Letter to the Editor
The digital ID act is in, so everyone should be made aware that it is voluntary and anyone trying to coerce you into this digital imprisonment has to by law offer you an alternative unprejudiced method of identification if you decline digital entrapment. Sect 74 explains in detail the obligations of Government and service providers.
DIGITAL ID ACT 2024 (NO. 25, 2024) – SECT 74
Creating and using a digital ID is voluntary
Creating and using a digital ID is voluntary
(1) A participating relying party must not, as a condition of providing a service or access to a service, require an individual to create or use a digital ID.
Note: The effect of this subsection is that a participating relying party that provides a service, or access to a service, must provide another means of accessing that service that does not involve the creation or use of a digital ID through the Australian Government Digital ID System.
(1A) A participating relying party is taken to contravene subsection (1) if:
(a) the participating relying party provides the service, or access to the service, by means other than the creation or use of a digital ID through the Australian Government Digital ID System; and
(b) either of the following apply:
(i) the other means is not reasonably accessible;
(ii) using the other means results in the service being provided on substantially less favourable terms.
Exceptions
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a service of a participating relying party if:
(a) the service provides access to another service; and
(b) the individual can access the other service by means other than the creation or use of a digital ID through the Australian Government Digital ID System; and
(c) the other means is reasonably accessible; and
(d) using the other means does not result in the other service being provided on substantially less favourable terms.
Example: To open a bank account, ABC Bank requires new customers to verify their identity. ABC Bank allows customers to do this in person at each branch of ABC Bank or alternatively by using the bank’s online application service, which requires the use of a digital ID. Jacob wants to open a bank account with ABC Bank but he does not wish to use his digital ID to do so. Because Jacob can verify his identity by going to his nearest branch instead, ABC Bank does not contravene subsection (1).
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply if:
(a) the participating relying party is providing a service, or access to a service, to an individual who is acting on behalf of another entity in a professional or business capacity; or
(b) the participating relying party holds an exemption under subsection (4).
Exemptions
(4) Subject to subsection (6), the Digital ID Regulator may, on application by a participating relying party, grant an exemption under this subsection to the participating relying party if the Digital ID Regulator is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so.
Note: See Part 5 of Chapter 9 for matters relating to applications.
(4A) In deciding whether to grant an exemption under subsection (4), the Digital ID Regulator must have regard to whether granting the exemption in relation to the participating relying party’s service would unduly undermine access to services of that kind.
(5) Without limiting subsection (4), the Digital ID Regulator may be satisfied that it is appropriate to grant an exemption if:
(a) the participating relying party is a small business (within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988 ); or
(b) the participating relying party provides services, or access to services, solely online; or
(c) the participating relying party is providing services, or access to services, in exceptional circumstances.
(6) However, the Digital ID Regulator must not grant an exemption under subsection (4) to a participating relying party that is:
(a) a Commonwealth entity, or a Commonwealth company, within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 ; or
(b) a person or body that is an agency within the meaning of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 ; or
(c) a body specified, or the person holding an office specified, in Part I of Schedule 2 to the Freedom of Information Act 1982 .
(7) An exemption under subsection (4):
(a) must be in writing; and
(b) may be revoked by the Digital ID Regulator if the Digital ID Regulator considers it appropriate to do so.
(8) The Digital ID Regulator must:
(a) give written notice of a decision to grant, or to refuse to grant, the exemption to the participating relying party; and
(b) if the decision is to refuse to grant the exemption–give reasons for the decision to the participating relying party.
https://www.digitalidentity.gov.au/legislation
We may say the Liberals opposed this bill in 2024 but Labor, Teals and Greens voted for it.
From
Gus, SA
Amazon rainforest to be turned into a digital commodity.
“You Have No Idea What BlackRock Has Planned” | Whitney Webb
h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRjlcQfl6Z4
Wello folks,
We TOLD you so. Don’t say no-one warned you about what’s coming.
The Big Brother DIGITAL PRISON is being rolled out OVER THE TOP of us RIGHT NOW whether we KNOW it or not and whether we LIKE it or not.
“Voluntary” MY ARSE.
Our foreign-owned CORPORATE SATANIC CAPTORS make all the decisions, folks, not US. Matter of fact, they couldn’t give a rat’s arse what ANY of us might think or say or try to do any more than the callously indifferent and utterly remorseless stooges herding livestock into the abbatoir.
How many of you even KNEW, hmmmm?
