Topher Field charges that the Liberals voted for the hate speech laws with Labor in order to attack and prosecute One Nation in European style to keep them out of parliament, a benefit to both parties.
If the Nationals now fail to see their big opportunity of forming a coalition with One Nation to go on and take government at the next election then the Nationals should be disbanded.
Is it no wonder Labor and Liberals were in closed-door discussions for hours on Monday scheming to get rid of One Nation.
There is another plan at foot by Liberal Party donors. Billionaire Gina Reinhart, a Liberal donor, is bankrolling One Nation for the next election campaign, but there is a catch. One Nation has to give its second preference to the Liberals in every seat which on its present trajectory One Nation could help re-elect quite a few Liberal candidates.
Then there is the omnipresent Jewish lobby backed by Netanyahu bankrolling their campaign and ensuring the Liberals don’t get off track.
What an opportunity for the Nationals who will probably replace present leader David Littleproud before the election. Hanson, who dislikes Littleproud, might even demand it before any coalition were to be formed.
Keep an eye on Nationals Senator Matt Canavan who would take on the leadership in the blink of an eyelid and his political persona would appeal to Pauline Hanson, not forgetting he is mates with Barnaby Joyce.
Littleproud said there would be no coalition with the Liberals while Ley is leader.
Will the Nats be silly enough to wait for the back room Liberal boys from the big end of town to replace Ley as leader and then jump back into a less than cosy relationship with Andrew Hastie as leader? If Hastie’s fast deserting support base asked war hero Ben Roberts Smith should they keep supporting Hastie, the answer would be “keep right away.”
Hastie, reportedly saw no action in Afghanistan, then outed himself as the anonymous court informant in the corrupt prosecution of Ben Roberts Smith VC for killing an Afghan civilian.
Will the Nats rural base support a One Nation coalition? You betcha.
RE: “Labor-Liberal uni-party will use hate speech laws to destroy One Nation”
We’ve already allowed them to destroy our Australia. Imagine if anyone is going to give a sht about destroying Pauline Hanson or any other alternative that might pop up in between the cricket and the footy.
The horrible UnaParty with Susan Ley Teals-lite and ALP is confident the dodgy Australian Electoral Commission will hand another lower house win to the Unrepresentative Swill and this will happen unless people like Rennick throw their lot in with the most recognisable brand, that is now PHON Orange Party. Look what happened in the US, when RFK was running his own probably fake campaign then Trump pulled him in I presume by prior arrangement. Rennick is not significant enough for these theatrics and should get on board in 2026, along with the other randoms. because if they don’t understand politics is about numbers they shouldn’t be in the game
Sorry to inform you about your comments which apparently are going nowhere, nobody else is complaining now. Swap your server to Yandex or God forbid Google. Ed
The use of this bill to crush one nation is a good thing: it will convince one nation members and other so called “patriotic” goyim that there is no political solution.
White Aussies are bovine = they continue to participate in democratic processes, thereby providing legitimacy to a corrupt system and its associated corporations. Each year the politicians (which they elect) import around 400k immigrants to replace the white population and ensure a loyal voter base of foreigner born goyim. Aussie bovine will be replaced, and the sooner these idiots realise this and accept the failure of democracy the better. But the white goyim won’t do anything as they’re effeminate simps who are too addicted to social media and goyslop. Plus they were disarmed in a false flag haha.
Aussies = bovine.
3 posts attempted, 3 posts disappeared. The “comments” are “fixed” alright.
The ‘hate speech’ laws with the main purpose of squashing ‘anti- semite’ sentiment, will also be assumed to capture ‘anti – arabic’ sentiment and ‘anti – christian’ sentiment and anti any other religious ideology so that no one speaks up about the conflicting messages of the Talmud or the Quran or the Bible in Australia – as this captured Nation is also led by the nose towards a One World Religion that is coming as part of a One World Luciferian Government.
Silencing free speech obviously needs to come first.
Particularly in relation to religions.
That’s why these ‘hate speech’ laws are happening lock step around the world.
They are all reading from the same illuminati playbook.
The thing that gets me is that our Politicians are choosing to go along with it – almost as if in a hypnotic denial.
Marching towards their own demise.
A One World religion has never succeeded and never will.
Topher’s analysis misses another possibility, known colloquially as ‘white-anting’, in which former members of the uniparty become members of One Nation. This is happening to Farage’s Reform Party in the UK, if the report about former Conservative, Nadim Zahawi, becoming a member is correct. The influx of career w**kers, sorry, politicians will undoubtedly change the complexion and direction of ON, and the demise of the Liberals will lead to ON replacing it in the uniparty. Whether the uniparty prevents ON from gaining a foothold in parliament, as Topher suggests, or whether it gets incorporated into the uniparty, time will tell. Whichever way it goes, Australia loses.
