NEW Zealand is a basket case example of the work of UNDRIP – the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous People. The country is under attack by indigenous extremists who essentially want the nation ruled by an indigenous dictatorship.
This has been all but admitted in Parliament by Maori Party MP Rawiri Waititi, a tattoo-covered racist loon who likes to parade himself around with a cowboy hat and oversized tribal ornaments around his neck.
Waititi’s demands for an all-Maori electoral is based on his warped understanding of the Treaty of Waitangi, in which most of the Maori tribal chiefs of the early to mid-1800s knowingly ceded sovereignty to the Crown of England and it’s colonial representatives.
Waititi exploits the cultural-Marxist indigenist claptrap taught in NZ schools and universities – the idea that the English and other colonists were simply intent in undertaking genocide against the Maori population. It was the Maori themselves who undertook genocide against the earlier inhabitants, the Moriori, who were forced to flee to the Chatham Islands.
Indigenism was put on steroids by ex-Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, and the country’s university law schools now require that students qualify not only in law, but “tikanga”, defined by Wikipedia as, quote: “a Māori term for Māori law, customary law, attitudes and principles, and also for the indigenous legal system which all iwi abided by prior to the colonisation of New Zealand.”
There was no indigenous legal system comparable to that which had been established in Britain over the centuries. Maori law was tribal law, enforced by the tribal leaders, who fought with other tribal leaders for territorial dominance.
NZ First leader Winston Peters and other Maori on the conservative side of politics, not having a bar of this modern indigenist baloney, ran a fairly successful election campaign on it and related issues, as did David Seymour of the libertarian Act Party, who wanted a restatement of Treaty of Waitangi principles put to a referendum.
Both parties went into coalition with the Opposition National Party who needed their numbers to run the Parliament. But the latter, especially its leader Christopher Luxon, were a bitter disappointment. Luxon has turned out to be little more than a globalist turncoat, a CEO-technocrat and banker’s yes man.
The best that Luxon’s team could do to stem the indigenist tide was to end the renaming of government departments in Maori. Even now, the foreign, English-speaking visitor to New Zealand is faced with a bewildering array of Maori language when trying to negotiate a government website or document.
Peters meanwhile has come out in strong support of a leading Kiwi KC Gary Judd, who filed a complaint against the compulsory teaching of Maori customs and language in law schools.
“Tikanga is not law. It is cultural indoctrination,” Peters posted on X last week. “A senior, highly respected King’s Counsel with decades of experience in our law courts, Gary Judd KC, has filed a complaint about compulsory tikanga Māori studies for law students – highlighting the utter depths of absurdity this woke cultural madness has taken our society.
“The tikanga regulations will compel law students to be taught that a system, which does not conform with the rule of law, is nevertheless law which should be observed and applied. As Judd KC points out in his complaint, tikanga is not law.
“Law students should not be force fed this kind of woke indoctrination from some culture warrior’s slanted version of what tikanga means.”
Peters noted with disgust that the Dean of the AUT (Auckland University of Technology) Law School, Kylee Quince, funded by the taxpayer, “decided to typically stoop to a gutter level and call Judd an ‘old racist dinosaur’ who should ‘die quietly in the corner’.”
“This is from someone who is in charge of teaching our law students. How has this kind of insipid, cancerous, woke indoctrination taken a hold within our education system?” he asked.
Judd KC pointed out what is written in law, and said it was ridiculous to require students be indoctrinated with “irrelevant cultural interpretations having no reason, being part of a law degree.”
“Someone in Quince’s position, with this septic and out of touch modus operandi, raises the question of the proper use of taxpayer funding. She does not represent New Zealand or what we expect in our tertiary institutions,” said Peters.
Peters, at various speaking engagements around the country, has expressed alarm at the cultural revolution happening within NZ, the same cultural revolution being turned on its head by President Trump.
lol It’s nuthing to do with indigenous rights. It’s a simple matter of demolishing national identity and nationhood AND LAND OWNERSHIP. It’s simply taking over the land as one of the key means of economic production (land, labour and kapital!)
It’s called TOTAL CONTROL! And soon they won’t need any labour when AI is refined and the robots take over. All youse useless eaters will become even more useless, except for causing trubble unless you’re under control. lol
Note on Mori-Ori, for readers who haven’t seen this series:
‘New Zealand Skeletons in the Cupboard’
Episode #1 is ‘The Red Heads’.
One of the better docos imo, still on YouTube.
Some of the people interviewed in NZ (South?) are direct descendents of the group that apparently all fled to Chatham Island – another psy-op.
NZ was a land of giants at one point in time.
I wonder if a similar thing was happening in Aus at the time.
Time for the original Mori-Ori sovereign owners to stand up & stake their claim. The Hawaiian Māoris have only very recently committed genocide on the Mori-Ori in the last 500years circa. The Maori have no lawful claim.
[…] Source link […]
I am not so sure how much to blame the UN. They could be shocked as well. John Key started the latest problems by sending Sharples to the UN at New York to sign to UNDRIP. Ardern piled in on top with more damage.
The warring and cannibalism caught up with Maori. They had murdered Marion du Fresne a French skipper and were afraid of French navy reprisals. Maori asked the British for help.
Maori had no sovereign ruler. They did not surrender sovereignty they surrendered themselves to Queen Victoria who they regarded as a higher authority.
Marxist communist mischief is behind it all.
Peters and others have signed in support of Treaty settlements. Controlled opposition?
Note: NZ had Natives. The term Maori came into use after 1840.
NZ was under NSW when the Treaty was signed in 1840.
Then came Queen Victoria’s Royal Charter/Letters Patent dated November 1840 which gave NZ independence and all were equal under British law.