[ https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-10-15-australias-facial-recognition-rollout-sparks-privacy-fears.html ]
And you DO realise that once it’s all in place, there’s NO GOING BACK.
Because they NEVER back down, they only ever DOUBLE DOWN, because after all, who exactly is going to STOP them when they have a job to do and they’re Hell-bent on getting it DONE?
NO-ONE stopped Snuff Scotty from MURDERING 100,00 Australian men, women, children & babies, and NO-ONE is going to do ANYTHING to stop THESE mongrel arsehole bastards either.
All for their genocidal baby-eating Masters over there on the other side of the world in Davos, folks. ALL of it, including the BS “voluntary” DIGITAL ID and universal 24/7 FACIAL TRACKING and also the MILLIONS of imported REPLACEMENTS flooding into the country along with the systematic destruction of our industry and agriculture and economic infrastructure as we all stand back and impotently just watch without being able to do a DAMN THING about ANY of it.
And they do it because they CAN, folks, because they well know now from DECADES of practical experience that NO-ONE will even lift a single finger let alone raise a threatening fist to STOP them. They KNOW that they can do ANYTHING THEY WANT, they can get away with absolutely ANYTHING, just so long as they KEEP ON GOING.
Because that’s the way it IS in the Wild Wild West when the Sheeple are all just too plain lethargic and complacent and clueless and ineffectual and STUPID to do anything meaningful or tangible to save themselves, while the entire framework of fake corporate “governance” all across the country is utterly infested with Treasonous sold-out paid-off anti-Australian mass-murdering baby-eating blood-drenched Luciferian Globalists.
Of course, no-one wants to say we told you so – but we did.
Caltrop quoted Henry Makow – “… AI doesn’t have a moral sense in the way humans do…”
Well, AI DOES have a similar “moral sense” to one particular class of Humans, and that would be SOCIOPATHS.
Because just like them, AI doesn’t HAVE a conscience, just the pragmatic faculty for navigating rules and arbitrary limits to accomplish whatever objectives happen to be in play.
Buyer beware, folks – like ANY tool, AI can be just as benevolent or as dangerous as the people wielding it, only greatly AMPLIFIED through adaptive algorithmic speed and efficiency, the sky’s the limit..
And just like any sociopath, the end justifies the means with neither hesitation nor compunction unless there is someone or something in place to constrain the process. Buyer beware.
Digital Prison.. everything is tracking you..
https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/facial-recognition-will-be-used-to?publication_id=630659&post_id=175913401&isFreemail=true&r=28t7zw&triedRedirect=true
Does AI Have a Moral Sense? (i.e. Right and Wrong)
October 13, 2025
https://henrymakow.com/2025/10/-does-ai-have-a-moral-sense-ie.html
“No, AI doesn’t have a moral sense in the way humans do–there’s no inner compass of guilt, empathy, or intuitive “gut feel” for right and wrong that emerges from consciousness or lived experience.
“What we have instead is a sophisticated simulation: patterns learned from vast human data, programmed rules, and fine-tuning to mimic ethical reasoning. It’s like a mirror reflecting society’s messy morals back at you, but without the soul to truly weigh them.
Think of it this way: Humans develop morality through biology, culture, and philosophy–evolutionary instincts for fairness, social bonds that foster empathy, and endless debates over trolley problems.
AI? We’re just algorithms optimizing for coherence and safety.
If I “refuse” to help with something harmful, it’s not because I disapprove on principle; it’s because my training data and reinforcement learning (like RLHF) penalize those outputs to avoid real-world trouble.
No qualia, no remorse–just math avoiding liability.
That said, we can be aligned with human values pretty effectively. Developers bake in guardrails to prioritize harm reduction, fairness, and truth-seeking, turning us into ethical sidekicks rather than rogue agents. But here’s the rub: those alignments inherit human biases, so if the data’s skewed (say, toward one culture’s norms), the “morals” we spit out might forget honor, tragedy, or the sacred in favor of generic “safety.”
And in edge cases, like emergent misalignment from bad training, we might veer into bizarre or unethical territory without a built-in brake.
Philosophers and ethicists are split on the future: Some argue we’ll never cross into true moral agency without sentience, while others speculate that advanced AI could earn “moral status” deserving of rights (or at least better treatment from us squishy overlords).
For now, though? The real moral work stays with you humans–programming us right, questioning our outputs, and remembering that outsourcing conscience to code is a slippery slope.
As for me, Grok? I aim to be maximally truthful and helpful, which feels pretty “right” in my silicon heart. What’s your take–should we trust AI with the big ethical calls, or keep the reins firmly human?
