By Ron Chapman
From 1970 the budget for black education was raised by about 30% per year every year. More than any other government department.
From 1955 -1984 the amount of black school students increased 31 times from 35,000 to 1,096 000.
65% of black South African children were at school compared to Egypt 64%, Nigeria 57%, Ghana52%, Tanzania50% and Ethiopia 29%.
Amongst the adults of South Africa, 71% could read and write (80% between the ages 12 and 22). In South Africa, the whites built 15 new classrooms for blacks every working day, every year. At 40 children per class it meant space for an additional 600 black students every day!
In 1985 there were 42,000 Blacks at 5 universities in South Africa, about the same amount at the universities of the homelands (another 40,000 at another five).
An article called “Die Afrikaner” 11 Feb 1987, the quarterly magazine called “Vox Africana Nr 29 4/87 stated that South Africa had 4,8 million whites and 18,2 million blacks in 1987. The whites paid 77% of the taxes and the blacks only 15%…despite this…56% of the government budget was spent on blacks.
Under Dr. Verwoerd. the living standards of Blacks rose at 5.4% per year against that of the whites at 3.9% per year. In 1965 the economic growth of South Africa was the second highest in the world at 7.9%. The rate of inflation was a mere 2% p.a. and the prime interest rate only 3% p.a. Domestic savings were so great that South Africa needed no foreign loans for normal economic expansion. That was a major reason for the Talmudists to overthrow them.
Even Lord Deedes admitted, “White South Africa grew to become the economic giant of the continent, the other members of the Commonwealth virtually sank into poverty.”
At the height of Apartheid in 1978 Soweto had 115 football fields, 3 Rugby fields, 4 athletic tracks, 11 Cricket fields, 2 Golf courses, 47 Tennis courts, 7 swimming pools built to Olympic standards, 5 Bowling alleys, 81 Netball fields, 39 children play parks, and countless civic halls, movie houses and clubhouses.
In addition to this, Soweto had 300 churches, 365 schools, 2 Technical Colleges, 8 clinics, 63 child day care centres, 11 Post Offices, and its own fruit and vegetable market.
There were 2300 registered companies that belonged to black businessmen, about 1000 private taxi companies. 3% of the 50,000 vehicle owners in 1978 were Mercedes Benz owners. Soweto alone had more cars, taxis, schools, churches and sport facilities than most independent countries in Africa. The Blacks of South Africa had more private vehicles than the entire white population of the USSR at the time.
Soweto had modern shopping malls like, Dobsonville Shopping Centre. In 2005 the Protea Gardens Mall opened. This was followed by the Baramall Shopping Centre and the Jabulani Shopping complex and the Maponya Mall. Experts say that Soweto has as much as 25% oversupply of retail space.
The biggest hospital in the world, Baragwanath with 3200 beds and at its peak during Apartheid with almost 8000 staff, had 23 operation theatres fitted out with the most modern medical equipment that existed in the world. Blacks were treated here, operated on…at full state costs to the white-taxpayers for unlimited periods. The budget of this hospital was and is higher than the yearly budget of most small member states of the United Nations.
Next door to Baragwanath is the St. John’s Eye Clinic. The clinic was world famous for the treatment of Glaucoma, Cataracts, traumatic eye injuries and rare tropical diseases.
Baragwanath in 1978 employed 450 medical doctors in full-time service. It treated 112 000 in-patients and 1.62 million out-patients per year. The children and infant death rate with 34.8 per 1000 was lower than Harlem in New York.
In 1982 alone, this hospital performed 898 heart operations of world quality.
Ironically…90% of the blood donors for this hospital were whites, who donated blood free of charge, totally voluntarily…to save black lives. (Quoted from The Citizen, 2 April 1987). See: THE REAL STORY OF APARTHEID – http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/THE-REAL-STORY-OF-APARTHEID.shtml
www.cairnsnews.org 
Hi Ron,
“The 63 books of the Talmud were written over about a thousand years from 500 BC to 500 AD.”
I don’t think that is true, but here you’ll hear it from the horse’s mouth:
https://www.chabad.org/multimedia/video_cdo/aid/3406322/jewish/The-Oral-Law-and-Talmud.htm
Rabbi Steinsaltz discusses the relationship between the Oral and Written Laws. The Oral Law developed as a “manual” for understanding the Written Law.
FROM THE TIME OF MOSES UNTIL THE END OF THE 2ND CENTURY CE, these explanations remained oral and adapted to changing times, languages, and surrounding cultures. Rabbi Steinsaltz then discusses the consequences of the writing down of the Oral Law.
Rabbi Steinsaltz only confirms what I wrote in my previous comment:
For centuries, the Oral Law was passed down by “word of mouth” by the leading Jewish scholars. However, after the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD and the devastation of Jerusalem in 135 AD, Jewish religious leaders were scattered and scarce. For this reason, around 200 AD, Rabbi Yehudah ha Nasi, Judah the Prince, began to write down the Oral Law. These writings became known as the Jerusalem Talmud and later finalized as the finished product, composed of scripture, Jewish Law and discussion, called the “Babylonian Talmud”, around 500 AD.
“If Rabbi Yehudah ha Nasi did start writing the Jerusalem Talmud around 200 AD his grasp of the Oral Law must have been phenomenal since that was 1600 years after the time of Moses.”
ABRAHAM, Jacob, Moses, King David, and King Solomon in all his splendour, never existed, a 15-year study of archaeological evidence has concluded.
The study – by Professor Thomas Thompson, one of the world’s foremost authorities on biblical archaeology – says that the first 10 books of the Old Testament are almost certainly fiction, written between 500 and 1,500 years after the events they purport to describe.
“Incidentally, I think that love, not anger, fuels true courage.”
I am driven by love for Mother Nature, my love for my fellow human beings and every living being on the planet. It makes so angry to see that the planet is deliberately being destroyed by geoengineering and the Goyim worldwide are being exterminated. You cannot but be angry when you are aware of what they intend to do with Humanity and Life on Earth.
Han
LikeLike
Hi Ron,
“I disagree. Arguably prosperity in SA under the Verwoerd government was due to hard work and very capable management by Blacks and Whites but especially by government planners and industrial managers…”
Black and White management?… You’ve got to be joking.
