Letter to the Editor
The new Labor/Greens Government appears to be in complete denial! They actually believe that THEY won the election, and have been given a mandate to do whatever they want?
The TRUTH is, the FACT is, Labor only achieved “32%” of the vote,….68% of Australians did NOT vote for Labor (36% voted for the Coalition!)!
The Labor/Greens Government, again in denial, are also claiming that it was a “Climate Change Election”, and that Australians overwhelmingly voted in favour of more action on the Climate Change conspiracy theory/myth/hoax/scam!
Once again, the TRUTH is, the FACT is, THEY only got 30% of the vote,….70% of Australians voted AGAINST the Climate Change scam,….skyrocketing electricity costs,….unreliable and inefficient electricity supply.
The 2019 election WAS the Climate Change election,….and it was a resounding/landslide “NO” vote!
During the 2022 campaign, NOBODY (Normal, decent, intelligent people) was talking about climate change, NOBODY! That is why Labor/Greens only achieved 32% of the vote!
The ONLY people who were ‘obsessed’ with the Climate Change conspiracy theory/myth/hoax/scam during the campaign, were Labor/Greens/Teal politicians, the corrupt left-wing extremist portion (90%) of the media, 90% of celebrities (all obscenely wealthy, never having lived, worked, or even breathed in the REAL world), and the obscenely wealthy ‘Yuppie-Blue-Bloods’ living in the obscenely wealthy suburbs of the major cities,….also never having lived, worked, or breathed in the REAL world!
Unfortunately, it’s those same obscenely wealthy ‘Yuppie-Blue-Blood’ suburbs of the major cities where many of Australia’s politicians live,….and like the above mentioned, have NEVER lived, worked, or even breathed in the REAL world!
Reminder:-
CO2 makes up just 0.04% of the atmosphere.
NATURE produces 97% of the CO2 in the atmosphere.
HUMAN ACTIVITY produces just 3% of the CO2 in the atmosphere.
Australia produces less-than 1.3% of the 3% of the 0.04% of CO2 in the atmosphere!
China produces 30%,….and rising daily!
If Australia ceased producing ANY CO2 whatsoever, it would make absolutely NO difference to the CLIMATE here, or in fact, ANYWHERE in the WORLD!
Rusty Marsh,
Cowra
www.cairnsnews.org 
Well said Rusty
It is also worth mentioning that all four parties plus teals are masons. So in fact people in NSW voted for the same mob to rule over them.
These criminals wish to make the originals citizens so they can more easily steal their land. Then our land. These commie bastards use the onion method of peeling a little bit away each time. The pain will be the same in the end.
Regards
Richard
LikeLike
This is related to my previous comment –
How The Threat Of China Was Made In The USA
LikeLike
Jewish Magazine To Honor Jewish Journalist Who Said Jews Control The White House & Congress
Next month, the jewish magazine Moment will hold its “DC Gala & Awards Dinner” honoring four ‘distinguished’ journalists, including Thomas Friedman of The New York Times, who has candidly
admitted that the pro-Israel AIPAC controls Congress and The White House:
h ttps://christiansfortruth.com/jewish-magazine-to-honor-jewish-journalist-who-said-jews-control-the-white-house-congress/
LikeLike
Tactical politicians under the well versed tutorials of those unelected billionaires and bureaucrats now run Australia and it not about us any more.
Time this all stopped.
LikeLike
We think he is demented or has been substituted with a US clone. Ed
LikeLike
Spot on Kev. Ed
LikeLike
The Constitution was thrown out of the window long ago. The referendum is IMO only being put to get the populace to contract by consent. The Blubbering PM was trying to gain your empathy.
White Christians are on the Synagogue of Satans hit list.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS
OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
PROTOCOL No. 1
RIGHT IS MIGHT
12. Our right lies in force. The word “right” is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you.
13. Where does right begin? Where does it end?……………………
PROTOCOL No. 4
2. Who and what is in a position to overthrow an invisible force? And this is precisely what our force is. GENTILE masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.