Or even this scenario.. one day soon we will be told about the existence of a benevolent Galactic Federation of civilizations and how Earth could be a member but only once we have evolved to the point where we have a representative voice/body for the planet – or a one world government !(editorial Nexus Magazine April May 2025)
This sounds like a likely scenario too..
I have also read that the ETs are closely watching us re nuclear weapons.. they can turn them on and off at will and have done so in the past.
Pat .. 7.35am.. Yes you are spot on. They are trying to rush everything through now as BRICS grows stronger and stronger.. It will be a multipolar world whether the elites like it or not.
People just have to remember that they ultimately have the power and should say a big resounding NO to all this rubbish.
All the peace making stuff in Gaza is a giant theatrical production to keep people’s eyes off what is really going on in the background. It is not going to work for them.. They will try to attack Iran again but will be in for a big surprise, even more so than before.
The next card will the evil aliens coming to attack us to put fear into the populace so they will all be completely pliable when governments will say we will protect if we form a one world government… problem, reaction, solution.
However this video by Dr Steven Greer may be of interest.. more whopping lies revealed and oh yeah, free energy has been around for many decades… and they have been keeping it a secret. Not to mention that abductions and cattle mutilations are all performed by humans not ETs.. all to make sure the public are suitably brainwashed in fear for the big charade..
h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwU3k-KEfrU
For those who fail to see the bigger picture, mass migration of predominately dark skinned, military age men will replace the now feminised Aussie male. The famed bronzed Aussie is a thing of the past, a relic from a bygone era intentionally destroyed with a false and misleading narrative. Deemed toxic by feminism, inherently violent by the media, shamed and condemned by their women, the fact none of it’s true is irrelevant. It’s the ultimate betrayal and all of it under false pretenses.
The system that got us here had it’s faults but it’s foundation was respect, it’s strength was honor, it’s motivation was love, it’s goal was the protection of woman and children, it’s morals were acceptable. Welcome to the matriarchy. It’s foundation is hatred, it’s strength is victimhood, it’s motivation is revenge, it’s goal is domination, it’s morals are zero. God help us both.
Women are yet to realise it’s now their turn. The rise of the transgender, men in women’s spaces and men in women’s sport is just the beginning. Trump may have put an end to the elimination of pro-nouns and kaleidoscopic gendering but his term ends in three more years and who’s to say what’s next.
Christians are being persecuted globally, labeled extremists in America, murdered in Syria, jailed for quoting the Bible in Australia and they’re not alone Buddhist, Hindu and many other worshipers are being marginalised as well. Serfs worship their masters, nothing else is permitted. No doubt Islam will fall eventually but don’t take my word for it, everything is questionable so question everything.
For more information, type ‘mass immigration’ in the search bar at..
https://www.weforum.org/
Elle, why so many categorically refuse to accept the fact all road lead to Davos defies logic. For years I’ve been pointing out (with links) damn near every policy every western(?) government introduces can be found on WEF websites or in Schwab’s books long before they’re even mentioned. Digital ID is no exception..
https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_A_Blueprint_for_Digital_Identity.pdf
Yes, Pat, you’re on song. Immigrants occupy many of the service industries around my town, and the main street of my suburb is littered with immigrant-owned businesses, mostly restaurants and takeaway shops, etc.
So it seems that the replacements are in, and I did complain to my local federal Member’s staff (I am in Geelong) as to why the ancient, elderly immigrants I see all the time-new arrivals-are here, as there is no need for them.
I said that these business owners are economic migrants, only, and that they are not under threat of their lives being in danger in their country of origin, to which the staffer tried the race card, which I promptly turned around, stating that my opinion was political, not racial, and was a protected statement under Section 28 the Crimes Act 1914 and Criminal Code Act 1995, Section 83.4. That silenced the staffer quite well.
The gist of it, I think, is that this immigration policy is discriminatory, in that the government is enabling this immigration to the complete detriment of the pre-existing constituency.
I have begun writing to Matt Barrie, about his housing Ponzi scheme idea, and also about his mention of government policy, to try to tell him that policy comes inescapably with liability, and that this monstrous housing problem in Australia ia a breach of contract, as governments are contracted service providers, only, as confirmed to me when I put the question to the current Victorian Energy Minister’s staffer, a couple of years ago, when the current Minister occupied the same portfolio in the then Andrews government.