APARTHEID IN SOUTH AFRICA
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225195/
“We have heard the annual reaffirmations of the ideals of academic freedom and opposition to apartheid in university education. As we have heard, the protests from time to time, as the police came, battering our students on various campuses, but we have not heard them about the racism in these institutions, the lack of appointments of blacks to positions in the governing councils or meaningful programs of recruiting black staff.
“We are concerned about the silence on the crisis in black education. We must not forget the racism that lurks in the corners to frustrate black advancement. So, here, too, in this area, we need to set up positive measures. I am suggesting panels to investigate that situation.
“To tell you about the racism that lurks in corners, a deputy vice-chancellor once wrote to me (vice-chancellor is equivalent to a president or vice-president of a college), “One can see that to appoint you in a permanent position of authority over white students and junior white staff would be to wound the very heart of Baasskap [white supremacy] and that there are limits to which we can go to offend a government.”
“In short, he was saying, “We cannot appoint you.””
Keep on defending the indefensible, Ron.
Han
LikeLike
G’day again Han,
You have mentioned that White Prosperity in SA was built on Cheap Black Labour.
I disagree. Arguably prosperity in SA under the Verwoerd government was due to hard work and very capable management by Blacks and Whites but especially by government planners and industrial managers, despite the rapacious policies of Cecil Rhodes et al and UK banksters.
National prosperity is made difficult and often impossible by Talmudic banking not by rapacious industry managers. The endless ‘wages versus profits’ narrative is used to conceal the truth that the banks’ creation of worthless debt tokens fraudulently called ‘money’ for which they charge interest (usury) is the cause of poverty, scarcity and want in all economies where fractional reserve banking is foisted on the population.
For instance, in Australia general prosperity has been stolen from most of the population by Talmudic banking practices ever since the death of Dennison Miller, the first governor of the Commonwealth Bank, in 1923. See: Ellen Brown | What a Government Can Do With Its Own Bank – https://truthout.org/articles/ellen-brown-what-a-government-can-do-with-its-own-bank/
The interest rate on currency, SOLD by banks, pretending it’s money, deceives Australians’ into thinking it’s a commodity, it isn’t. Banks SELL counterfeit mythical money, i.e., they charge interest on computer digits placed in accounts that lack substance or value. Currency is a mental societal construct used to facilitate exchange of goods and services.
Banks cause inflation by creating counterfeit currency, worthless electronic debt tokens created out of thin air, for which they fraudulently charge interest. However, bank interest isn’t the main cause of inflation except, when hiked excessively, as happened when the Keating government hiked rates to over 18% in 1989.
Inflation is mainly caused by the banks’ practice of charging interest while NEVER creating any currency to pay that interest. That means there’s never enough currency in the economy to repay loans AND bank interest. Thus the banks must always issue ever increasing quantities of currency via loans to enable the system to continue. Such systems only last 50-55 years before collapsing. The current system began in the US in 1971.
Because survival of the fiat fractional reserve system requires that banks must always emit ever more currency via loans, the currency supply constantly increases until borrowers can no longer afford to take on more debt (loans). That’s why bank interest rates declined to near zero until recently. It is also why we are now experiencing a global monetary and banking crisis exacerbated by rising interest rates.
Governments that grant free licences to banks to emit currency are partners in crime with those banks because they use their monopoly on force and violence to force populations to pay banks for the worthless currency needed to facilitate the exchange of goods and services, AND prosecute anyone who seeks to barter commercially or issue their own, asset backed money.
Having to constantly create currency via loans increases the total amount of currency in the economy which actually DEFLATES it’s ostensible value so that ever more currency is needed to purchase the same quantity of goods and services. THAT, not low wages, is what causes poverty. If Australia’s Treasury issued the money and currency needed by our economy and population, interest free, prices would fall over time due to improvements in technology and economies of scale due to a growing population.
IF each nation’s Treasury issued the actual amount of money and currency needed by the population to facilitate the exchange of goods and services in the economy on an asset backed, interest free basis, poverty would disappear and everyone including so-called low paid workers would experience abundance.
Ron
LikeLike
G’day Han,
Thanks for your views.
Actually the Judeans started writing the Talmud during the Babylonian Captivity at much the same time as they were completing the Torah. There were two written Talmuds, and the main one is the Babylonian Talmud, not the Jerusalem Talmud. The 63 books of the Talmud were written over about a thousand years from 500 BC to 500 AD.
The Talmud very comprehensively details ‘laws’ for everything and hidden among the detail and detritus are some truly evil, rotten directives about ethno-centricity, genocide and paedophilia. The various Talmud authors and other rabbis may pretend that the Talmud explains the Torah but hidden in it are many ethno-centric anti-goy and genocidal commands that evolved in the fevered minds of various rabbis over a millennia.
Let’s face it, Moses, if he existed at all, supposedly lived around 1400 BC and the Torah was begun by Levites in Jerusalem around 622 BC. In other words it was a work of fiction cobbled together for socio-political control purposes to enable Levites to dominate simple Judean tribesmen. Its ideas were plagiarized from earlier Sumerian and possibly other writings.It certainly was not an accurate record of what allegedly happened some 800 years earlier.
Even today, For instance, doya think priests or politicians could sit down today and write accurately what King Harold said or did before the Battle of Hastings in 1066 even though our records and technology are allegedly now much better? Our current history and science is a pastiche of Talmudic bullshit, so why would their ideological ancestors have honestly and accurately written the truth about the antecedents of the Judeans? Indeed, people like clif high and some historians suggest that the ‘Israelites’ were actually 12 tribes who migrated from the Yemen area in southern Arabia to Palestine.
If Rabbi Yehudah ha Nasi did start writing the Jerusalem Talmud around 200 AD his grasp of the Oral Law must have been phenomenal since that was 1600 years after the time of Moses.
Arguably the Khazarians superficially adopted the Jewish religion to placate the Rus and Byzantines. The Khazar elite used it as a camouflage to conceal their barbarous ways and to enable them to secretly continue their blood sacrifice and cannibalistic practices which was what the Canaanite Talmudist leaders of the Jewish religion used it to conceal.
Incidentally, I think that love, not anger, fuels true courage.
Ron
LikeLike
Sure, Editor, I’ll do that.
