Katter questions boys going to school wearing dresses

“In the yes-no ballot we were lied to. The law recognises no difference between man & woman or man & man. After a period of living together the law imposes all the rights & legalities of ‘marriage’ whether the word is ‘partner’ or ‘de facto’, in the eyes of the law you are ‘married’, whether you like it or not.

“We’ve been told people won’t be discriminated and won’t be punished – they’ve already been persecuted. The Catholic Bishop in Tasmania was charged under the discrimination act. All the legislative amendments in Parliament to protect religious freedom were voted down.

The real controversy here arose out of Victoria where boys were being made to go to school wearing dresses – a move which supposedly would enable them to be more ‘open minded’ about their sexual preferences.

“One thing for absolute certain is that up until 30 years ago, every single person on this planet, for the last 3.5million years, was the result of a heterosexual relationship and when you start putting into an impressionable young boy that he should be a girl’, then I’m not really surprised Australia has some of the highest juvenile male suicide rates in the world.

“For those promoting this behaviour, if you are successful, we Australians have the lowest birth rate on earth, in other words we are a vanishing race.  Come back in a hundred years time and we’ll be gone. When 20 Australians die, they are replaced by only 17 people. There cannot be a more definitive statement on a race of people than that they simply eliminate themselves from the gene pool.

“The health risks and a lot of this behaviour are high and they are real, and this happy clapper stuff out there is like the use of the word “gay”. It’s not real.

“I got Distinctions for English on an essay on Alexander Popes, a famous poem “And then Belinda smiled, and all the world was gay”. The word gay has been arrogated by the homosexual community. The dictionary defined ‘gay’ as beautiful, light, ethereal, attractive, happy. You’ve got to have a really high opinion of yourself describing yourself with those adjectives. Now they want to steal the word marriage. Marriage is a ceremony sanctifying the relationship between a man and a woman.

“I do not advocate anything else except friendship towards same sex couples, some of whom definitely have it as nature not nurture. My attitude towards such people is best exemplified in my History of Australia where I continuously quoted a person who I consider to be one of the wittiest communicators in the country.

“Finally, I saw the rally on the yes-no vote and I could not see a single person who was over 27 years of age. And I recall my days at Qld University when thousands of students were running around at demonstrations waving their Mao Tse-tung books. We now know he was responsible for 48 million deaths. One of the greatest monsters in history. How did my generation get it so wrong?

“We’ve spent the entire year in Parliament fooling around with the yes-no vote, it has no effect whatsoever legally. Wasted time and $122m. The rest of the year has been spent playing party games over ‘citizenship’ (‘let’s see if I can knock off more MPs than you can’). No wonder the vote of the Major Partys is down to the mid to low 30%.” Mr Katter said.

Advertisements

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understand the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head this year.

Posted on December 18, 2017, in ABC, Agenda 2030, australian Labor Party, big brother, Bob Brown. Tasmania, Centrelink, Corporate policy, Facebook, Federal Politics, Greens, Gun Control Australia, KAP, Katters Australia Party, Labor Party, LNP, political spin, Same Sex Marriage, Unions and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.

  1. Well like all thinkers WHO HAVE A BRAIN TO THINK..we should all be DISGUSTED with this SSM vote and the acceptance of MALES ALLOWED TO WEAR FEMALE CLOTHING!!
    And Vis Versa?
    The Moronic Government passing a law which has no merit….HAVE DONE WHAT THE NWO TOLD THEM WHAT TO DO!! This is planning in the NWO AGENDAS…to cause
    Chaos…Divide and Conquer..GEORGE SOROS and the Band of Evil Satanic Elite!
    Who listened?..No-One.Now they (SSM) have been identified ..the HITLER PROJECT will continue the practices of extermination ..fools are born one a minute….There is always a PRICE TO PAY!! We are living in very bad times where TREACHERY TYRANNY DECEPTION SATANISM
    As in the “DAYS OF NOAH”

  2. Dear Mr cairnsnews editor,

    I would like to help you comprehend the difference between the words People, persons and man/woman because the amendments to the marriage had little to do with the relationship being created because the same relationship could have been created by the couples of people them selves by a simple written agreement and with the Gov have nothing to do with it.