Some person/s wrote this in the Wikipedia, since it is prone to changing I thought I would cut and paste it
On 19 November and 5 December 1835, about 900 Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama men, women and children, previously resident in Te Whanganui-a-Tara (Wellington) and led by the chief Pōmare Ngātata, arrived at Chatham Islands on the brig Lord Rodney. The group brought with them 78 tonnes of seed potato, 20 pigs and seven large waka (war canoes).
The incoming Māori were received and initially cared for by the local Moriori. When it became clear that the visitors intended to stay, the Moriori withdrew to their marae at Te Awapatiki to meet and debate what to do about the Māori settlers. The Moriori decided to keep with their policy of non-aggression. Soon, Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama began to takahi, or walk the land, to lay claim to it.
Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama saw the Moriori meeting as a precursor to warfare on the part of Moriori and responded. The Māori attacked and in the ensuing action killed over 260 Moriori. A Moriori survivor recalled: “[The Māori] commenced to kill us like sheep… [We] were terrified, fled to the bush, concealed ourselves in holes underground, and in any place to escape our enemies. It was of no avail; we were discovered and killed – men, women and children – indiscriminately”. A Māori chief, Te Rakatau Katihe, said in the Native Land Court in 1870: “We took possession … in accordance with our custom, and we caught all the people. Not one escaped. Some ran away from us, these we killed; and others also we killed – but what of that? It was in accordance with our custom. I am not aware of any of our people being killed by them.”
After the killings, Moriori were forbidden to marry Moriori, or to have children with each other. Māori kept Moriori slaves until 1863, when slavery was abolished by proclamation of the resident magistrate. Many Moriori women had children by their Māori masters. A number of Moriori women eventually married either Māori or European men. Some were taken away from the Chathams and never returned. Ernst Dieffenbach, who visited the Chathams on a New Zealand Company ship in 1840, reported that the Moriori were the virtual slaves of Māori and were severely mistreated, with death being a blessing. By the time the slaves were released in 1863, only 160 remained, hardly 10% of the 1835 population.
Listen to Madison King NZ >
Australia – Welcome to a ‘conned’ Country – Madison King – Aboriginal Academic & Author
Posted on : 05/09/2024
by SEAN BURKE – WELCOME to Country ceremonies are a money-making scam with no credible links to Indigenous culture or traditions, according to Aboriginal academic Madison King.
Ms King said these ceremonies, which have been forced upon Australians for years, were a “made-up” tradition.
This is the outcome when you let a lie go on for that long. People now think Welcome to Country is real, that this is what our culture is.
“Welcome to Country is a private matter, it’s a personal matter. Doing it for thousands of people at the same time – I reckon it’s BS,” she said on a YouTube post yesterday.
“Everything about it is wrong, but they try to make out that it’s normal. It’s not normal.
COLLECTIVE
“I never turn up to anything that has Welcome to Country. If it is one-on-one or family-to-family, I’ll do it. Otherwise I’m not interested in doing it as a collective.”
Ms King, who has a double degree in psychology, criminology and justice, said the traditional ceremony was a religious-style event acknowledging the spirits of the dead.
“This modern-day Welcome to Country, however, was made up by what we call the ‘people in the purple circle’, a bunch of know-all f#ck-alls,” she said.
“They are forcing their religion onto you.”
She said the “purple circle” had been dishonest to enrich themselves.
“This is the outcome when you let a lie go on for that long. People now think it’s real, that this is what our culture is,” Ms King said.
“It’s just entertainment. Look at all these people who go to boxing rings clapping sticks or onto football fields carrying on with didgeridoos.
“That’s not our culture. Didgeridoos only came from a small area in the Northern Territory.”
She said the wider Australian community needed to be aware of the con.
“It’s one thing to do a little entertainment, but put things into perspective – that’s not our culture.
PURPOSE
“We didn’t just go around and have corroborees and stuff whenever we felt like it. There was a purpose and meaning to it.
“What an insult to all the mob that still do corroborees as a tradition, while you mob make a mockery out of it for money purposes.”
She said every-day Aboriginals were disgusted by their money-grabbing city cousins.
https://politicom.com.au/welcome-to-being-conned/
You mean this KC?
[ youtube.com/watch?v=O0_H3F84Yjk ]
… because clearly, that IS the way they like it, folks.
And anyway, what are ya gonna do about it?
[…] Source link […]
New Zealand was ‘taken over’ by British settlers as was the custom in those days.
There was no specific battle for New Zealand by it’s natives, so in their ignorance of civilized practices, these lost ownership and became subordinates, as was customary.
Life happens and deaths result as has been the custom for about 6000 years.
Superior force overcomes inferior weaponry and governments follow.
The losers must integrate to the best of their ability to do so and become fully ones of the new system. Then life goes on when the unfortunate ones learn to cope and grow in new experiences.
This has always been the case historically, and natives are unlikely to get all their lands back as the settlers are now also the native race of that land, and everyone has to learn to live together peacefully or create uncomfortable living for others.
This is what happens when you eat the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.
Grandmother Mulara (apologies if that is spelt wrong) is one of if not the leading experts in Aboriginal law, which is natural law.
One of their peculiar parts of their law is how everybody in the tribe/s must decide one way or another, they talk and talk until it is all settled. Everyone then supports the decision. I probably didn’t explain that well…near enough.
Very educated lady, has law degrees so knows what she is talking about. The Aboriginals have never ceded their sovereignty and that was what the voice fraud referendum was about, a contract to cede sovereignty, by asking the rest of us…If it were yes it were still unacceptable, as it was fraud and deceit, sovereignty was not going to be ceded.
Treaty? Yeah! The bankers want contracts…treaties via the states these days…do not support their frauds.
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]