PROTOCOL No. 5
5. FOR A TIME PERHAPS WE MIGHT BE SUCCESSFULLY DEALT WITH BY A COALITION OF THE “GOYIM” OF ALL THE WORLD: but from this danger we are secured by the discord existing among them whose roots are so deeply seated that they can never now be plucked up. We have set one against another the personal and national reckonings of the GOYIM, religious and race hatreds, which we have fostered into a huge growth in the course of the past twenty centuries. This is the reason why there is not one State which would anywhere receive support if it were to raise its arm, for every one of them must bear in mind that any agreement against us would be unprofitable to itself. We are too strong – there is no evading our power. THE NATIONS CANNOT COME TO EVEN AN INCONSIDERABLE PRIVATE AGREEMENT WITHOUT OUR SECRETLY HAVING A HAND IN IT.
LikeLiked by 2 people
So, is it just plain fear that makes you think you have to do what some Corporation tells you they want you to do? You do understand that the government of AUSTRALIA is Naught but a Service Corporation right? Oh, you don’t know that. Well, there is the #1 problem The People of Australia have right there. You think you are owned by some government. Want to stay Healthy and Free???? NEVER talk to anyone that works for a government Let alone ASK them to stop Raping you and Pillaging your Property; Government is NOT your friend yet you continue to “vote” for someone you know NOTHING about and is more likely than not out to get ALL they can from the efforts of your labour
LikeLike
You do not have to fill out anything. Stop lying to people. The service corporation of AUSTRALIA Inc. has zero authority over living men and women. I’m sorry but what exactly does a service corporation have to do with people just living their God given lives? If Ronald McDonald sent Hamburgulars out to be “voted” for, what would you do? What if the CEO of a “Company” ordered their employees to snatch you off the streets or out of your home? What do you do? Remember the words, “SERVICE CORPORATION”.
How do we collectively overcome this evil empire that has captured our nations you ask? The answer is a very simple one once you comprehend it. We have always had this LAW but it has been suppressed and hidden from us in order for their Masonic Maritime Admiralty legalism system to take control from within. COMMON LAW will destroy all aspects of the cabal and quickly put all members under trial by Common Law Tribunal and sentencing carried out immediately. There are no appeals under the Common Law.
“The Corporation named – AUSTRALIA. That Corporation runs under Maritime Admiralty legalism. Anything that that system writes or says (contract) ONLY applies to “registered, regulated and licensed members” & Corporate “Property & Commerce”, period. A membership contract is called a berth (BIRTH) certificate which creates a legal corporation; the “Person or Citizen”. No one can claim that YOU are their property and claim jurisdiction over YOU, the Living Man or Woman.
Challenge jurisdiction: Common Law not legalism. Legal jurisdiction begins and ends with “PUBLIC CORPORATE” property and commerce. It wields no jurisdiction over privately owned property or commerce under the Common Law of the Land and it certainly has no force or effect upon Living individuals. YOU are not property! 1)Who is claiming Authority in This Parliament? 2)Where does that Claimed Authority come from? 3) Where is the Corporations Mission Statement? 4) Where is the Product Disclosure Statement from The Corporation? 5) Where is there a Rights and Obligations Document signed by ALL parties? 6) Who is moving this court? 7) Where is the verified claim before this court that is being relied upon? 8) Where is the contract in which I am in breach of? 9) Where is the bill of particulars, where are the damages?
Bring forward the Living Man or Woman that is bringing a claim against me that I have trespassed upon or caused harm to them that I may confront my accuser. Only a Living Man or Woman can bring forth a claim. A service corporation is not a Living being; it is a fiction of the imagination, a paper fiction or contract with no substance.*Corporations are not living people, they cannot step forward with a claim.
