Senator Tim Ayres, the arrogant face of Labor Party privilege and power, who bristled when put on the spot about his party's sell-out of Australia to the Paris Accord and the global green energy scam.
Senator Gerard Rennick … hard-hitting questions rattled Labor kingpin Tim Ayres.

LABOR Senator Tim Ayres, who is also Minister for Industry and Innovation and Science, has provided a stunning example of the corrupting effect of power and privilege.

The former union official who allegedly served the interests of manufacturing workers, was caught metaphorically with his pants down when Senator Gerard Rennick repeatedly asked him and a senior public servant why it is that renewable energy suppliers need to be subsidized with Federal Government handouts when Australians are repeatedly told that renewable energy is the cheapest form of electricity.

When Ayres attempted to evade Rennick’s questions, he then reverted to his old bully boy union tactics of pulling rank and began to tell Rennick to basically shut up because he would answer the questions how he wanted to without interruption.

Rennick’s persistence clearly got under the Minister’s skin: “As I said, if you want to shout over the top of me that’s fine, but you won’t get answers to your questions,” he said, displaying body language that reflected rage and an arrogance of power as if to suggest questions were below him.

“Well I’m not getting answers now. I just asked a question,” Rennick shot back, at which stage the committee chairwoman came in to tell Rennick to “ask your questions but please allow the Minister to answer them. It is up to the Minister to choose how he answers the questions …”

Ayres, barely concealing that rage, then reverted to the tired old tactic of saying how badly the former Coalition government handled the energy system. “Four gigawatts out, one gigawatt in,” he said. “That was the result of a decade of people sitting on their hands in terms of energy policy.

“This government has, and I think we’ve traversed some of the detail this morning, I’m not sure whether you were listening or not, Mr (Simon) Duggan (deputy director) is in a position to go through the detail – a significant amount of new capability coming in,” he said, again talking around Rennick’s question.

“Now that requires government leadership, it requires government action. It is anticipated that the cost that is attached between now and 2050 and achieving the government’s targets will largely be met by the private sector,” he blathered on.

Cairns News knows, as do many Australians, the reality is that the cost will be met largely by consumers and the lying Ayres and his party have sold out Australian consumers, business and industry to an expensive and unreliable energy system that will send the Australian economy backwards.

At the hearing Rennick had raised the question of “energy contracts for difference”, that is how much the Commonwealth and NSW governments provide under agreements with the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO Services) to effectively underwrite revenue for energy suppliers.

Duggan, a deputy director at the Department of Climate Change, Energy and Water, responded: “In volume terms, the Federal Government is underwriting 32 gigawatts of renewable and storage.”

“What’s the cost of that in dollar terms?” Senator Rennick asked.

“So the cost isn’t disclosed in the budget papers, for the reason that having disclosed the total volume, disclosing the cost would then give you a sense of what the average price would be per gigawatt and effectively that would prejudice the negotiations were we to publish a figure.

“Well, effectively, as I said, what we need to see is highly competitive auctions with the private sector going through the price discovery process and bidding at the lowest possible price,” Duggan responded.

Rennick: “But isn’t that taxpayers’ money you’re using to underwrite renewables?”

“So it sits as a contingent liability on the Commonwealth’s balance sheet,” said Duggan, attempting to water down Rennick’s suggestion.

“So if electricity prices were to fall to a level, wholesale electricity prices would fall to a level below to what an individual proponent had put forward through their tender arrangement as the price, the strike price that they are bidding in at in order to receive underwriting support, then there would be an implication for the Commonwealth Government in terms of payments that would need to be made under those contracts, but at the point where the contracts are set – as I said it’s a contingent liability, it’s a balance sheet.”

Rennick persisted: “Okay, why should the taxpayer have to underwrite the private sector, given that we’re constantly told by the government that renewables are cheaper? … Maybe you can answer this Minister (Ayres), but why does the Federal Government, the taxpayer, have to underwrite privately-owned energy providers?”

At this point Ayres came in with an outpouring of duplicitous “polispeak”. “Well I think I might let Mr Duggan answer on the detail about what the, ah, mobilising principles are under the CIS and the way that incentives are structured to deliver the fastest possible rollout of the lowest cost.”

