonder in the heat of the moment whether you will get in trouble or not, just as he was smashing down my door with a sledgehammer while I waited to plant a woodsplitter in the side of his head as he would have walked in the door…Circumstances changed.. That is the pressure of the Serpent (beast) system, you should not have to think about what you can and can’t do to the man who is trying to kill you! Kill them. they have no rights under common law in such a situation, so why do we go along with the Jews law system for that protects friggen criminals in their criminal acts? They don’t accept Jesus so have got rid of His law, I reckon we get rid of them like over 100 countries have in history for the same bloody reason.
.
Common law is mentioned, that is all that living men and women are subject to, though these days you don’t get tried in a common law (Law of the land-God’s Law) court with a common law judge with a jury of your peers either…The problem isn’t the law it is the LEGAL SYSTEM. In that system, which is Admiralty/Contract/Administrative/Law of the Sea/Law of the Holy See/Talmudic (Jewish) Law/Satan’s Law criminals have rights when they are committing criminal acts which is WHOLLY SATANIC!
.
It is only a legal fiction, made up bullshit, written on bloody paper, that Australia’s shoreline was moved to cover the entire continent, immersing the continent under the sea (fictionally of course) subjecting us to Pirates law/Admiralty/Contract/Administrative/Law of the Sea/Law of the Holy See/Talmudic (Jewish) Law/Satan’s Law…We will rule through terror and make believe! So they say…You can’t live in the truth while we live under this law (beast) system, by design too.
Until it happens to a scumbag Labor, Greens or Lib politician or their family is will never be passed. They are more interested in the rights of crims then the law-abiding. Plain as the nose on your face that they are cowards.
[…] Source link […]