There are 3 questions under the Common Law Jurisdiction, from the Royal law, The Perfect Law of Liberty. 1) Am, “i”, a Living Man or Living Woman property? 2) Do you, as an individual, have a signed contract that says, “i”, am your, “property”, or gives you authority over, “i”, a Living Man or Living Woman? 3) Do you, as an acting representative of the Corporation (government) AUSTRALIA or independent or subcontracting service corporation (STATE) operating under Maritime Admiralty law/legal system, or any other service corporation, have a signed contract that says, “i”, am your, “property”, or gives you authority over, “i”, a Living Man or Living Woman? The answer to all 3 is always a resounding NO. It cannot be anything other without Documented evidence; That “evidence” does NOT exist;
You have just established that no legal jurisdiction exists between you and whom ever you are speaking with. After establishing these truths your one and only answer to any question or unlawful order under, “color of law”, will be: “I will not contract with you”. “I will not enter into any Joinder with you”; NEVER answer “I understand” to any question, simply repeat I will not contract with you.
“YOU” became “PROPERTY”, as a corporation when issued a, “LEGAL” Corporation named (SURNAME) and numbered (REGIS-STERED) “BIRTH-CERTIFICATE/Business License”. This is the “mark”, or name and number of the “beast system”, which every country operates under; Maritime Admiralty legalism. That system has hijacked our PUBLIC Courtrooms and does everything possible to block us from using our PUBLIC Courts under the Common Law. THAT “IDENTITY” IS WHAT THE LEGAL SYSTEM HAS JURISDICTION OVER. Not YOU. Do you believe that YOU are a corporation and YOU are not a Living Man or Woman? Do YOU believe that someone owns YOU? Do you know that YOU have been duped into becoming someone’s (CITIZEN) regulated property? I will say that all berth (BIRTH) certificates are issued under the intent to commit fraud and thus they are VOID of contract
LikeLiked by 1 person
When are people of Australia going to WAKE UP and realise that by “voting”, you are giving a Notice To CON-TRACT with someone representing a CORPORATION that has The Corporations vested interests at heart?
Every single Critical Thinking Australian NEEDS to stop this Unlawful USURPING of The Commonwealth Of Australia;
‘No Confidence’ plastered onto ANY vote is supposed to be a vote that counts, but we know that those “votes” will just disappear;
The GG has proven that it is a Figure Head of The Corporation with No Power to do absolutely fuck all except live in Granduer and Largess, in a Mansion with servants paid for by YOU; So, Australia, who do Whereas The people turn to when we have no faith in Government or The Corporation known as The AEC?;
Whereas The People ARE the Commonwealth; We all, each and every one of us Hold a Single share in the Commonwealth; The Constitution Of The Commonwealth Of Australia (1900Uk) and The Act Of…….Chapter 12 (1901) is INDISSOLUBLE; It CANNOT be undone; It CANNOT be ALTERED without Referendum; It CANNOT be removed OR replaced by ANY politician OR vote of “Parliament”;
Do you know there is ANOTHER book calling itself The AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION that was NEVER referred to Whereas The People; It was NEVER ascended to by a representative of The Victorian Crown; It was NEVER put to referendum; It is an UNLAWFUL document CREATED by an Unlawful Government;
Australia, YOU ARE THE AUTHORITY;
It’s time to stop fucking around with these arse clowns called politicians and Claim Back Our Parliament and return Government to what it is, by Law, meant to be; Of The People, By The People, For The People;
Has the last 3 years not taught any of you who “The Government[s]” really work for? Has the last 3 years not taught any of you about what a Dictatorship looks like? Has the last 3 years not taught you “Your Voice” means jack shit?
Wake the fuck up before this gets totally out of control and YOU and YOUR kids end up in slave cities working for The Master just so you can eat while you pay The Master to keep you enslaved….Oh shit, it is ALREADY out of control
LikeLike
I wonder if Albo was teary because he might not be able to pull it off…
And what a coincidence that an expert in Australian Constitutional Law died just recently.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MANDATE Definition & Legal Meaning
Definition & Citations:
h ttps://thelawdictionary.org/mandate/
In practice. A Judicial command or precept proceeding from a court or judicial officer, directing the proper officer to enforce a judgment, sentence, or decree. Seaman v. Clarke, 60 App. Div. 416, 69 N. Y. Supp. 1002; Horton v. State, 63 Neb. 34, 88 N. W. 146.
