By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
VICIOUS transgender activists are using Queensland and other states’ slimy, communist-style anti-vilification legislation to bankrupt Australians – mostly women at this stage – by convincing courts to impose outrageous fines against those who dare speak out against the warped transgender attack on gender reality.
And at a federal level, the Liberal Party is grovelling to the Jewish lobby who want to punish people who dare criticize the Zionist state as “anti-semites”. The Liberals are also bending to Jewish demands that they decide the terms of the Royal Commission into the Bondi Massacre.
Several Queensland cases in which people are being hauled before courts for expressing their political opinions could have been prevented if Premier David Crisafuli had the willpower and guts to repeal anti-discrimination and “vilification” laws that transgress the sacred right of free speech that Liberals traditionally supported.
Freedom of religious speech and belief is already clearly protected under Section 116 of the Constitution, but Labor-Green governments have been doing their best for decades to legislate around that by using anti-discrimination and vilification laws to silence dissident voices who dare criticise cultural Marxist gender and gay activists.
In Queensland Muamer Nukic, a member of the Queensland Police Service’s Protective Services Group and a self-described anti-Zionist, has been charged with 41 counts of using a carriage service to menace, harass, or cause offence over alleged “anti-semitic comments” on social media.
Shane Dowling of Kangaroo Court Australia (see video above), believes two key elements suggest that Nukic has been “stitched up on false charges and is being persecuted”.
“Firstly, key evidence produced in court … doesn’t support an alleged crime on antisemitism. And secondly, the police prosecutor wanted bail refused in a case relating to social media posts, which is scandalous.”
Dowling says that with governments around the country either introducing, or planning on introducing, new so-called hate speech laws his article is “a must read”.
Meanwhile the conservative Human Rights Law Alliance (HRLA) says a landmark case heading to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) could determine the future of public discourse, especially concerning women’s rights, children’s health and freedom of expression.
Former breastfeeding counsellor Jasmine Sussex is defending a vilification complaint brought by a “transgender-identifying man” under Queensland’s discrimination laws – not merely for her words, but for publicly raising concerns about the safety of induced “breastfeeding” by men.
According to coverage in The Australian, the dispute centres on whether Jasmine’s public commentary — grounded in years of experience supporting mothers and their babies — falls within the scope of protected speech or crosses into punishable conduct.
Ms Sussex told The Australian that her statements were made in defence of maternal rights and the safety of mother-baby relationships, not to vilify individuals. She has emphasised that her concerns are about infant welfare and the biological foundation of breastfeeding.
At HRLA, we see this case as far more than a personal dispute — it has significant implications for the freedom of Australians to speak about contested social topics, including sex, protection of women, and children’s wellbeing.
John Steenhof, Principal Lawyer at HRLA representing Jasmine, told The Australian: “It’s not going to be a case that’s going to come to a definitive position on what is right and wrong in those particular issues, but whether we’re allowed to speak about them.
“It’s important for a good, robust, open political debate that people are able to speak without fear of the law being used to silence their opinion.”
The HRLA maintains that when laws designed to protect vulnerable groups are weaponised to silence professional opinion or criticism, the public square shrinks and the space for honest debate is lost.
“Jasmine’s case connects directly to HRLA’s broader work defending Australians who face adverse action for speaking or acting in line with their convictions. Whether it’s professionals in the workplace, volunteers in community organisations, or individuals in public discourse, we are seeing patterns of censorship, social shame, and legal threat.
“The outcome of the QCAT matter will matter not just to Jasmine Sussex but to every Australian who values the ability to express their opinions – respectfully, robustly and truthfully – on matters of public interest.
“HRLA remains committed to representing those who stand for women’s and children’s rights, to preserving free speech, and to ensuring that no Australian is punished simply for speaking the truth or expressing a belief grounded in evidence and conscience.”
Meanwhile Kirralie Smith, the publisher of the Binary Australia website, which raises objections to transgender and LGBTQ activism, was found guilty last year of vilifying two males in female sport. She was ordered to pay $95,000 in damages and several other orders she described as contradictory.
Deputy Chief Magistrate Sharon Freund ordered Smith to undertake “anti-discrimination training”, take down the posts that publicly identified the football players, and issue public apologies for “misgendering” them.
In August, Smith and Binary Australia were found to have vilified two trans women in social media posts. Smith and Binary were liable for $100,000 in damages for vilifying one woman, and a further $100,000 for vilifying another.
Binary Australia was listed as an “far-right hate and extremist group” by the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism in 2022.
Mrs Smith managed to raise $250,000 from a national fundraiser to support her ongoing legal action and an eventual High Court case. On December 31st were successful in getting a stay on the orders so that her appeal can proceed to the Supreme Court of NSW.
“Tonight I will enjoy a medieval festival with 65 friends in my paddock,” she posted on New Year’s Eve.
“Tomorrow I will continue to stand for reality. In 2026, just like every other year in history – men will not be women.”
