Christian values are tried and true

STJOHNOFGRAFTON said – “Your comment is wrong. You, as we all, are just as guilty.”

Your response deflects from the original issue – that of supposed “JudeoChristian values” – and might be dismissed as a Strawman, disputing a matter irrelevant to the underlying concern.

However, you are correct in the metaphysical context.

BUT…

Christians acknowledge Christ’s sacrifice for ALL of our sins, to save all of Humanity, and acknowledge his Divinity. Christians acknowledge that Jesus Christ IS the Christ, the Saviour promised to Humanity. If not, then they’re not Christians.

The Judaists, on the other hand, do NOT. That’s why they PHYSICALLY MURDERED him, without remorse, and they’d do it AGAIN if they had the opportunity…

QUOTE – “Let his blood be on our hands, and those of our children!” … UNQUOTE.

And in that respect, the comment that you say is wrong, is in fact right. There ARE no “JudeoChristian” values outside of a delusional self-loathing sycophantic mindset. The Judaists – still waiting for their OWN “Christ” to turn up and kill us all, none other than the ANTICHRIST – are PROUD of having Jesus Christ’s blood on their hands, while Christians – TRUE Christians – live their lives in repentance for Jesus Christ’s willing submission to his own savage MURDER at the hands of those same Judaists.

To Pat from Vic,

“Christianity fundamentally repudiates the ruthless & vindictive Master Race mentality of Judaism. Lest we forget, these are the very people who MURDERED Jesus Christ”.
Your comment is wrong. You, as we all, are just as guilty.

( 1 Peter, 2:24 ) He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed.

The correct term is “Protestant Christian” values held by Australia up till 1950 round about. “Judeo-Christian” is a term commonly used but wrong. There’s no Judeo in those values except for the 10 commandments, Even “Christian” values gives the impression that RCs are included, although held by many members. It’s certainly not held by the leadership. I could give a lot of examples.
Some commenters here are delusional like DR – he forgets that the OT is the best history of the world we have today.
Somebody said Everybody knows right from wrong. Really. Where do you think values like sleep with whomever you want, all religions are equal, abortion, multiple genders, LGBTQIA+++, mandatory vaccinations etc etc come from. Certainly not from the protestant Christian world view of 1950 (I’m not talking about the majority of churches today). I remember the days when the government would not even force JWs to have a blood transfusion and the child could well die, Yes, correct to leave this to parents.
Present day lunacy comes from an evolutionary world view. “All religions are equal” so who decided to bring in all the riffraff religions and races?
With the Protestant world view of 1950, did we have the today’s problems then? Use a brain folks. “It’s appointed unto man once to die and after this the judgement.” Hebrews 9:27 Get your excuses ready, let the judge have a bit of a laugh.

Actually, the Roman govt was the instrument used to destroy Jesus’ body.

And for all practical purposes J.C. committed “suicide”, basically putting his money where his mouth was and proving that death is a lie and this so-called “reality” a farce.
He/It surely did not die. The filter It(The Truth-Spirit-The Real) used was perishable and disposable, but It is not bound to any one instrument nor is It bound to time and place.

Thus the fraudulent karma/reincarnation/false-judgement schemes of the ego were rendered null and void. And The Kingdom of Heaven open to any and all that will to let go of deceit and accept The Truth(Reality) in It’s Totality.

Moreover, according to the seventeenth century Irish text and compilation of ancient chronicles, commonly known as – ‘The Annals of the Four Masters,’ it is interesting to learn how the ancient Europeans understood the meaning of the word Gentile, which to them, was synonymous with Pagans: – ie. ‘Gentlidig, ‘’Gentiles, or Pagans.’’

If certain truths be told, – Egypto-Christian would probably be a more appropriate term.

The more closely one examines the OT and its wider body of affiliated scripts, the more obvious it becomes, that the Davidic inheritance was a Mesopotamian and Egyptian royal succession.