In the practice of the supreme court of the United States, the mandate is a precept or order issued upon the decision of an appeal or writ of error, directing the action to be taken, or disposition to be made of the case, by the inferior court In some of the state jurisdictions, the name “mandate” has been substituted for “mandamus” as the formal title of that writ In contracts. A bailment of property in regard to which the bailee engages to do some act without reward. Story, Bailm. jj 137.
A mandate is a contract by which a lawful business is committed to the management of another, and by him undertaken to be performed gratuitously. The mandatary is bound to the exercise of slight diligence, and is responsible for gross neglect. The fact that the mandator derives no benefit from the acts of the mandatary is not of itself evidence of gross negligence. Richardson v. Futrell, 42 Miss. 525; Williams v. Conger, 125 U. S. 397, 8 Sup. Ct. 933, 31 L Ed. 778.
A mandate, procuration, or letter of attorney is an act by which one person gives power to another to transact for him and in his name one or several affairs. The mandate may take place in five different manners,…………………….”
From Noah Websters 1828 Dictionary –
GRATUITOUSLY, adv. Freely; voluntarily; without claim or merit; without an equivalent or compensation; as labor or services gratuitously bestowed.
2. Without proof; as a principal gratuitously presumed.
LikeLike
MANDATE Definition & Legal Meaning
Definition & Citations:
https://thelawdictionary.org/mandate/
In practice. A Judicial command or precept proceeding from a court or judicial officer, directing the proper officer to enforce a judgment, sentence, or decree. Seaman v. Clarke, 60 App. Div. 416, 69 N. Y. Supp. 1002; Horton v. State, 63 Neb. 34, 88 N. W. 146.
In the practice of the supreme court of the United States, the mandate is a precept or order issued upon the decision of an appeal or writ of error, directing the action to be taken, or disposition to be made of the case, by the inferior court In some of the state jurisdictions, the name “mandate” has been substituted for “mandamus” as the formal title of that writ In contracts. A bailment of property in regard to which the bailee engages to do some act without reward. Story, Bailm. jj 137.
A mandate is a contract by which a lawful business is committed to the management of another, and by him undertaken to be performed gratuitously. The mandatary is bound to the exercise of slight diligence, and is responsible for gross neglect. The fact that the mandator derives no benefit from the acts of the mandatary is not of itself evidence of gross negligence. Richardson v. Futrell, 42 Miss. 525; Williams v. Conger, 125 U. S. 397, 8 Sup. Ct. 933, 31 L Ed. 778.
A mandate, procuration, or letter of attorney is an act by which one person gives power to another to transact for him and in his name one or several affairs. The mandate may take place in five different manners,…………………….”
From Noah Websters 1828 Dictionary –
GRATUITOUSLY, adv. Freely; voluntarily; without claim or merit; without an equivalent or compensation; as labor or services gratuitously bestowed.
2. Without proof; as a principal gratuitously presumed.
LikeLike
Our politicians who support the Voice should be charged with treason and notified that under section 44 of the Constitution they are no longer eligible to sit in Parliament.
LikeLike
Albos Tears on the 9 News
this Thursday for the Voice was pathetic,,he’s like the Local Car Salesman ,the 2019 National Indigenous Australia’s legislation, the 35 Billion Dollars allocated every Year for Indigenous causes ,the Eleven Aboriginal Members of Parliment ,shouldbe enough
LikeLike
If there is a conflict between Australia and the Aboriginal nation, will the United Nations send ‘peace keeping’ troops to assist in keeping the peace?
If the NT has a black majority will they have the right to secede from Australia?
LikeLike
ALERT, ALERT….Just saw a message from Riccardo Bosi on Telegram – A supporter has informed him of the following… obviously someone who knows Common Law by the sound of it.
The Labor Party is not being open and truthful as to the real reason it is conducting this referendum.
The UN has has given the Federal Government a mandate of ownership of housing, farms, property and business to government once a Republic has been proclaimed. The UN is NWO in waiting for a One World Government.
