CANDACE Owens and numerous other researchers looking into the assassination of Charlie Kirk are agreed on one thing – the case just does not make sense.
Owens has spoken to the man who took the infamous “shooter on the roof” video and he says that Tyler Robinson is not the man he got on video. That person was wearing full tactical gear, he told Owens.
In addition, police don’t know how Robinson’s rifle got on to the roof at the campus. Robinson allegedly had it stashed down his trouser leg, but various photographs show this to be highly unlikely.
Robinson has also not confessed to the shooting, despite what appears to be an oblique reference to shooting on text exchanges that have no time stamp on them.
Owens also brings some additional information on the now deceased Thomas Matthew Crooks, the 21-year-old man who allegedly attempted to assassinate President Trump on July 13, 2024.
She shows Crooks social media and Google searches that show him obsessed with guns, shootings, bombings and other violent activities. Yet somehow he evaded the radar of Federal law enforcement.
Just BTW, folks, following from what Caltrop said – “… Charlie Kirk Murder Weapon Revealed…”
… neatly explains so many anomalies, including no exit wound, and the desperate need of all the “security” perps to immediately remove all the CAMERAS from Charlie’s tent, seeing as how the entire murder including the ASSASSIN would likely have been captured in that close video footage.
Remember that video camera BEHIND Charlie, folks? Seems they REALLY wanted to disappear THAT little item, and to Hell with any lawful CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION protocols!
Now watch over coming days, weeks and months as they figure out how to neatly ELIMINATE that poor stooge patsy the FBI now has in custody. My money’s on him SUICIDING in his high security cell, after all the guards fall asleep and all the security cameras mysteriously simultaneously “fail”. After first writing a “suicide note” admitting EVERYTHING, of course.
Caltrop said – “… Charlie Kirk Murder Weapon Revealed…”
About as open-and-shut as a case could be.
Expect debunking efforts with allegations of AI video fabrication.
If there are multiple recorded angles on that individual, it would be very hard to bury. Although we can be assured that neither the FBI nor Secret Service (WTF were they doing at a Charlie Kirk event anyway?) will even acknowledge it, seeing as how we all know who owns and runs their respective in-house circuses.
They’ve already got their fall-guy, after all, and they’ve got agendas to push and patsies to hang.
https://rense.com/general98/MURDER-WEAPON.php
Charlie Kirk Murder Weapon Revealed And How The Brown Shirt Man (Professional Assassin) Killed Him
CLICK HERE
https://rense.com/?Learn
Kirk event whether real or not is irrelevant. Narrative set. Agenda achieved.Christian Revival happening in billions. Using deepstate tactics in reverse.Unstoppable now. Alls fair in love & war 🫡🍿🌞
Pat from Vic asks “If Charlie Kirk was actually shot in the neck” – no he wasn’t, he was shot in the back of his head, the neck injury was the exit point.
See this video which shows the bullet (not from Tyler’s rifle) entered the back of his head then exited from his neck – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbaQadkqkzI
I don’t know who shot him, I expect we’ll never know, but it wasn’t the Tyler bloke.
If Charlie Kirk was actually shot in the neck, severing his Carotid Artery so he rapidly bled out, then we KNOW with 99.9999% certainty that it weren’t no damn moose-killing sniper round from 200 yards, which would have removed his entire neck and taken out about three or four people behind him as well.
In summary, everything coming out of the organs of officialdom around this assassination is BS. Is anyone surprised? Now, why do you suppose they would all be so determined to BURY THE TRUTH, hmmmm?
And if we want to find out who was REALLY behind it, just look around for the biggest and quickest DENIAL of any involvement and the most opportunistic EXPLOITATION of the event to advance OTHER narratives and agendas. That oughta give you a clue.
Hint – the usual suspects. And we don’t mean Hamas or Isis or even Al Quaeda. And no, not Iran FFS.
Where is the proof that Kirk was actually shot with a bullet in the first place? All the supposed evidence, both actual (gunshot and Kirk falling to the ground?))and anecdotal (pretty well everything else?), is creating so much confusion (chaos?) along with statements by the FBI, etc, etc.Even the suggestion that a 30.06 round hitting Kirk in the head has been bunked over and over again?
All the focus seems to be on trying to find the shooter, the gun or even the supposed cartridge as definitely causing the death (maybe?) of Kirk ….and yet no one is considering an alternative to a shooting ….to consider that this was all staged? It will not be the first time?
Hint: The man in the brown shirt at the front of the crowd, taken with a video behind Kirk at the time, was facing Kirk on the stage. He strangely fiddled with his shirt as if pulling something ( maybe a remote trigger?) and then the gunshot went off and Kirk slowly fell over to the floor on his left, All seems a bit too coincidental?