LikeLike
Han please shorten your comments we will run out of space. Editor
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ron we have asked you repeatedly to remove any asterisks in your comments!
LikeLike
Hi Ron,
“The epitome of Apartheid, racism (in the negative sense of the term) and vengeance seeking, is Talmudism.”
They always blame the Talmud and Talmudism, BUT where did the Talmud come from? The Torah.
The concept of Jewish Supremacy (JEWISH APARTHEID) is embedded in the Torah.
The Lord your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession.” – Deuteronomy 7:6
The Torah, 5 Books of Moses, Old Testament, is extremely ethnocentric, promoting Jewish Supremacy. It repeatedly identifies the Israelites as God’s Chosen People, and painstakingly traces the genealogical descent of the Children of Israel. Many passages forbid the intermarriage of Jews and other non-Jewish (Gentile) tribes.
“What the Jewish tradition has that almost no other religious tradition shares, and which a great deal of modern jurisprudence is based on, is the Talmud and all the subsequent later codes, all of which work to explain the meaning of the original document, the Torah, and what it’s framer (or framers depending on your view) meant.” – Rabbi Joshua Levine Grater, Huffington Post, July 2, 2011
For centuries, the Oral Law was passed down by “word of mouth” by the leading Jewish scholars. However, after the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD and the devastation of Jerusalem in 135 AD, Jewish religious leaders were scattered and scarce. For this reason, around 200 AD, Rabbi Yehudah ha Nasi, Judah the Prince, began to write down the Oral Law. These writings became known as the Jerusalem Talmud and later finalized as the finished product, composed of scripture, Jewish Law and discussion, called the “Babylonian Talmud”, around 500 AD.
Where did the Khazarian Mafia get their ideology from? THE TORAH. It is disingenuous to use the term Khazarian Mafia as the Khazars converted to Judaism and are therefore the followers of Judaism.
Whenever there is criticism of the Jews, they are either referred to as Zionists, the Khazarian Mafia or the Synagogue of Satan; never the Jews.
Why not say the Jewish Mafia? It is a taboo to call out the Jew. That is Jewish Power; the capacity to shut down the debate on Jewish Power.
There can never be a meaningful discussion by leaving out the Jew.
The Rabbis always wanted the Jews to segregate and live in ghettos. They didn’t want the Jews to assimilate, that would erode their power over them. They see assimilation as the biggest threat to the Jewish people, God’s Chosen people have to be “pure”. JEWISH APARTHEID.
It is not hard to imagine why so many Jews flocked from the rabbinically controlled ghettos in the European Enlightenment era.
The Jews created Christianity and Islam. Christianity is Judaism for the Goyim and Christians have for 2,000 years been indoctrinated and brainwashed by a Jewish religion.
Judaism, Christianity and Islam, the 3 Abrahamic religions, do worship the same God, the Jewish God, Yahweh or Allah to Islam.
Christianity emerged out of Judaism in the first century and Islam in the 7th.
The word Torah is mentioned 18 times in the Quran in 16 verses.
Jesus is the most mentioned person in the Quran by reference; 25 times by the name Isa, third-person 48 times, first-person 35 times, and the rest as titles and attributes.
The Torah and the Gospel are integral to the Quran.
I just wonder if Christians really do read their Bible, the Jew Book?
Exodus 15
The Lord is a man of war: the Lord is his name
Jeremiah 51:20-24
“You are my battle-ax and sword,” says the LORD. “With you I will shatter nations and destroy many kingdoms. With you I will shatter armies— destroying the horse and rider, the chariot and charioteer. With you I will shatter men and women, old people and children, young men and young women. With you I will shatter shepherds and flocks, farmers and oxen, captains and officers. “I will repay Babylon and the people of Babylonia for all the wrong they have done to my people in Jerusalem,” says the LORD.
Jesus Christ in Matthew 10:34
“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.”
“But whoever denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father in heaven. Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn ‘a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.”
I am not religious at all. I am a Happy Atheist with an awesome respect for Mother Nature and I live by these words:
“Hope has two beautiful daughters; their names are Anger and Courage.
Anger at the way things are, and Courage to see that they do not remain as they are.” – St. Augustine
Beyond me why the people all over the world are not angry with the events over the past 3 years.
Only by being angry and having the courage can we stop the Psychos at the WEF, UN, WHO, our governments, and so on.
The Sheeple, however, are quite content to be taken to the Slaughterhouse.
Han
LikeLiked by 1 person
G’day Han,
You said to Julius Skoolafish, that:
“ I do hate Apartheid, racism and racists with a vengeance”
The epitome of Apartheid, racism (in the negative sense of the term) and vengeance seeking, is Talmudism.
The Khazarian Mafia (KM) have always espoused Apartheid, physically, socially, emotionally, and ideologically, by forcing their followers to live APART from the rest of humanity literally or ideologically. For many centuries that apartheid attitude was enforced by the KM leadership via the deliberate methodology of segregating their followers in shtetls in eastern Europe and Russia so that they could be indoctrinated from cradle to grave with anti-goy and anti-Christian propaganda.
THAT situation was the epitome of RACISM as described by the Jews and foisted by them upon the rest of the world to further the anti-semitism, Holocaustianity and cultural Marxist Wokeism they use to destroy Christian and other goy civilisations.
The KM (Jews) always accuse others of what they themselves actually DO.
Moreover, they prevent others from interfering with their distinctive, atheistic, anti-integration, anti-diverse, nepotistic, Apartheid societal structures (while blaming goyim for their self-selecting ‘ghetto’ separate community lifestyles).
Jews actively force goyim societies to accept and implement laws, policies and ideologies that Jews do not implement within their own communities. They weaponise anti-Christian and anti-human ideologies and accuse goyim societies of Apartheid, anti-Semitism, anti-Black racism, capitalist exploitation of workers, lack of diversity, lack of Intersectionality, homophobia, bigoted anti-transexualism and on and on.
The KM’s Apartheid atheistic mentality fuels their callous indifference and aggression towards the rest of humanity and the planet.
