Letter to the Editor
https://twitter.com/i/status/1754654821829722395
Grazing is regenerative agriculture, the best single way to sequester carbon from the atmosphere into the soil, by grazing off plants and bringing the cattle in.
We’re managing a “solar panel”. It needs to be green and growing so it can capture sunlight and pull carbon from the air and put it into its roots, but those plants will stop doing that if they get too tall, or they get too short.
So what farmers do with their cattle is they come in and graze those plants off, so they rest it, they prune the solar panel so it doesn’t get too tall and then they leave and it rests, and that graze rest recovery is actually a cycle of pulling carbon from the air into the plant roots.
When those plants get grazed they actually release that carbon into the soil and in turn pick up water and other minerals from the soil. Microbiological activity causes our soils to be living and alive instead of dead and sterilized, and year after year putting it into our soil which produces more grass, which the allows us to graze and produce more cattle
Seventy percent of the Earth’s land is land is not suitable for tillage, which is to say, it’s not arable, and if you just say we’re not going to do any cattle grazing you’ve completely given up the ability to produce food on that acreage and you’ve lost your single best tool to actually restore that land.
There are groups out there that have done these same principles in the desert and transformed desert landscapes into something that looks just beautiful and lush. Cattle can be a tool to heal that and in terms of water and in addressing that they do drink a lot of water.
However as they graze, that water then filters down through healthy soil and it actually is a system that helps increase soil life and activity. By drinking that water they are continually watering the fields and they’re not as reliant on rainwater, and so that cycle actually builds health and builds ecology deep into the soil and there’s no net loss of water in that system because it is a closed system.
As for methane, we know that cattle burp and release it. It is called a “greenhouse gas” but in the last few years they have discovered that if you take a field that’s been grazed and regenerated with cattle for a few years, that soil has microbes in it that break down methane.
They didn’t think there was a microbe that could handle methane and as it turns out they do. When they measured the total amount of microbes it turns out that these microbes in the soil that support, say 100 cows, are actually capable of breaking down the methane from way more than 100 cows.
It’s all about how you take care of it, they can be a tool of destruction or they can be a tool of life, it really first comes down to how you care for them, and with cows. – Carey Kelly, US
Why were more than 200 dams demolished in Spain?
https://michaelwalshwriter.com/2024/11/03/why-were-more-than-200-dams-demolished-in-spain/
Why did cloud sowing in Morocco cause concern in Spain? Do you also modify the weather and change the climate suddenly just for you?
According to EU directives, 30 dams were demolished in the affected areas of Spain, and in total about 200 were demolished in Spain.
During the reign of General Franco in Spain, hundreds of dams and reservoirs were built to control and distribute water to farmers, to prevent floods. During the last government, 30 dams in the affected areas were demolished by EU directives.
Two months before the ‘sudden’ flood in Spain, it was reported that Morocco’s cloud seeding plans (Cloud Seeding) caused concern in Spain.
According to a report by the Spanish meteorological agency El Tiempo, since 2023 Morocco has allocated about 10 million euros to expand the cloud seeding program to create artificial rain.
The aim is to increase the amount of precipitation in certain areas by 15% by implementing a total of 20 cloud-sowing projects.
However, the report highlights that artificial changes in weather conditions can have unpredictable consequences for the entire region, especially in nearby areas such as southern Spain and the Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla.
Heavy rainfall in places unfamiliar with such conditions can lead to flooding, soil erosion and deterioration of its condition.
Despite these fears, cloud seeding is not a new practice in Morocco. The country has been studying ways to increase its water supplies through climate change, also known as climate geoengineering, since the 1980s. In fact, the Moroccan program Al-Ghaith has been active since 1984.
The program carried out 27 cloud artificial seeding operations from 2021 to 2022, and 22 operations from 2022 to 2023. Then, sudden floods in Spain, Poland, Dubai, Kazakhstan, and China? They sow artificial clouds and create artificial rain?
Do you also have weather modification suddenly? Look at the skies more often. Check out the weather forecast. Be of an enquiring nature. If some prefer you not to they could have a sinister reason. To keep you in the dark in this increasingly fake and modified world. RAISE AWARENESS – SHARE THIS STORY ON SOCIAL MEDIA
@ Aussiemal
Atmosphere and Temperature
There is no atmosphere on the moon, which means there is no air temperature. The surface of the moon, however, has a vast variation of temperatures depending on whether or not it faces the sun.
The Bright Side of the Moon
The bright side of the moon is the one which is visible because the sun is hitting it. The surface of the moon in areas getting sunlight can be as hot as 253.4 degrees Fahrenheit (123° C). Keep in mind that water boils at 212 degrees Fahrenheit (100° C). The average daytime temperature of the moon is 224.6 degrees Fahrenheit (107° C).