Sent this to Pauline Hanson a few minutes ago:
To: Pauline (Senator) FYI Senator Pauline on these Act.\
> They predate the Hate Speech Bill and mean that the Bill should never have been drawn up, as it is contrary to those existing laws.
> As Topher Field says, the HSB could be used against Pauline because she said, years ago, that we were being overrun by Asians, which is
> pretty much a fact, but could be misread as hate speech.
> Your statement was a political statement, not specifically a racial statement, because you were only stating apolitical fact,
> Topher is on target, but is incorrect in accepting the Bill, as it can be regarded as unlawful for the reasons stated in my and other comments in
> the article.
> https://cairnsnews.org/2026/01/22/labor-liberal-uni-party-will-use-hate-speech-laws-to-destroy-one-nation/
They will try but they will not succeed…
It’s a dandy state of affairs. We get the choice of the Uniparty or the privately owned and run Pauline Hanson’s ON? I like it! It beats just having the Uniparty. Not that it’ll make a scrap of difference in the end though.
The preferential voting system and the party powerbrokers will see to that. Our representatives owe their allegiance to the party they represent, not to the electorate they allegedly represent. And the parties owe their allegiance to those who bankroll them.
All nice and CONSTITUTIONAL by convention. Preferential voting = Vote Theft! Say no more.
We’re there any differences in the two Hate Bills bought in 2025 and 2026, is it the same bill that they’ve been working on for a year and are these politicians lying in our faces again saying they only received a copy a few hours before the vote in 2026?
The test now for all candidates/parties is to see who really REPRESENTS us, and whether they will the run on REPEALING the Hate Laws, 18C and Surveillance laws to name a few.
ON was MIA to vote when the 2025 Hate Laws were introduced in the Senate saying they didn’t have the numbers to make a difference.
In 2026 Pauline conviently was still serving a suspension for wearing a burka.
Pauline is being used to create distractions by pulling stunts in parliament by her handlers, (she draped herself in a foreign flag in parliament too) as they try and make ON the saviour for Australia when in fact they are ALL sitting in treason as parliament.
“For more than 40 years, Labor has assisted Muslim immigration despite warnings that rushed programs could not meet adequate security checks.
Long term national security was traded for short term political advantage.”
https://cairnsnews.org/2026/01/08/albanese-reluctantly-agrees-to-bondi-royal-commission-which-could-expose-swapping-visas-for-votes/
That’s what Pauline was missing way-back-when
And I’ve yet to see her or any other Aus politician acknowledge what’s up ahead: the full brunt of the long-term fallout
Ditto the U. K. mob
Hey folks,
Let’s not be ambiguous or play along with the narrative of “political parties” here, because that’s all just a facade, a Trojan Horse, a Satanic baby-eating wolf in a flock of sheep’s clothing, and always has been, at least in the experience of people still alive here in Australia today.
OF COURSE they’ll use the BS corporate “hate speech” laws – which are NOT “laws”, they’re corporate policies of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION (and the capitalisation is important,folks, because that’s it’s NAME) – to crush any opposition or dissent against the self-annointed Zionistic Globalist stooges who presume to rule over us with neither consultation nor consent. That’s what ALL these BS fake corporate “laws” are FOR, folks, because these mongrel arsehole bastards neither work for us nor answer to us, and all their BS fake corporate “laws” articulate the systematic framework for the corporation’s hostile occupation and pillaging of what we thought was “our” country.
Because we’re living in a totalitarian POLICE STATE run by corporate GANGSTERS, folks, that’s WHY they have literal ARMIES of ruthless relentless utterly remorseless gun-toting shit-for-brains Granny-bashing child-molesting pig-raping mass-murdering hired mercenary thugs entrenched throughout every Australian state and territory, to ENFORCE the foreign corporate occupation of what we THOUGHT was “our” country, the “Lucky Country”.
Think corporations don’t do tyranny? Think the fear of “corporate law” somehow constrains these Treasonous blood-thirsty arseholes? Think again, folks, have you already forgotten Dictator Dan’s PRIVATE ARMY shooting up protesters in Melbourne with ZERO repercussions or consequences for ANYONE involved in outright WAR CRIMES here on Australian streets? And what about military directed energy weapons deployed against TWO MILLION clueless Australians there in Canberra with NO blowback or downside for the ruling junta WHATSOEVER, not then, not now, not EVER.
For some context, folks, maybe think of India, they’ve been down this path already, long before us, the British East India Company herded thousands of unarmed defenceless Indian men, women & children into stadiums and MACHINE-GUNNED them. If you actually think these mongrel bastard vermin wouldn’t do that or WORSE to us right here in Australia in a PINCH, then you’re dreaming.
