This was first published by cairnsnews 25th September 2015. We were inundated with inquiries about the real ancestry of Australian Aborigines so we have republished it here today
Source: The Catalyst, Volume 1, Issue 2. September 1999, pp. 10-12.
Copyright: CairnsNews.org© First published in Cairns News in 2015
by Robert J Lee, investigative journalist
Aboriginal land claims, native title and land rights are based on a false anthropological premise and are totally fraudulent according to astounding new Australian archaeological discoveries and recent linguistic studies.
The delusion of 40,000 years of dreamtime mantra is the product of untruthful anthropologists.
According to Alfred Cort Haddon, a turn of the century figure revered today as the ‘founding father’ of British anthropology, the aborigines were clearly “pre-Dravidian” people from South India.
In Haddon’s 1909 book, The Races of Man, he asserts that Australia was originally inhabited by Papuans, or Negritoes, who wandered on the extreme south of the continent.
Later, a pre-Dravidian race migrated to Australia and overran the continent, absorbing the sparse aboriginal population.
Thus, said Haddon, the original aborigines were either “driven off, exterminated or even partially assimilated.”
Modern anthropologists have a real problem, should they try to dismiss Haddon’s findings. If they dismiss this work of the oligarchy’s icon of the time, they are also discrediting the man who led the famous 1898 Cambridge Anthropological expedition to the Torres Strait, upon whose findings the High Court heavily relied in the Eddie Mabo case.
Mabo was from Murray Island upon which Haddon and his researchers had concentrated their study.
In the remarkable work, Cape York – The Savage Frontier, Queensland author Rodney Liddell asserts, from studying the Jardine diaries, the original Negritoes were hunted down and wiped out by invading aborigines from India.
The tip of Cape York was one of the major landings used by the invaders who arrived in either canoes or on rafts.
Archaeologists in 1973 decided to look for campsites and other evidence on the Cape, finding fire places and middens. Although unreliable, carbon dating of shells and other organic matter was used.
To the horror of the investigating academics, the best they could come up with was between 600 and 1,100 years of occupation by the aborigines.
These aborigines from India were an extremely violent, savage and cannibalistic race who mercilessly hunted down the smaller Negritoes.
It would be impossible to accurately calculate the number of Negritoes massacred by the aborigines, but based on the evidence it would be fair to say at least 150,000 were wiped out over a long period.
In modern terms this would be classed as genocide.
This process evidently occurred into the modern era, because pre-1770 explorers such as William Dampier, who visited West and Northern Australia in the late 1600s, described the existence of a race of people with “hair curled like the Negroes” – clearly not the modern aborigine.
Early explorers and settlers such as the Jardines who settled Cape York wrote how they witnessed the Negritoes being hunted down like kangaroos by the taller aborigines.
The island of Tasmania offers some interesting evidence in attempting to date when Aborigines came here from India.
There is geological evidence indicating that there were once land bridges joining the Australian mainland to Papua New Guinea and Tasmania.
These land bridges were covered by flooding some four and a half thousand years ago.
This accords with the biblical account of a world-wide flood as well as other similar accounts found in the early histories and folklore of most cultures of the world today.
Aboriginal legends also contain such allegories.
The discovery of the remnants of Noah’s Ark lodged on Mount Ararat in Turkey in 1948, proves conclusively the biblical recount of a great flood.
Dreamtime dreamt up by lying anthropologists
Last century Anthropologists recorded that no aborigines of the type found in most of Australia today, lived in Tasmania at the time of European settlement – only a “curly – haired” people, presumably the Papuans (Negritoes) Haddon referred to.
These died out some time after European settlement.
The reason this particular race of Papuans survived ravages of the aborigines, was due to the aborigines having lost the art of sea travel, through degeneration from a higher culture.
This would have prevented the marauding tribes from travelling across the Bass Strait.
Anthropologists have dreamt up the fallacy of 40,000 years of dreamtime and then tried to substantiate their lies by Carbon 14 dating rock art and other organic remains.
This methodology has now been discredited by most responsible scientists, who have labelled it as erratic and highly inaccurate.
It was developed in the 1940s by Professor Libby who acknowledged that the method was only good for dating material between 5,000 years and at the most 10,000 years.
However scientists have found these parameters to be far too generous.
Carbon 14 occurs naturally in the atmosphere. It combines with oxygen to form carbon dioxide that is absorbed by vegetation, which in turn is eaten by animals and humans.
After death, the amount of C14 found in a specimen should decrease.
The C14 content of a live specimen is then compared to that of the dead one, but the age factor is calculated by guesswork.
The method is so unreliable, that a recently killed seal gave a C14 date of 1,300 years, live snail shells showed and age of 27,000 years and the shells of living molluscs were dated at 2,300 years.
This concurs with present day archaeological evidence such as relatively modern rock art and organic remains, despite so-called carbon dating which has been proven beyond a doubt to be scientifically unreliable.
The arrival of the Phoenicians
There is now conclusive evidence ancient Egyptians arrived in Australia long before the pre-Dravidian Indians, or Australian aborigine.
An extensive gallery of Egyptian sandstone petroglyphs accidentally found several years ago in NSW, and dated at least 232 BC, has yielded evidence of Egyptian expeditions circumnavigating and settling parts of Australia, New Zealand and Polynesia.
A rock art expert, accredited by the Department of Aboriginal and Islander Affairs (who declined to be named in fear of heresy accusations by the ruling academic junta), told The Catalyst he visited the secret New South Wales site in 1995. After some basic translation by an Australian academic, these beautifully preserved hieroglyphics depicted a Pacific sea voyage by an Egyptian expedition seeking precious metals whilst trying to circumnavigate the world.
He said the engravings were definitely of Egyptian origin and the work of an artisan who could only have come from that period.
“No Australian aborigine was responsible for this incredible work, and indeed local aborigines have said it is not theirs,” he said.
This evidence opposes the misconceived belief that aborigines are indigenous to Australia, a misconception nurtured by British-trained anthropologists over the last 120 years for the ultimate benefit of the London based financial oligarchy, which is pushing for the establishment of a separate aboriginal nation state.
The expert said most Australian and probably most overseas anthropological academia would not accept the discovery of this previous “missing link” in Australian archaeology.
“They will wriggle and squirm, avoiding at all cost, this outstanding archaeological find.”
