A woman keeps a candle next to flowers laid as a tribute at Bondi Beach to honour the victims of a mass shooting that targeted a Hanukkah celebration at Bondi Beach on Sunday, in Sydney REUTERS/Flavio Brancaleone


From UK correspondent Andrew Andreotti

Research Report: Real Reason Current Federal ALP Government Do Not Want to Call a Royal Commission into Bondi Shooting December 2025

Executive Summary: Real Reason is that, since 1970’s Communist Aligned ALP MPs have been trying to stop reformation of State Based Police “Special Branch” Departments, from developing and storing “dirt files” on serving MPs, especially Communist backed or Communist loving MPs.

Case Precedence: On 13 February 1978, the Sydney Hilton Hotel was bombed, one of the few domestic terrorist incidents on Australian soil. The Hotel was the location for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM). Three people in the street were killed – two council workers and a policeman – and several others injured. Former police officer Terry Griffiths, who was injured in the explosion, provided some evidence that suggested ASIO might have orchestrated the bombing or been aware of the possibility and allowed it to proceed. In 1985, the Director-General of Security issued a specific denial of the allegation. In 1991 the New South Wales parliament unanimously called for a joint State-Federal inquiry into the bombing. However, the Federal government vetoed any inquiry

Summary Timeline Since World War 2:

1901 – The Australian Government assumed responsibility for national security and intelligence on federation in 1901, and took over various state agencies and had to rationalise their functions

1939 – The forerunner of the Special Branch in the South Australian Police Force was the intelligence section established in 1939, on the eve of World War 2.

1941 – Commonwealth Security Service (CSS) was formed in 1941 to investigate organisations and individuals considered likely to be subversive or actively opposed to national interests; to investigate espionage and sabotage

1945 (June 1945) CSS produced a report warning of the danger of the Communist Party of Australia

1948 – The New South Wales Police Special Branch Unit was established in 1948 to liaise with military intelligence units and assist in the maintenance of national security. It was modelled on New Scotland Yard’s Special Branch and took the same name. The unit’s major focus during the Cold War era was monitoring members and sympathizers of the Communist Party and other left-wing political groups. Later, the focus shifted with the rise of international terrorism in the 1960s. The Special Branch’s activities included advising the Commissioner of Police on potential violence or civil disorder, providing intelligence about proposed demonstrations, gathering information on ethnic community factions, and assisting in security arrangements for high-profile visits.

1949 – ASIO formed as an organisation, The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation is the domestic intelligence and national security agency of the Australian Government, responsible for protecting Australia from espionage, sabotage, foreign interference, politically motivated violence, terrorism, and attacks on the national defence system. ASIO is a primary entity of the Australian Intelligence Community.

1949 (July) ASIO raided on the Sydney office of the Communist Party of Australia

1949 (December) – ALP Chiefly Government lose power over mishandling of Australian Communist Movement

1951 (February) – Petrov Affair, This affair sparked controversy in Australia when circumstantial links were noted between the leader of the Australian Labor Party and the Communist Party of Australia (and hence to the Soviet spy ring).

1951 – Menzies Government bans Australian Communist Party

1950s – The operation to crack the Soviet spy ring in Canberra consumed much of the resources of ASIO during the 1950s. This operation became internally known as “The Case”. Among the prime suspects of the investigations were Wally Clayton, a prominent member of the Australian Communist Party, and two diplomats with the Department of External Affairs, Jim Hill and Ian Milner. However, no charges resulted from the investigations, because Australia did not have any laws against peacetime espionage at the time

1972 – Gough Whitlam ALP Government wins Federal Election, ALP take a dim view to ASIO and Australian Intelligence in General

1973 (March) – Attorney General Lionel Murphy organises Raids Melbourne and Canberra ASIO Office, around time Yugoslav President Tito was due to visit Australia

1974 – The Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security (RCIS) was established on 21 August 1974 by Prime Minister of Australia Gough Whitlam to investigate the Australian Intelligence Community. (Justice Robert Hope) and concluded its work in 1977. It aimed to make recommendations about the machinery for ministerial control, direction, and coordination of the security and intelligence services.