The Far Side of the Moon
The far side of the moon that is without sunlight is extremely frigid. The average temperature of the far side of the moon is -243.4 degrees Fahrenheit (-153° C). Water freezes at 32 degrees Fahrenheit (0° C). There are some areas of the moon where there are craters which sunlight never gets to, and these areas are as cold as the far side of the moon.
Because of the lack of atmosphere, there is no air temperature on the moon. Rather, it is measured by surface temperature. Different areas of the moon will have extreme temperatures, varying from boiling hot to freezing cold depending on whether the area is being hit by sunlight or if it is not…………”
https://planetfacts.org/temperature-on-the-moon/
The astronauts who landed on the Moon however had no complaints?
I believe if there were less gases in our so-called atmosphere, whether carbon dioxide, nitrogen, oxygen, or water vapour, Earth would be way too hot during daytime and way too cold at night to sustain the existence of mammals that we are a species of. The reason being that direct radiation from the sun would fry us. Of course during the night as with being on the wrong side of moon everything would freeze, including our blood. Wouldn’t need a Covid-19 “vaccine” to clog up our arteries.
Atmospheric gas ratios are self regulating. If Greens as they reckon have the ability to alter the atmospheres gas ratios then there will be no life left on Earth.
From “CO2 Spin on that” – a site no long available –
……..In his memoirs entitled “Contributions to Molecular Physics in the Domain of Radiant Heat”, detailing a series of experiments conducted at the Royal Institution, Tyndall fallaciously states with regard to Oxygen and Nitrogen that they are both quote:
“practically transparent to radiant heat.”
Thus laying the foundations of AGW fraud.
This statement by John Tyndall is the origin of such claims as “the science is settled” and the “greenhouse effect is 150 year old established physics.” In terms of radiant heat it is the only factor that would differentiate between the various atmospheric gases.
After all, Oxygen and Nitrogen constitute 99% of the atmosphere. If these two gases are shown to absorb and re-emit infrared radiation, what would make so called “Greenhouse Gases” like CO2, such a threat to the environment at only 0.0385% of the atmosphere?
So the basis for the “Greenhouse Effect” is that incoming and out going IR is not absorbed by Oxygen and Nitrogen which instead passes straight through these gases. According to this unsubstantiated hypothesis, only those gases which are termed “Greenhouse Gases” posses the capability to absorb and re-emit infrared radiation.
The problem for the hypothesis of the “Greenhouse Effect” and of course AGW itself is that the basic premise on which the hypothesis is based is false.
Firstly, Oxygen and Nitrogen both have higher specific heat capacities than CO2……………
……………The evidence I have presented here conclusively shows that Oxygen and Nitrogen which constitute 99% of the Earths atmosphere, as one would expect, do in-fact absorb infrared radiation.
The claim that these two gases are transparent to IR is completely fallacious. Which goes along way to explain why the “Greenhouse Effect” hypothesis is one of the longest standing unsubstantiated hypothesis in the history of science.
The so called “Greenhouse Effect” will always remain an hypothesis for the simple reason that it is based on pseudo science.
……………
The climate change believers science is debunked
CO2 is only 0.0385% of the atmosphere and is the heaviest gas in the atmosphere which is why plants are able to utilise it in the respiration process.
Carbon Dioxide Not a Well Mixed Gas and Can’t Cause Global Warming
By: John O’Sullivan
“………CO2: The Heavy Gas that Heats then Cools Faster!
The same principle is applied to heat transfer, the Specific Heat (SH) of air is 1.0 and the SH of CO2 is 0.8 (heats and cools faster). Combining these properties allows for thermal mixing. Heavy CO2 warms faster and rises, as in a hot air balloon. It then rapidly cools and falls………………”
https://co2insanity.com/2011/09/04/top-scientists-in-heated-debate-over-%E2%80%98-slaying-of-greenhouse-gas-theory/
CO2 is soluble in water e.g. soft drink and a humid or cloudy atmosphere
Oops, science was ‘settled’ — until it wasn’t: Plants absorb 31% more CO₂ than we thought
Charles Rotter
WattsUpwithThat
2024-10-30 00:36:00
https://www.sott.net/article/495831-Oops-science-was-settled-until-it-wasnt-Plants-absorb-31-more-CO2-than-we-thought
A new study reveals that plants have been absorbing 31% more CO₂ than previously believed. Yes, 31% — a glaring error that casts serious doubt on climate models, emissions scenarios, and policy prescriptions like Net Zero. For years, we were told that the “science was settled,” and that urgent action was needed to avoid catastrophic warming. But this discovery suggests that our models have been dramatically underestimating nature’s ability to manage CO₂. This revelation not only upends the rationale behind aggressive policies but also raises broader questions about the supposed certainty of climate science.