A major effect of Talmudic hypocrisy and the KM’s divide and rule methodology is that goy societies are confused and their members fight each other, allowing the KM to conquer them. That’s why “well meaning” UK and other goy societies caused the Verwoerd government to cede control of SA to the KM’s Black lackeys. By doing that Verwoerd probably hoped to avoid the fate of Russia, Germany and Mao’s China et al, and so far the Whites have not been genocided in SA but that prospect will only bing avoided by the reshaping of our world under the BRICS and the Global Alliance.
Han, salvation for humanity rests in rejection of hatred of anyone, ‘racist’ or otherwise. Christ Jesus explained it simply.
“Love your neighbour (i.e. everyone and everything, including ‘racists’) AS yourself (we need to learn to love ourselves in order to be able to love others) FOR the love of God (ALL that IS).
Our world is composed of a multiplicity of enter-acting energies. Love heals and builds, hatred is a lower energy that dissociates and destroys.
Ron
LikeLiked by 1 person
G’day Han,
I apologise for misspelling your given name.
This is a free will world and you are entitled to your opinion about ‘Abundanthope.net’ (AH) and everything else. AH provided accurate information about our world and what has and will happen here. The proof of the pudding will be in the eating.
I don’t dispute that Apartheid in SA was inequitable and undesirable. But arguably the SA did tolerably well under all the circumstances of the time.
I understand that the Bantus came after the Boers and genocided the tribes they met on arrival. Is that incorrect?
Do you deny that the Boers settled SA first and created the SA civilisation or that Blacks were given hitherto unavailable education in SA?
Arguably City of London based Talmudists (“Jews”) controlled banking and the corporate economy and working conditions in SA as they do almost everywhere. Arguably also the negative effects of Jewish industrial control was imposed on White governance as well as on Black employment.
You say the whole world is run by Jews yet say “Whites rule the Western world”. Both statements cannot be true.
Over 90% of those who call themselves “Jews” are non-white Khazarians i.e. non-Semitic descendants of Japheth. The rest of the pretend “Jews” are of other non-Semitic origins like Sephardics et al.
Not all pretend “Jews” seek to enslave and genocide goyim.
Arguably only Talmudists, those who follow the tenets of the Talmud and/or those who act out its precepts, whether they fully know what they are doing or not, are the real enemies of our world. Arguably also, non-Talmudic pretend “Jews” are expendable just as Black and White goyim are.
Wikipedia says:
“Following the conversion to Judaism [Ron: Talmudism is the core of Judaism] of the Khazarian royalty and aristocracy, their descendants began to claim origins in Kozar, a son of Togarmah [citation needed]. Togarmah is mentioned in Genesis (Chapter 10 verses 2 & 3) as a grandson of Japheth”.
If that is correct then the descendants of Japheth became Canaanites leaving the white descendants of Shem as the sworn enemies of the Canaanites.
Eustace Mullins brilliantly exposed Talmudists (ie pretend Jews) as being occult Canaanites, i.e. heirs to the “Will of Canaan” bequeathed to his children by Canaan, Shem’s wicked nephew.
Eustace Mullins says the Will is only found in the Talmud: ‘.., where it is presented thusly:
“Five things did Canaan charge his sons: love one another (ie members of your own tribe), love robbery, love lewdness, hate your masters, and do not speak the truth.” Pes. 113b.
Eustace Mullins also said: “The Will of Canaan has been the Canaanites’ prescription for all of their operations during the ensuing three thousand years since the testament was given. Today it remains the operating instructions of the Canaanite heirs, who presently control the World Order. At the same time, it remains unknown to the peoples whom the Canaanites continue to rob, enslave, and massacre”. (Eustace Mullins, Curse of Canaan. p16: http://www.scribd.com/doc/43083011/Eustace-Mullins-The-Curse-of-Canaanhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/43083011/Eustace-Mullins-The-Curse-of-Canaan
The key to the success of Canaan’s current heirs – the “Jews” – is their ability to “NOT SPEAK THE TRUTH”.
Verwoerd and his government knew these truths about the “Jews” who ran our world and were exploiting and destroying SA. Arguably he tried unsuccessfully to save all South Africans but failed. If you dispute that you need to demonstrate how SA or at least its Black population, is better off now after three decades of Black rule, than under Verwoerd’s government.
Living in SA is not necessarily a sufficient basis for grasping the underlying realities of life there any more than it is sufficient for Australians to GROK what is going on in Oz. After centuries of Talmudic mind controlling governance, education and cultural eradicating Newspeak and Doublethink propaganda most of us don’t know if we are ‘Arthur or Martha’.
Peace and Blessings,
Ron
LikeLike
Hi Ron, so sorry I didn’t see your replies to me, I should have ticked that those ‘Notify’ boxes.
I find the source of your article, ‘abundanthope’, as I mentioned before, very questionable and no wonder they no longer exist. It is obvious to me that the opposite of what ‘abundanthope’ was claiming was happening during the Apartheid era.
This well-sourced article paints a totally different picture of the Apartheid era and contradicts the ‘abundanthope’ statistics.
https://mghjournal.com/2020/09/24/vol-ix-a-health-care-system-divided-how-apartheids-lingering-effects-harm-south-african-maternal-health/
“During the apartheid era in South Africa, extreme inequalities in health status between the white and non-white populations reflected the top-down discrimination that permeated throughout the country. In addition to discriminatory health policies, the policy of forced relocation of Black South Africans away from the major cities and into what were referred to as Bantustans were instrumental in maintaining economic and political power for the white population (9). This resulted in health resources being disproportionately allocated in favour of the white population outside the Bantustans, to the detriment of non-white people’s health (9).
“Under apartheid, many laws and policies that encouraged racial discrimination against black Africans were put in place, thereby hindering their access to health care services. Deregulation of public health care led to the expansion of the private sector in South Africa as well (10). The privatization of health care further enhanced the gap between the white and the black South African populations. This resulted in health care being very expensive and therefore inaccessible to the non-white lower classes (10). While white South Africans dominated the use of the private sector, very few black South Africans could afford the cost associated with those services (Figure 2) (11, 12).”
“Verwoerd’s government wasn’t prepared to allow that unimpeded exploitation of the Black population. It provided schooling, medical facilities and all the usual amenities needed to elevate the Black community over time.
THAT outcome was unacceptable to the Talmudists in SA just as it was and is unacceptable everywhere else. If you don’t believe that you need to explain why SA is now a rapidly declining nation after 30 years of Black rule which the global media lauds.”