He said it would leave the reputations of some academics in tatters and force an axiomatic change in the way our historians and educators viewed present day Australia.
“It will turn upside down all of the pet theories and dogma of those benefiting the burgeoning aboriginal industry and have a significant legal impact on the whole notion of land rights,” he said.
How was it that the Egyptians were able to so accurately embark on a circumnavigation of the world, at a time when it was thought to be flat?
One of the greatest discoveries of ancient times was made in the third century BC by the Libyan scientist and member of Plato’s academy, Eratosthenes, who based his discovery that the world was round, not on his senses but by what he thought.
He observed two obelisks of ancient Egypt, that were separated by some 490 miles, throw shadows at different angles, which could not happen if the world was flat. Since no one had ever seen the earth was round until modern space travel, Eratosthenes could only discover that reality by using his mind to solve the paradox presented to his senses.
By such creative discoveries of principle, man masters the universe around him, something which no animal (or anthropologist) can do.
The key which unlocked the chain of events surrounding the origins of the Australian aborigine has been provided by the brilliant New Zealand marine biologist Professor Barry Fell, who became a pioneer in philology and the virtual founder of the science of epigraphy – reading old inscriptions from rocks.
In 1974 Fell deciphered some writings copied from a cave wall in Irian Jaya, which together with other cave petroglyphs in Chile, showed that an Egyptian expedition of 232 – 231 BC, based upon the work of Eratosthenes, sailed across the entire Pacifica and discovered America in 231 BC. The navigator for the six-ship fleet was a student of Eratosthenes’ named Maui, and the voyage was an attempt to circumnavigate the world, to prove the earth was a sphere.
Fell had a remarkable meeting with a Honolulu based researched, Ruth Hanner, who showed him copies of reports on ancient New Guinea cave inscriptions.
They proved to be the bonanza Fell had been seeking for years.
They were contemporary records, etched on cave walls, giving details of a migrant fleet of ancient Libyans and Egyptians some 22 centuries ago.
References to the then ruler of Egypt, and to other prominent people of Greek and Egyptian history, enabled the inscriptions to be dated to about 230 BC, the 15th year of the reign of Pharaoh. Fell later found a record of an eclipse that enabled him to date the event to November 19, 232 BC, for the Harvard astronomers held records of every possible eclipse going back 3,000 years.
The records had been made 40 years ago by a German expedition for the University of Frankfurt am Main, though they have lain unread until now.
The captain of the fleet was named Rata, and as Fell noted, Rata and Maui are the mythological founders of all Polynesian civilisation, from Hawaii, down to Easter Island, across to New Zealand, and back up to Hawaii.
This ground-breaking evidence clearly points to the fact that the peoples of ancient Libya whom the Greeks called the “Mauri” became the ancestors of today’s Maori of New Zealand.
The extensive Egyptian petroglyph site in New South Wales, coupled with the discovery of small pyramids in the Gympie district and elsewhere, as well as Egyptian artefacts found in a ploughed paddock in Far North Queensland all lend much credence to Fell’s discoveries.
Fleet commander Rata and navigator Maui were well-equipped for their epic sea voyage, armed with the most up-to-date astronomical and navigational aids based on the work of astronomer Eratosthenes.
The rise of Barry Fell – Harvard Professor Emeritus
From investigating about 280 mysterious engravings or painted inscriptions throughout Polynesia the allure of a long forgotten civilisation had whetted the appetite of Fell, who spent eight years unravelling his theories on linguistics.
At Harvard University in 1964 he began a program of statistical analysis, in the course of which the relative frequencies of the Polynesian signs were compared with the corresponding frequencies of sound in all the languages bordering on the Pacific.
The work was long and laborious, lasting eight years before a breakthrough was made. The signs showed a distinct similarity to those used in Ancient Egypt and the sound frequencies of modern Polynesian tongues showed a corresponding match.
By now progress became more rapid. Soon he had generated the first Egypto-Polynesian vocabulary, resolving laws of phonetic change by which the modern Maori language had apparently been derived, originating from some tongues of the Egyptian group. He also found numerous parallels in the syntax of these languages.
America claimed for Ptolemy III
At a Harvard seminar the November 1974, where Fell finally presented his translations, it was concluded that the voyage of Rata and Maui would probably follow a circuitous route according to Eratosthenes’ plan, landing on the west coast of America.
Therefore it could be expected to find similar inscriptions in American caves.
Fortunately, after learning of Fell’s work, professor George F Carter, Snr., of Texas A & M University who had an interest in ancient petroglyphs, recalled a cave inscription he had copied down from a German-language scientific journal published in Chile, which he found at the Johns Hopkins University library in Baltimore in the 1950s, when he was teaching in the geography department.
The inscription was copied in 1885 by Karl Skop, who had taken shelter in a cave near Santiago during a storm. Carter thought the script was similar to the Polynesian inscriptions. He was right. As Fell was able to translate it, the Santiago inscription gave the date as the “regnal year 16,” which would have been 231 BC.
It read: “Southern limit of the coast reached by Maui. This region is the southern limit of the mountainous land the commander claims, by written proclamation, in this land exulting. To this southern limit he steered the flotilla of ships. This land the navigator claims for the King of Egypt, for his Queen, and for their noble son, running a course of 4000 miles, steep, mighty, mountainous, on high uplifted. August day 5, regnal year 16.”
If the Australian inscriptions, which bear an uncanny resemblance to those of Santiago, when fully translated, contain a similar message, then the Australian aborigines will have great problems with their land claims.
Boomerangs in Egyptian Tomb
The inventory of objects found in (boy) King Tutankhamun’s Tomb as noted by Howard Carter who discovered it, lists at least 11 boomerangs. Surely they are strange objects to find in the tomb of an Egyptian King, who died some 2,500 years ago.
Did the Egyptians introduce boomerang technology to the early Australian inhabitants‒the Negritoes‒then to be taken up by the invading aborigines?
Another startling similarity between the Egyptian and aboriginal cultures was found by Australian anatomist, Professor Grafton Eliot Smith at the end of the 19th century.
It was the ancient Egyptian practice of mummification of the dead among aboriginal tribes and Torres Strait Islanders.
Smith had examined hundreds of mummies in Egypt noting there were certain precise and also highly unusual features in common, in the cuts made in the body, which would be almost impossible to be “independently invented.”