The Human Rights Law Alliance is happy to take donations to support its work.
Common Sense seems to be in short supply in Queensland and WA. There will be hell to pay if it is allowed to continue. What is coming for Australia is not pretty. People in high places may go missing? See the latest legislation coming out of Florida?
[…] READ MORE AT CAIRNS NEWS […]
e-Karen is dodging her US Congress obligations for the 3rd time, she must be so scared of Mein Trumpf who loves the 1st amendment. She has to do something by Monday or maybe he is going to “Lock Her Up”. Also available on Instagram greg_cheesman_4_victoria if you need to log into things.
https://www.tiktok.com/@greg_cheesman_4_victoria/video/7594196232545897749
CairnsNews used to be readable; now it’s crappy.
I suspect the LNP would be fearful of Australia’s credit rating be affected if they don’t toe the line if they ever regained the government they might find themselves short of cash to fulfil their election pledges .
Look very carefully at the Mathew gruter deportation by Minister BURKE for being at a political protest which had a sign affixed to a fence that read “Abolish Jewish Lobbying”. There is the key to stopping the Jewish or any other influence into our Parliamentary system of government. We need to talk seriously to our elected representatives to pass a law that applies to every level of government preventing lobbying of our reps and political parties. When does a donation become a bribe? DO NOT BE WEAK AUSSIE and do not say “oh they will not listen, forget it , NO are we SHEEP or are we LIONS . In our Commonwealth Constitution section 44(i) is very clear that the representative cannot have any allegiance to a foreign power, that how we control our politicians, including One Nation. Do not forget the photograph of Pauline Hanson wrapped in an Israeli flag , there is evidence that she should be removed from Parliament.
No point in complaining to those of us who are happy to lay down and be fkd silly, is there? We Aussies are now too gutless and indolent to tell our spineless politicians enough is enough. We’ve been spayed by our public servants in the name of “population control”. Or haven’t we noticed yet how we’re “building better” all the time?
ZIONI$TS ARE THE $ECRET BACKER$ OF THE COMMUNISTS.
“”The Zionists” 1950 Full Audio-book By Texas Judge George W. Armstrong”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qfGWVQx6wTfy
Who is “Larry Fink”?
fink /fĭngk/
noun
A contemptible person.
An informer.
A hired strikebreaker.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition
They are stealing your birthright and assuming it for themselves over you.
Wake up out of the hypnosis. You are not stupid, you are not cowards.
Welcome to the Tranny Apocalypse.
Funny how DNA has for decades now been touted as the cure-all for everything including every possible medical, veterinary and agricultural treatment and also the key to solving crimes. Well there is a crime underway and it’s “word theft” by the manipulators. The word “female” now defies definition if you ask politicians. The word “semite” is re-purposed to describe ZIonists and to exclude muslim semites. In both cases the DNA evidence should be sought. Are you at least 50% semite ? If not you are not a semite. Are you of XX chromosome, if not you are not a woman. The small amount of people who are right on the line, such as XXy “intersex” or androgynes may like to go either way or use the handicapped toilet. These agonies of the progressives are stultifying and a waste of energy. The Zionists are a much deeper and darker issue and use a fake adherence to religion as a backup. Now the Zionists are capturing “Somaliland” they will be joined to the hip with the USA and by extension Australia.
The best way to stop Zionists from using regular joos as their human shield is to call them out every time. Unfortunately this is too complicated for a lot of people who compulsively conflate both sides, playing into the hands of the manipulators.
It just occurred to me, looking at Kirralie’s fine again, that a very knowledgeable Aussie bloke I once knew was ordered, in a family court action overseas, to pay maintenance for his coupe of children.
So he went and worked out how much the cost would be until the age of majority of his kids would amount to, made up a Bill and gave it to the Judge who made the order, billing the Judge for the amount.
He never heard form the Judge again, and never paid the maintenance.
Point being that anyone who “orders” anything, in this case the Judge, must pay for the order in the same way as you would order a hamburger. You have to pp-ay for your burger before you are going to get the thing.
Maybe Kirralie should try that one, and see how she goes?
HLRA: typical lawyers: not doing anything for nothing, has to be a quid in it.
Got another problem here: QCAT is an unlawful court, because it is a court of summary jurisdiction-a Star Chamber, which were outlawed by the King of England centuries back, so the order and decision should be regarded as invalid too.
And if this further matter is to go to the Supreme Court then it must be decided by a jury, for real justice, not a single Judge/Justice or panel of, as it is a matter of express public interest and should be decided by a jury-aka: the people who will be affected-of the accused’s peers.
And in any event, people’s political rights and duties are protected by the Acts I have frequently mentioned in these columns-Section 28 of the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code Act 1995 Section 83.4.
People like Kirralie Smith and Lyle Shelton ought to bone up on stuff like that before they act, as it really does help to actually know your rights and protections under the Law, especially when the Communist Gestapo have it in for you.
but all up, these HRLA lawyers should know all this for a start!!!
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]