The Myth of “Settled Science”
The phrase “settled science” has been the bedrock of climate advocacy for decades. We’ve been told that if we don’t make rapid, costly changes, we’d face imminent disaster. Skeptics were treated as heretics, while the so-called consensus was portrayed as unquestionable. Yet, it turns out we were 31% wrong about something as fundamental as plant CO₂ absorption. This isn’t a minor correction; it’s a massive revision that undermines the credibility of models driving policy.
The Unraveling of Climate Models
Climate models are the tools used to predict warming and guide policy. They’ve been treated as scientific scripture, driving policies from emissions reductions to renewable energy mandates. But with a key assumption proven wrong, the models’ projections are called into question:
1. Overblown Emissions Impact: Climate models predicted rapid CO₂ buildup, assuming limited natural absorption. This inflated the urgency of drastic emissions cuts. Correcting for higher CO₂ absorption rates means that CO₂ accumulates in the atmosphere slower than models predicted, weakening the case for urgent, economy-wrenching measures.
2. Questionable Feedback Loops: Many models rely on dramatic feedback loops — such as reduced plant CO₂ absorption at higher temperatures — to justify emergency interventions. But this new data shows plants can handle more CO₂ than anticipated, making these feedback loops look less inevitable and more speculative.
3. Policy Implications: If the models guiding climate policy have been this far off, then the entire framework behind policies like Net Zero becomes shaky. Policies driven by these models were never proven to be beneficial, but were only assumed to be so. The discovery that plants are absorbing significantly more CO₂ undermines the supposed need for extreme measures.
This in-depth documentary explores Allan Savory and how he has used Holistic Management to completely transform his land in Zimbabwe…
https://youtu.be/q7pI7IYaJLI
Alan Savory, founder of The Savory Institute, has proven that properly managed livestock can restore damaged lands…
https://youtu.be/mVuQghXRPrw
Like millions of others in 2001 I was thinking “where did the plane go” on seeing the small hole in the side of the Pentagon wall, but the ClimateChange™ lie lived on much longer. The weather cycled to cool in 2016 and has only started warming up again recently, bringing unprecedented levels of hysteria from the fake news M$M. The old fake climate scientists said it would warm up 1 degree by 2050 then suddenly it was revised to have warmed up already. It was claimed sea life such as whales would be affected when they migrate from Antarctica to the tropics every year. We are told “the planet is boiling” by idiots who are supposed to be world leaders. Now we know the real drivers behind ClimateChange™, they are depopulation and peak oil. The forced injections will continue to take old people out in greater numbers, according to Deagel predictions most of them in Australia, England and the US will be gone by Xmas 2025. The wars by Israel will either subjugate the oil producers in the region or see Israel wiped out. What is the rationale for Israel otherwise, the Crusades were premature, the god is money, oil is money, there isn’t much more to it.
Cows are not a problem, grazing is a solution to a problem which is entirely fake.
The fake problem has appeal such as saving the wilderness plants and animals but unfortunately doesn’t have a practical application, the fake problem brings more environmental imposts such as Carbon Capture and Storage which is another money grubbing racket, this time totally implausible, beyond stupid, beyond idiotic, the wool well and truly pulled over the sheeples’ eyes.
https://gumshoenews.com/climate-change-simplified-the-end-of-cheap-oil/
[…] Source link […]
They are using hundreds of weather patents now (The 1st one from around 1891), in order to manipulate & alter the climate, to further their own ends, to suit their own purposes + as they see fit = CLIMATE CHANGE.
https://old.bitchute.com/video/UNmFbBw2ntce/
Farmers know cows don’t fart, they belch…This is an exercise in indoctrination, of brainwashing of what IS absolutely absurd and ridiculous, that the gas of life, carbon dioxide, at an absurdly low 0.04% of the atmosphere is responsible, as well as methane, a lot less than co2 in the atmosphere, for the climate/weather.
It is not a debatable subject, as they have been refusing to for decades because they never win. Common sense and truth always win the day.
What is the point? You accepting their Satanic depopulation plan is why. You to accept that farmers must stop farming your food…that you must eat bugs, cancer meat and Apeel (thanks once again to Eugenicist Bill Gates) sprayed vegetables…why? TO DEPOPULATE YOU!
Tell the truth. Climate change is all lies, from top to bottom. I have always known it is bullshit, how frustrating for more than three decades later, from a kid to almost an old man. This is a conspiracy to commit vast crimes against humanity, wake up!
