If Sharia law is so desirable, why do those who advocate for it choose to leave countries where it is already in place? Australia’s legal system is based on equality, freedom, and fairness for all. There’s no place for Sharia law here.
By cairnsnews
From the land of Australians
it was common for Jewish writers to describe Muhammad as ha-meshuggah (“the madman”), a term frequently used in the Bible for those who believe themselves to be prophets. it explains a lot of things like his supposed encounters with Jibril in a cave, his journey to Jannat to meet Allah on a winged horse called Buraq, and his claim of the splitting of the moon. According to Aisha, it happened once. But it does not seem to have been a one-off case due to someone practising magic, but repeated episodes due to psychiatric issues.
According to modern-day researchers who have analysed his character based on his life, he suffered from narcissism, delusion, and paranoid schizophrenia. since he was orphaned and secluded himself in a cave for no apparent reason and started to see and hear voices of an Angel which told him to do things, most people who suffer from schizophrenia believe that they are born to change the world and what not, also remember that early converts were weak minded, easily manipulated, society rejects and young children. It is also believed that he split the moon into parts, there is no such scientific evidence to back this miracle which might suggests that he was an illusionist – he definitely had a thing for children when he married Aishe at the tender age of only seven sitting her on his lap and publicly showing her his affection. Yet he claimed that he did not consumed the marriage until she was at the right age of maturity which was nine at the time. Even though they claim that women from that region tend to mature into adulthood earlier then those from the western world, still a nine years old is no where ready to participate in the act of intercourse with a grown man 30 or 40 years her senior. That is truly a sick and a dark chapter of Islam and its founders that are still respected and looked up to as god’s will and his true words through his holly men, the messenger of god with all its glory, my back side, they are a bunch of lying savages that fooled or forced many into embracing this nonsense that is religion at the time and to our disbelieve still do in many parts of the world. Ignorance has no limit no era knows no boundaries and goes on spreading like a wild fire.
Why multiculturalism must be annihilated:
“Australia’s culture is multiculturalism.” This was the answer my high school teacher gave when my class was discussing what Australian culture is back in late-1990s. Apparently, Germany, Lebanon, France, and every other country in history had a culture, but not Australia, which was merely a collection of co-existing cultures. At the time I believed my teacher – and he was a great teacher. I have since been told by countless people ranging from many of my fellow late-Gen Xers down to the Zoomers that they were told the same thing: “Australia’s culture is multiculturalism.”
This myth of multicultural essentialism must rank near the top of the list of the most pervasive and detrimental pieces of propaganda inflicted on Australians over the past thirty years. Not only is it false, but it has proven to be severely detrimental to the well-being of our nation.
Australia was not settled by a tossed salad of Italians, Greeks, Lebanese, Chinese, and a hundred other nationalities; it was not even settled by Australians. In 1788 Australia was settled by the British (including the Irish). In other words, Australia’s formative ideas, language, political institutions, expressions of Christianity, tastes in sport, economic system, literature, forms of entertainment, security alliances, and even sense of humour have been most powerfully shaped by Great Britain. This simple and obvious historical fact is the key to understanding who we are as a nation, even to this day.
As long as this truth is repressed, we will never know who we are; and if we do not know who we are, we will be powerless against false narratives about who we are. Indeed, the very point of telling Australians that our culture is multiculturalism is to weaken our sense of national identity in order for ideological movements such as multiculturalism, Aboriginal grievance, cultural Marxist wokeism, and Islamism to have an unopposed walkthrough in reshaping our laws, education system, and nation as a whole.
If the true answer to the question of who we are as a nation is banished from the public discussion, why should it be any wonder that Australians find it difficult to define themselves as a nation? It would be like trying to explain who you are to someone without being allowed to talk about your work, beliefs, interests, or family background. There’s not much left to say, not because there isn’t a truth to be said, but because the truth is the one thing that you cannot say. The truth is that Australia is historically and still to a large degree a British nation, albeit one which has welcomed people in from cultures all around the world to enjoy the fruits of the British traits I listed above.