1975 (November) – Whitlam Dismissed

1970s – The penetration of ASIO by a KGB mole in the 1970s. Due to the close defence and intelligence ties between Australia and the United States, ASIO became a backdoor to American intelligence. Upon realising ASIO was compromised, the United States pulled back on the information it shared with Australia

1977 – Mr Peter Ward, who had been Executive Assistant to Mr Don Dunstan, Premier of South Australia, and who was then Adelaide Bureau Chief of the Australian, alleged that up to 10,000 secret dossiers on South Australians had been compiled and were being kept by the South Australian Police Special Branch Unit.


1978 February –Sydney Hilton Hotel Bombing. On 13 February 1978, the Sydney Hilton Hotel was bombed, one of the few domestic terrorist incidents on Australian soil. The Hotel was the location for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM). Three people in the street were killed – two council workers and a policeman – and several others injured. Former police officer Terry Griffiths, who was injured in the explosion, provided some evidence that suggested ASIO might have orchestrated the bombing or been aware of the possibility and allowed it to proceed. In 1985, the Director-General of Security issued a specific denial of the allegation. In 1991 the New South Wales parliament unanimously called for a joint State-Federal inquiry into the bombing. However, the Federal government vetoed any inquiry.

1978 – When premier Don Dunstan confronted South Australian police commissioner Harold Salisbury with the 1977 White Report into the police special branch activities, he said he was extremely displeased that Salisbury had misled him and the public. Salisbury Resigned

1978 – Since 1978, the Australian Government’s National Anti-Terrorism Plan has required each state police force to maintain a specialised counter-terrorist and hostage-rescue unit.

1979 – Australian Federal Police formed by new Commonwealth Act and reform of ASIO by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.[

1983 – Wood Royal Commission into NSW Police

1997 (March 12) – NSW Police Special Branch disbanded by Commissioner of NSW Police. This was in response to investigations by the Royal Commission into the New South Wales Police Service and later the Police Integrity Commission.

1998 – NRS-18689 | Intelligence dossiers [New South Wales Police Special Branch] NSW State Archives Collection AGY-1221 | Police Subversive Organisations Branch [I] ; AGY-1222 | Military/Police Intelligence Branch ; AGY-1223 | Police Subversive Organisations Branch [II] ; AGY-1224 | New South Wales Police Special Branch

This series consists of files, known as ‘dossiers’ containing information concerning individuals, groups, terrorist activities, close personal protection of dignitaries, politicians or high profile figures visiting New South Wales, bomb threats and information received from other organisations.

Prior to the creation of an Intelligence Dossier, Main Index Cards would be used to record information concerning a subject or individual. When the number of Main Index Cards exceeded several, a Dossier would be created.

Intelligence dossiers would include all information accumulated on both coloured temporary and Main (Blue) Index Cards prior to the creation of a dossier. Some matters became the subject of a dossier straight away, for example a subject file in which a lot of information was going to be collected, such as the Sydney bid for the 2000 Olympics Games.

Conclusion: Real Reason Current Federal ALP Government Do Not Want to Call a Royal Commission into Bondi Shooting December 2025 is to stop Commission recommending the reformation of State Based Police “Special Branch” Departments, from developing and storing “dirt files” on serving MPs, especially Communist backed or Communist loving MPs, especially since 1970’s Communist Aligned ALP MPs such as Albanese.

Editor: The term Royal is superfluous in any government terminology because the Crown was removed by Whitlam in the 1970’s. Refer Sue-v-Hill HCA 30 199, CLR 462

Share Everywhere !

Shares

By cairnsnews

From the land of Australians

18 thought on “Why Albo does not want Royal Commission into Bondi Beach deaths”
  1. Simple. Because a Royal Commission can compel chosen witnesses to attend the commission to answer questions under oath. Albo’s preferred alternatives do no such thing. Ergo, Albo does not want the truth to come out.

  2. Commenter Neville
    You don’t mean Logically you mean Theatrically but the conclusion you draw is correct anyway, look what happened to Babet’s va666ine inquiry, the ALP and Greens hogtied it and left it to die, I blame Sarah Hanson Young ( WEF infiltrator ) for frauding her constituents. Greens lost half their senators but they haven’t learned anything. I’ll support lawyers when they bring back “the stocks”.

  3. Logically , the Palestine slaughter is the reason behind the Bondi shooting and as the PM said, a RC would take years and cost a lot so of what use is there having a RC .