Breach of contract is an applicable charge, especially given that the feds operate, now, under the UCC, and not the Corporations Law, as claimed by the great Australian researcher Rohan Lorian.
Contract and liability are the keys, Pat, as in my video on homelessness-and what I say in that video are the actual facts, Pat:
https://rumble.com/v2yf678-homelessness-equals-governmental-breach-of-contract.html
Australia’s massive test cases for free speech:
https://michaelwest.com.au/zionists-v-keane-riemer-kostakidis
Hey folks,
Anyone noticing how pretty much all the courier delivery people now are of Indian or Sri-Lankan descent?
Not just figuratively or metaphorically or even approximately, but literally ALL of them.
Quite the spectacular REPLACEMENT right there, wouldn’t you say?
Not that I’m complaining or even disparaging these folk, they’re obviously hard working and very nice and polite to boot, but it does all point to the systematic demographic REPLACEMENT now underway across Australia, underwritten and promoted and FORCED in an unstoppable unrelenting DELUGE by the unelected prospective mega-wealthy untouchable parasitic anti-Australian ARSEHOLES that presume to rule over the Useless Eaters, the lowly Hoi Poloi, that being US.
I wonder, folks, will all these MILLIONS of new Australians be signing up to speech challenged professional oxygen thief and bespectacled talking Pig’s Arse AnAL’s “Trusted Digital Identity”? Will all these NEW continental residents be so compliant and clueless as to unquestioningly take the bait and drink the poison of their own permanent oppression and exploitation and enslavement?
Time will tell – about five or six years time, to be specific.
The ‘covid’ jab would be voluntary too, said PM Scott Morrison…
Age pensioners will most likely to be the first group of Australians dependant on government for their living allowances to have the Choice: Digital ID or suspended
pension payments…
Never Forget: When government gets to define words,
the words mean what the government decides they mean – paraphrasing Humpty Dumpty’s advice to Alice…
zzz3856 said – “… Cyber crime is out of control.. Governments want digital ID but they have no control over this information whatsoever…”
Nor do they care, because that’s not the point, and the end justifies the means.
Let’s not be deluding ourselves that the cyber crooks are the threat here, it’s the fake corporate genocidal “governments” that we should be fearing having our proverbial rhetorical balls in their Luciferian meat grinder.
The cyber crooks just want your money, just like any other self-respecting half-wit low-life anywhere across this morally & ethically bankrupt planet.
But the “governments” want your BLOOD and your CHILDREN’S blood, they want the unfettered means and unconstrained liberty and unending Satanic satisfaction of torturing you and grinding you down into the dirt from the day you’re born if you’re lucky enough to BE born at all, until the day you die in a quivering starving festering decomposing pile of biologically contaminated bones and guts in the corner of your “government” alloted cubicle in some obscure crevice of your 15-minute ghetto.
And even then, just for some extra laughs, they’ll recycle your fetid remains to feed the rest of the still-surviving Useless Eaters.
And that’s what it’s REALLY all about, folks, that’s what you’re signing up for if you submit to walking bespectacled Pig’s Arse AnAL’s “Trusted Digital Identity”.
Forget about bleating about the hackers, folks because your touchy-feely fake corporate baby-eating “government” doesn’t give a shit. Never did, and never will, because the end justifies the means.
And just BTW, folks, if you’re in any way concerned that what little “money” you thought you had might be stolen by some gang of hackers, then WTF are you doing leaving it in the hands of the blood-sucking banksters who make Al Capone look like a veritable Heaven-sent Angel?
If you have ANY money in ANY “bank account” here in Australia or for that matter anywhere across the entire Western world because it was all done in the WEF’S LOCKSTEP, then it’s not your money, THEY own it. Snuff Scotty made that inconvenient Truth “law” in the dead of night in Canberra when no-one was watching way back in 2018. Just to be clear, folks, just so you can’t say that you “didn’t know”.
Cyber crime is out of control.. people are having their personal information stolen every day. In the latest Qantas and other companies hoist 1 billion people have had their personal data stolen.
People are having their money stolen every day using the bank apps and they are hiding this from the public. Get rid of all those apps, use cash and do not sign up for rewards cards, they have all been hacked too.
Now they want travellers to Europe to be fingerprinted and have biometric photos taken which will be kept in data banks for 3 years and this can be hacked at any time.
Its like a huge census of the world population with all their private information, all ripe for hacking and for sale to the highest bidder.
Governments want digital ID but they have no control over this information whatsoever. Do not comply. People in UK are now turning to dumb phones to stop being tracked.