    The changes to the Commonwealth Marriage Act below.

    The bill amends the definition of “marriage” in the Act, omitting the words “man and a woman” and replacing it with the gender-neutral statement “2 people”

    New York Consolidated Laws, Business Corporation Law – BSC § 401. Incorporators

    One or more natural persons of the age of eighteen years or over may act as incorporators of a corporation to be formed under this chapter.

    What would you have created if two naturals person, one male and one female get married and consolidate and incorporate all of their property, real and personal into a corporate body, or in fact a corporation, a de-jure corporation. Is this not a marriage for the purposes of supporting a family with children, that is the purpose of incorporation.

    This then creates a corporate body that the State has no jurisdiction over as the persons would no longer be registered constituent members of the sovereign state of the commonwealth of Australia or one of its citizens.

    Blacks Law on Corporations.

    CORPORATION

    A “corporation” is more nearly a method than a thing, and the law, in dealing with a corporation, need not define it as a person or entity, or even as an embodiment of functions, rights, and duties.

    A corporation is a collection of natural persons, joined together by their voluntary action or by legal compulsion, by or under the authority of an act of the Legislature, or a real action of a natural person under common law and consisting either of a special charter or of a general permissive statute, to accomplish some purpose, pecuniary, ideal, or governmental, (self government) authorised by the charter or governing statute (or international law.)

    A corporation is a collection of natural persons, joined together by their voluntary action or under common law to accomplish some purpose, pecuniary, ideal, or self government under international law.

    The statement that a “corporation” is an artificial person or entity, apart from its members, is merely a description, in figurative language, of a corporation viewed as a collective body.

    Our private family corporation, TUDEHOPE FAMILY ESTATE is a collection of the personal property and rights of natural persons joined together by their voluntary action under the authority of the father and by his real action of incorporation as a natural person under common law and to accomplish the specific purpose of self government under private international law.

    You could consider that a MARRIAGE between me and my children but not for the purposes of the normal marriage but it is still a marriage for the purpose of getting out from under the jurisdiction of this fucked Roman Catholic civil law commonwealth government

    Blacks Law Edition 4

    A corporation is a collection of natural persons, joined together by their voluntary action or by legal compulsion, by or under the authority of an act of the Legislature, consisting either of a special charter or of a general permissive statute, to accomplish some purpose, pecuniary, ideal, or governmental, authorised by the charter or governing statute.

    A “corporation” is more nearly a method than a thing, and the law, in dealing with a corporation, need not define it as a person or entity, or even as an embodiment of functions, rights, and duties.

    New York Corporations Law BSC § 401. Incorporators

    One or more natural persons of the age of eighteen years or over may act as incorporators of a corporation to be formed under this chapter.

    Blacks Law Dictionary Ed 5

    Common-law marriage. One not solemnized in the ordinary

    way (i.e. non-ceremonial) but created by an

    agreement to marry, followed by cohabitation.

    A consummated agreement to marry, between persons

    legally capable of making marriage contract, per verba

    de praisenti, followed by cohabitation.

    Such marriage requires a positive mutual agreement, permanent

    and exclusive of all others, to enter into a marriage

    relationship, cohabitation sufficient to warrant

    a fulfillment of necessary relationship of man and

    wife, and an assumption of marital duties and obligations.

    Marshall v. State, Okl.Cr., 537 P.2d 423, 429.

    Such marriages are invalid in many states;

    Blacks Law Ed 4

    MARRIAGE. Marriage, as distinguished from

    the agreement to marry and from the act of becoming

    married, is the civil status, condition, or

    relation of one man and one woman united in law

    for life, for the discharge to each other and the

    community of the duties legally incumbent on

    those whose association is founded on the distinction

    of sex.

    Per verba de pnesenti lpar varb; diy prizentay I. Lat.

    By words of the present [tense]. A phrase applied to

    contracts of marriage.

    ________________________________

    • this whole agenda is about depopulation of the planet that’s why male sperm counts down some 90% to stop the natural progression of things to stop people from having kids.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s