After having the internal organs removed from the corpse, then being sun-dried on elevated timber ‘drying-racks,’ similar to the style of the American Indians, the Australian mummies were wrapped in bark cylinders and bound with rope made of plaited human hair and bark.
The mummies were lodged in elevated holes or caves found in various sandstone formations, then sealed with boulders or rocks.
After examining a Torres Strait mummy, Smith reported: “I was convinced from my knowledge of the technical details used in mummification in ancient Egypt, that these Papuan mummies supplied us with the most positive demonstration of the Egyptian origin of the methods employed.
“Moreover, as they revealed a series of very curious procedures, such as were not invented in Egypt until the time of the New Empire, and some of them not until the XXI st Dynasty, it was evident that the cultural wave which carried the knowledge of these things to the Torres Strait could not have started on its long course from Egypt before the ninth century BC at the earliest.”
What is probably the most extensive record ever compiled about aboriginal mummies had been meticulously kept by Queensland-based aboriginal rock art expert, the late Graham Walsh, located in the famous Carnarvon Gorge National Park.
Walsh’s astounding and unique collection of bark cylinder mummies is testimony to the findings of Smith et. al, and totally supports his observations of a close connection between the funerary rites of Egyptians and aborigines.
Wandjina Cave Paintings of the Kimberley
In 1837, Sir George Grey led an expedition to the Kimberley region looking for an inland sea.
He was sponsored by the British Government and the Royal Geographical Society. He was later knighted for his services to administration South Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. Therefore he was a man whose impeccable establishment credentials make his discoveries hard to dismiss, at a time when Britain preferred to push the “wild savage” dogma to aid their colonisation of Australia and New Zealand.
On March 26 and 27, 1837 Grey came across two caves with extraordinary paintings, clearly non-aboriginal.
He reproduces these in his 1841 Journals of two expeditions of discovery in northwest and western Australia during the years 1837, 38 and 39.
Near one of the caves Grey also found and copied a two-foot high carved European type head, which clearly was not of aboriginal origin. This sculptured head apparently has never been re-discovered.
Grey noted of the carving; “this rock was so hard, that to have removed such a large portion of it with no better tool than a knife and hatchet made of stone such as the Australian native generally possesses, would have been the work of very great labour… the ear was rather badly placed, but otherwise the whole of the work was good, and far superior to what a savage race could be capable of executing.”
The well-protected cave painting depicted dozens of human faces and shoulders (or busts), carrying a head adornment surrounded by a halo, which strongly resembled actual Egyptian mummies uncovered at Luxor and similar tomb paintings found throughout ancient Egypt.
Modern anthropologists implicitly believe the Wanjina paintings to be the work of aborigines. Documented evidence of actual aboriginal art found throughout Australia at the time of European settlement consisted mainly of sandstone or other rock etchings, carvings, stencil art and limited crude freehand drawings.
To claim the exquisite Wanjina, Bradshaw or even some of the Queensland’s quinkan art to be that of aborigines flied in the face of most known sites sound in the southern part of Australia, which consist of crude rock etchings, engravings or mostly stencil art.
The aborigines of northern Australia, particularly in the case of the Wanjina site say they are not responsible for the paintings, but merely retouched them, apparently believing this to cause rain. It is inconceivable the aborigines painted the alphabetical script on the headdress of one of the Wanjina paintings as captured by Grey.
Anthropologists as agents of influence
British-trained anthropologist, A. P. Elkin, spent a lot of time and money over the years trying to discredit Grey’s reports and sketches of the Wandjina.
The Rockefeller Foundation backed Elkin first when he saw the Wandjina site in 1927, and ever since then he refuted Grey’s findings.
To understand Elkin’s mindset at the time, and his financial backers, it should be noted that the Rockefeller Foundation put up 30,000 pounds-a huge fortune in 1924‒to finance field trips which were often carried out under the aegis of the Australian National Research Council, an arm of the London-run International Research Council.
Elkin’s career spanned from the mid-1920s, when he studied under the ‘founding fathers’ of British anthropology in London, such as Alfred Cort Haddon, Bronislaw Malinowski and A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, until his death in 1979 at the age of 88.
In 1933 he was appointed to the prestigious chair of anthropology at the University of Sydney, only the third such anthropology chair in the British Empire at the time. From this he dominated the field for decades.
He authored the first major work on aborigines, The Australian Aborigine. It was viewed as the last word on the subject, even after its embarrassing racist overtones became a little unfashionable in the 1960s.
The entire discipline of anthropology in Australia, particularly the field expeditions that discovered alleged anthropological evidence, was dominated from almost the very beginning, by the Rockefeller Foundation.
After one year’s indoctrination to anthropology in London, Elkin was elected to the Royal Anthropological institute, and suddenly given a “firm offer of a Rockefeller Fellowship” to do fieldwork for one year among Kimberley aborigines.
He soon left for Australia to examine the Wandjina paintings. He published his first work on the Wandjina in the September-October 1930 edition of the main anthropological journal of the day, Oceania: A Journal devoted to the study of the native peoples of Australia, New Guinea and the islands of the Pacific.
He later became a long-time editor of this journal, which was financially backed by various oligarchial groups such as the Carnegie Foundation of New York.
In the article Elkin says; “I can throw no light on the origin of these paintings. The natives say they do not make the wondjina (sic) paintings, only repaint them.
“Further, they say that black-fellows did not originally make them, but the picture, ‘Ialan wondiauina’, that is, made itself.”
Elkin however, reported something of much more value in his unpublished Kimberley journal: “The natives say that these and other similar paintings were made a great time ago by some supermen.”
Regarding Grey’s own ideas about the origins of the Wandjina paintings, fellow anthropologist I. M. Crawford noted: “Grey was very cautious in his statement about the origins of these paintings, but in a footnote to his account of the expedition published by the Royal Geographical Society, the editor remarked that Grey believed the paintings to be the work of Asiatic people in Kimberley.”
History shows the rue function of Rockefeller-backed British anthropologists entailed extra-curricular activities often not in the best interests of the fledgling nation.
The evidence points to Elkin’s ulterior motive: an attempt to carve out a separate aboriginal nation within Australia.
The first attempts to create a separate aboriginal state were organised in the 1920s by the establishment-sponsored Australian Communist Party, as part of its general assault on Australian Sovereignty.