Here’s some education from former New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew Napolitano regarding the slide of the USA into a totalitarian police state…
[ https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/01/andrew-p-napolitano/the-american-police-state-has-arrived/ ]
… which mirrors Australia’s trajectory, folks, because Australia is barelling down the SAME path in LOCKSTEP with every other Western nation all around the world. Here’s a KEY QUOTE from Judge Napolitano’s piece – “… In a police state, the laws are written so as to appear to defend freedom; but they are enforced and interpreted so as to enhance the power of the government…”
Which is EXACTLY what we are seeing playing out in EVERY BS fake corporate-owned “parliament” in every Australian state and territory in LOCKSTEP with the fake foreign-owned corporate baby-eating Luciferian Zionistic Globalist AGENDA, all done with neither consultation nor consent, because the inmates in a prison and the livestock on the ramp to the abbatoir don’t GET any say in their fate.
The old saying two enough three a crowd, and that’s the way they like it.
The Uniparty appears to have existed for a very long time.
Time’s up.
One thing I forgot, Daryl, is that Gough “The arch-Fabian” Whitlam unlawfully put us on UNIDROIT, which is all about Private Law, which also means that our governments have been acting unlawfully, for a start:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNIDROIT
We, the living men and women, are only subject to the public law, which is one of our unalienable rights.
Good one, Daryl, though the Crimes Act 1914, Section 28 and Criminal Code Act 2015 say that anyone interfering with anyone’s political rights and duties, by threats, violence or intimidation is guilty of a crime punishable by three years jail means that the Bill should never have gotten up in the first place.
If i know that, these learned Parliamentary colleagues-and especially our “data driven” Senator Malcolm Roberts-should have nixed the thing at the outset, and the Bill should never have been drawn up.
Misrepresentation is an applicable complaint that can be made against your Member, and can be followed up, if the complaint is successful, so I am told, with the criminal charge of Misuse of Office.
The only way to undo the hate speech laws is to take the matter straight into the High Court of Australia under section 75(v) of the Commonwealth Constitution requesting that the court bring about urgent injunctive relief against the law and requesting the court make a declaration invalidating the legislation as being a breach of the implied freedom of political communication which is enshrined within sections 7,24 and 128 of the Commonwealth Constitution and which is in contempt of previous High Court rulings.
Now if the dissenting votes in both houses were fair dinkum they would be filing the above action immediately in the High Court , so lets wait and see whether they are also part of the problem because One Nation is Liberal through and through.
Emailed to Topher about 30 seconds ago:
In regard to your appearance here, Topher:
https://cairnsnews.org/2026/01/22/labor-liberal-uni-party-will-use-hate-speech-laws-to-destroy-one-nation/
…you’ll get a fair few views.
What may be a good one is to-and I’ll be phoning Hanson’s electorate office today about it, is to mount a
legal challenge to the Hate Speech Baloney (HSB), as it is unlawful.
One reason being that it trashes established law that the UniParty Corporate government must observe,
that being the Crimes Act attachment, the Crimes Act being Imperial Law, to boot.
I think there is merit in that.
I am going to suggest to Pauline’s people that they see about mounting a legal challenge to the HSB, on
the grounds that it is unlawful (LEGAL and Lawful are two different things, as you should know)
It seems that none of THEM in the Parliament raised that protection of people’s political rights and
duties from threats, violence or intimidation-what the HSB actually does, and retrospectively too!!-
but I did send it to my local Senator, Sarah Henderson who, BTW, received 1100 call/emails on Monday
and Tuesday about the HSB.
The fact also seems to be that the legislation likely was written, though a couple of weeks and a battery of
lawyers might get it done-perhaps that is why the Bill was so flawed?
In any event, Buick Bucks Clive could easily stump up for the cost of the litigation and get his bucks returned
should One Nation get a win.
And, most importantly, any court action would have to be via a jury hearing, so that Aussies actually get a say
in the whole show.
This is important because your alleged Parliamentary representative never consults any constituent on how
they think said rep should vote.
Hmmm? Does that then amount to misrepresentation then, Topher?
I think it does.
And you might also liek to know that Davis Limbrick, who is a Libertarian, told his staff tat everything Daniel
Andrews (breached the Federal Bio-Security Act big time) did in the fake pandemic was illegal-and it was.
One of Limbrick’s staffers told me that when I phone the Office on day.
I may still have the recording.
In any event, whilst your piece is good, talk is still cheap, and must be backed up by action, Topher, in order
to validate what is said.
You seem to accept the HSB, which is not good, so some action one your part might reinforce what you have
said.
See how you go.
If the Uniparty’s Plan is to use their unlawfully established Admiralty Courts to sack One Nation and every other opponent, then One Nation and the Nationals should make lawful moves to remove Admiralty Maritime Courts and restore Common Law courts.
Common law courts require a Jury.
Fake corporate government cannot override these courts which can easily establish the fact that the government is not the government of the Common wealth of Australia.
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]