By Lyndesy Symonds
Whereas the people of New South Wales, Victoria [esp Victoria], South Australia, Queensland and Tasmania [also Western Australia and Northern Territory] humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God do need a Constitutional determination. All persons living under this federation are included in the Commonwealth of Australia and are constituted as Australians.
The jurisprudence of the 1901 has been continuously under threat from the agencies and assets of the Communist Revolution throughout the 20th and now the 21st centuries to the extent that all branches of government are now subverted and operating in Yuri Bezmenov’s Stage Four of subversion: New Normal. This turns out to be the standard issue Communist genocide whether it is the class, tribal or in this case national ‘enemies’ ie ‘us’.
To amend the 1901 with a view to configuring our jurisprudence to the United [Communist] Nations through UNDRIP will work to extinguish the jurisprudence of the Commonwealth of Australia. If we as Australians are ever to restore our foundation, we must retain the Constitutional foundation.
This Voice amendment is about governance and configuration of Australian jurisprudence to the United [Communist] Nations.
The Aboriginal people as a specific demographic of Australians are recognized by the Australian High Court as a source of law, they have their own Ministry in Parliament, representation, franchise, corporate structure, land councils and a taxpayer subsidized industry. They have a Voice because they belong and are included in the Commonwealth of Australia.
i don’t put up with fools, liars or misinformation spreaders; Nor should i, particularly when they attack my integrity and name;
In every battle there are always dissidents who want to do things their own way despite willingly putting the entire battalion in grave danger;
Articles Of War declare they must be de-armed and removed from the Battalion
People people people, have care, were I the “elites”, my response to the discussion going on here would be, “goody goody, it’s working, they are starting to fight each other rather than me, so now I can continue with my process”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sir, My own 2 cents worth on the current debate on the Voice and our so called first nations people .I realise we depended on the science for the so called pandemic in the last few years, do we not have science that others,, were here many years before the so called first nation peoples who are claiming to be the original peoples, those claiming first nation status on TV appear to have more Caucasuian blood and facial features. It is a bit like the Coconut tree. The Council s in North Qld. cut them down as an invader, yet a fossilled Coconut has been found to be 3000 years old.
Ph. 0429395799 8 kippin Rd Arriga
Further it is you who is attacking the player and not the ball;
I rebuked your claims; I dismantled the purported facts that you presented on a public forum;
If you keep spewing untruths, then it is my right to dispute what you claim to be true;
Strange thing is, you never come back at i with ANY evidence that refutes the claims i have made;
Perhaps this is because you are not as “rude” as i
“@won’tbedenied. As usual : accusatory, ignorant and rude. You are trolling this messageboard”
Ah, spoken just like a true Shill using the first rule of propaganda; Blame others for what you yourself are doing;
Accusatory?; Yep; I will always call a spade a spade BUT i base my accusations on what i know to be true and evidential;
ignorant?; Hardly; if i were ignorant i would not see through the BS you sprout as truths; if i were ignorant, i would not bother with outing you;
rude?; Well i guess i must be seeing as i don’t agree with you and call you out; It is after-all, very rude for a “guest” to call out his host on a given topic;
Sorry that i did not get the memo that you are the doyen of all things wise….
How very rude of i
@won’tbedenied. As usual : accusatory, ignorant and rude. You are trolling this messageboard. Eire fought a 700 year war of independence against England.
More words with no substance…..
The Crown is NOT from The Monarch…are you deliberately trying to sway facts? I guess you must be as you seem to have some intelligence;
The Monarch represents The Crown, not vice’ versa; [A] Monarchs Coronation is taken under [a] Crown and an Oath sworn to The Crown; Then that “Monarch” is ordained to be the holder of The Crown;
Who is one Ordained by and who does He represent?;
You seem unable to Comprehend where Our Federation came from and what Line Of Authority it was established under;
Just because Our Parliamentary System of Government was based on Westminster, does not give Westminster Authority to Govern; Nor has it ever been claimed as such; Same as your precious (murderous/usurping) St.Edwards Crown..it has No Lawful Line Of Authority to The (de jure) Commonwealth Of Australia;
No wonder then that The Irish fought tooth and nail against your church; Lies built upon Lies…just as The Jews controlling the Vatican planned it to be;
This has Nothing to do with British Monarchs but rather [a] Blessing Under God;
Religious Zealots are not needed……
And then you make a follow up statement that contradicts what you state previously;
Beffudled much? Make up your mind as to which side you are on; At the moment it looks like you are in on an each way bet which demonstrates to i EXACTLY who you are;
Not all of us are easily confused with long paragraphs, reciting dates and reeling off cut and pasted statements;
All too True jo BUT we have to start again from somewhere with a Lawful standing;
Perhaps this time Whereas The People can stand in Law and Stay At Law and state this via National referendum into The 1901 exactly this as being Indissoluble;
Otherwise, what is it that we will argue against The Corporation? Where will We The People claim Authority if we have No Lawful document to present as evidence?;
@won’tbedenied. The Owners of the City of London Corporation and the consols of the Bank of England are the Princes (and their descendants) of the Great Synagogue of Mulheim an der Ruhr. The Vatican is owned by the same dynastic trust and its central banking cartel.
