By George Christensen
On 15 October, the Victorian Labor government promised to make abortions free.
Labor wants you to pay for every abortion in Victoria. The procedure, the pills, the scans, even the travel for women from the regions.Thirty million dollars of your money, so that the killing of a child in the womb costs the person doing it nothing at all.
And here’s the part that should make your blood boil.
Within hours, the leader of the Victorian Liberals, Jess Wilson, said she’d do the same.
The woman who wants to be Liberal Premier on 28 November looked at Labor’s taxpayer-funded abortion scheme and copied it. Same day. No debate. Not a word to the pro-life voters the Liberals have relied on for decades.
She even added that “there would be “no changes to abortion laws under a government I lead. Full stop.”
The Victorian Liberals have never been a pro-life party. But they were the only major party where a pro-life Victorian could still vote with any hope of being heard. In a single afternoon, Jess Wilson took that away.
Let me be blunt about what Labor’s scheme will do: It will see many more Victorian babies being killed in the womb.
When something is free, you get more of it. Labor’s plan makes abortion before 16 weeks free at the point of service. It pays for travel costs for women from the regions. It widens the window for state-funded chemical abortions.
Every one of those measures has one outcome: more dead babies, and your taxes paying for every one of them.
The Liberals’ Jess Wilson matched the core of it, no out-of-pocket costs up to 16 weeks. So whoever wins on 28 November, abortions in Victoria become free, and every Victorian who believes a child in the womb is a human life will be forced to fund it.
Your conscience, overruled by your own tax bill. And the party pro-life voters have been loyal to for decades signed up without blinking.
Now ask yourself one question.
What did either party promise the mother who wants to keep her baby?
Nothing new. Not one dollar.
Yes, Victoria has public maternity care. But the state’s own health advice admits pregnant women still pay out of pocket for GP visits, scans and tests. Then there’s rent. Then there’s the cot, the pram, the nappies. Then there’s a landlord who doesn’t want a baby in the flat.
For a woman who is scared, broke and alone, both major parties have now made one path free and left every cost on the other. That isn’t choice. That’s a thumb on the scale, pressing down on the side of death.
Melbourne’s Archbishop, Peter Comensoli, said as much in the Herald Sun last month. He asked a simple question: if the government will pay for everything to end a pregnancy, will it pay the same to help a woman continue one?
Neither party has answered him. The Liberal leader didn’t even wait for the question to be asked.
Add your name to our petition now: Demand the Liberals’ Jess Wilson scrap her free abortions pledge.
Here is what I’m asking the Victorian Liberal leader to do, and it’s not complicated.
Withdraw the pledge. Say publicly that a Liberal government will not spend taxpayers’ money making abortions free in Victoria. That’s it.
She doesn’t need a new policy. She needs to un-say one sentence she rushed out in a single afternoon to avoid a bad headline.
Here’s why this has to happen right now.
Victorians vote on 28 November. Liberal candidates are locking in their positions. Preference deals are being done. The Liberal copy of Labor’s scheme is currently costing the party nothing, because the Liberals are betting pro-life voters will grumble and then vote for them anyway.
I want to prove them wrong, and I need your signature to do it.
Here’s the plan. I’ll gather as many signatures as this petition can carry and deliver them to Jess Wilson’s office on Friday 13 November, fifteen days before the election. I’ll make sure every Liberal and National candidate in a marginal seat knows exactly how many pro-life Victorians signed, and that we’re watching how they respond.
That turns a free headline into an electoral problem for the Liberals. And it gives Jess Wilson an easy way out: withdraw it.
If she does, I’ll say so publicly. If she digs in, I’ll make sure every pro-life voter in Victoria knows it before polling day.
But picture what happens if you and I stay quiet.
Taxpayer-funded abortions become the settled position of both major parties. The next expansion gets sold as routine healthcare. And every Liberal strategist in the country learns the lesson: pro-life voters can be ignored at zero cost.
The delivery is on 13 November. The election is on 28 November. After that, your leverage is gone for four years.
Murder can only ever be defended on grounds of self defence. So all those born and unborn babies that might have “threatened” pr “attacked” the lives of someone or other are literally defenceless. Their lives are treated as forfeit and worthy of being terminated.
.
But killing the defenceless is a brutal and heartless exercise in butchery, albeit a mere matter of convenience or even profit for some. For others, it’s a quick and easy way of getting someone else to die for one’s own mistakes. The vulture of course considers it a source of sustenance for himself as well as a lucrative spare parts business.
On the other hand, more mature killers and murderers by contrast avoid being terminated and get “life” in prison (circa 20 years) because we find the DEATH PENALTY abhorrent.
.
Go figure why schizophrenia works for so many!!
Now, I’ll be honest with ya — it makes a fella wonder, doesn’t it? With a health system this creaky, is there a fortune in it? Snipping the wee ones and posting the parcels to some lab in Ukraine for a tidy margin? Makes you scratch yer head.
And that’s why the Blue-bellied Premier up in Queensland — Crisafulli — walked in and said “nah, we’re not havin’ a chat about this.” Banned the whole topic. Four years, no talk.
