A RECORDING seized by police may be the evidence that clears five Sydney Swans players of hysterical “trial-by-media” accusations of “sexual assault” that has been used to fuel the establishment Left’s social media censorship campaign.
According to vlogger and law professor Joanna Howe, the media has now gone quiet after carrying out “one of the most intense, unjust and finely orchestrated character assassinations in recent Australian history”.
Cairns News would suggest it’s a shining example of a psychological operation involving the demonisation of five young white men for the causes of “women’s sexual rights” and social media censorship by the “global progressive Left”.
The media uproar and blatant criminal allegations “coincided beautifully” with an appearance at the National Press Club of Australia in Canberra of Chanel Contos, the woke CEO of Teach Us Consent, who says children should openly talk sex in classrooms, that her future partner should pay her a salary and that Australian men are the most mysogynistic men in high income countries.
Contos was handed $3.5 million by the Albanese government for her organisation Teach Us Consent and is “closely advising” the government on its new so-called “digital duty of care” bill.
Her website is an exercise in Leftist hypocrisy and psychological manipulation – on one hand bleating about “consent” as some sort of high moral standard set against rampant “sexual assaults” while on the other promoting all manner of sexual licentiousness and perversions as “normal for kids”.
Speaking on her podcast Dr Howe said it appears that the tape is of a conversation after the alleged sexual assault, between the complainants, a trio of strippers hired by the five players for “entertainment” which included payments for slaps on their butts – needless to say, a stupid stunt for high-profile sportsmen to get themselves entangled in.
“They’re just pawns in this bigger ideological agenda to shut down social media and to indoctrinate our kids,” says Dr Howe.
Her husband James, put it more bluntly: “The club, Sydney Swans, have been perfectly happy to see five of their players branded rapists with no evidence that that’s what they are. They have just thrown them squarely under the bus to save their own woke arses.”
Victoria Police meanwhile, say it will take eight weeks to get an update on what seems from the outside to be a quite simple investigation. Come two months and the media will have almost forgotten about the entire incident they ran with screaming headlines for two weeks.
“Meanwhile, Riley Bice has been cleared, Nick Blakey wants to leave the Swans for another team, and the secret recording that possibly exonerates the players has been seized by the police.
“A full month on, and still the only clear “allegation” we’ve heard is one of the girls believes the fee she charged the Swans players to slap her butt only covered three slaps, rather than the four she received,” says Dr Howe.
“Yet these five men have basically been accused of the most heinous crimes imaginable, and stood down for the entire season, while no one bothers to even ask whether they themselves might be the victims of false allegations – a scenario that seems increasingly likely to be true.”
Dr Howe makes it clear she is against prostitution in all its forms, which she considers immoral, exploitative of women and gross. “But the same Left who is piling on the Swans guys loves prostitution.”
“One of the Left’s infallible doctrines is that so-called sex work is empowering for women. If you think you smell a rat behind the double standard, you’re right.”
An example of how this investigation is used by the LGBTQ/me too crowd as “moral justification” has been demonstrated by Kirsti Miller, who declares herself “a proud transsexual woman, Australia and champion athlete, researcher and educator regarding diversity, inclusion, acceptability and the broader issues of sport”.
“Every single person who is arguing that nothing should be said about the Sydney Swans incident until a full investigation, is on the side of men being protected from accountability for their behaviour and for women to be presumed to be liars,” she posted on X.
“Many sexual assaults are never fully investigated or go to court. That does not mean women are liars, it means the systems to investigate such things are terribly flawed. It is OK to believe women before any systems kick in. And anyone protesting that is just flying their own red flags.”
No point booking lap dancers for the next party fellas. You never know how badly you might get stung by people running agendas. Slap a pack of SAOs next time.
The Pullman hotel was a nominally poor choice of venue! … But it was a black swan event!!
At a guess, I thought Toxic Femininity was beefy butch types earbashing and beating up on men.