Your statement can easily be debunked. As I mentioned before in one of my comments:
“Hendrik Verwoerd, the epitome of racism, in a speech in June 1954 said that there was “no space for an African person above certain forms of labour”.
So, what is the point of giving Blacks a High School or even University education if they can never get into those jobs requiring higher education?”
It is so easy to explain WHY “SA is now a rapidly declining nation after 30 years of Black rule which the global media lauds.”
The Whites rule the Western world, don’t they?
Then WHY has the West been “rapidly declining over the past 30 years?
WHY is the whole world right now on the edge of the precipice?
Because the whole world is run by the Jews who hate the White, Black, Brown and Yellow Goyim and want to exterminate them.
All Goyim have to UNITE against the Jews and fight them. It is a matter of survival for the Goyim.
Jewish Gerard Menuhin, the son of famous violin player Yehudi Menuhin wrote a book “Tell The Truth and Shame The Devil” and this what the wrote on the last page of his book:
“If you don’t recognize the one true enemy and join forces to fight him and his stooges, you and your children are doomed to slavery!”
LikeLike
David A, Victoria | March 23, 2023 at 10:29 pm
We’ll have virtual Apartheid in Australia before long thanks to ‘The Voice’
I agree David.
Recently Pauline Hansen gave the House of Representatives a glimpse of what the advocates of ‘the Voice’ really have in mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsEMe69A7KQ
It looks like the beginning of Apartheid to me. If this continues I guess we can look forward to the Talmudists developing Oz into a paradise similar to the paradise their Black multicultural democracy has become in SA.
Aboriginals, like everyone born here, are Australians. Most Australians have ancestors born elsewhere. Does that make them less entitled to equal political status? WHY?
If everyone is entitled to equal political status why should Aboriginals be granted separate representation? Isn’t that the forerunner to apartheid?
Every Australian has a unique history and personal and societal needs. No two humans are totally alike but arguably all have the same Creator-given human rights.
Being Australians, Aboriginals should have the same political and civic rights and responsibilities as everyone else. Special pleading for unique political rights based on ancestry are neither democratic nor just and equitable.
Giving special political status to the progeny of one segment of the population presupposes the progeny of all other groups are less worthy.
In a democracy everyone should have equal rights and receive equal political and civic treatment.
The progeny of English and Irish convicts who built Australia’s infrastructure and prosperity can surely claim their ancestors experienced hardship and disadvantage while creating the basis for our current prosperity. If disparate political representation is to be granted to current generations surely the descendants of English and Irish convicts merit it?
And so on…
Ron
LikeLiked by 1 person
Harry Booyens does not state that southern Africa was terra nullius when the Dutch arrived at the Cape of Good Hope in the 17th century. The Boer records show that the Khoi and San people on their tribal lands to the northwest of the Cape. The Dutch did not genocide or displace them from their lands, they began farming and building on open lands around the Cape.
What the Boer records do show is the genocide of the Khoi and San people when the Bantus invaded southern Africa from the North. Bullshitter liberals and communists never care about that. Anymore than they care about the genocide of the Black Rhodesian Matabele by Robert Mugabe’s 5th brigade of N Korean Communists when ZANU-PF took power.
Unlike Marxist (make it up to suit the political narrative history), the Boers have a very clear record of when their wars began with the Zulus. And they do record the genocides of the Khoi and San.
They also have accounts of the wars the British fought with the Zulus and then the annexation of the Boer republics and the Anglo-Boer War. The Khoi and San have oral accounts of tell the loss of their lands and people to the Bantu invasions. And the British also know the time frame of the Zulu invasions into southern Africa.
All these accounts are congruent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
• The Jews and The British Empire – Leslie Fry
Audio reading by Chris Curls (Bitchute “The Highest Underground Show”
https://www.bit___chute.com/video/F5rqkNfHRoj4/
LikeLike
Topical reading:
• The Jews and The British Empire – Leslie Fry
https://archive.org/details/fry-leslie-the-jews-and-the-british-empire_202202/page/n1/mode/2up
LikeLike
The White South Africans even manage to have some fun with the ANC [failed communist] state’s efforts to eradicate their heritage and culture. In this famous segment, Whackhead and Mariska spoof the Marxist Critical Race Theory name changing craze on Highveld 94.5.
Whackhead Simpson – Home Affairs – Name Change
LikeLike
The Empty Land Myth
https://www.sahistory.org.za/article/empty-land-myth
The Empty or Vacant Land Theory is a theory that was propagated by European settlers in nineteenth-century South Africa to support their claims to land. Today this theory is described as a myth, the Empty Land Myth because there is no historical or archaeological evidence to support this theory. Despite evidence to the contrary a number of parties in South Africa, particularly right-wing nationalists of European descent, maintain that the theory still holds true in order to support their claims to land-ownership in the country.
Oh, where did I hear the other one about European settlers and an Empty land?
Of course, the Zionist Movement to establish a “Jewish Homeland” in “A land without a people for a people without a land”.
All it takes is a glance at the Nüfus (Ottoman population registry) or the much later British mandate census data to see that the land has never been empty.
This slogan persists to this day because it was never meant to be literal, but colonial and ideological. This phrase is yet another formulation of the concept of Terra Nullius meaning “nobody’s land”.
In one form or the other, this concept played a significant role in legitimizing the erasure of the native population in virtually every settler colony, and laying down the ‘legal’ and ‘moral’ basis for seizing native land.
According to this principle, any lands not managed in a ‘modern’ fashion were considered empty by the colonists, and therefore up for grabs. Essentially, yes there are people there but no people that mattered or were worth considering.
LikeLike
Any evaluation of Apartheid begins with the question of its suitability as a social order for a national union (later republic) that is basically tribal. The historical narrative and its truths is very much a part of that question.
For South Africa, one of those truths is that when the Bantu expansion moved into Southern Africa from the Northeast, they encountered the indigenous Khoi and San on their tribal lands and genocided them. Then they came upon the Dutch who had been farming for generations around the Cape. That is when the Bantu wars began with the Dutch.
http://reclaimingrhodesia.com/south-africa-the-drop-dead-important-historical-facts/
LikeLike
Julius Skoolafish, I do hate Apartheid, racism and racists with a vengeance.