  4. Hey folks,

    Maybe a Royal Commission would unearth allegations of dastardly baby-cooking going on down there at terrorist-central Bondi.

    But that would just be silly, folks, because think of the extension cords. Unless they took the “attack” over to the nearest 711, but would the fake corporate hired mercenary “police” keep standing down long enough for them to get all those babies properly roasted?

    Just BTW, folks, FWIW and just to be perfectly clear, there were NO babies roasted by those hordes of professional circus clowns riding lawn mowers and tooting bicycle horns over there on 7 October way back when, that was bald-faced WAR PROPAGANDA by Lucifer’s Tribe because they had lots of genociding to do and were just ITCHING to get started.

    But there sure were HUNDREDS and HUNDREDS of hapless expendable Israelis ROASTED in their cars by Hellfire missiles fired from IDF Apache helicopter gunships. FACT, folks, we have all the PHOTOS and even IDF Apache gun-camera VIDEOS to PROVE it.

    Lucky for all those Hannukah celebrants down there at Bondi beach there were no IDF gunships in the area, otherwise NONE of them would have gotten out alive. As it was, we might speculate that IDF snipers were on the job just like down there at Port Arthur.

    Hey, don’t shoot the messenger, already enough of that going on down there at Bondi beach.

  5. An excellent article, and many sound comments.
    A Royal Commission, even if chaired by a dodgy judge, would have difficulty suppressing the inevitable conclusion that this was another false flag, rather like Port Arthur, and there were either no deaths or far fewer that the official number. Another mystery is, when almost everything the governments of recent decades have done are against 99% of Australians’ interests, why has no politician, or anyone else for that matter, proposed a specific solution to completely restructure Australia’s government and governance? Unless there’s a proposal that I’m not aware of, why is my proposal on my website at http://www.better-management.org the only one?

  6. After Mezies banned the Australian Communist Party they joined the Aboriginal groups detailed inthe book Red Over Black. Red over Black 1984, a complete archive of the communist takeover of Aboriginal land rights movement
    Available from Veritasbooks.com.au
    Date: October 31, 2023 Author: Editor, cairnsnews14 Comments
    This narrative by former communist party member Geoff McDonald warns of the land rights movement and its communist control. The [communist] United Nations is running the agenda to split Australia into black versus white, divide and conquer, which the Labor Party has adopted as it major policy.
    The book Red Over Black is available at the Heritage Book Shop, Melbourne. Look in the RH column of this page.
    It was created more than 40 years ago and inflamed the land rights debate in Australia. Red Over Black, a book and documentary released in the early 1980s, claimed the movement was a communist plot to erode Australia’s sovereignty.
    How Australian white supremacists used a 40-year-old documentary to divide voters on the Voice
    RED OVER BLACK — Behind The Aboriginal Land Rights
    https://archive.org/details/red-over-black-behind-the-aboriginal-land-rights/page/n3/mode/2up

  7. Commenter Russell Cullen
    January 1, 2026 at 10:33 pm

    I do not believe that China’s brand of communism is based very much on Karl Marx’ manifesto, but I have no doubt that the United States system of politics is based on pure Communism.

    The Communist Manifesto that was read on the House Floor

    THE 45 COMMUNIST GOALS AS READ INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, 1963
    Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35
    January 10, 1963

    Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDAIN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
    Thursday, January 10, 1963

    Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

    At Mrs. Nordman’s request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following “Current Communist Goals,” which she identifies as an excerpt from “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen:
    [From “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen]

    CURRENT COMMUNIST GOALS

    10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

    11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

    12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

    13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

    https://cdn.subsplash.com/documents/W8FD27/_source/5b8c9068-5344-4a33-b77a-31d54f98a52e/document.pdf

    Here is your Test Question for today: What is the UN?

    by Anna Von Reitz

    All those who answered, “Why, the United Nations, of course.” — get an “F” and go to the back of the line.

    The “UN” is a corporation founded in France several years before the United Nations Charter was ever created.