According to the OT, Abraham and his wife Sarai were half-brother and sister (Genesis. 20: 12), sharing the same father, Terah. In the Syriac text, ‘M’ arath,’ Terah, or Tohwait, was none other than Nfry-ta-Tjewnen: the former Egyptian wife of Pharaoh Amenemhet I (1991-1962 B.C.).

The marriage of Nfry-ta-Tjewnen and Amenemhet I, produced their son and eventual pharaoh, Sensusret I (1962-1926 B.C.). This was the very same pharaoh who later claimed Sarai (his half-sister) for his wife (Genesis.12: 12-15), which is unsurprising, due to the Egyptian royal matrilineal tradition of marrying half-sisters through which to maintain the royal bloodline.

With this growing body of evidence, and especially those deriving from ancient Egyptian sources, many researchers are now coming to the very real conclusion, that Isaac was not Abraham and Sarai’s son, but instead, – he was the son of Senusret I and his temporary wife, Sarai (Genesis. 12:19).

If, as expected, Isaac was the son of pharaoh Senusret I, then everything relating to the covenant (Genesis. 17: 18: 21, etc), starts fitting perfectly into place; eg. Sarai’s changing of her name to Sarah (princess), which coincided with the time when the Egyptian custom of circumcision was introduced to the Hebrews, Isaac’s descendants were then proclaimed as the future inheritors of the Egyptian Empire – ‘from the river of Egypt, into the great river Euphrates’ (Genesis. 15: 18). But at the same time, these promises did not extend to Abraham’s other seven sons: – but only to the true Egyptian royal bloodline of Isaac.

Notwithstanding this, until further incontrovertible evidence is located, or unearthed, the existing OT tradition still maintains that Isaac is Abraham’s son.

Of further interest concerns Isaac’s son, Esau: the elder twin brother of Jacob, whom according to the former Egyptian scenario, would thus imply, that both twins were legitimate grandsons of Pharaoh Senusret. However, being the eldest son, any legitimate inheritance of kingship would naturally have passed to Esau.

Esau’s blood lineage becomes more interesting, as well as more confusing, due to his three wives. When the family genealogies are examined, it becomes immediately obvious, that Esau’s first marriage to Bashemath (daughter of Abraham’s eldest son, Ishmael, and Mahalath of Egypt), provides a ‘direct’ matrilineal link to the royal Egyptian messianic, or dragon bloodline. Indeed, Mahalath was none other than Nefru-sobek, daughter of Pharoah Amenemhet II (1929-1895 B.C.) and granddaughter of Senusret I.

The daughter of Esau and his third wife, also called Nefru-sobek, or Mahalath, was called Igrath, whom eventually, married Pharoah Amenemhet III (1841-1797 B.C.). Their daughter, Sobeknefru, became the high Dragon Queen of Egypt (1785-1782 B.C.), which essentially brought the messianic, or dragon bloodline back into the Egyptian court.

With no male heir, Queen Sobeknefru became the last ruler of the XII Dynasty, yet despite this, the messianic bloodline still continued matrilineally, until its fusion with the equally temporary rule of the Hyksos delta kings (XV & XVI Dynasties). This eventually led to the Hyksos pharaoh, Apepi II, whom by all accounts, was the last hereditary Dragon King of Egypt. Despite this, the female line still continued into the subsequent dynasties.

The Egyptian heirs of Esau, eventually became the Dukes of Edom (Genesis. 36: 31).

With the end of Esau’s royal line via his daughter, Igrath, and Sobeknefru’s failure to propagate the male succession, the male messianic bloodline then passed to Pharoah Senusret’s other grandson, i.e. Jacob/Israel, and his descendent House of David of the Tribe of a Judah.

For reasons known only to themselves, the compilers of the OT went to great effort into omitting Esau’s purer Egyptian strain of the dragon lineage from their version of events. Where by all accounts, the descendent matrilineal successors still exist.

I agree in principle with those who have called out the oxymoronic phase ‘Judeo-Christian’.

Those who practice Judaism are still waiting for their Messiah warrior King.
Some claim he is coming soon and he’s friends with Netanyahu.
He will come with a sword.