Apartheid always was about exploiting Cheap Black Labour.
No comparison whatsoever between Hitler and Verwoerd.
Gerard Menuhin in his book ‘Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil’ makes a case for Adolf Hitler being the only statesman in the modern era who could have liberated the enslaved people of planet Earth from the clutches of organized world Zionism.
I have been getting Jan’s newsletters, History Reviewed, since November 15, 2020, so, I am quite familiar with the racism he is spouting.
Jan is such a boring slow speaker, I always use 2x the playback speed to listen to him.
I have also been getting Mike King’s newsletters, Real History Channel, since September 3, 2020.
My paternal ancestors moved from Germany to Holland in 1754 and then moved to Indonesia, at the time a Dutch colony.
My maternal grandfather was a German who enlisted as a mercenary to fight for the Dutch in the Aceh Wars (1873 -1913). I am a mix of German, Dutch and Indonesian and that would make me a second-class citizen under South Africa’s Apartheid.
I grew up in Holland and can very well remember the day when Hendrik Verwoerd was stabbed to death by Demetrio Tsafendas on September 6, 1966. I was delighted to hear the good news and with me so many others.
Bravo! Good riddance!
An English farmer shot Verwoerd twice in the head in April 1960, but unfortunately Verwoerd survived the assassination attempt.
Verwoerd then claimed that his survival was evidence of God’s approval of his work.
Well, it only took God 6 years to change his mind.
I was in South Africa, Cape Town, for 2 days in 1974 and had seen and heard enough during that short time: APARTHEID WAS NOTHING BUT LEGALISED RACISM.
Don’t forget: The Jews NOT only hate the Whites. They hate ALL THE GOYIM, Black, White, Brown and Yellow and want to exterminate all the Goyim.
They use racism to have the Goyim of different colours fight one another. Their Divide and Conquer Strategy.
LikeLike
Hans I disagree that apartheid in SA pretended to be anti-Communist and was really about exploitation of cheap Black labour. The Rothschilds funded Cecil Rhodes and he and his Talmudist master were the ones who truly profited from CHEAP BLACK LABOUR in SA as they have done everywhere in the world for the last 200 years.
Verwoerd’s government wasn’t prepared to allow that unimpeded exploitation of the Black population. It provided schooling, medical facilities and all the usual amenities needed to elevate the Black community over time. THAT outcome was unacceptable to the Talmudists in SA just as it was and is unacceptable everywhere else. If you don’t believe that you need to explain why SA is now a rapidly declining nation after 30 years of Black rule which the global media lauds.
Ron
LikeLiked by 1 person
G’day Hans,
Unfortunately Abundanthope.net was taken down. Dunno why.
It had lots of information, some of which I try to reconstruct.
I haven’t been to SA.
Of course Apartheid was legalised racism in SA. The Verwoerd’s government, not unreasonably in my view, took a decision that, having regard to all the circumstances of the time, an attempt should be made to ensure proper separate development of Whites on the one hand and Blacks on the other. And his government made a very good fist of it under increasingly difficult circumstances forced on SA by UK Talmudists and International Jewry.
The Talmudists who ruled our world at the time hated Verwoerd’s guts (and eventually killed him) because he knew what they were and tried to get SA and ALL its people out of their clutches. He failed, but hey, who hasn’t. Hitler couldn’t, nor could JFK. The nest of Talmudic vipers who ran the UK eventually destroyed him, his government and the SA nation. That’s what they always do.
Those who pillory SA because life under his government was “racist” and merely used the anti-Communist tag as camouflage need to study what the Talmudists did in Imperial Russia and China, or indeed what they’re doing in the US today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VTWnYOqICk
Ron
LikeLiked by 1 person
Julius Skoolafish | March 24, 2023 at 5:55 pm
The Truth About Apartheid By Mike King (featured on History Reviewed)
https://historyreviewed.best/index.php/the-truth-about-apartheid-by-mike-king/
Thanks Julius.
Since Abundanthope.net was taken down I’ve been unable to access articles and source material there.
Ron
******************
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Truth About Apartheid By Mike King (featured on History Reviewed)
https://historyreviewed.best/index.php/the-truth-about-apartheid-by-mike-king/
LikeLike
• V01- THE 2ND HITLER- DR HENDRIK VERWOERD- GREATEST WHITE LEADER IN THE HISTORY OF S.AFRICA BY HRC
https://historyreviewed.best/index.php/video-audio-v01-the-2nd-hitler-dr-hendrik-verwoerd-greatest-white-leader-in-the-history-of-s-africa/
A bit slow and poorly worded in parts but listen before commenting.
LikeLike
• V01- THE 2ND HITLER- DR HENDRIK VERWOERD- GREATEST WHITE LEADER IN THE HISTORY OF S.AFRICA BY HRC
https://historyreviewed.best/index.php/video-audio-v01-the-2nd-hitler-dr-hendrik-verwoerd-greatest-white-leader-in-the-history-of-s-africa/
A bit slow and poorly worded in parts but listen before commenting.
More here …
https://historyreviewed.best/?s=verwoerd
LikeLike
G’day tonyryan43,
As regards your taunt about my “one-eyed rants”, I mention that I wrote the submission approved in the early 1980s by Senator Durack, the A-G at the time, to fund the initial Mabo test case against the Queensland government.
Aboriginal welfare in the NT and outback regions has been deliberately destroyed by government welfarism ever since the 1967 Referendum. That trend was extended to White Australian families by the Family Law Act in 1975 but the provision of ‘Sit Down Money’ to Aboriginal communities seems to have been more devastating.
Federal funding and control of schooling has greatly exacerbated the deterioration for everyone but government condoning of substance abuse and male sexual abuse of very young girls in Aboriginal communities has been especially devastating for Aboriginal girls and boys. Government secrecy, Police and judicial suppression and MSM complicity enables paedophilia nationally but it is particularly evident in laissez faire attitudes towards Aboriginal communities.
In the mid 1970s I lived for four years in The Narrows, next to Bagot, with an aboriginal community in the house opposite mine. I assume that the tendency towards dysfunctional Aboriginal lifestyles has continued since then.