Rennick: “Why would renewables need incentives given that they’re already cheaper? I’d call that a subsidy, wouldn’t you?”

The bristling Ayres then responded: “I’m going to take the approach for these estimates, Senator, where I’ll, you’ll ask the questions which you’re entitled to ask, and I’ll answer them and you won’t interrupt me.”

Rennick says it turns out that the government is actually underwriting renewable energy providers for their losses. “This means everything we’re told about them being cheaper is a lie,” he said in a social media post.

“What’s worse is that the government won’t tell us how much taxpayers are stumping up to fund these companies.”

And thanks to a bunch of corrupt, clueless and compromised Queensland Liberal National Party backroom operatives, the Senator who valiantly and decisively exposed the Labor Party’s renewable energy scam and the destruction of Australia’s economic lifeblood is no longer sitting in the Senate.

Before getting into Parliament Senator Ayres was an organiser for the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (NSW/ACT branch) and assistant secretary for the same AMWU branch from 2004 to 2010. He rose up the ranks to secretary of the branch from 2010 to 2017.

Now as a prominent Labor minister and member of the ALP national executive, Ayres is effectively destroying Australian manufacturing and industry and the small business sector by pushing the virtual destruction of the coal-fired energy supply system that fueled Australia’s spectacular industrial growth for much of the previous century.

At the committee hearing Rennick effectively exposed Ayres and his Labor gang’s treacherous sell out to the Paris Accord’s global “wealth redistribution scheme” (aka transition to net zero carbon) to dismantle the nation’s 24×7 coal-fired energy supply by subsidizing a bunch of opportunist companies to build wind and solar farms with standby batteries.

This so-called renewable, net zero energy system is already in place in South Australia, which provides Australia’s most expensive and unreliable electricity and would simply fail were it not connected to the national grid and coal-fired power stations.

The transition to net zero effectively completes the UN’s long-standing deindustrialisation scheme to shift industry to the so-called third world cheap labor locations. So Ayres is effectively selling out the manufacturing workers he once allegedly represented.

Rennick also exposed the dirty, underhanded dealings of the TGA in regard their pushing of dangerous mRNA vaccines, which is probably the major reason he was dumped for preselection by his cowardly Uniparty colleagues – but that’s another story.

Share Everywhere !

Shares

By cairnsnews

From the land of Australians

15 thought on “The day Rennick nailed union boy-cum-Minister over Labor’s renewable energy subsidy scam”
  1. It’s worth chipping in about Gough, he was sacked by the G-G so that says it all. The loans affair would have been a scam, the blue faction bought off, the Lima Declaration was basically a foot in the door not a total sell-off. Whatever Gough’s political origins, no matter how misguided, nothing beats getting sacked to prove you were working for the people.

  2. Having read important parts in previous comments, I would like to point a few things out that are undeniable.
    Firstly regarding the the custodian issue and the 65,000 years comment. God created Australia and everything in it. God also has ownership of everything in Australia. However, He gave people Dominion over Australia. meaning that we in Australia have a responsibility to care and to develop this country.
    (this is opposed to the theory of the environmentalists and false prophets with their doomsday predictions, now guiding this fine country down the drain.

