
By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
LYLE Shelton, who runs the Family First political party, did what any decent Australian would do and posted warnings on social media to parents with young children to beware of the drag queen brigade and their obscene sexual activities that they want us to see as “normal” or “entertaining”.
That was seven years ago, and drag queens Dwayne Hill and Johnny Valkyrie dragged Shelton to the Queensland Human Rights Commission to have him charged under so-called anti-vilification laws that became part of Queensland’s Anti-discrimination Acts.
“After 6 years in court, my drag queen free speech case just took a shocking turn,” Shelton said in a social media post this week. “An appeal tribunal overturned my earlier win and now I’m heading back to court for year seven.
“”The drag queens and their taxpayer-funded lawyers have pursued me relentlessly. This latest ruling does not make any findings against me, but make no mistake, the drag queens and the political activists backing their actions want me punished and silenced.
“But the punishment seems to be the process itself. This case isn’t just about me, it’s about whether Australians can still speak freely about child protection and contested cultural issues without years of litigation.”
Shelton says he has no option but to go back to court because his earlier win for free speech meant free speech wins for other similar cases because his win set a precedent.
He says the bizarre saga began when he published several blog posts critiquing drag queen story time held at a Brisbane City Council library back in 2020.
“My concern has always been child protection. I do not believe children should be exposed to early sexualisation through sexualised role models and they should not be exposed to role models who promote gender-fluid ideology.

“I published confronting and unsavoury material from the drag queens’ own public social media accounts (see inset). Some of this promotes the life-long consequences of gender-fluid ideology. Some of it simply reflects the world view of LGBTQ+ drag queens.
“I wrote about the suitability of proponents of harmful gender ideology and radical LGBTQ+ radical sexual expressionism being appropriate role models for children.
“These blog posts became the subject of complaints which continued to entangle me in this long-running struggle for freedom of speech”
Shelton says Australia’s regime of anti-discrimination and anti-vilification laws known as “hate speech laws” are deeply flawed. “They make the process the punishment. That in turn has a chilling effect on important public discussion.
“These laws cause good people to walk past things they know they should speak up about for fear of litigation.”
Cairns News notes that this latest action against Shelton is happening under an allegedly conservative Liberal-National Party government led by an allegedly Catholic premier who has not lifted a finger against this abusive, Marxist-inspired legislation.
We also note that the drag queen library readings that prompted Shelton’s investigations happened under a Liberal Party-dominated Brisbane City Council. Labor councillors, of course, backed them all the way.
According to the diabolical Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld), vilification happens when a person does a public act that incites hatred, serious contempt, or severe ridicule of a person or group because of their race, religion, sexuality, sex characteristics and gender identity.
Note the last three categories: These are so vague as to allow any LGBTQ+ gender activist to drag any critic of their activities to a government tribunal and then a court.
This is a clever way to target conservative Christians like Shelton who may air public objections to the ideology that basically seeks to overthrow western Christian civilization.
“Incite means to urge on or promote. It is not necessary to show that anyone was actually incited,” states the Queensland Human Rights Commission in a self-contradicting explanation of the term “incite” in the Act.


Kyle needs to ask the Court. Please provide the legal basis for what I have allegedly done wrong.
No one can tell a parent not to take their children to a drag queen show.
I cant understand why a parent would even do so, mindless.
What can be done is to approach councils asking, why are they seen to be promoting drag queens.
Do parents think it is a freak show and somehow hilarious? Mindless again.
It’s what happens when governments manipulate and twist people into a different morality and declare laws that the power to be offended far exceeds the power to offend.
If you like it take it. If you don’t like it, leave it. You can always pay for it later.
@ “the punishment seems to be the process itself”
A clayton’s punishment, a mechanism designed to push a point of view hidden by regulation and by quasi-legal apparatchiks who are paid to fk ordinary people around and to punish them for having an opinion and daring to express it. Without any necessary conviction of wrongdoing for exercising free speech.
Today, it’s become the kosher way to manipulate the ‘normality’ of behaviour because a ‘criminal record’ for such things would be unacceptable to most fair thinking and decent Aussies. So enjoy!
In this very good Never Settle poddie, Graeme, Clive tells you jowl signing on to the electoral roll puts you into the lowest legal category/status possible-that of the nothing mentioned in the Presumptions document:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgLOFBZ2ZTs
It is actually a fraud, because you have not been given full disclosure when signing the application form.
As you should know, everything you sign is a contract, Graeme. Try this:
https://annavonreitz.com/voidcontracts.pdf
Yes, Graeme, but Lyle needs to go in in a non-representative capacity. He has already gone in knowing nothing, and not knowing that he needs to ask for Full Disclosure, as they have to fully inform him of the process:
https://solidaritymovementofaustralia.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/The-Twelve-Presumptions-of-Court.pdf
And you’d best find out how Cal makes judges run out of the Court.
Whenever they jail you they have posted a Bond, and they take the living man into custody until the Bond on the fictional strawman entity matures:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cal+washington+never+settle+pdocast&t=braveed&ia=web
In other words, you need to learn how to negotiate your way around these corporate administrative courts.
Wicked laws by wicked politicians.
Australia is ruled by depraved wolves in sheep’s clothing.
Obvious Bob these lot subscribe to private copyright rules not public law such as the Crimes Act 1914…
The Law is not enforceable in their private commercial Courts.
RESPONSE to Sir Rope re Israel:
<<<<<<<<
The top-of-the-pops vilification of Israel of the hour is every bit as wide of the mark as what the fake Zionists are pushing; the members of BOTH movements are pitifully out of their depth and headed for a very nasty shock
Good. Family First deserves to be targeted in lawfare cases. Family First is part of the conservative movement associated with LNP, Bob Katter and One Nation – all shabbos goy parties that support Israel and defend its gobalist interests in Australia.