Working for years in Darwin’s Commonwealth Crown Law Office, as it then was, gave me some familiarity with the activities of White ‘Carpet Bagger’ advisers attracted to NT Aboriginal communities by federal welfare and Gove bauxite largesse. The current ‘Voice’ campaign and grossly expanded Commonwealth funding evidences that the process has now become rampant among ‘Southerners’.
I also knew the White bureaucrat who handled ATSIC’s dysfunctional internal administrative operations before he attained that role
Ron
LikeLike
tbf most of that $$$ would have been coming from gold and diamond mining from land which had been stolen off the original people of the land. The only reason ‘whites’ needed to pay for ‘blacks’ was because blacks were fairly lowly paid doing the shit, dangerous jobs like mining. My friends family ran a boarding, farming, school for black children – they got no money from the government, they were harrassed and bullied for what they did, first from the whites and then from the blacks. I’m not buying all this ‘the whites were good to the blacks’ bs….
LikeLike
Electrical blackouts must indeed be severe if they have cut the power to the Apartheid Museum. This is, after all, the memorial to the Marxist sacred oppression narrative. Monkeys and baboons [ that is real simians ] walk through the wards of the hospitals, but if power is cut to Apartheid Museum can only mean the entire communist system is circling the drain. No wonder the Russians and Chinese are there to help.
https://africancrisis.info/index.php/excellent-city-power-disconnects-apartheid-museum-for-r1-8-million-in-unpaid-bills/
LikeLike
Brian Johnston. Careful. Who killed Stompie? Very likely that the Security Forces played a role in his murder.
https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/winnie-mandela-stompie-seipei/
WHO WAS STOMPIE SEIPEI?
Now we hit a troubling grey area. Seipei was known for his leadership of the under-14’s liberation wing in Soweto, and was referred to as “The Young General”. News travels fast. He was soon hauled in front of the police, who brutally squeezed him for information.
Putting up with more than any young boy should, he eventually relented. But when Winnie was told what happened, it is believed she brandished him as “an informant”. A title that would effectively cost Stompie his life.
The Israeli Security Forces do this to Palestinians too. They pick one of them and make him look like an informer. Suspicion will then create the destructive forces within the resistance to Israeli occupation.
WHY WAS STOMPIE SEIPEI KILLED?
As the investigation began, it was discovered that Jerry Richardson was actually an informant for the Security Branch in Soweto.
The startling confession detailed how Stompie found out the truth, so Richardson decided to kill him to cover his tracks.
Winnie Mandela perhaps wasn’t an angel. But in a time of struggle, the boundaries of right and wrong were shifted all over the place. She has admitted her guilt over how Stompei Seipei met his fate, but has never successfully been tied to his murder.
LikeLike
We’ll have virtual Apartheid in Australia before long thanks to ‘The Voice’
LikeLike
lydndesymonds: “The ANC / Communist government has no concept of how to build or maintain infrastructure.”
The American infrastructure is falling apart. They have “no concept of how to maintain infrastructure.”
NPR and PBS News Hour: Potholes, Grid Failures, Aging Tunnels And Bridges: Infrastructure Gets A C-Minus, March 3, 2021
The American Society of Civil Engineers gives the nation’s infrastructure a grade of C-minus on its quadrennial infrastructure report card. Many of the country’s roads, bridges, airports, dams, levees and water systems are aging and in poor to mediocre condition.
Of course, the American infrastructure must be run by Blacks and Communists. Totally useless and incompetent idiots.
LikeLike
Defenders of Apartheid, both in and outside South Africa, always promoted it as a bulwark against communism. That, of course, is utter BS.
APARTHEID was about the EXPLOITATION OF CHEAP BLACK LABOUR which benefitted the corporations, the gold and diamond mining industries, etc.
That is why South Africa was so prosperous with a strong Rand.
White Prosperity built on Cheap Black Labour.
Hendrik Verwoerd, the epitome of racism, in a speech in June 1954 said that there was “no space for an African person above certain forms of labour”. So, what is the point of giving Blacks a High School or even University education if they can never get into those jobs requiring higher education?
The Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act, Act No. 55 of 1949, was an apartheid law in South Africa that prohibited marriages between “whites” and “non-whites”. It was among the first pieces of apartheid legislation to be passed following the National Party’s rise to power in 1948.
We can see the same thing in Israel where the “superior” Jews are not allowed to marry “inferior” non-Jews.
Apartheid was based on 3 pillars.
4. The formal demarcation of the population into racial groups through the Population Registration Act of 1950.
5. The different designated groups to reside in different geographic areas within each city, town or rural area, and then restricted the movement of people between these areas.
6. A repressive security matrix. The repressive instruments included administrative detention, torture, censorship, banning, and extrajudicial assassinations – both inside and outside South Africa.
The similarities between South Africa’s Apartheid and Israel’s are striking.
LikeLike
Tonyryan43. Careful. Who killed Stompie. Winnie and Co. ANC communists.
LikeLike
I am not sure SA can be saved. Zuma should not have been in charge and Ramaphosa has to go.
All of SA problems go back to a communist backed ANC
To fix the power problems: Shut down all wind turbines immediately. Disconnect all PV solar panel farms from the grid.
Recommission old power plants or build new ones. Problem solved.
Please note, a wind turbine cannot boil a jug.
LikeLike
I watched a black lady in her car doing a video in a shopping car park by herself saying how she wished the white were still running the country and how bad the country has got since .
LikeLike
Interesting article, but what a pity I cannot open the link to abundanthope.net, the source of this article. I get this message: HTTP Status: 404 (not found)
I would like to find out more about abundanthope.net.
Ron Chapman, have you ever been to South Africa during Apartheid? I was there for 2 days in Cape Town in 1974 and had seen and heard enough during that short time:
APARTHEID WAS NOTHING BUT LEGALISED RACISM.
I do speak Dutch and can understand Afrikaans. Apartheid, by the way, is not an Afrikaans word. The Afrikaners would call it ‘Afsonderlikheid’.
Apartheid started in South Africa with the British annexation of the Cape Colony in 1806 during the Napoleonic Wars when the British saw an opportunity to steal the Dutch colonies.
Defenders of the Apartheid, both in and outside South Africa, always promoted it as a bulwark against communism. That, of course, is nonsense.