    God gave promises to His children Israel, in that his chosen people were given a range of them (with certain parts of the covenant). Now the nation of the Israel went through captivity and finally left the middle east and migrated north and northwest. (these people are know as the lost 10 tribes.)
    These people finally made their way to Australia. The lost people’s identity are the Christian faith believers in the Lord.
    God told his people that they should not let foreigners rule over them.
    If we follow the destruction of Australia from around the beginning of the 1900’s, and compare our constitution of our founding parliamentarians, the destruction of the Commonwealth Bank (see the booklet of the History of the Commonwealth Bank). Early Australia was a world leader, manufacturing industries, made most of out needs here, and compare with our situation now.
    All but basic manufacturing has disappeared. and we rely on imports.
    I have been to overseas countries and what has struck me is when I shop there, the local products are much cheaper than imported products. Meaning they look after their own. In Australia the reverse is opposite. Forget about where our food comes from, and the treatment of our farmers is appalling.
    All forms of Government are responsible, and the Uniparty is alive and well.
    Without labouring on to much longer we need to look at major determinations that have occurred over time. Our oil industry was flourishing during the 50 and 60’s. Then the policy of world parity pricing was adopted. Result, devasting effect on all of our industries.
    Car manufacturing industry, I have been to many countries overseas, which have small populations and they have thriving car manufacturing industries.
    Now we have to put up with the false prophets with their own self belief in alternative energy. If you go to China, South Korea, Japan you will notice that the countryside is covered with beautiful forests, the streets are lined with beautiful flowers. Can not see any harmful Co2 effects.
    If you travel to Ephesus, the ships delivering cargo to that once famous city, the ships delivered the cargo right on the doorstep of the city. The ocean is now miles from the shore. I wonder much global warming is needed to bring the sea level back.
    The same is obvious if you visit the location of the famous city of Troy. The ocean is miles away from the shore.
    Solar panels – I have solar panels and they only work during the day and power production is less in heavy overcast weather. Production varies with the seasons, and when the mains power goes out, the solar does not function unless you have back up batteries. Just wondering how people put up with no mains power and their solar units do not take up the gap.
    Australians have been hammered with interfering policies –
    Rising seas, carbon supposedly increasing, oil and products imported, destruction of our main power grids, the meeting in Japan with a number of other countries where they started the dis-arming of Australia, destruction of the family makeup, what happens when our primary industries can no longer supply our needs (look in the shops this stage is very close) etc.
    Just a few thoughts.

  3. Once again we can thank our good mate Gough Whitlam and Barry Jones for signing Australia (not The Commonwealth) up to The Lima Declaration, thus implementing the slow death and decline of our manufacturing industry.
    Bravo Labour. sic

  4. I pray for the day Aussies wake up to the Labor-Greens ‘renewables’ scam….another example of economically illiterate Leftists burning $Billions of taxpayers money as they chase their socialist dreams…Europe has already woken up to the reality that ‘renewables’ will just hasten the destruction of their economy, while Australia-ten years behind- is still being mismanaged by a Labor Clown Show intent on destroying our reliable, effective coal and gas baseload power. Wake up Australia, you’re being had !

  5. Sooner or later these traitors need to be dealt with. I’m not getting any younger so I’m for sooner.

  6. It is not over yet for I request that Senator Rennick request The Chair get that question answered seeing Senator Tim Ayres seems none too keen on enlightening Australians on what we are paying for

  7. The ALP’s ChinaFirst! policy has been in existence at least since Prime Minion Bob Hawke’s time, and the hothouse effect has been running that long too, still with no change in the Australian ski season, and other markers. As soon as greenism appeared, the manipulators were in there boots and all. World trends and events in most cases seem to be directed by the manipulators, if not, quickly infiltrated, patented and sold back to the public.
    All ALP minions are available for a cheap price and the blue faction of the UnaParty also willing to sell out for a small, very small cut in the profits they deliver, in the case of Climate, the Blue faction has been engineered sideways by Baron S Hacca the younger, of the pitifully cheap NGO “Climate200” with its Teals Party marketing confection. Kate Chaney, the Teal’s MP for Curtin, Western Australia, re-elected in 2025, was named a Young Global Leader in the WEF’s 2023 cohort. So who is to blame, the politician or the philanthropist. If the latter, they are like the drug dealer, with multiple clients, while the former is like the drug user. Continuation in my comment below for anyone who missed the connections.

  8. Rinnick is totally correct in Renewables are subsidised by the tax payer. As for being cheaper, energy prices have never been higher. And Minister Ayers behaviour when questioned, is routinely bombastic and rude, because he heads a duplicitous ministry and could not lie straight in bed. Tax-pyers are just being robbed by government’s false “breathing” tax (this is what it effectively amounts to).

