By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
THE eminent British historian and broadcaster Rafe Heydel-Mankoo has confirmed the political game plan behind the massive surge in UK and global immigration patterns in recent years.
“Demographics is destiny. Once the indigenous population becomes a minority, it is game over for traditional British culture and society – the Tories and Labour have betrayed this country and its people,” Heydel-Mankoo said in a recent address to the New Culture Forum.
The historian noted that in the past 25 years there had been more immigration to Britain than in the island nation’s past 2000 years of its history. Even after the Romans invaded only 3% of the country was born abroad.
“Those on the Left who decry the rise of ethno-nationalism should realise that they are responsible,” he posted on X last week.
“Mass immigration, the suppression and demonisation of a legitimate and historic English ethnic identity and the elevation of multiculturalism over English and British culture led us here.”
Mankoo points out that Britons who voted in a series of Conservative governments on the promise of cutting immigration to just tens of thousands, were betrayed time and time again.
And now in Australia we have the leader of another “conservative” party, Angus Taylor, promising to cut immigration, against the policy advice his backroom handlers get from multiple globalist and business bodies like the Business Council of Australia.
The fact that big business, UN agencies, various NGOs and high-level international organisations like the GATT and the World Trade Organisation all support mass immigration is not irrelevant to mainstream Australian political parties.
These policies filter down to the politicians and party officials through the lobbyists employed by these organisations and the implied promise of party donations come election time.
Is it coincidence that the deceased Irishman Peter Sutherland, the man who pushed mass immigration across a range of global organisations, was a “political centrist”, a prominent member of the Fine Gael party, which describes itself as a “party of the progressive centre” with the core values of “equality of opportunity, free enterprise and reward, security, integrity and hope”.
This Irish political party would fit perfectly into today’s Australian Liberal Party, whose previous leaders, post the Menzies era such as Billy McMahon, Harold Holt, Malcolm Fraser, Malcolm Turnbull and John Howard, were not averse to pushing the progressive causes of multiculturism, feminism and globalisation.
Sutherland was the classic multi-functional globalist as UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General for International Migration until March 2017, during which time he created the Global Forum on Migration and Development (GFMD), was president of the International Catholic Migration Commission, as well as a member of the Migration Advisory Board of the International Organization for Migration.
His financial reward for his loyal service to the cause of globalism, was being appointed a board member of the Swedish-Swiss industrial conglomerate ABB (owned by the Swedish aristocratic Wallenberg family) and the conglomerate holding company Investor AB.
Sutherland, as indicated by the quote attributed to him in our inset, was more than just a “liberal” or “political centrist”. He was a revolutionary who wanted to overthrow the culturally homogenous English society and those of Europe. Perhaps he held some of the historic Irish animosity towards the British Empire.
Whether Angus Taylor can pull the Liberals away from “progressive centrism” is questionable, especially with the determination of the globalist elites to continue their “white replacement” policy.
Taylor’s latest statement on immigration leaves plenty of “wiggle room” among the promises to drastically cut the numbers by 650,000 over four years while proposing an increase of 100,000 temporary skilled visas, and focusing on employer-sponsored migration and fast-tracking of construction workers to assist with housing infrastructure.
Historian (BA Hons, LL.B, MA, FRCGS) & Broadcaster: Royalty, British Identity, Immigration; Fellow NewCultureForum; CoEditor: Burke’s World Orders of Knighthood
Peter Sutherland
Peter Sutherland (1946–2018) was an Irish politician, businessman, and international official widely known as a “father of globalisation” for his defining role in shaping the modern, rules-based global economy. [1, 2]
Core Role in Economic Globalization
Corporate Leadership: After his public service in international trade, he expanded his global footprint by serving as the chairman of Goldman Sachs International and BP. [1, 2]
GATT and the WTO: As the final Director-General of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the founding Director-General of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in 1995, Sutherland successfully steered the landmark 1994 Marrakesh Agreement, which dismantled trade barriers across more than 130 nations. [1, 2, 3]
Free Market Advocate: As a free-market liberal and European Commissioner for Competition (1985–1989), he worked to eliminate state monopolies, open up European markets, and lay the groundwork for the EU single market and the Erasmus student-exchange program. [1, 2, 3]
Advocacy for Migration and Multiculturalism
- UN Special Representative: Appointed as the UN Secretary-General’s Special Representative for International Migration from 2006 to 2017, Sutherland championed the rights of refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants. [1, 2, 3]
- Challenging Homogeneity: He famously argued that declining native populations in Europe meant countries should embrace multiculturalism and “undermine national homogeneity” to maintain economic vitality. [1]
- Global Migration Framework: He founded the Global Forum on Migration and Development (GFMD) and authored key proposals that helped integrate the International Organization for Migration (IOM) into the United Nations framework. [1, 2]
Because of his relentless advocacy for open borders, free trade, and cross-border migration, Sutherland became a celebrated figure among international policymakers—as well as a frequent target for populist and nationalist movements later in life. [1, 2]