.
I was confused, so I searched, What is Toxic Femininity ?
.
Aggressive A.I. Search Assist butted in, at the top of the list of search results, as programmed: Queue jumper.
.
“Toxic femininity encompasses traits and behaviors that pressure women to prioritize the needs of others over their own. This often results in self-neglect and can lead to internalized misogyny. It is characterized by a strict adherence to traditional gender roles that can be harmful to both individuals and society.”
.
So if I’m hearing right, a wif, whose very nature is mothering, loving and caring, can be attacked by a woman-hater living within her very being; so has to toughen up woman and fight her natural instincts or be seen by psychos as a threat to society.
.
Whose society, the one living in a resilient echo chamber, the combined two percent, others that have kidnapped the alphabet.
.
If this is the new norm facing today’s young men, then I suggest RESET, take up house with Mrs. Palmer and her five daughters, live the depop agenda, we can’t have wifs cutting up over themselves.
.
Young men, is it worth putting your hearts on the line, slave to put a roof over a wif’s head, feed and clothe her and have beautiful, wonderful children, having her forced to work by greedy corporates using cheerleading feminist words of equal opportunity, only to be devalued by unequal pay in an attempt to sustain a quality of life continuously eroding by government’s economic mismanagement of devaluation, whilst paying the same grifter sponging parasitic class for the privilege?
.
Of course it is, men and wifs make up 98% of the population, parasites and others make up 2%: The deliberate breakdown of society and attack on nature’s laws by parasitic infestation, is at a guess, why 40% of child murders are by the hands of distressed emotionally disturbed and confused mothers.
.
The story is really part of the war on men which was seed funded by Rockerfellas through promotions, book deals, recently deceased Gloria Steinem et al. We see in the story above “Chanel Contos … says that her future partner should pay her a salary and that Australian men are the most mysogynistic men in high income countries.”
Women need a restructure since they no longer produce 3 babies (1960’s) 4 babies (1950’s) 6 babies (1920’s) 8 babies (1800’s) or more. They are a displaced workforce, machines have taken their jobs, the have lost their purpose so they want to be men, but just as cross-dresser men will never be women, and cats will never be dogs, women will never be men though they may stand out in their own field good luck to them. The way they can get a viable income is by collecting the superannuation of their children, if their children are winners they will get a good superannuation, if the children are losers they will get nothing. This would incentivise them a bit instead of just dumping their kids at childcare. Normally they get a house when the husband dies and this income is never accounted. Normally they spend more hours in the house and this is always manipulated into a complaint about “share of cleaning”.
As for all the wife bashings, Australian men are actually very tolerant and prosogynistic, the smart ones just give up on the feminists and go to the Philippines for wives. I express my prosogynism by avoiding feminists including suspect feminists as much as possible.
“You’re welcome”
The problem with the LIES is very tragically that a lot of remote aborigines are doing the woman bashing and getting the statistics up to dizzy levels. This is a societal problem and the aborigines need better integration but this is not the subject of the story. The feminists should go out to the aboriginal communities and fix them, otherwise the feminists are simply full of shit. The feminists in Australia benefit from the disadvantage of the aborigines, they are exploiting them. The footballers the same.
I will leave you with a name that has historical context into these types of allegations and police misconduct (the want of the pip over the stripe). JACK DE BELIN. The facts are there to be investigated if interested as this is not my website to rehash long and lengthy articles.
These men will suffer from T.V.-P.T.S.D. for many years.
.
I hope they have extremely greedy lawyers.
.
Besides the fact that HE ONLY PAID FOR 3 BOTTOM SMACKS NOT 4 is a childish over inflated claim. And the media response looks to be a part of a set-up. This kind of story avoids the OTHER ISSUE here.
The OTHER ISSUE here is that a Swans management/media representative said previously on air that they supported Palestine in it’s struggle with Israel.
