By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
|IT appears that a slim majority of voters on Sydney’s North Shore have fallen for billionaire Simon Holmes a Court’s grand deception that his “Community Independents” movement is some sort of alternative political movement.
A Court’s big lie is contained within his Climate200 organisation that proclaims “The fight to climate-proof Parliament continues”. The big lie is that if Australia goes all out on “green energy” it will somehow be “saving the planet from climate change”.
A Court and his businesses are invested to the eyeballs in so-called renewables, and a massive part of that is the easy money reaped from the Albanese government’s renewable wind and solar subsidies.
As noted by the Centre for Independent Studies: “The 2024-25 budget allocates more than $22 billion to boost renewables in Australia. This includes $13.7 billion in production tax incentives for green hydrogen and processed critical minerals as well as the $1.7 billion Future Made in Australia Innovation Fund aimed at developing new industries like green metals and low carbon fuels.”
Oh yes Mr A Court, we really do believe you have deep and sincere concern for the planet, which is why you spent millions of dollars funding first the Teals in the previous election, and now the “Community Independents” to ensure “the program” keeps on track.
And just in case our readers missed it, we’ll state the obvious again: Simon Holmes a Court’s Climate200 organisation is funding and using a fake political front groups to push the global green agenda, the very same agenda being pushed by the Albanese government and previous Coalition governments.
Holmes a Court very cleverly funded the green Teal ladies’ campaign in 2022 because he knew there was (and still is) a big chunk of Liberal Party voters who are Left-leaning feminists and “climate aware” aka, “sophisticated”, well-heeled urban folk, many of them women, who have swallowed the climate change/green-is-good narrative.
And as we know, these Teal ladies like Dr Monique Ryan from Melbourne or Zali Steggall from North Sydney, were basically Greens in high heels and professional business suits.
This time round however, slippery Simon added another touch: his Community Independents were out to challenge the “two party dominance”. Now where have we heard that line so many times, freedom fighters? Perhaps Clive Palmer and a few others could take a lesson here.
A Court targeted a specific demographic, a section of the population who have traditionally voted Liberal but have Left leanings and wouldn’t stoop to vote Green because they can see a little “red” in there.
The freedom parties are also targeting a section of the population who are disaffected with the political system. The difference is that a Court had a unified movement when the freedom parties were thoroughly fragmented.
In the North Sydney seat of Bradfield, a Court’s candidate Nicolette Boele looks to have won the seat from her Liberal “opponent” Gisele Kapterian. We question the opponent designation because she (like many Liberal women) and Boele basically believe in the same things.
Kapterian has all the “correct qualifications” for Liberal candidacy; corporate world high achiever who studied law at Cambridge under a Commonwealth Trust Scholarship, assisted in the case against Ethiopia for war crimes and completed an internship at the World Trade Organization, before working as an international trade lawyer in Geneva and London – a true globalist.
Cairns News election specialist Lex Stewart had some interesting observations about the Bradfield result.
“One of my observations of the close counts of the last 30 years is that it has almost always been the case that the result ends up against the Coalition. One would expect on the ‘law of averages’ that roughly half the time it would go one way, and half the time the other way.
“When I looked at the counting for Bradfield this morning it was 56,047 votes for the Liberal candidate and 55,997 votes for the Teal, who was therefore 50 votes behind the Lib in a total of 112,044 votes..
“Now TV9 news has a story about a “shock twist in the election race”.
“At 6.07pm on https://tallyroom.aec.gov.au/HouseDivisionPage-31496-108.htm it shows 56,192 for the Liberal and 56,231 for the Teal, a margin of the Teal over the Liberal of 39 votes, in a total of 112,423, plus about 6,417 informals.
“And so during today the AEC has counted an extra 379 votes, of which 234 or 62% went to the Teal, and only 145 or 38% for the Liberal. This large disparity 62 to 38 seems suspicious to me.Where did those extra 379 votes counted today come from?
“I see that the data for postal and absentee votes shows much larger numbers of votes for the Liberal than for the Teal, so you would expect that with a few more of this dribbling in that the balance would tip towards the Liberal candidate..
“Did the Liberals have good scrutineers in attendance during all of the counting, and at all polling booths on election night?!! I wonder if an AEC employee with an eraser altered a few pencil ballot papers?!
“Yes it did happen – refer to my attached submission to the Parliamentary review committee. But my submission was ignored, and its concerns were not mentioned in the committee’s report.”
We might add that the great irony of this electorate is that it is named after the brilliant Australian engineer John Bradfield who oversaw the building of the Sydney Harbour Bridge and advocated for dam building.
We strongly suspect that, sadly, neither of the Bradfield candidates would support John Bradfield’s vision for Australia in the form of the Bradfield Scheme, and certainly not the billionaire greenie a Court, his other candidates and business cabal.
There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe: MIT Professor Dr Richard Lindzen – Climate Depot
According to Lindzen, all recent predictions of climate catastrophe have proven false, and future ones will be as well. “2030 will pass. 2050 will pass. Fifty years will pass. There will be no climate catastrophe,” he says.
In the interview, Lindzen thoroughly discusses what climate scientists know about climate change and its processes, as well as the half-truths and outright lies propagated by those proclaiming a climate crisis. He addresses topics such as the limited capacity of CO2 to warm the planet, its actual role on Earth, misleading claims about the increasing frequency of extreme weather events, the absurdity of climate policies and the future of energy.