The Communist Party of Australia’s newspaper, the Workers Weekly ran a story entitled; ‘Communist Party Fight for Aborigines: Draft Program of Struggle Against Slavery, which called for:
“The handling over to Aborigines of large tracts of watered and fertile country, with towns, seaports, railways, roads, etc to become one or more independent states or republics. The handing back to the aborigines of all Central, Northern and North West Australia to enable the aborigines to develop their native pursuits. These aboriginal republics to independent of Australia or other foreign powers. To have the right to make treaties with foreign powers, including Australia, establish their own army, governments, industries and in every way be independent of imperialism.”
This also was Elkin’s goal which he proclaimed in an October 1926 article in the periodical, Voice of the North in which he called for a large part of Arnhem Land to be returned to the aborigines and be governed by them as a separate state.
At the time authorities took interest in Elkin’s role with various Communist Party activities, including its aboriginal work; his chairing of a meeting of the Friendship with Russia League in February 1945; and his membership of another Communist front, the Association of Scientific Workers.
Today’s anthropologists, archaeologists, available to highest bidder
Since aboriginal land rights were first implemented in the 1970s, profound changes have taken place in resource-rich Australia.
The social and economic fabric of the nation has been subverted in the name of mainstream anthropology, where academics have been accused of being captured by aboriginal groups.
From the handover of Ayers Rock to the battle to block uranium mining at Jabiluka, on the word of a handful of dissident anthropologists, their testimony has cost the country billions of dollars.
The profession has finally realised it has an enormous credibility problem, especially after the “secret women’s business” instigated the Hindmarsh Island debacle.
Anthropologists admit credibility problem
On July 10, 300 professional anthropologists met in Sydney for their annual conference to discuss among other things, their declining credibility.
One of our more distinguished anthropologists, Les Hiatt said it all: “Anthropology in Australia faces a crisis of credibility.
“Any young anthropologist who publicly gives primacy to scientific values risks becoming a pariah without a job.”
In 1995 a Royal Commission into the $68 million Hindmarsh Island affair found the “secret women’s business” was cooked up by aboriginal groups and the so-called experts who supported them.
It began in 1989 when the South Australian Government approved the building of a bridge between Goolwa, 83 km south of Adelaide and a marina on nearby Hindmarsh Island, sited in the backwaters of the Murray River estuary.
Some local groups protested against the development, but nothing was done until a story emerged that the area was sacred to women from the local Ngarrindjeri tribe.
Commissioner Iris Stevens, a retired judge, presided over the inquiry, comprehensively demolishing the case for women’s business.
She said in her decision: “… the women’s business emerged in response to the need of the anti-bridge lobby to provide something of a cultural significance to warrant the making of a declaration by the federal minister … it was unknown to the 12 dissident Ngarrindjeri who gave evidence … the whole claim of the women’s business from its inception was a fabrication.”
In 1970s it was fashionable talk about the “genocide” inflicted upon the Tasmanian aborigines, and to describe Truganini as “the last Tasmanian.”
This is no longer acceptable since anthropologists belatedly grasped the implications for Tasmanian land rights‒there would be no aborigines to claim it.
More recently there was the fight against gold mining at Coronation Hill, the stopping of the gold platinum and palladium rich mine in Kakadu.
BHP estimated that several hundred jobs and $500 million in export earnings were lost.
Money, naturally not land rights, is the bottom line in most of the hard-fought contests.
Two years ago, anthropologist Jeff Stead of the Northern Territory’s Northern Land Council in Darwin keyed ‘land disputes’ into the council’s new computer database.
He found that of the 50 files registered, six were solely of lawyer’s invoices, and a “major proportion” of the others were devoted to billing matters, including substantial anthropological costs.
Should this abundant and ground-breaking archaeological evidence be called upon in a court case involving land rights, then an honest judge would find it impossible to ignore its implications.
He would also be forced to ignore the hoax of modern anthropology.
The Native Title Act and its associated agencies including the Native Title Tribunal would have to be thrown out.
The land seized by aborigines in the name of land rights would have to be returned to governmental control, and used for the benefit of all Australians. Governments would then have to ensure aborigines were given adequate budgets to look after themselves, in much the same way as ordinary Australians.
Our country could then return to normality.
Acknowledgements:
The New Citizen: Citizens Media Group
Cape York – The Savage Frontier: Rodney Liddell.
Editor: Please don’t inundate comments with this is a fraudulent archaeological site. It has been analysed and investigated by archaeologists and Aboriginal rock art experts. The Aborigines say it is not theirs and we say it is genuine.
This paragraph confuses me,
He observed two obelisks of ancient Egypt, that were separated by some 490 miles, throw shadows at different angles, which could not happen if the world was flat. Since no one had ever seen the earth was round until modern space travel, Eratosthenes could only discover that reality by using his mind to solve the paradox presented to his senses.
How did he know the obelisks were casting shadows at a different angle? With a distance of 490 miles between them, and no way of transmitting the information between the two places.
My theory is that the earth COULD indeed be flat and the difference in the angles of the shadows easily explained by the sun being a lot closer to the earth than what we have been led to believe. TRY IT. Put two candlesticks 49cms apart, get a torch and shine it on them from a distance, they will cast almost identical shadows, move the light closer, and the shadows will of necessity appear to increase at opposing angles. Now put the candlesticks on a Lazy Susan (to simulate the earths daily rotation), and repeat the process. The shadows will follow each other. There is so much information that we have had force fed to us that is now being debunked as bullsh!t. The trouble is that we have been trained since childhood that the government and educators knew the truth. Some do know the truth, but they don’t want any of us to know it.
If your interested in the ‘Romanised‘ Christian atrocities and destruction of the classical world, this succinct chronology should serve as a useful gateway to further research.
http://churchandstate.org.uk/2016/06/christian-atrocities-three-centuries-of-pagan-persecution/
Yes: and not to mention the burning of the so called ‘talking books,’ – ie., the men and women of the ‘oral tradition.’
Very strange that there was a lot of book burning going on before (and after) Christianity was born and life started to become very “artificial”.
Great link Dr! Thank You!
“…all transient things are caught in the same transmutation, that all substance is one: the stuff that pots and men and dreams are made of.” page 77
“Omar Khayyam may speak as a weary skeptic or a mystical Sufi, but all he speaks of is understood as real. The heroes of the past are as real as the friends for whom he is writing, as the vine and the roses and the waters, as his own direct experience of flux and impermanence in life. When he makes his earthenware pots to feel and think, it is no literary trope; it is the knowledge that all transient things are caught in the same transmutation, that all substance is one: the stuff that pots and men and dreams are made of.”
Dreamtime or Reality or both at once in the very same instant/transmutation. Well, dreamtime never existed say some. They must surely know!
Something else to bear in mind with regards to Sunday, – and it often forgotten six accompanying days!
The seven days of the week were named after the the Sun and the six ‘wandering stars’ (ie. the planets). These names are still apparent in the Germanic and French tongues, for example.
Sunday – Sonna’s-tag, Dimanche (Sun‘s-day)
Monday – Mani’s-tag, Lundi (Moon‘s-day)
Tuesday – Tyr’s-tag, Mardi (Mars-day)
Wednesday – Wotan’s-tag, Mercredi (Mercury’s-day)
Thursday – Thor’s-tag, Jeudi (Jupiter‘s-day)
Friday – Freya’s-tag, Vendredi (Venus‘s- day)
Saturday – Saeter’s-tag, Samedi (Saturn’s-day).
Indeed Jo.
As we’ve previously touched upon, the gods according to the ancient world view, were simply anthropomorphic terms for the celestial bodies, – who of course, – live in the heavens.
Tools such as Stellarium are essential to understanding the ancient world, and more specifically, – their religious views and systems.
As an example, a Greek temple dedicated to the god Hermes [ie. the planet Mercury], was always aligned to Mercury’s dawn rising on the eastern horizon. As precession results with the perceived movement of the heavenly sphere, over time, the rising of Mercury no longer aligns with temple. This makes it easy to determine the temple’s foundation date, as one simply has to roll the heavens back to the time it aligned with temple. This forms the basis of archeo- astronomy.
Precessional mechanics results with what the ancients called the dislocation of heaven and earth, and was the central reason, why many Egyptian temples were continually dismantled and rebuilt.
For the pioneering, and to this day, the undisputed classic study into the mythology of precession, refer to Hamlet’s Mill [if you haven’t already done so?].
https://ia902500.us.archive.org/24/items/hamlets-mill-an-essay-on-myth-and-the-frame-of-time-1969-giorgio-de-santillana-bookmarked/Hamlet%27s%20Mill%20-%20An%20Essay%20on%20the%20Myth%20%26%20The%20Frame%20Of%20Time%20-%20Giorgio%20de%20Santillana.pdf
Whilst most fail to grasp the cosmic symbolism of Christ and the Twelve Disciples, etc, even fewer notice, that the symbolism also reveals the correct heliocentric arrangement of the solar system!, – how many miss that one?
List of Sun Gods before Jesus Christ who share some similar stories and attributes:
Horus/Ra of Egypt
Mithra of Persia
Krishna of India
Amaterasu of Japan
Apollo of Greece
Quetzalcoatl of Mesoamerica
Sol of Rome
Surya of India
Helios of Greece
List of Gods born on December 25th:
HORUS
An Ethiopian-Sudanese/Egyptian God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 3,000 YEARS before Jesus. Resurrected after death.
KRISHNA
An Indian God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 900 YEARS before Jesus.
ZARATHUSTRA
An Iranian God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 1,000 YEARS before Jesus.
HERCULES
A Greek God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 800 YEARS before Jesus.
MITHRA
A Persian God, born 25th December, by a Virgin- 600 YEARS before Jesus. Resurrected after death.
DIONYSUS
A Greek God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 500 YEARS before Jesus.
THAMMUZ
A Babylonian God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 400 YEARS before Jesus.
HERMES
A Greek God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 200 YEARS before Jesus.
ADONIS
A Phoenician God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 200 YEARS before Jesus.
JESUS CHRIST
A Roman God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 300 AD.
FYI: Dec. 25 is a celebration for the Roman festival of the SUN.
Almost all of these Gods were often depicted with a sun-like halo above their heads, and their day of worship is on a SUNday.
Sun halo signifies enLightened consciousness (illumination).
“I am the Light of the world.” – Jesus Christ
Christ was also called “The Bright and Morning Star.”
Sun = Star
Christ’s birth was also associated with the star of Bethlehem, and he was visited by the three kings which is symbolical for the Orion star constellation. His entire story is filled with astrological symbology.
“The story of Christ and his 12 disciples is a parody of the sun and the 12 signs of the Zodiac. Everything told of Christ has reference to the sun. His reported resurrection is at sunrise, and that on the first day of the week; that is, on the day anciently dedicated to the sun, which was called sunday.” – Thomas Paine
Dr, Stellarium is a beautiful tool and is FREEly available
Well said J,
I can’t remember the Greek text off hand, but during a discussion with one of the Egyptian priests, the priest told the Greek student that the origins of their race commenced at the time – ‘when the Sun rose, where it now sets.’
This of course, refers to the horizontal motion of precession and indicates a time scale of twelve thousand years previous to their discussion.
When you delve into this material, with a corresponding understanding of the ancients world view, one soon discovers that such evidence soon becomes overwhelming.
It’s also worth remembering, that one of the Chinese emperors (Huangdi ?) ordered the confiscation and destruction of every ancient text in China. Due to this imperial edict, only a handful of truly ancient bamboo scrolls remain.
In order to understand those ancient texts and myths, one needs to understand the horizontal, and the lesser known vertical mechanics of precession. Only then, can the ancients communicate with their contemporary audience.
To do this, you need to download the appropriate astronomical software, such as Stellarium [which is what I use]. With this, one can then go anywhere in the World, such as Giza, Tiahuanaco, etc, and go back to any point in time, and see precisely how the heavens appeared at that particular time and place.
If you choose to do this, and need any help with it, – just ask, as there’s a special knack to rotating the heavens back in time beyond the B.C. mark.
I did some groundbreaking research some years back, mostly inspired by something Hancock wrote, which I decided to take up, – so I’m familiar with how it all works.
I’m very glad I did, as I made some phenomenal discoveries, but It’s knowing when to stop that’s the problem!
I think stories are written by the people who experienced it. The Aboriginals as well as other ancient peoples handed down their stories to others over hundreds of generations and left pictographs and carvings about their lives and of the solar system (Gobekli Tepe to name just one). Then science comes along and declares it is all legend and myth and put their own stamp on it because they don’t understand it. It has been suggested now (and believably so) that the Great Pyramid was a power conductor for electricity and that ancient cities had free energy.
To say that there have been no other more advanced civilizations is hypocritical.. they cannot even rebuild any of the ancient buildings with all their engineering know how today. Ancients knew the movements of the planets and knew pluto existed long before it was even discovered. They also knew more about medicine which was handed down from very ancient times. Hippocrates stated circa 400 BCE that his wisdom was received from a medical authority, that even in his time, was already “ancient”.
There is truth in the legends and myths, people would not write them down if they didn’t happen because they wrote and drew what they saw. The Graham Hancock series Ancient Apocalypse is worth a look.
Although too American for my liking, this guy offers a quick intro into the Grand Canyon issue. The government’s naming of the zones using Egyptian Temple names is interesting.
Yes, although Kincaid’s diary is said to be a hoax, this precise region of the Grand Canyon is curiously ‘out of bounds.’
At the top of this location, the Government has placed large, and seemingly meaningless concrete covers, which are obviously concealing something.
Any one who enters this zone is immediately buzzed by planes, that fly into the canyon below surface level, which is against the law: except for them of course.
Something going on there for sure.
The ancient Egyptians clearly understood the precession of the equinoxes and navigated by the pole star. They also left artifacts in the Grand Canyon of Arizona in the US.
And they left hand prints in the canyons of the American Southwest. I think this was a universal greeting among human nations – to display the hand with five digits. In the Americas, the Mongolian people who migrated into those lands were at war with a non-human race which the Bible calls : Rephaim, a remnant of the giant race which once built a global civilisation in the ante-Deluvian world. They had 6 fingers on each hand and 6 toes on each foot and are clearly depicted as being at war with Mongolian tribes in the petroglyphs of the latter.
https://www.kon-tiki.no/expeditions/ra-expeditions/
xyz47 said – “The current lords that be think we are the most advanced civilization ever…”
… as do most of their clueless minions living their clueless lives.
Even the Christian tradition acknowledges a lost history – “In those days, there were giants…” Anne Catherine Emerich went back in time and saw them – she said that next to those giants, a human appeared as a grasshopper.
It seems to me that many of the legends of old had some basis in fact. Pick your culture, there’s many a riveting tale to be told, with a curious coherence spanning the lot.
As an aside, I’ve long been puzzled how humanity could have survived alongside dinosaurs and dragons, let alone cyclops and giants. But humans of old were allegedly superhuman compared to the current rabble, and we have no knowledge of their tools and methods.
Sadly, despite the growing capacity for destruction, IMO humanity has reduced itself to a gang of dimwitted schoolyard brats, and the world today is just a misshapened shadow of its former self.
Indeed, the biological ancestors of the Tarim Basin mummies were displaced by the Han Chinese only as recently as ca. 200 B.C.. These were formerly known as the Yuezhi (Tokharians) consisting of the Lesser Yeuzhi which relocated south into Tibet, and the Greater Yeuzhi, which retreated west into the Western Oases.
Having taken over Alexander’s Eastern Greek Empire, the Greater Yeuzhi then transformed into the Kushans, and their newly founded Kushan Empire.
Most of the ‘Turkic stock’ Uighurs arrived in the Western Oases after the Yeuzhi has vacated the region in ca. 120 B.C. Hence their current features are a Turko-Mongol admixture.
The Yeuzhi were Caucasian just like their ancient mummified ancestors, as later Kushan sculptures and paintings confirm.
The real history books of these people, as written by their descendants, are extremely rare and little known, but I do have one such book. Thankfully preserved prior to Chinese Cultural Revolution.
These books are verifiable treasuries of the region’s extremely ancient and little known histories. Even to this day, their descendants are perceived as heretics by the dominant Buddhist theologians.
Dig deep and ye shall be rewarded.
Pat from Vic… Our whole history has been a lie, everything has been changed – its hard to even find any books in the library now on ancient history.
There are some good sites though like Stolen History that show what has been before and is now covered up..Also Tartaria.. Archaeology is much the same as most sciences now, they do not debate but hold a certain viewpoint and all stick together and anyone who bucks their narrative is called a liar and an idiot… Graham Hancock is one of those who is not afraid to question the accepted views, and they hate him.
The current lords that be think we are the most advanced civilization ever.. they are very wrong.. there have been many before us who all fell by the wayside because their egos got too big and money and power became their God.
The CCP pushes this ‘first in time, first in right’ principle in terms of sovereignty. They have made this a cornerstone of UNDRIP and their fourth political position.
This principle is also found in Westminster jurisprudence and it is applied to property under Chancery Law.
The CCP opines that the Han people were first in time (indigenous), that is why they have made the White pyramids of Xinjiang ‘no go’ areas and forbid any discussion of the Tarim Basin mummies and grave goods. These mummies are clearly of Caucasian race and probably ancestors of the Uyghurs who are presently gulagged and providing organs for China’s lucrative organ harvesting industry. The Uighurs are Muslim so in the sale of organs to the Muslim elites, they are halal.
Pyramids in China?
Editor, cairnsnews said – “Since no one had ever seen the earth was round until modern space travel…”
… still haven’t.
Just saying.
judith gange said – “This historical information appears to go against the claims by the First Nation People…”
… indeed, imagine the cultural shock and dissonance which would ensue if the truth dawned on all those poor schmucks out there that everything they believed about their history was one big fat collection of fanciful LIES.
Imagine the pushback and political machinations by all the naysayers and contingent academics and agenda-pushers and vested interests on the gravy train, let alone the distress of all those people whose cherished heritage and historic roots evaporated in an instant.
That applies to most ALL of us, BTW, and not just our Aboriginal brothers and sisters.
Oldavid said – ” “A thing that does not exist cannot cause itself to exist”.”
And yet, if by its absence it provokes thoughts of its presence, then it has been conjured into existence – if thoughts are really “things”, that is.
Of course, you’re still correct – the “thing” was the object and not the agency of its own creation.
Hence for creation to occur – even of time and space itself – by necessity there must be an original agency. It does all elicit musings of the Word.
BTW, you have my wholehearted agreement – Evolution is a scam, a fake religion, founded on nothing more than blind faith and wishful thinking. Sure, the idea of “natural selection” may play some minor niche part in the cacophony of Nature, but it has absolutely no hope of legitimately explaining the abundance and diversity and exquisite intelligence and adaptability of the natural world.
Ditto the intellectually vacuuous “Big Bang Theory”, a veritable exercise in cerebral myopia and academic dogma, yet one more prodigious edifice supporting a stupendous faux scientific superstructure while itself being founded on thin air, floating in the very space that embodies its religious belief system – beliefs which the Scientific Method emphatically DISPROVED long ago (and yet, somehow, it still lives on).
Maybe there’s some genuine science going down on Mars.
And it is the same story over in New Zealand. The earth was circumnavigated also by the ancient Persians it would seem (the Biblical Elimites – a people descended from Shem).
New Zealand Skeletons in the Cupboard Episode 1 The Red Heads
I’m a bit more than 70 odd years old and in my childhood about a third of the children in my earliest school days were “abos”. We always knew that we were different but we got along very well knowing that some of us were “wadyella” (white fella) and some of us were “blekyella” (black fella). Not much problem in the classroom or playground.
Not so in the streets. The “enlightened” ones that inhabited the State School only about 400 yards away harangued us as “nigger lovers” and other more pointedly anti-Catholic epithets.
Now, even though all the people with some aboriginal heritage at that time chose to send their children to the Catholic school and not the State School only a couple of minutes walk away must tell you something. Perhaps that pompous pomminess is not the one way to utopia.
Terry Schulz should know better. I know a old man who was reared amongst central Western Australian Aboriginal people. He implicitly understands the ” first nations communist scam”.
A few decades ago he listened as a old elder who was head man of one of the really wild natives and rather drunk, spilling the beans about the Anthropologist “dream time myth rubbish”.
This old elder told of a much more recent advent of the indigenous settlement of Australia. He said they were expelled from South India for cannibalism and human sacrifice to the Rainbow Serpent (Satan).
He was drunk, so my friend set up another elder and after getting him very angry confronted him with the expulsion from South India only in the last centuries story and that all the Dream Time rubbish was made up to cloud the truth and entertain the women and kids.
This old elder who was very sober blurted out ” how did you know about that”. Then realising that he had confirmed what the drunk elder had revealed he abruptly left. Till the day he died he never approached or spoke to the man I know.
The 800 to 1000 year for their occupation would be quite likely correct. And that they killed and ate the real ” first nation” people has lots of factual evidence for anyone not totally conned into the Marxist/ Jesuit narrative.
Orrite, I sneaked one past the “wordpressgang” trying to “wordpress” the narrative into the “acceptable” by the new age ideology of inevitable “progress” of a primordial “Nothing” turning itself into a proposed “Everything”.
Think about it! It’s rooly, rooly, stupud!
I dunno how some of you galahs were formed but there’s no reasonable denying that an effect is not greater than its cause. “A thing that does not exist cannot cause itself to exist”. Of course it’s obvious but all relativistic perverts simply assume that it’s a fact of “Evolution”.
The perverse doctrines of “Evolution” assume that Time is the ultimate creator that can do what never, ever occurs in the real World.
Hi Old David WordPress can’t blank anyone off. Try your server. Editor
Well said, Usaac 731.
However, it is evident from all the historical records available that those who “will be as gods knowing good and evil” are entirely impervious to mere observable facts of life.
Just do the sums! If just two couples had landed here only 4000 years ago the island continent would have been full of people… unless they ate each other instead of fulfilling the Divine mandate to “fill the Earth and subdue it”.
I’ve more to say but I fear that “wordpress” has got me blanked off.
Pretty much correct. Just do some calculations: If population doubles every 50 years as it has 1950-2000 (actually 2.5b to 6b). Let’s halve that and say it doubles every 100 years. That means doubling 40 times since 2000BC, the time of the Babel dispersion. Let’s allow for some disasters and say it doubled 32 times.
Open up the Windows Calculator program, select Programmer mode, Decimal and enter 2 (or binary mode and enter 10). Change to binary mode and shift left, then enter 100000 (32 in decimal) and =. Convert the result back to decimal and you should get 8,589,934,592.
Hey, that’s our population today. If the the Babel dispersion was about 2000BC, aborigines could have arrived no earlier that that. Their population on arrival of Europeans was estimated at about 500,000, a population that would have been achieved in 2,200 years, 1,000,000 in 2,400 years.
If they’d been here for 48,000 years, that’s 480 doubles, wow, barring the odd peaceful boomerang and spear war, there would be no standing room. We’ve all been had folks, fed myths all these years starting with the theory of evolution.
Cheers; I appreciate your reply. Ray
Hi Ray/Terry we very much doubt a passing Egyptian or more correctly Libyan sailor would have the tools or inclination or ability to sit there for many months to create these carefully crafted glyphs.
Close analysis of the incisions clearly shows a degree of silica patinate in the Sydney sandstone which can only occur after being exposed for millennium. We are not relying on the centuries old British/US archaeological dogma espoused and funded by Old family oligarchs reinventing the origins of blackfellas and their intended separate nation state allowing for exploitation of natural resources.
The local blackfellas told me 25 years ago nearby Lion Island a long time ago, had a lion’s head sarcophagus, a part of which can still be seen. They said none of it was their work or did they ever possess the stone-carving ability. The sarcophagus has eroded over millennia just like the partial overhang that existed at the Phoenician gallery on the mainland near the mouth of the Hawkesbury River adding a metre or more to the floor depth, hence the subterranean wall sculptures. We won’t engage in any more analysis of this site because as far as we, and other archaeological investigators are concerned the site, when correlated to the historical, authenticated data of an eastern Australian seaboard expedition circa 231BC is genuine.Editor
Hi Ray we very much doubt a passing Egyptian or more correctly Libyan sailor would have the tools or inclination or ability to sit there for many months to create these carefully crafted glyphs.
Close analysis of the incisions clearly shows a degree of silica patinate in the Sydney sandstone which can only occur after being exposed for millennium. We are not relying on the centuries old British/US archaeological dogma espoused and funded by Old family oligarchs reinventing the origins of blackfellas and their intended separate nation state allowing for exploitation of natural resources.