The push for the Voice is a very important part of their plan which is to include ORIGINAL men, women and children of this country because at the moment they have NO CONTRACT with the ORIGINAL men, women and children of this country.. Because there is ‘no contract’ with the indigenous people of Australia, a republic would not be achieved because the ORIGINAL men, women and children are the lawful land owners and the government would be unable to take control over ownership of housing, farms, property and business, thus thwarting its secretive push for a totalitarian republic where you would own nothing and be happy.
This plan was already underway back in 1990. Every State in Australia has already sold off the Lands and Title Office, your original titles have been destroyed. The value of your property is in the TITLE. All properties certificate of titles has been digitised and this is not a lawful proof of historical ownership.
A YES vote will change the Constitution by referendum.. I hope the Aboriginal people can see what is happening…
That’s the main gist of the message that I copied from the Telegram site.. apart from a couple of paras… I don’t know if its on Bosi’s website.. perhaps someone could check
Someone familiar with, or expert in, Constitutional law, will know the meaning of all this…
LikeLike
Aussie Dictionary definition of Albanese’s Voice:
“A bunch of loud mouths selected (as opposed to elected) and put in place by VESTED interests for the purpose of systematically MILKING Australians of ALL shapes and colours.”
The likes of ATSIC, NIAA, and a plethora of already established institutions dealing with Aboriginal issues, etc… simply couldn’t go far enough.
The VESTED interests want everyone to be “happy”! The likes of George Soros and Klaus Schwab luvs us all, that’s why they put their money where our Loud Mouths are.
LikeLike
The Constitutional Amendment proposed by The VOICE Referendum spells Black Minority Government of the 3.8% [ Its Industry and Corporates ] over the Australians.
And that government will be exercised by the NIAA Box Ticker Aboriginal Industry (funded to the tune of 4.5 billion / year by Australians) which has failed TOTALLY to benefit its constituents.
The VOICE spells ‘pay the rent’ for the 96.2 %. Don’t imagine this is like a one off payment. It will apply in every aspect of Australian life.
In addition to the Aboriginal Industry there are the ‘stakeholders’ – these would be “the roughly 3,000 Aboriginal Corporations all registered under CATSI Act”. Check out the NIAA Eleven Bullet Point Plan of Black Economic Empowerment on steroids that Senator Pauline Hanson has just read into the Hansard.
It even includes fees for water consumption.
Everyone needs to know about this.
Has The Truth Of Albanese’s Voice Been Exposed?
LikeLike
Albanese wants a treaty with aboriginal First Nations (plural).
Who will be the aboriginal head of the aboriginal nations?
What is the definition of an aboriginal?
The treaty will naturally cause the Australian Parliament to be subject to the terms of the treaty.
Treaty | National Geographic Society
ht tps://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/treaty
Treaties are agreements between nations. They can be bilateral, between two nations, or multilateral, among several nations. Key aspects of treaties are that they are binding (meanning, there are legal consequences to breaking them) and become part of international law.
Under section 44 of the Constitution those subject to foreign power are ineligible to sit in parliament.
“Any person who:
is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power; or
is attainted of treason, or has been convicted and is under sentence, or subject to be sentenced, for any offence punishable under the law of the Commonwealth or of a State by imprisonment for one year or longer; or
is an undischarged bankrupt or insolvent; or
holds any office of profit under the Crown, or any pension payable during the pleasure of the Crown out of any of the revenues of the Commonwealth: or
has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the Commonwealth otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five persons;
shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives…………………….”
…………….
ht tps://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/treaties
“The power to enter into treaties is an Executive power within section 61 of the Australian Constitution.”
Section 61 says nothing of the sort in my copy of the Constitution –
Chapter II. The Executive Government. – Parliament of Australia
https://www.aph.gov.au/…/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Constitution/chapter2
61. Executive power The executive power of the Commonwealth is vested in the Queen and is exercisable by the Governor-General as the Queen’s representative, and extends to the execution and maintenance of this Constitution, and of the laws of the Commonwealth
LikeLike
Thanks Rusty …you’re 100% correct …but it’s actually MUCH worse!