For those who thinking I’m joking, I’m actually not.

Christians however, had their Messiah arrive 2000 years ago and his name was Jesus.
His life story is written about in the New Testament of the Bible.
He wasn’t accepted as the King as prophesied in some of the Old Testament, particularly the book of Isaiah and was eventually crucified by some Jews who hated his message.
In religious context Jesus was known to call out the Chief Priests of his day as ‘wolves in sheeps clothing’, and of the ‘synagogue of satan’.

Muslims accept Jesus as a prophet, but not as a Messiah.

Judaism holds onto the Old Testament of the Bible. An Abrahamic promise to the Jewish people (bc)
As to who is actually from the line of Esau and who is from the line of Jacob, the brother’s who fought over an inheritance promise, still continues to this day.
Claims abound.
The rivalry is deep seated.

Christianity starts from the New Testament, the ‘New Covenant’, (ac) the teachings of Jesus
whose heritage was through the line of Judah, one of the 12 tribes traced back to Abraham.

Putting this Judeo-Christian phrase in the same sentence has been one of the most successful manipulations for as long as anyone can conceivably know IMO.

Many people sitting in pews continue to be taught that their faith is all about ‘the chosen ones’, the Jewish Nation, causing them to still hold onto an Old Covenant.
All the while the church has been quietly infiltrated with Zionists and Freemasons keeping that message alive.
A Freemason can join that Society with the god of their choosing, but the ‘great architect’ of the Freemasons is Lucifer.

Some Bible translators have had links to Freemasonry with words removed and context changed over time.
The idea of a Creator God has also been intentionally eroded away which is fundamental to Biblical text and faith, whether Judaism or Christianity.

Governments who are neither Judeo or Christian manipulate beliefs for their own political means.

People who identify as christians just need to go back to identifying with the message of Jesus if they want to identify as christians.

They might surprise themselves with what he actually had to say.

@Lindesymonds There are 2 streams of Bible manuscripts. The Antioch of Syria, used the Jewish text of the OT and faithfully collected the 26 books of the new testament and carefully preserved them. The Other came from Origen in Alexandria, a hotbed of pagan philosophy. He basically made his own Kentucky Fried Chicken Franchise version of the New Testament and used the Egyptian version of the Old Testament called the Septuagint, both of which the Roman Catholics took up. These had all the extra books rejected by the Jews because they held that Malachi 409BC closed the OT, as does Daniel 9:24-27. The Antioch manuscripts were circulated among all churches till 312AD and kept active by the Christians hiding from the Prostitute Church who slaughtered over 100 million over the 1260 years from 538 to 1798. Catholic Priest Erasmus collected the Antiochan Textus Receptus manuscripts lying unused from churches and monastries around Europe and wrote a new Latin version. He was a friend of Martin Luther. That’s where the King James Version came from. Maccabees and those other books you mentioned are just nonsense. The book of Enoch has no record of it’s copying and history, so like Maccabees, it’s good history.
We did not get the KJV from the Roman Catholic Church. Read Rev 17 and 18 carefully and tell me it doesn’t point to a Prostitute Church.

Judaeo-Christian-Islam all Abrahamic Covenants.
Unfortunately, makes for bad bedfellows…

Are Albert Pike’s prediction of a third world war coming to fruition?

Albert Pike’s 1871 letter to Giuseppe Mazzini:

“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of the Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.”

The Bible is the library of the New Covenant – those who are hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, Saviour and King.

The Books that should be in the Bible are the translations of books of the Septuagint and Vulgate which were removed by the Reformation. The Book of the Machabees is especially significant and it narrates the history of how the Edomite / Idumean descendants of Esau came into the Israelite Covenants, their migration into Judea, their Babylonian ‘Tradition of the Elders’ / Talmud and how as Judeans they start styling themselves Jews. Of course they begin the work of taking control of the kingly, messiahnic bloodline of Juda and the Temple. This is a very important Book as is the Book of Enoch which was conserved by the Ethiopian Church.

evilbible.com