Dr Richard Lindzen is an internationally recognized American atmospheric scientist and MIT emeritus professor whose contributions to climate science are significant.
https://www.climatedepot.com/2025/05/29/there-will-be-no-climate-catastrophe-mit-professor-dr-richard-lindzen/
RE: “Voting” isn’t about what we want. Never was. It’s about US consenting to THEM doing whatever the Hell they want to do to US.”
Too right!
The “mandate” we give our political slime by “electing” them feeds the slime fest and invests it with the alleged aura of “the will of the people”!
Best of all, it gaslights you that if you disagree with the slime fest you’re running against the community trend. Against their herd management policies.
And that makes you a black sheep ‘radical’ simply because you’re normal and don’t fancy being dicked around by a procession of Toms, Dicks and Harrys and Arthas and Marthas.
They DO KNOW how to get you to bend over and keep your knees straight as you do their dusting for them.
Sorry, posted on the wrong page, meant for the public service budget blowout
Ai the lot for pennies in the dollar and an upgrade way above the pay grade. The advantages AI is accountable, adjustable and far far more intelligent. Plus it’s probably the only fix left for all the Victims In Crime in Danny boys buggered state of Victoria. Once it’s setup and payed for it should be practically free.
Australia ‘most bloated bureaucracy in the world’
Excerpt > Economy suffocated by expanding public servant numbers.
The urgent need to tackle and dismantle leeching bureaucracies is ever-present, especially with estimations that another 25,000 new public service jobs have been created since the Albanese government took power.
Will reckless spending ever be reined in?
BUREAUCRATIC MADNESS
Australia’s government public service burden is getting out of control.
It’s a shame that any discussions regarding this fact were dismissed as ‘Trump policies’ at the 2025 Federal Election, because it is an issue that needs addressing quickly.
Let’s take a look at just how bad things have become.
THE LATEST DATA FROM THE AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS (ABS) SHOWS THAT PUBLIC SECTOR WAGE BILLS INCREASED BY 8% NATIONWIDE IN 2023-24 ALONE – NOW SITTING AT $232 BILLION.
‘BUREAUCRATIC LUNATICS RUNNING THE ASYLUM’ IS IT TIME TO ABOLISH LOCAL COUNCILS?
PEOPLE FED UP
LOCALS SLAM BLOATED COUNCIL’S HISTORY OF ‘INCOMPETENCE’ AS IT SEEKS 40 PER CENT RATE HIKE
‘SHOCKING’: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL PUSHES FOR 87 PER CENT RATES HIKES TO PAY FOR BOTCHED POOL REDEVELOPMENT
DAMNING POLL REVEALS SIGNIFICANT SUPPORT TO SCRAP LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR SCALE BACK BUREAUCRACY
CALL TO CANCEL COUNCILS
Please continue >
https://crazzfiles.com/australia-most-bloated-bureaucracy-in-the-world/
Well folks,
Here’s today’s thought for your meditation.
“Voting” isn’t about what we want. Never was. It’s about US consenting to THEM doing whatever the Hell they want to do to US. And they’ve got your name on a list to PROVE it.
Because they get to kill US, but we don’t get to kill THEM. And they get paid SHITLOADS of money by US to DO it. And they’re UNTOUCHABLE, there’s no possible downside for them no matter WHAT they do, not here, not there, not now, not then, not EVER. There’s only obscene wealth and luxury for them, and the sky’s the limit.
Hey, with odds like that, who WOULDN’T kill everyone in Australia and hand the place over to a bunch of genocidal megalomaniacs? Dr. Evil never had it so good, with all the Useless Eaters just obediently lining up for the abbatoir without him even having to TRY.
The more Australia goes GREEN the more the weather becomes chaotic it is apparent.
RE: “A Court and his businesses are invested to the eyeballs in so-called renewables”
Reckon there’s not much to be condemned when a fella invests a few million to score a few billion. Right, possums?
It’s how “communism” works, right, possums? rotfl
Whose fault is it that we silently permit
shills to herd us into rabbit holes and into stupidity without even a squeal?
We’re being plundered, possums, just in case youse have any doubts. We’re losing and going backwards on just about every front. Starting with our basic civil and human rights, whatever assets and savings we have and ultimately ending with even our own self respect, assuming we end up breathing by the time the plunder is done.
Why does the spell checker change prima donnas to primaRY when it let’s all sorts of other typos go through, this spell checker is the dumbest invention of the year.
Even in this comment look what it’s done, put an apostrophe in lets. It is so dumb it would not get through a year 10 English exam. This can only be done on purpose. It could not be so dumb by accident. They are trying to screw everyone up.
There is no such thing as human induced climate change. Fact not opinion.
If Holmes a Court is intelligent and educated he would know this and if so he is either very deluded or very corrupt.
The only alternative? Eccentric and madness come to mind.
Yes in critical seats they would install AEC workers capable of critical missions, to judge by history all over the world. Now if Clive had learned from Hacca’s operation he would have covertly started the Pink Ladies party and split the ALP vote. “Pink Ladies for cheap electricity” would work for Clive’s coal interests whatever they might be. Unfortunately almost none of the independent primary donnas could work together despite very similar platforms.