It is less cultural amnesia than it is a form of hypnotic memory erasure cast upon us by professional multicultural activists, the ABC, and educators over the past thirty years. In our school curricula, the British aspect of our identity has been consistently left out of accounts of who we are and replaced by a focus on Asia and Indigenous history. When the impact of Britain is mentioned, it is solely to highlight the sins of colonialism. In other words, Britishness equals bad, and who would want to be defined by the bad guys?
The most pernicious effect of the myth multicultural essentialism is an immigration system that has produced deeply divisive sub-communities and social trauma, every now and then exploding unto ugliness and violence – the 2005 Cronulla riots and their reprisal, and Islamist protests glorifying terrorism.
For decades no one has been able to say that our immigration policy should be guided by the need for immigrants to be able to conform to Australian identity, for apparently Australia has no identity other than multiculturalism. Thus, Australians have lacked the knowledge and vocabulary to say no to massive and rapid intakes of Muslim and Chinese migrants, for it’s impossible to argue that such irresponsible immigration will disrupt and threaten a pre-existing culture when we no longer are able to articulate what that pre-existing culture is. In other words, when we wish to object to certain immigration schemes but lack the cultural-historical knowledge to articulate our concerns, our concerns are easily dismissed as simply racist and xenophobic. But they are not. And recent pro-terrorist, anti-Semitic protests should alert us to legitimacy of many Australians’ concerns with our immigration system.
Some have asked me why it’s even important to nurture the Britishness of our identity. The answer is simple. The positive and negative aspects of every society grow from deeper cultural roots. While Australia is not perfect, it is far more good than bad, as testified by the fact that people freely come from around the world to live here far more than vice versa. Australia’s political stability, social peace, and economic prosperity did not come from nowhere. They grew from deep roots in a British heritage that came to emphasise government by open reason, rule of law, economic efficiency, and Christian teachings.
These are the ideals that nourished our political, economic, legal, educational systems, and our daily interactions with fellow citizens. In other words, to ask why we should care about nurturing the Britishness of our culture is analogous to asking about why we should care about nourishing and maintaining the roots beneath the garden that sustains us.
Vague talk of Australian values does little to nothing to define who we are. At best it really just says we are not North Korea, Pakistan, or Saudi Arabia. Vague, abstract values are also easily manipulated to serve any ideological agenda. We must abandon the tedious, road-to-nowhere discussion of Australian values and lodge our identity in something more concrete and historical: our British heritage and its continued powerful effects.
This, to my mind, is the main reason Australians should wish to preserve our ties to the British monarchy now more than ever. Our membership in the Commonwealth is a spectacular declaration and reminder of who we are in a period in which our self-understanding has never been weaker and more under attack. Ours is a time when people wish to divide the country into racially-defined fragments, whether along lines of Indigeneity or lines of ethno-religion. The Voice referendum, the continued push for a treaty, the new (Islamic) Australian Voice party, unbridled, culturally-insensitive immigration, and the rising anti-Semitic and Islamic extremist movements are all threats to national solidarity and stability.
Once we recognise and understand our British heritage we can embark on a responsible immigration programme that ensures we do not nourish the growth of migrant communities that stand opposed to it. Australia’s immigration problem is not so much about individual immigrants, but the creation of immigrant communities so large, assertive, politically powerful, and insular that many within them fail to assimilate as well as they should. We can also make it very clear to migrants who we are and invite them to assimilate to a reasonable degree to that identity and to make their valuable contribution.
The question of who we are as a nation is becoming an existential issue for Australia, and the only answer that can be powerful enough to resist forces that would erode our national solidarity is the one grounded in our actual history and our present institutions. Australia is not essentially multicultural, it is essentially British, and if we wish to have a responsible immigration system and a cohesive society, this must not only be recognised, but unashamedly celebrated by all Australians, regardless of their cultural and racial background.