    And here, for your edification, are the Principal Parties of Interest driving the “UN Agenda”—– Current version UN Corp dba World Bank dba FEDERAL RESERVE — 52% owned by Rothschild Bank of London and Berlin; 8% owned by Lazard Freres Bank of Paris; 8% owned by Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy, 8% owned by Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam; 6% owned by Lehman Brothers of New York; 6% owned by Kuhn Loeb of New York; 6% owned by Chase Manhattan/Rockefeller Bank of New York; 6% owned by Goldman Sachs. (There may be some changes in ownership(s) since this list was compiled, but the above is accurate for the most part.)

    So for all those who are alarmed about the UN, perhaps you should share this information about what the “UN” really is? And maybe you should be bringing appropriate political and international scrutiny to bear on the owner/operator/shareholders of the “UN”???

    And also on the French Government, meaning the Rothschild dominated corporation dba FRANCE?

    It’s time to bust these bunko artists and take back control of the world for sane people.

    See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website: h ttp://www.annavonreitz.com

  8. What is a Royal Commission?Royal Commissions
    A Royal Commission is a public investigation into a particular issue or event. Royal commissions examine important and often controversial matters such as government structure or events of considerable public concern.

    Royal Commissions are independent of government and are usually chaired by retired or serving judges who are referred to as “Royal Commissioners”. The results of Commissions are not legally binding, but are published in reports of findings and typically contain policy recommendations.

    https://ngm.com.au/royal-commissions-2/

  9. THE CHERADE THAT PAST GOVT MEMBERS HAVE CREATED WILL NEVER BE CHALLENGED BECAUSE EXPOSURE TO THIER HENOUS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY WOULD SEE THEM CHARGED WITH TREASON, THAT IS OF COURCE IF THERE WAS AN HONEST JUDGE LEFT TO ROUND UP THESE CRMINALS.

  10. They; this Cultic state(Nation) within states(Nations)), tries to impugn upon their enemies what secretly they themselves are actively doing and pursuing.
    Coopting and capturing. ZOG.

    Fraudulent scapegoats, patsies, and controlled opposition entities and operations.

    Deflecting and distracting suspicions and scrutiny and endlessly playing the “persecuted victim”.

    Gaslighting the public to think and feel that it’s “crazy” to suspect “thejews” of such diabolical intents and actions.

    ORDO-AB-CHAO.

  11. Haha, because there weren’t any “deaths”.

    It was a Chabad-Lubavitch sponsored ZOG of Australia theatrical production.

    They’re setting up the people (“Goyim”/”useless eaters”) for the “Zionist Terror/Purge” to come.
    Like “The Red Terror “/ “Great Purge” that preceded it 100 years ago in JEW-controlled Russia. Now worldwide.

    They just need some contrived big event (false-flag/war) as an excuse/cover to go into full-on extermination mode, and round up and kill the claimed “enemies of the people” that are a claimed threat to “national security”, the lives of “the public”, etc.
    Like the 100% faked 2020 “pandemic”, a cover story for the intentional effects of poisonous injections and drugs that are maiming, degenerating, and killing the people right now.

    HOLOHOAX.
    COVIDHOAX.
    BIG LIES!

    (what they say about the danger of the muslims in their mosques is 1000 times more true about the Jews in their synagogues.)
    Of course!
    Once you know their game, it’s easy.

    That’s why they’re faking attacks and pushing for the special protection.

    ZOG of America did 9-11 in service to ZOG WORLD INC.

  12. How was Whitlam’s 1975 overreach of power overlooked? Cxn s46 power to all people to protect s44 integrity of Parliament was snuffed! BUT, if any instance of impropriety has not resulted in disqualification, including foreign allegiance, then Parliament did NOT provide otherwise for s46. ‘Any competent court’ can recognise the overreach. High Court under Parliament control is the least competent. Reset democracy.

  13. We have had too many bad compromised untruthful politicians who have actively worked to destroy this country & its people & there is ample evidence of this nefarious attitude in the well sourced article above.

  14. Most people new albanese is a hard core communist.with his 11 day visit to communist china 2025 it should have set off alarm bells with the security asio

  15. “The only reason why the government would want to disarm you after 243 years is because they intend to do something that you would shoot them for”

  16. Royal Commissions are like elections – they do nothing for the people. They’re a tool used by politicians to distract the goyim.
    Want real change? Give Sir Rope and Mrs Lightpole a chance.
    Aussies = bovine

Leave a Reply