Why would you defend family values against LGBT+ globhomo? There are no values left to defend! The LNP destroyed the family unit when they reformed the tax system to encourage female participation in the labour market. The LNP under Howard later destroyed the concept of family home ownership and its associated stability when he introduced taxpayer subsidies to private property investors. As a result, white Aussies have children later in life and have fewer children. It is the growing Muslim and Asian communities that continue to value family, in contrast to white cattle who value material pursuits above all else.
If you don’t believe me, look at their website issues. “Christian Schools campaign” – the teaching of Judaeo-Christian values in Christian schools only serves one purpose – to produce loyal goyim. The party is calling for petitions to close gender clinics and to ban abortions.
Politicians are laughing at them and their protests and their petitions. If Family First wants change, they should vote with rope. But that won’t happen as they were disarmed in 3 false flag attacks.
Family First = bovine.
Welcome to the Tranny Apocalypse 🏳️🌈.
These days there’s a lot of these weirdos posing as women for perceived advantage, women because of their inherent dependence get a better deal and the weirdos want a piece of it. They are quite a pushy and belligerent crowd, it goes too far in situations such as feminist boxing where the weirdo infiltrates and punches the girl’s lights out. I don’t know why it’s tolerated but just because they dress up in clowny outfits is no reason to be distracted. The place to start is Senator Heffernen’s list of highly placed pedos. The crooked M$M including totally bent and fraudulent, criminal accomplices the ABC-TV, completely ignored Heffernen’s list and scoffed at him, they are pedo protectors and they should know what they are, they are complicit, they are perverts, all of them at the ABC-TV hanging on to their stoopid jobs, which seem to get stoopider with every year that goes by, until it is nearly continuous drivel all day every day, rubbish about climate and getting injected, these people are Class A morons dragging the whole country down as fast as they can.
It should be called “The LGBT Ideology Enforcement Act”
Albeit Lyle Shelton’s naivete re government funded learning facilities and the state of the extant justice system.
He and his kind sure need a big wake-up call re the Hour at hand and the nature of the Fixtures and Forces at play
And a head-on encounter is the only way it’s going to happen
Likely criminal too. As they are tampering with young children’s minds which are not capable of properly processing the information given.
And this may result in a permanent problem with doubts about their sexuality, as these library sessions may well be sowing those seeds of doubt.
There may be a correlation with Konrad Lorenz’a theory of psychological imprinting, and in any event, one cannot unremember things:
https://www.simplypsychology.org/konrad-lorenz.html
I overcame the lack of a contact address by Messaging Lyle on the Family First FB page, complete with the Acts, as per:
Your protection against these court actions are the Section as per the Acts here. I have run those by a staffer of the Deputy PM who tried to “warn” me about a complaint i made about the massive immigration into my town, me saying that many of these immigrants were not refugees but economic migrants. Said staffer backed off when quoted and recited the Acts verbatim. Lyle will also likely find his surname in All Caps on the Court documents. He needs to read this article for the significance of the SURNAME: https://annavonreitz.com/twocrimesusedmostoften.pdf
Anna is a retired Alaskan Supreme Court Justice, so she knows her stuff.
Enjoy the read, Folks.
“PORNOGRAPHY AND THE DELIBERATE MANIPULATION OF HUMAN SEXUALITY”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/uTvleJFNfB6Z
Don’t be fooled by the ZIONIST$ pretending to be the “good Jews”, they’re the ones that secretly created and used Marxism as a weapon of war against the Western world.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tod_der_Lüge.jpg
I have posted the Crimes Act 1014, Section 28 and the Criminal Code Act 1995 Section 83.4 a few times here, these Acts, which protect everyone’s political rights and duties, several times, and would have sent a copy to Lyle except that he has no contact address, so he ain’t getting it.
And there is no Head of Power in the Constitution for social engineering, which is what that program is:
An extract from a Lawful Notice I wrote to the CEO of my local council, in September 2024,whose libraries were running these Rainbow Library Storytimes:
“All addressees herein, and their agents/colleagues, are hereby Lawfully Noticed that the proposed legislation relating to the Victorian Government’s Rainbow Libraries Toolkit legislation, and accompanying story-time program, are unlawful and unconstitutional, in that no Head of Power exists in our country’s Constitution document for social engineering, which is what gary alleges that Rainbow Libraries Toolkit legislation and accompanying programs of library drag queen story-times is:
https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/rainbow-libraries-toolkit-launches-wear-it-purple-day
The Constitution of this country, the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900, is, as personally confirmed to me, by former Victorian Upper House Member Simon Ramsay, a legally and lawfully-binding contract between the people of this country and those who would profess to govern for us.
The Heads of Power in that constitutional contract, being detailed, as they are, contain no mention of any power for the government of the day to undertake any social engineering initiatives whatsoever.
Education, Yes-social engineering and any associated indoctrination programs, a resounding: No as, as is said of the Constitution: What is not granted is denied.
gary maintains, then, fervently, that the Allen state government’s Rainbow Libraries Toolkit legislation is thus Constitutionally unlawful and cannot be implemented, given that the relevant Head of Power does not exist, and that no such programs should be conducted in Victorian public libraries, or elsewhere, until the issue of the lawfulness of that legislation and the accompanying programs is established.”
Lyle ought to know his business properly, else he would have used the protections available to him under the quoted Acts.
Tell Lyle to get hold of the Free Speech Union, for what it’s worth. It may be able to help.
[…] Source link […]