The foundation of Westminster, its jurisprudential expression in the Magna Carta, the institution of the House of Commons in the Parliament etc all predate the Reformation in England. These institutions of England were laid down and created when England was part of the Holy Roman Empire of the West. Centuries of religious wars in England and Scotland did not destroy the foundation of this jurisprudence or remove it. But the Oath of Supremacy, Act of Supremacy, Civil War 1642 over the Supremacy (monarchy vs parliament) and the War of the Succession to settle the Parliamentarian debt to the Synagogue did weaken the strength of Westminster as its jurisprudence has been steadily eroded in the UK since 1688.
Yet, Australia’s 1901 stands solidly in the best traditions of Westminster, the Magna Carta and also Scotland’s Declaration of Arbroath. The High Court recognizes the 1901 as a source of law in Australia. And that source of law states of the sovereignty that it “rests with the people”.
This is what we have to hang onto.
The Voice wants to trick the Aboriginal people into giving up their position and recognition in that sovereignty as the High Court also recognizes them as a source of law.
When a soup is spoiled, what can be done apart from throwing it out? Picking out a smelly bone with rotten flesh and start a new soup with other ingredients just results into the very same. Going back to 1901 or any other crown/com on wealth related “bones” will have the very same effect.
You speak many fine words but you are NOT addressing the FOUNDATION in the room;
There has NEVER been a consecrated OR Lawful succession to the St.Edwards Crown in THIS Commonwealth; George VI murdered his own flesh and blood Brother to see to it that the St.Edwards (catholic, Vatican) Crown had a way of being held High on this land;
Just because The Crown was usurped by Bankers (Jews) and The City Of London (The Vatican) does NOT make it Lawfully so;
I have to wonder which side it is that you are truly on…..One CAN-NOT serve Two Masters; You (allegedly) want a return of The Commonwealth of Australia and yet you argue against the very Foundation of it;
What is SET-in-STONE cannot be cast aside
Lindesymonds said “There is no political solution within the current status quo of corporate entities impersonating the government of the Commonwealth of Australia.” I agree. But not because I’m a catholic. In fact I’m a Protestant, but I always read with interest Lindesymonds editorials and comments. Lindesymonds is looking to the ‘revived Catholic Church’ for the answer to our worries. I instead am looking to a revived Anglo-Saxon nations (the true Israel) and Jesus Christ the true King of the Davidonic throne in Britain and who will destroy the counterfiets as His Stone Kingdom is finally revealed and the Replacement Theology where the Catholic church replaced the nations of Israel by applying the promises to Israel to the church,will be put to shame. http://www.britishisrael.co.uk/ For more information firstname.lastname@example.org
LikeLiked by 1 person
@won’tbedenied. Since the War of the Succession 1688-1746, ‘The Crown’ is not the British monarchy, The Crown is the Owners of the consols of the Bank of England – all estates in allodial or udal title. You can have all the Protestant succession you want in the figurehead monarchy, but it is the Judaic imperium of the Corporation of the City of London which rules
The UK is an even bigger legal fiction than terra nullius.
This is because the foundations of Westminster jurisprudence remain from time of St. Edward the Confessor and even at the end of the Union of the Two Crowns , those foundations hold and carry over into the 1901 and will serve us well.
David. You caught my attention with the start of your discourse; and you have put together an outline that is hard to deny. Let those who have ears, hear.
DJT can play a great game of chess!
So the RC Church has the answers hey lindesymonds?
The same Church that gets its orders from The Vatican, hides known pedophiles and denies any responsibility for harms caused to stolen generations of children from the UK and Indigenious of Australia….
All is else you state is well and truly on track BUT the Federation Of this Commonwealth was founded under the Imperial Protestant Crown of Queen Victoria;
To attempt proclaiming a “King” under The Vatican is absurd and could be considered a Crime against The Crown once (1901) Constitutional Australian Government is restored to this land…..and it WILL be restored
@obviousbob. You raise an important point. The permanent, world-wide Revolution in its Communist phase has imposed upon Australia certain conditions that are well documented and discussed on CN. And these conditions – like a standard issue Communist genocide of the CoVID vaxx -will give rise to Australian solutions.
Believe me, the Australians are perfectly capable of Australian solutions.
Before these can be organised and implemented, howeve, people must have a clear understanding of what these conditions are. Today, most of the people in my immediate circle think the conditions which they find objectionable are due to CoVID, corporate land grabs and even climate change. And they look to corporate political parties to make the alliances to win government and implement solutions which they imagine to be political.
I think this political analysis is wrong: historically, nationally, politically and economically. That is why I correspond with CN, taking time out from the website (on which I work for the traditional Roman Catholic home school community of the Anglosphere nations).