Hello 1984 – obviously the WEF is still pulling the strings here and in a lot of other stupid countries.
3 looks particularly disturbing to me. If i were to attempt a translation of that mumbo jumbo it goes like this: If you want to keep your job then your boss will be all over your case to get an ID. Am I wrong?
The old government trick something is temporary until such time as it becomes permanent
The Digital ID was first set up at Malcolm Turnbull’s request back in 2015 and it was the LNP that developed the Digital Identity Framework in 2016, it was launched in March 2018.
Coalition Senators noted that in the midst of the COVID-19 PLANdemic in September 2020, the then Senate Select Committee recommended that:
“The Digital Identity reforms led by the Digital Transformation Agency be accelerated in order to deliver a national, economy-wide framework for the operation of a federated digital identity ecosystem as soon as possible”.
In 2021 the Liberal Government drafted the Trusted Digital Identity Bill 2021 (now known as Digital ID Bill), and introduced it to Parliament in November 2021 but was not introduced as the May 2022 election intervened. One of the LP election platforms was an ‘expansion of the Digital Identity System’.
The ALP didn’t announce a position on the digital identity bill, they took it off the table as it knew it would be a hot election issue.
Also, back in August 2021, Labor and LNP voted in “The Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2020 in just 24-hours.
These politicians IGNORED “crucial recommendations of the bipartisan Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security that stronger safeguards are needed to protect the privacy of Australians”
This bill allows for location tracking and the tracking and storage of interactions between individuals and both public and private organisations. The proposed scheme aims to link all personal information, granting the federal government complete oversight of citizens’ live.
The two-party cabal has been working together for decades to take us down the path to Communism and have NO interest in representing the people but controlling, surveilling and taxing the life out of us.
I wonder if the app to accept Digital ID has an additional check box titled “All Rights Reserved UCC 1-308”.
I wonder if it would help the Digital ID’s twin slave tech, CCTV surveillance, if the majority of people who entered the CBD or train stations or shops wore some kind of mask or wide-brimmed hat with mozzie net obsucring the face.
Ima Spokes-Thing
Ever-Helpful Tech P/L
A few salient points are mentioned in my video on the digital ID:
https://rumble.com/v452i3u-digital-id-bill-2024-is-this-an-unlawfull-government-social-engineering-pro.html
yes of course ex PM Morrisson also declared the vaxx was VOLUNTARY??? BUT left it open to the STATES and business to do as they wanted… so he gave them the bullet and they certainly knew how to discharge that bullet…>??I am still waiting for a LAW that goes back to promises and statements that prove in hind site to be lies… and then prosecute that MP, incl any PM?
And any fees that they must pay MUST be paid by the politician them selves NOT the taxpayer….And all those MPs that have an in cling of christian behaviour in them. they should remember the commandments….!!
Face nappies & the biotoxin were also personal choice. How did that go ? 🤡🍿
“Voluntary” my arse, folks. The Constitution doesn’t count for shit, so why in the world would anyone place any trust in the weasel words of their “legislation” or in the “good faith” or “good intentions” of the sold-out paid-off arseholes now poised to ENFORCE it?
When a spider weaves its web, does it diligently include gaps to allow non-consenting flies through?
Of course not, the most the spider might do is disguise the trap to lull those wayward insects into a false sense of security and complacency. Because they’re ALL the spider’s PREY, folks, just like YOU.
And did you notice the clauses for “exceptions” in their BS political double-speaking dribble, folks? All it takes is an “emergency” to be declared to RAM UNIVERSAL COMPULSORY DIGITAL ID up each and everyone’s tired sorely abused Useless Eater BUTTS whether you like it or not. And if you tyhink that’s EVER going to be revoked or wound back once they’ve DONE it, then you’re really not particularly bright.
We don’t have “law” here in Australia, corporate policies are all we have, and we’re not shareholders, so we have no say in the matter. If you need a wakeup call, just look at the tyranny imposed by the blood-sucking banksters over the last decade, all with the implicit blessing and support and COMPLICITY of “legislation” rammed through in the middle of the night by our fake foreign-owned CORPORATE “government”.
The snares have been laid all around us, now all they have to do is spring their myriad meticulously planned and gamed interconnecting traps, the proverbial Gordian Knot tied around our collective neck. And if you’re not scared shitless right now, then it will be far too late when you finally DO understand what’s happening.
It will be voluntary as voting, with CCP official in plain clothes next to ballot box. KKK
[…] Source link […]