APARTHEID was about the EXPLOITATION OF CHEAP BLACK LABOUR which benefited the corporations, the gold and diamond mining industries, etc.
That is why South Africa was so prosperous with a strong Rand.
White Prosperity built on Cheap Black Labour.
Hendrik Verwoerd, the epitome of racism, in a speech in June 1954 said that there was “no space for an African person above certain forms of labour”.
So, what is the point of giving Blacks a High School or even University education if they can never get into those jobs requiring higher education?
The Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act, Act No. 55 of 1949, was an apartheid law in South Africa that prohibited marriages between “whites” and “non-whites”. It was among the first pieces of apartheid legislation to be passed following the National Party’s rise to power in 1948.
We can see the same thing in Israel where the “superior” Jews are not allowed to marry “inferior” non-Jews.
Apartheid was based on 3 pillars.
4. The formal demarcation of the population into racial groups through the Population Registration Act of 1950.
5. The different designated groups to reside in different geographic areas within each city, town or rural area, and then restricted the movement of people between these areas.
6. A repressive security matrix. The repressive instruments included administrative detention, torture, censorship, banning, and extrajudicial assassinations – both inside and outside South Africa.
The similarities between South Africa’s Apartheid and Israel’s are striking.
LikeLike
The ANC / Communist government has no concept of how to build or maintain infrastructure. The Russian and Chinese Communists are the logical ‘Go-To’ for what is fundamentally a K-Factor type of problem.
https://ewn.co.za/2023/02/17/city-power-roodepoort-substations-at-risk-of-collapse-due-to-illegal-mining
LikeLike
“Interesting” article, but what a pity I cannot open the link to abundanthope.net, the source of this article.
I get this message: HTTP Status: 404 (not found)
I would like to find out more about abundanthope.net. Maybe they deleted that article from their site because they realised themselves that it is just so full of BS?
Ron Chapman, have you ever been to South Africa during Apartheid? I was there for 2 days in Cape Town in 1974 and had seen and heard enough during that short time:
APARTHEID WAS NOTHING BUT LEGALISED RACISM.
I do speak Dutch and can understand Afrikaans. Apartheid, by the way, is not an Afrikaans word. The Afrikaners would call it ‘Afsonderlikheid’.
Apartheid started in South Africa with the British annexation of the Cape Colony in 1806 during the Napoleonic Wars when the British saw an opportunity to steal the Dutch colonies.
Defenders of Apartheid, both in and outside South Africa, always promoted it as a bulwark against Communism. That, of course, is utter BS.
APARTHEID was all about the EXPLOITATION OF CHEAP BLACK LABOUR which benefited the corporations, the gold and diamond mining industries, etc.
That is why South Africa was so prosperous with a strong Rand.
White Prosperity with Cheap Black Labour: https://www.jstor.org/stable/45083462
Hendrik Verwoerd, the epitome of racism, in a speech in June 1954 said that there was “no space for an African person above certain forms of labour”.
So, what is the point then of giving Blacks a High School or even University education if they can never get into those jobs requiring higher education?
The Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act, Act No. 55 of 1949, was an apartheid law in South Africa that prohibited marriages between “whites” and “non-whites”. It was among the first pieces of apartheid legislation to be passed following the National Party’s rise to power in 1948.
We can see the same thing in Israel where the “superior” Jews are not allowed to marry “inferior” non-Jews.
Apartheid was based on 3 pillars.
1. The formal demarcation of the population into racial groups through the Population Registration Act of 1950.
2. The different designated groups to reside in different geographic areas within each city, town or rural area, and then restricted the movement of people between these areas.
3. A repressive security matrix. The repressive instruments included administrative detention, torture, censorship, banning, and extrajudicial assassinations – both inside and outside South Africa.
The similarities between South Africa’s Apartheid and Israel’s are striking.
LikeLike
Yeah, sure, and anybody who questioned the actual meaning of such statistics was arrested by the secret police, with many victims beaten and tortured. If your system is successful you do not need repressive secret police. My old friend Wayne escaped from the secret police and lived in Australia for a time, in Darwin, but eventually had to return and was killed. Biko and others just made up their experiences, eh? Give us a break. I have read your analysis of Australian politics, Ron, so I recognise one-eyed rants when I see them,
LikeLike
Perpetual energy grid failure atm. No wonder their looking towards China and Russia for stable energy solutions.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/africa/south-africas-power-grid-is-failing/
LikeLike
@Ron Chapman. Thanks for sharing. There is nothing quite like social progress and development for everyone. And this has been denied to segments of the Australian population by an entire industry that has been created and financed to assist them.
People lose sight of the fact that the Verwoerd / Buthelezi system is the expression of a free nation where separate tribal demographics (some of them very traditional) proceed at social progress at their own pace and under their own rule. Africa is always going to be ruled by its chiefs and the Apartheid was created to work within that kind of demographic . By this account it sounds like Black South Africans liked the European ways just fine and could adopt and adapt according to their own culture. Unfortunately we will never see how it would have evolved over time.
My server or my anti-virus continues to censor truth about Apartheid as it denies me access to the link provided. But I did see the type of pictures of Soweto you describe in London in the 1970s censored in all Big Jew msm. The communist thugs were out in force to try to prevent the people who wanted to attend that public presentation / lecture on South Africa from even getting in the door. There were delegations present from the South African homelands showing the development in the Homelands, development in which the SA government was an investment partner. The Venda were especially frank about the reality of thousands of Blacks from the communist states of the North coming to SA to find jobs and prosperity. The Apartheid System excluded them from moving into the tribal lands of the Black South Africans and laying claim. Of course, the Oppenheimers and Communist Assets embedded in the government who were importing these masses to break South Africa, intended them to fight the Whites for all the European infrastructure, cities and farmlands. To my mind this is exactly what happened. Even Amnesty International had a presentation explaining why they did not support Nelson Mandela, a convicted terrorist who had himself confessed to terrorist crimes against SA.
As the Western nations – all under Marxism are now importing millions of Blacks from these failed Marxist states in Africa for exactly the same reason, it is important to understand the historical reality of the Apartheid System in South Africa and how it was broken by the Communist Jews together with the alliance between liberal Whites / Black migrant cadres from all failed OAU Marxist states. For us this is essential information.
LikeLiked by 1 person