Dr. Stephen Chavura
ANCIENT HISTORY.ALL FORMS OF ISLAMIC RELIGION IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH AUSTRALIA..
Islamic teachings and followings is so desirable, why do those who advocate for it choose to leave countries where it is already in place? Australia’s legal system is based on equality, freedom, and fairness for all. There’s no place for Sharia law here.Early writers to describe Muhammad as ha-meshuggah (“the madman”), a term frequently used in the Bible for those who believe themselves to be prophets. he definitely had a thing for children when he married Aishe at the tender age of only seven sitting her on his lap and publicly showing her his affection. Yet he claimed that he did not consumed the marriage until she was at the right age of maturity which was nine at the time. Even though they claim that women from that region tend to mature into adulthood earlier then those from the western world, still a nine years old is no where ready to participate in the act of intercourse with a grown man 30 or 40 years her senior. That is truly a sick and a dark chapter of Islam and its founders that are still respected and looked up to as god’s will and his true words through his holly men, the messenger of god with all its glory, my back side, they are a bunch of lying savages that fooled or forced many into embracing this nonsense that is religion at the time and to our disbelieve still do in many parts of the world. Ignorance has no limit no era knows no boundaries and goes on spreading like a wild fire. The Qur’an, the Haddiths, the Sirah & the motivation of greed in stealing other people’s land, property, enslaving the inhabitants and ruling over them. A master manipulator,. A con-man, yes. A violent, merciless murderer, yes. A slave owner, yes. A sex-mad pedophile, yes. A rapist of young kids boys for girls..even if they were dead. the man was suffering from epilepsy. The sweating, the uncontrollable spasms point to it. Another symptom of epileptics often is staring spells, during which the vision is lessened, hindered or plain wrong, which would explain the visions. Other symptoms may be seizures, amnesia, sleepiness, anxiety, depression and headaches.
It is of course extremely difficult to analyze the man after 1400 years, but this explanation sounds much more likely than the explanation that an illiterate merchant and warlord had perfect recall and that the arch angel gabriel suddenly only speaks arabic. The latter being the explanation you must accept if you are a Muslim.
Pat from Vic: “In any case, arguing about which death-cult should be ruling over us is just a little bit like complaining that there are maggots and cockroaches on the dog-shit we’ve been served up for breakfast. Rather a distastefully machiavellian application of the Hegelian Dialectic, wouldn’t you say?”
Machiavelli? … hmmm… Is he the bod who wrote the Protocols of the Learned Princes of Sion? You know, the 16th century instruction manual on how the future Princes should go about ruling the World and achieving political supremacy and glory, with a few bucks thrown in for good measure?
Crikey I’m slow off the Mark, but here it is, the History they don’t teach you on the History Channel or any History classes anywhere. https://archive.org/details/MonstersOfBabylon1 PS, down every Rabbit Hole is the ……..;; go on say it, but be careful – what happens to a Country which brings in Anti Semitism laws, (Case study, Russia under Stalin)… be aware of the Red Terror 4.0 Info for the Historical Record.. Anno Domini 2025…
daviddd2 said – “… We, in Australia don’t have Muslims or Jews running our state…”
Are you SURE about that? Strange how it’s always been verbotten to criticize the Master Race in any way, shape or form, even in the midst of their ongoing rampant genocide of the Palestinians and anyone else who falls into their clutches. And a celebrated journalist who boasts and laughs about shooting children in the face for fun faces absolutely no repercussions or consequences whatsoever.
At the very least, by default what DO we have is arguably much worse than either, namely a pack of sold-out treasonous avaricious insatiably sadistic Luciferian WEF-owned anti-Human baby-eating monsters.
In any case, arguing about which death-cult should be ruling over us is just a little bit like complaining that there are maggots and cockroaches on the dog-shit we’ve been served up for breakfast. Rather a distastefully machiavellian application of the Hegelian Dialectic, wouldn’t you say?