See, it’s not just Red and Blue flashin’ on the cop cars. Two colours in parliament, two sides, same old song and dance. And now we’ve got Orange in the mix. And what’s it all for, mate? Bread and circuses, that’s what. Keep the sheeple squabblin’ over which colour’s on top while the real business gets done in the back room with the old brown paper bags.
Birth control happens pre- conception.
What do you call it when you dismember a babies in eutero?
So it seems the Unaparty operates in Vic as well ….it appears the Libs singing like obedient sheep from the same globalist hymnal.
The values of the globalists seem to resemble a death cult, and if both “sides” of politics are run by the globalist Unaparty, then we should logically expect the same moral values, in varying degrees.
If you look at what appears to be globalist values, it’s LGB….alphabet, green nonsense, turning kids into opposite sexes via surgery ( often with parental agreement ), death, destruction, corruption and what appears to be a demented pursuit of global population reduction.
Once you sweep all their values into a pile, it’s better of used as fertilizer in the garden.
I don’t know why this is even being discussed. There is something called birth control. Available to all.
Millions around the world would be grateful for that. And yet we have it and prefer abortion!!
Plus the whole process of removing a foetus if it doesn’t harm the woman psychologically eventually, it will harm her body. Or has commonsense and humanity disappeared? No need to answer that.
Why should we be surprised. Both parties are complicit in the deaths and permanent injuries of hundreds of thousands of people. They imposed euthanasia laws on us. And now pledge free deaths of unborn babies!
These parties are parties of death and they’ve killed everything around them, including the economy.
This is a young woman, a political plant, in her first term and still wet behind the ears that’s also willing to give up the nurture and time she should be devoting to her own very young child rather than promising the death of everyone else’s. A young child needs their mother!
She has little to no experience in any real world job and born with a political silver spoon in her mouth. Somehow with this very little real world knowledge and experience she figures that she can fix a devastated state economy that took years for more experienced politicians than her to destroy. She is NOT QUALIFIED!
Meanwhile she is neglecting the very thing that her gender and body were made to do very well. That is to nurture her own child. The level of being blatantly out of touch with the real world has just reached astronomical heights.
If the liberals had bothered to do a poll they would have found that the public’s taste for abortion has changed drastically in recent years. Most people I know are dead set against it except for very extreme cases.
We will not be voting for any party that promotes killing babies.
You can’t expect women to want to keep the fetus when the living environment is how it is, all day and night the M$M regales us with disasters of all sizes, and threats of every kind. Nobody in their 20’s can buy a house unless it’s bought for them. The baby if born is threatened with massive quantities of forced injections, and sneaky injections where the injectors sneak up on kids at school where they can’t run away. Nobody wants their kid to get side effects from that, and most people don’t want their kid to be brainwashed into going transgender. If the government was interested in having more babies ( they’re not ), they would introduce income splitting and fixed rate mortgages at a reasonable price, and give full access to superannuation for buying a house. But the government prefers to import the labour at working age. The government wants the women to go back to work and pay tax, and dump the kids in childcare. The government ministry, which we must recall is a bunch of individuals with not much life-experience outside the ALP, wants to re-invent society and bring on the “Brave New World” of their Fabian masters.
Governments are there to provide services, only, and not to run your life. And they are reneging on that service delivery everywhere you look-the roads ($64 billion in fuel excise the last four years has seemingly disappeared, judging by the well-reported dilapidated stat of the nation’s roads;
-health care, nationally, is a fiasco; aged care is just a money-spinning racket;
-homelessness is rife, and a seemingly orchestrated problem given that hundreds of thousands of what can only becalled economic migrants have swallowed up available housing all over Australia and been shoe-horned into jobs that should go to Aussies (a constant 7100 official unemployed here in Geelong, with likely three times that number being the fact, as someone who is allegedly employed, by the usual definition, is someone who works one or two hours per week!); skills shortages, despite the fact that billions have been spent of the Job Network program over the last twenty five years-plus, and with TAFE colleges seriously underfunded all that time;
-cost of living pressures a direct fault of government, you might think? Yet local councils will not drop their rates, and will also not-I have head of only one, secured by a fellow advocate in Melbourne, for an old Greek friend he knows=-grant fee waivers despite the exiting of industry from Australia on a massive scale (witness Ford’s departure from Geelong, along with Alcoa, Winchester, and a few others
If you tap this site you will see the extraordinary amounts of money flowing through local government:
https://www.councilwatch.com.au/investigations
The ALGA in 2018 said, on their website, that the total take that year-and they were seeking a referendum for Constitutional recognition of local government that year, but packed it in-for all local councils in Australia was $17.4 billion.
For “what councils really are” see this:
https://rumble.com/v6sr8t5-australian-councils.-who-and-what-are-they-really.html
-and know that they are all signed up to UNESCO, as the former Mayor of Geelong stated
In a statement Mr. Sullivan said (26 July 2023): “As Mayor, I am deeply committed to upholding our obligations to UNESCO and Korea, both of which bring great economic and cultural benefit to Greater Geelong. We will continue to work on clever and creative ways to bring the world to Geelong.”
Those obligations would be contractual, as I asked Council that and they did not reply.
Further to that, I asked how these contracts came to be made and why the express knowledge and approval of the constituency was not sought in the process of making that contract?