  9. Tims lifetime unionist career and a BA explain a lot. His betrayal of his own people is surprising though, especially for somebody who grew up in rural NSW. All true communists / labor members must toe the party line so I guess that why he has turned on us. His 2019 first speech opening paragraphs clarify labors racist doctrine over their soon to be mongrelised 2nd nations peoples, removing their indigenous rights and sovereignty completely;
    I want to begin by acknowledging the Ngunawal people, traditional owners of the land where this parliament meets, and—given that this is my first speech—acknowledge First Nations all around Australia. No other nation can boast 65,000 years of continuous history, culture and custodianship of its lands.
    Australia is, as the Governor-General said, a work in progress. We should embrace this continent’s grand history of culture, of art and language, of music, of dance, of governance and of songlines. Aboriginal languages are Australian languages. Indigenous art is at the core of Australian art. And continued First Nation custodianship enriches our nation. I want to acknowledge and pay respects to Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander elders past, present and emerging and, in particular, to my Labor colleagues the Hon. Linda Burney MP and Senators McCarthy and Dodson.
    The Uluru statement sets out a course for the nation toward reconciliation and advancement of the First Australians. I wholeheartedly embrace it and the opportunity to make change possible. Voice, treaty, truth: simple, powerful demands. Clarity of purpose is vital, if Australia is to grow together. That the voice to parliament has been so wilfully misrepresented so early should be a source of shame.
    No, the shames all yours Tim

  10. Arrogance, a superior attitude & corruption will come back to bite you in the b*m Ayres..!! You are not a senator’s bootlace… 🤡

  11. Asking the bot:
    The question appears to refer to Robert Holmes à Court, the South African-born Australian businessman who died in 1990. However, the phrasing suggests you might be asking about a hypothetical scenario where he did not die, or possibly conflating him with his brother Simon Holmes à Court, who disappeared in 1977. Since the query mentions “Holmes-a-Court” and the context of disappearance aligns more closely with Simon, I’ll address both possibilities, focusing on Robert’s hypothetical survival and Simon’s disappearance, to cover all bases.
    If Robert Holmes à Court Did Not Die in 1990
    Robert Holmes à Court, Australia’s first billionaire, died suddenly of a heart attack in 1990 at age 53. Speculating on where he might have gone had he not died involves considering his business trajectory, personality, and the economic landscape of the time.
    Business Ventures and Corporate Raiding: Holmes à Court was a renowned corporate raider in the 1980s, building a diversified empire through Bell Group and Heytesbury Holdings, with interests in resources, media, and entertainment. His aggressive acquisition strategy included unsuccessful bids for companies like Ansett Transport Industries and The Times, as well as significant moves against Broken Hill Proprietary Co.. Had he lived, he likely would have continued targeting undervalued companies, possibly expanding internationally. The 1987 stock market crash had already forced him to sell assets and restructure, but by 1990, he was rebuilding Heytesbury as a private entity. He might have focused on consolidating his holdings in media (e.g., West Australian Newspapers) or pastoral properties, or pursued new sectors like technology, which was emerging in the 1990s.
    Retreat to Private Life: After the 1987 crash, Holmes à Court expressed fatigue with public life and a desire to focus on his thoroughbred horse breeding farm, Heytesbury Stud. ( etc etc )
    If the Question Refers to Simon Holmes à Court’s Disappearance
    The query might be confusing Robert with his brother Simon, who disappeared in 1977 under mysterious circumstances in Africa. Simon’s car was found abandoned over 1,000 km from his home in Botswana, and author Geoff Elliott wrote a book about the case. Theories about Simon’s fate include:
    Foul Play or Kidnapping: Given the distance between his last known location and the car, some speculate Simon was targeted, possibly due to his family’s wealth or business connections. Southern Africa in the 1970s was politically volatile, with conflicts in Rhodesia and apartheid-era South Africa. He could have been caught in political or criminal activity, though no evidence confirms this.
    Accidental Death: Simon may have suffered an accident in the remote region, such as getting lost or encountering wildlife. The lack of a body or further clues makes this plausible but unproven.
    Voluntary Disappearance: Another theory is that Simon chose to vanish, perhaps to escape family pressures or start anew. However, his close ties to his family, including brother Robert, and lack of subsequent sightings make this less likely.
    No Definitive Leads: Despite investigations, no conclusive evidence has emerged. Geoff Elliott’s book suggests the mystery remains unsolved, with the car’s location being the primary clue. Simon’s whereabouts, if he survived, are purely speculative—possibly living under a new identity ( etc )

  12. Senator Tim Ayres, why are you so hellbent intent on collapsing Australia & repeatedly liaring to the public & your own conscience = you wouldn’t be doing that to keep your job would you????? Because if you are you are going to suffer hard karmic lessons which will cripple you with anger & repeatedly see brick walls thrown up in front of you.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from cairnsnews.org

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading