Coroner’s office will not make any Bondi Beach autopsy details public

The edict that ,quote,“private and highly sensitive information may only be released to those entitled to receive it, eg the families of the deceased” together with the pixelation of video footage of the corresponding incident is, of course, the best way ever of spawning conspiracy theories
When the truth is that the policy is based on nothing more than a fear that releasing such details might trigger mass panic or some sort of populous insurrection such as the 2024 Southport riots
Which is of course a conspiracy in it’s own right

We will never get the full truth about the Bondi Hanukkah massacre, only the government version, take it or leave it. Already the AFP – the babycino police force – is laying the trail with the red herring about the Philippines.

Although I live on the other side of Australia, and am unfamiliar with Bondi and the scene of the crime, I have tried to relate Google Earth images to Cairns News videos, There are many questions that I, as a citizen, would like answered, and which I would expect the police to be asking. I have tried to list them below, separating them into shooters, scene, and victims. Some may overlap. The questions also are not necessarily in logical order.

SHOOTERS:
Who were Sajid and Naveed Akram?
Where did they come from?
Did they have any ‘bad’ experiences with Israelis in their home country?
Were they Australian citizens, or permanent residents?
How, and for what purpose did they obtain firearms licences?
Where did they learn their shooting skills?
Were they genuine Moslems?
With whom did they associate prior to the Bondi event, Moslem and non-Moslem? And were those persons aware of their intentions?
Why did they choose the Hanukkah festival? Was it planned or opportunistic?
Did they undertake their attack as willing martyrs, knowing that they would most likely be killed?
If the attack was planned, they would need information about the site and security. Where did they obtain the information that would allow them freedom to fire at will for almost twenty minutes?
Even if the attack was opportunistic, it was an extremely fortunate set of circumstances that allowed them such freedom of access.

SCENE:
Where exactly in Archer park was the festival held, especially in relation to the overpass from which the shooters directed fire?
Were there any temporary structures, e.g. tents, gazebos for displays?
Was the site fenced off, and was there an entrance with security checking attendees?
Had the Hanukkah festival been held at the site in previous years? And had those festivals proceeded peacefully?
Although the festival was free, I understand that attendees had to book. Was it open to all, and were there any non-Jews in the crowd? (The presence of other Australians would make this more of a random killing spree, not a targeted massacre).
How many people had booked, and how many were on site at the time of the attack?
Given that Israelis are neurotic about security, where was the organisers’ security, and why were there only three policemen on duty?
Where were the organisers’ security team and the police when the shooting started?
How did they respond?

VICTIMS:
Where were the victims killed in relation to the overpass? Were they in the car park or the grassy area?
Were the victims all together in a crowd or dispersed?
Were the victims shot in a particular part of the body, e.g. head, heart?
Were all the victims Jewish?

Looking through the Cairns News videos again, here are some additional observations:

There are at least two, possibly three, cameras filming the incident. One close to the overpass on Campbell Parade. The second on or near the steps from the overpass landing, leading south. The third is located at high level in one of the buildings on Campbell Parade, possibly on one of the balconies of the concrete framed block of units.
None of the videos shows the festival, its attendees or the victims. There is no visual evidence of first responders, police, ambulances, etc. They focus only on the shooters.
If the audio is synchronised with the video, there appear to be the sound of shots, other than from Naveed when he is on the overpass, suggesting that someone is returning fire. Hence his ducking below the parapet. So, who was returning fire? By the way, his waving appears to be to Sajid to get back to the overpass.
Then there is Sajid. Why is he in the grassy area firing towards the northern apex of the park? What is he shooting at? And why is there a puff of smoke when he fires his rifle, especially if the ammunition is non-smoke?
When Ahmed disarms him, why doesn’t he fire the rifle? Maybe because he considers it the wrong thing to do, for obvious legal reasons, but could it be because the ammunition was not real? (What I am suggesting, without evidence, is that the whole show could have been a set-up, a pseudo-film scene, and all the characters actors. However, it is quite likely they were unaware of what they were being used for, or what the results would be).
This brings me to Mr. Morrison, who appears to be wounded in the hand or arm, staggers off, then collapses, fatally we are told.
Now we are not told at what point in this attack the videos are taken, although in one, police sirens can be heard. Funnily, this does not seem to faze the shooters who carry on, rather than make a quick getaway. Why?

Finally, although it might have been published somewhere, we do not have a list of the victims or how they were killed. I have also heard that no autopsies will be done. So all the identifying features of the bullets will be buried, and we will never know whether they came from the guns of the Akrams.

I have no answers to these questions, and as the political agenda has been fulfilled, I doubt that the real truth will ever emerge. Maybe there are others who made video recordings, but will they come forward now the government has effectively closed the case?

Were the bullets from either of the two guns examined to see if they were the ones causing the tragic deaths? From the video, there looked to be a third shooter. And where were the police? The video showed them cruising around.
It must be imperative that this is the first thing checked.
It doesn’t seem to have been done when those two beautiful, young police were shot. Nor for the witness, a neighbour. They are not forgotten.

Shusssh
And in whose hands is the land?
So many questions. Very few answers.

The glaring anomaly is that the alleged bodies were released for burial so early, myself commenting on Cairns News that they should not have been released until fully detailed autopsies were carried out, which would take weeks, given the number of alleged deaths.
The haste is especially dubious as the undertakers would have been working 24/7 to prepare for the burials.
This led me to wonder if there were actually any bodies in the coffins-a horrendous thought, but given the anomalies, not without plausibility.

Coroner office refusal to release autopsy details = more evidence that Bondi was a false flag to disarm the goyim.
Aussies deserve it though, as they tolerate it and vote for it.
Aussies = bovine.

Cairns News made an error in their request. They asked two questions and received a response to one.
1. Will there be an inquest into the Bondi shooting?
2. Will autopsy details be released?
The reply was to the second question only.
Could Cairns News now write asking if the coroner’s office will be conducting an inquest?
Note: When dealing with difficult bureaucrats on sensitive subjects it is advisable to ask one direct question per letter.
I look forward to your second reply.
Cheers.

(Cough) Bullshit!