The local blackfellas told me 25 years ago nearby Lion Island a long time ago, had a lion’s head sarcophagus, a part of which can still be seen. They said none of it was their work or did they ever possess the stone-carving ability. The sarcophagus has eroded over millennia just like the partial overhang that existed at the Phoenician gallery on the mainland near the mouth of the Hawkesbury River adding a metre or more to the floor depth, hence the subterranean wall sculptures. We won’t engage in any more analysis of this site because as far as we, and other archaeological investigators are concerned the site, when correlated to the historical, authenticated data of an eastern Australian seaboard expedition circa 231BC is genuine.Editor
I suggest anyone ‘on the fence’ as to whether the carvings are legit needs to see them firsthand. Take a lunch with you and you can sit up on the rocks with a view while you eat.
Same site Terry but your argument is lost to contemporary experts not influenced by academic dogma enforcing the century-old, British/US sponsored blackfella line.Editor
Are we talking about the same site? The picture of ‘Anubus’ in the article is from the site I visited. The site I visited was never covered by a sandstone precipice, it was always open to the elements. You walk down between two rocks with the petroglyphs carved on each side. The site I visited is on the central coast in NSW, near Gosford as I recall.
Sorry; forgot to mention that the ‘Egyptian glyph site’ overlooks LION ISLAND, with Palm Beach behind in the distance. Guess what the Sphinx [in Egypt] was before a ‘me, me, me, pharaoh had his smaller head-likeness carved on it?
My belief is that when the northern railway connection between Hornsby and Newcastle was put in place in the latter part of the 1800’s [crossing Hawkesbury River], maybe a bored tunnel [no pun intended] and cutting mason carved the glyphs which wasn’t far from the new line, on a weekend.
And guess what subject was VERY popular during that time period?
But who did the circles?
Like Terry; I have seen the carvings in the middle nineties; and I believe them to be more ‘modern’ made. If there was a rock overhang in the past that eroded away: where are the pieces? Or at least larger chunks or small boulders lying between the rock faces? The carvings look VERY amateurish in comparison to those found in Egypt. But then again they could have been made by a ‘just passing through sailor’ from Egypt way back.
Did you also see the many carved circles surrounding the site UNDER THE DETRITUS AND LEAVES? There are plenty of them if you look without destroying the surrounds [I believe the site is fenced off now]. No one ever mentions them!
Sorry Terry I have been there too with an Aboriginal rock art expert accredited by the DAIA and the late Dr Alan Roberts of Baulkham Hills. This site was originally covered by a sandstone precipice and had been protected from the elements for centuries. As sandstone exposed to the weather does, the overhangs eroded into time. Its existence fits into the dozens of other Egyptian sites along the Eastern coastline particularly the Freshwater site near Sarina which I have also visited.
Dr Roberts in 1995 had a an American Egyptologist colleague translate the myriad petroglyphs which were closely analysed by the rock art expert. The glyphs were carved many centuries ago and certainly not as you described. There has been no artisan for 2000 years who could duplicated the Egyptian or Phoenician methodology of these glyphs. Dr Roberts and others also found much other evidence in the area around the site. Did you not read the balance of the article? Editor
“An extensive gallery of Egyptian sandstone petroglyphs accidentally found several years ago in NSW, and dated at least 232 BC” – I’ve been to this site, it is a hoax. Apparently, it was carved up during a summer by some college students. Crikey, the very clear petroglyphs were carved in soft sandstone that is exposed to the elements. They would not have lasted 100 years given the medium they are carved into and the rain on them.
Someone recorded the gallery contents and took them to someone that understood Egyptian hieroglyphics and were told that the ‘writings’ were complete gibberish. Just random Egyptian signs strung together to look good.
Ah! The subtle kid-gloved fist of censorship. Curiously, the following comments do not offer any opportunity for reply.
Now look, mr edfella, the poor, wretched boongs and the purple haired, masked misfits of ANTIFA with their faces full of metal and plastic are the victims of the real enemy that farksemup with unreal expectations of who and what they are via perverts who control the media, politics, and “law”.
Now, I’m not an apologist for disorientated idiots who seek to destroy our society… If they are criminals they should be deported/exiled or executed by firing squad … but only after the secretive criminals in high places who enable them are disposed of by firing squad.
What I’m saying is that the real enemy is not defined by his skin colour or ethnicity… the real enemy of all of us is the Globalist, ethno-narcissist who’d like us to exhaust ourselves fighting amongst ourselves. The guts of it is that criminals and traitors are not determined by lowly status or ethnicity. Usually by the opposite. Judaeo-Masonic lackeys almost always command the narrative to further their secretive agendagenda.
Something really strange is going on here. Part of my comment vanishes.
Agree David we should be united but I hate tags.Ed
You clearly don’t understand what I said. “Wadyella” and “blekyella” are nothing more than phonetic representations of what we called each other without any particular malice intended.
The “smart part of the World” seems to be a silly sycophant of “British Israelite” narcissism that tries to distract attention from the establishment secretocracy (which is the real enemy of all of us “blek’n’wite”) and to goad us into fighting amongst ourselves. Everyone except the oligarchs loose.
Look, Mr Ed, everyone in the World should be united against the common enemy that manipulates politics, media and unlawful “laws”.
In our part of the world, the smart part of Australia, there are blackfellas and whitefellas-nothing more and nothing less. As yet we haven’t been subjected to 30 years of Marxist, Fascist government conditioning which emanates from Victoria.Ed
The evidence that we’re being systematically conned by a perverse ideology is plentiful and convincing, but where are the men who will defend their own?
Most are shit scared to even question the “official narrative” let alone even think about any opposition.
Look, the enemy is not boongs or abos or whatever you call them in your part of the world; they are just poor people who are too indolent to be revolutionaries (much to the disgust of “enlightened” agitators) the real enemy is the smarmy secretocracy that perverts, politicians, lawyers, journalists, “educators” and the like serve.
If there are not a minimum number of “just men” (courage is of justice) to stand up and defend nation and culture (father and mother and, by extension, their children’s patrimony) we’re farkt.
Yeee-ikes. How to colonise a country and still act like a victim
Yes Des we examined this area 14 years ago too around Freshwater Point.Ed
This historical information appears to go against the claims by the First Nation People..and no wonder it is not elaborated upon “ownership ” What a MESS
We have had the pleasure of being taken to see the evidence of early Phoenician occupation in areas around Sarina some years ago. A resident of Armstrong’s beach had lots of samples of petroglyphs collected from these areas which were definitely authentic and his knowledge of the previous occupation and activities derived from his discoveries was remarkable.