Maybe we should be getting serious about cleaning the joint out, washing ourselves off and starting over from scratch, and not fretting so much about the next bucket of shit that they’re going to pour over our heads.
No, it is not compatible, but it is a global political agenda as wellas being a religion.
Here is the agenda: h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hy6eZnj1gpc
The reason western governments have condoned Islamic migration is because, for one, they are to a man Freemasons, with the Masons being undeclared Muslims, as in:
https://isawthelightministries.com/shriners.html
Western governments cannot make actual Law, only statutes and Legislation and Codes, none of which are consented to Law, as all Law is by consent.
Islamic Law is “consented to” and valid Law, and is also summary law, which will appeal to tyrants, as it precludes the right of appeal and juries, which will be most appealing to tyrannical regimes like that of Keir Starmtrooper.
Why are we even discussing nonsense like Sharia Law or Noahide Laws in Australia?
Muslims and the Jews are welcome to them in their Muslim and Jewish run states. We, in Australia don’t have Muslims or Jews running our state. Not yet, it would seem.
Unless of course we’ve been colonised and I wuz asleep. Separatist garbage promoting killing should be shut down quick smart. No matter who sells it.
You are quite right. There is NO place for Sharia law in Australia. However, let’s not get carried away claiming Australia’s legal system has anything to do with equality freedom and fairness for all!
[…] article and image courtesy of Cairns News: Date: January 16, […]
Sharia law proponents to return to sharia law countries, good plan we need some leadership, how about Communications Minister Michelle Rowland formerly of the MaD bill be a good example and go and live in North Korea.
Cant find his name got lost somewhere but somebody will probably know it. Ed
They should take a look at those Tik Tok videos coming out of Syria since Assad was ousted.
Sharia victims having their brains blown out in public for prostitution, etc.
The western liberal fags supporting this agenda will end up the same.
Both Sharia and Talmud (and Noachide for the goy plantation of Freemasonic republics) are legal systems. Both are deeply inimical to Western jurisprudence and the moral, ethnical and legal principles that derive from the Christian nation state and before that the empire of Christian nation states.
The Australian Constitution and its jurisprudence derive from the tradition of Magna Carta, Declaration of Arbroath and the long centuries of English Common Law recognized by both Church and State – from the time when England was part of the Holy Roman Empire of the West.
Hang the Gov Bastards for Treason in Australia, and clean out the Bloody Indians and Muslims out of our Immigration Department, should sort out a percentage of crap coming in and ruining our culture, I look back on the 70’s to 90’s with sadness and anger
I totally agree. Some years ago Andrew Bolt, a respected media commentator, was very concerned that advocates of Sharia had increasing influence in this country. He is right and so are you
Commendable statements by the chap in the video. Attribution would have been courteous, after all, credit where it’s due.
FWIW, what patriotic Australian wouldn’t endorse those sentiments? Lucky there’s still a few good men and women left in the joint.
Bit of a shame there’s actually no law in Australia, being hijacked by a foreign Globalist corporation as we are. And how many of these fake corporate sold-out treasonous scumbag politicians and paedophile magistrates and judges are eating babies and drinking their blood on weekends? Hardly Australian culture, but there you are. Just saying.
And Snuff Scotty and AnAL and the Kirribilli Bumbandits and Lurch and all the rest are each doing their own little bit to replace whatever laws and cultural norms we thought we had with something more acceptable to creepy Bill and his Luciferian bum buddies. Like torturing and butchering and eating people and drinking their blood – ours, that is.
That, and killing us all. Snuff Scotty already got paid his $52 MILLION Genocide Bonus for that, even though some of us are still standing.
If Sharia Law is going to be an issue for Australia, rest assured that will just be a stepping stone to get us to where Klaus and Smeagol really want to take us. And I’m guessing the Noahide Laws will be in there somewhere too. Just a suspicion. You do know that they rape and eat and kill babies and drink their blood, right?
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]