So that is classed as an anti-Semitic statement even though Palastinians are more Semitic than Israelis.
(The mind boggles with this kind of Jewish twisting and turning of semantics. )
So apparently the Jewish lobby/mob didn’t want that kind of ‘Friends of Palestine’ statement to be publicly aired by a popular sporting entity such as the Swans Football Club.
So they arranged a bunch of Prostitutes (who were probably offered ‘cheap’ up front) to set-up these players. They may have also supplied the Cocaine.
So now the Israeli owned Press can’t say that the Swans were naughty for supporting Palestine, can they.
So they are banging the misogyny drum to hide the truth.
And here we are on CN debating misogyny and police ‘ evidence, instead of the REAL topic.
That’s how the Jewish community successfully ducks and weaves.
And CN fell for it.
(or maybe can’t find the original story about the Swans ‘Friends of Palestine’ statement)
Either way.
Which story would have more impact, more punch?
Swans being ‘Friends of Palestine’, or the Misogyny business.
I vote for ‘Friends of Palestine’.
But I’m sure that CN would get trounced if they went that way.
It seems to me that this anti-Semitic up-roar was re-inflated a few years ago because of the obvious Jewish involvement in the COVID vaccination business.
It was a ‘main and kill’ the Goy sort of thing, wasn’t it?
Cull the herd of Cattle.
It is bizarrely obvious isn’t it?
I suppose next they’ll tell us that Bill Gates is a naughty Palestinian.
Always believe the female ‘victim’, so today’s woke brainwashing goes. That makes any man an easy touch and a sitting duck for any sheila that feels hard done by and vengeful, or might want to get her rocks off and a few bucks in. Especially when the M$M lynching party and the standing ‘Men Are Pigs’ crews are backing her at the drop of her hat. No surprise that traditional love and romanticism are now surpassed by modern day fear, suspicion and skepticism.
I have been a bit suspicious of the utter lack of any detail to what allegations they are actually facing, although they are , according to the media, disgusting sexual assualting misogynists’. We are all supposed to have that maxim at law ‘Innocent until proven guilty’…If I were the players I’d be suing the Swans and having my contract null and voided and try move to another club. They have no right under the law to act as an extra-judicial power over these men who are still presumed innocent until proven guilty and convicted of a crime we haven’t heard about yet.
.
“I once cam across a handyman bloke, just up my street, who was doing renovations, who told me that he must be the only man in this town who had been “cleaned out” by the same woman not once, but twice…”
‘Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice…shame on me!’. Bloke is a real dickhead it looks…’Once bitten mate, twice shy!’ is how most of us see it!
These movie stars called reporters, are employed by faces we never see, who get instant pleasure for giving them jobs. The perversion is from top down, not bottom up.
I once challenged Clementine Ford, who seems to be the inventor of the toxic masculinity term, to define the term. I never heard from her, likely because she would be unable to actually define what she means by that term, even though she wrote a book about it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boys_Will_Be_Boys_(Ford_book)
If you accept the synopsis of the Wiki entry on her book then well and good, but the other side of the story is that of feminine toxicity, in that women often inflict emotional and psychological harm on men, operate within the parameters of the man being the breadwinner (and the bacon to!), and often come to grief having sought out a man to bring that bacon home whilst not doing their due diligence as to whether the man is a suitable partner or not, due to their desperation to find a bloke to bring some bucks in. Or at least that’s how I see it, and have, in many instances. As the song goes” All that she wants is another baby…” and some lassies go and have the baby and then go and find a breadwinner to finance the operation.
I once cam across a handyman bloke, just up my street, who was doing renovations, who told me that he must be the only man in this town who had been “cleaned out” by the same woman not once, but twice.
Would that sort of thing not be some sort of an example of feminine toxicity?
I doubt that the ABC’s Q & A program would indulge such a debate question-ever, as it would be contrary to heir undeclared brief to indoctrinate its viewership.
[…] Source link […]