As a Catholic I think the solution to the Communist Revolution and its emerging world soviet is the social kingship of Jesus Christ. Nations must again hail Him as Saviour and King, become baptised as nations and place the government of the nation state upon His kingdom order for all nations : the Catholic Church. This is the foundation of social order for the Western nations in law and government. The foundation of Westminster government, for example, was laid in the Abbey by St Edward the Confessor, King of England in AD 11th century. And in England this gave rise to so many institutions of law and liberty which served the baptised population of England so well: Parliamentary legislature, Magna Carta, for example, arose upon this foundation. Our 1902 stands in the tradition of Westminster upon great pillars like Magna Carta and Declaration of Arbroath.
That said, such a foundation must be a restored Church because like every other Western institution, the Church, has been infiltrated and its hierarchy overthrown by its enemies working for the Revolution. Its structures world-wide have been seized and instrumentalised for the organised forces of Anti-Christ. Or as our Lady put it most succinctly: “Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Anti-Christ. The Church will be in eclipse and the world in dismay.” And this prophetic statement (made at La Salette 1846) occurred during the Risorgimento when the Grand Orient Freemasonry financed by the Synagogue made war upon the Italian Peninsula to overthrow the principalities, city states and little kingdoms of traditional Italian government, unify the peninsula and throw a Jew Bank down on top of it. Our Lady’s statement, made specifically for our own time, was published under episcopal approbation and the Holy Father, Pope Leo XIII. Clearly she refers to the time when the hierarchy of the Church would be overthrown by the Revolution.
Our Lady’s choice of metaphor is exact. In the progress of the eclipse we see the sun devoured by the occulting object. At the totality it is completely hidden in the darkness, but its light reveals the occulting object absolutely.
And yes. I am aware that most readers of CN will not agree with the solution that I regard as solution to the Communist Revolution. They will want to argue: ‘it was ever thus’. Fine. World-wide events will occur that might just change their minds, events clearly stated in the Bible.
I think everyone who has some understanding of the issues documented and discussed on CN as a public fora must take stock of what his or her convictions are and get up every morning to live the resistance to the powers currently destroying the nation of Australia. Individual rules of engagement apply. In the course of this commitment to serve one’s fellow Australians in the ways presented, you will meet up with others of like mind will come along and so the resistance and movement will grow.
There is no political solution within the current status quo of corporate entities impersonating the government of the Commonwealth of Australia.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The one BIG question I have yet to see answered, or even asked, is, Why do we need a multi Million Dollar Referendum in order to change our Constitution, giving the Aboriginals a “Voice”, which they already have, when the people of Australia were given no say in our country becoming a Corporation, with the ensuing ‘New’ Constitution? Definitely more to this skullduggery than we are being told of.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We must vote “Yes” to the Voice because if we vote “No” we will delay the introduction of the One World Government. Only the One World Government can save us from “Climate Change” and other Extinction Level Events. The City of London, Israel, the Chinese Communist Party, the US Department of Defence and the Pentagon know what is best for their survival and our future. If we vote “No” Australia will be blamed for all sorts of catastrophies, plagues and pestilence that will fall upon us. Anyone who believes this narrative is part of the swamp. This will help you understand:
Click to access Outline%20of%20the%20Blueprint%20by%20Derek%20Johnson.pdf
Correction of typo, “democracy” should read “republic”. Apologies.
VOICE AMENDMENT IS ABOUT…
Nah. Beasley let the cat out of the bag way back in 1990 when in answer to a question in parliament, “The UN has granted the gov. ownership of all of Australian land, businesses, and private homes, once a democracy has been declared”.
There is the elephant in the room.
As I have said before, Lindesy-and never published in this tome, mind you-well and good for your comments and research, but where are the solutions?
If you are not solution-oriented, then why post?
Like a demented dog jealously guarding an ancient bone, many people just cannot grasp that there are two entities in the world today, those bent on enforcing the new elitist world order, which is actually a rebranded medieval, fuedalistic regime; and the other entity being those who oppose this.
The brain-necrosed dills still don’t get that the uniforms, citadels, and flags of Communism, the Vatican, the Jesuits, the Freemasons, the Tavistockians, the London School of Economics, the City of London, Basel Schweitzerlund, Wall Street, Club of Rome, Illuminati, Bilderbergers, UN, World Bank, IMF, News Corp, WHO, ILO, ALP, LNP, Greens, Australian Democrats, Trotskyites, and so many other fronts, are merely marketing ploys for the one central lobby… the Globalist elites.
Such stale perceptions dangerously complicate what is in fact a simple picture. It is them or us. Kill or be killed.
Everything else is an episode in the series. Likewise, the ‘Voice’ is just another ploy to place power in the hands of the easy-to-manipulate. All the participants in the architecture of the ‘Voice’ strategy are mediocre, self-deluding, and are cultural frauds who neither know nor care what the actual genuine Aboriginal people want or need.
Say NO to the destruction of the last remnant of democracy in Australia.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If the Voice were to go ahead one just needs to look across the Tasman and see how the Maoris have been given unprecedented power and control there through their “Treaty”. (eg 3 waters, etc) It all benefits the wealthy Maoris, not the ordinary, poorer majority.
Leighton Smith’s podcasts are a mine of information as to where we too could be heading.