It seems water vapor is the main cause of global warming. Starting 4 years ago, the plandemic saw air traffic grind to a virtual halt for a period. High altitude geo-engineering that was a result of the NATO mandated (in the late 1990s) high-altitude fuel mix basically went bye byes. The result was that the blanket of high-altitude engineered cirrus cloud which acts like a heat trap thinned and the natural build-up of heat each day was allowed to dissipate each night.
Now that air traffic is back to ‘normal’ the skies again are blanched 24/7. Yesterday I walked into the backyard, looked west and saw about 50% of my field of vision was irritatingly bright white, no blue, not a single cloud, just a wide wall of high altitude ice crystals – all the result of geo-engineering.
But the greedy ones need to control the weather, so they keep spraying, and the fools keep screaming ‘climate change’. The MSM clowns are barking mad and could help turn this shite-show around with a week of honest reporting, but with $s in their eyes they have lost their will to help.
Grazing animals builds soil, chemicals/aerial spraying do not.
NWO Rothschild Purchases Weather Central: Why? To Control The Warming Hype What Else?
NEW YORK – (Business Wire) E.L. Rothschild LLC, a private investment company led by Chairman Sir Evelyn de Rothschild and CEO Lynn Forester de Rothschild, today announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Weather Central, LP (www.wxc.com).
The world’s leading provider of interactive weather graphics and data services for television, web, and mobile, Weather Central’s personalized forecasting offers businesses and consumers a truly unique suite of psuedo-science-driven weather information products.
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/09/globalist-fear-monger-rothschild-purchase-weather-central-why-to-control-the-warming-hype-what-else/
Greenhouse Gases in the Atmosphere Cool the Earth!
In 2001, the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) announced that carbon dioxide (CO2) was causing the earth to warm and developed computer models to predict how much the earth would warm in the future.
Does any empirical scientific evidence exist to support this premise of the IPCC? The answer is no, in fact it is just the opposite, CO2 has a cooling effect. The major components in the atmosphere that cause the earth to be cooler than it would be otherwise are the so-called greenhouse gases.
Calling these gases greenhouse gases are misnomers. Yet, many meteorologists have blamed water vapor and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere for warming the earth. Below is an excerpt from a paper 1 written by meteorologists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
“Water vapor plays the central role in the atmospheric branch of the global hydrologic cycle and is the most abundant greenhouse gas. Climate models used for estimating effects of increases in greenhouse gases show substantial increases in water vapor as the globe warms and this increased moisture would further increase the warming.”
They got it backwards about water vapor just as Al Gore did about CO2 in his “Inconvenient Truth” presentation of the Vostok Ice Core data.
https://principia-scientific.com/greenhouse-gases-atmosphere-cool-earth/
Prof. Murry Salby: Atmospheric carbon is not a pollutant and humans cannot regulate it
In 2016 atmospheric scientist Professor Murry Salby delivered a lecture at University College London. The purpose of his lecture was to provide proof of why atmospheric carbon is not a pollutant and why humans cannot regulate it.
The effect of fossil fuel on CO2 emissions is minute, Prof. Salby said. “The fossil fuel perturbation is too small to even be detectable … [It] is presently not detectable. It will not be detectable, ever.”
Science has been taken over by “government bureaucracy under the aegis of the UN.” Its objective, he said in 2016, “has become an exercise in social engineering to predict and control the undetectable.”
https://expose-news.com/2024/06/08/carbon-isnt-a-pollutant-humans-cannot-regulate-it/
CO2 has nothing to do with any additional warming of our atmosphere.
See below;
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/11/3/286
And also see below;
https://co2coalition.org/facts/
It is a SCAM. And the sad reality that people continue to believe the propaganda about it is what is leading to the enslavement of nearly every single person on this planet.
READ THE FACTS. Then after you’ve read the facts, READ THE FACTS AGAIN, and keep doing that until you realise you have and continue to be CONNED.
STOP SUPPORTING THE PEOPLE WHOM ARE BUILDING YOUR PRISON.
The farmers knew straight away if you feed the cows a bit of seaweed the methane stops. But the scientists don’t know and seem to be deaf, the M$M scientists we keep hearing about anyway, like Dr Fauci. The M$M scientists have not even worked out climate comes from solar cycles and not the miniscule increase in the miniscule amount of CO2 in the air. The whole thing is utterly stoopid and the poisonous ABC-TV pervert minions can’t repeat the bullshit often enough, they are sickos, trying to scare the kids and inject them for good measure.
Some common sense at last…but science is not smart enough to see and use common sense because it does not fit their political agendas.
[…] Go to Source on cairnsnews.org Follow altnews.org on Telegram Please donate now! 00 […]