The May 2023 election was the biggest electoral fraud in our history!
It was TOTALLY corrupt, deliberately manipulated, extremely well planned and organised.
Remember Albo’s (with his trim new look) bragging on TV about what he was going to do when he became PM about three months before the May election?
Scomo had to tell Albo, “hold your horses, as the election is nine weeks away!”
Thousands of AEC workers, Labor/Greens supporters & paid Uni students re-wrote ballots each night (almost in real time) at locations all over the country during the extended pre-poll period.
The vote rigging sweat shops filled out millions of new ballots, subtracting the required number of votes from One Nation, UAP LDP and the other freedom parties and giving them to Labor/Green and the Teals.
Some Labor/Greens candidates were 9-38% lower than previous elections, so they systematically substituted original ballots with FAKE ballots that “topped up” the difference of each Labor/Greens/Teale candidates vote’s to achieve a subtle and believable 2% – 5% margin above each Liberal Party, One Nation, UAP and LDP etc, candidate in key seats and most electorates.
They collectively removed the appropriate number of votes from the Liberal party, One Nation, UAP and LDP and other freedom parties and carefully added them to Labor/Greens/Teal candidate’s ballot results.
This quietly destroyed any genuine opposition and guaranteed a (fake puppet) Federal government with a convincing 2%-5% controlling majority, with no questions asked.
The ABC and SBS had lead stories prepared well ahead of the Federal election to attack the anticipated public outcry (which never occurred) concerning the “Trump style claim” about the stolen Federal election?
The Federal and State governments were involved, along with the AEC, CCP, WEF and Soros who organised and financed this disgraceful fraud.
The ONLY way to expose this massive fraud is to initiate a public and very transparent, thorough independent FORENSIC AUDIT of the last federal election processes, chain of custody AEC and every ballot paper ASAP.
LikeLike
If Labor got so little of the vote, how come they are in office??BarbaraSent from my SAMSUNG Galaxy S7 on the Telstra Mobile Network
LikeLike
No need to vote – the Voice has already been decided!
Proclamation under the Flags Act 1953 (Australian Aboriginal Flag)
h ttps://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2008L00209
Proclamation under the Flags Act 1953. Flags Act 1953. I, PHILIP MICHAEL JEFFERY, Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council and noting the fact that the flag reproduced in Schedule 1 and described in Schedule 2 is recognised as the flag of the Aboriginal peoples of Australia and ………….”
LikeLike
You are judged by the company you keep, even by whom you choose to make the rules governing your life.
LikeLike
“One good thing about the referendum”
There is NOTHING good about installing a special interest group in the Australian Constitution. Vested interests will inevitably HIJACK it for its own ends.
LikeLike
How to open up a can of worms! Institutionalising ANY special interest group within the Australian Constitution is a bad idea… Period.
LikeLike
@Rusty Marsh
I agree with you whole heartedly on the climate claptrap as does the data.
Labour is in denial?
Yes they only received 32 % of number one votes in 2022’s Fed election and with the greens and not so independent independents are forcing border hopping foreign directives onto Australia’s children.
On preferences they sit in 77 of the 151 lower house seats.
Liberal Party sit in 27, LOL.
Nah, Rusty is in denial.
The Liberal/National Coalition is an AEC lie.
They call it a Party, like lying media calling gene editing platforms Vaccines, but it isn’t a registered party, so they lie.
The Coalition received zero, nought, zilch, no votes, 0.
Why reinforce the two Party preferred BS; it only exists in the minds of programmed sheep and cunny funts dressed in sheep’s clothing?
https://results.aec.gov.au/27966/Website/HouseDefault-27966.htm
LikeLike
One good thing about the referendum is that THERE ARE NO PREFERENCES, so poor old Albo is panicking…nothing can be rigged.
The only way they can cheat is by the wording of the questions.
It should be a plain YES/NO answer.
“Do you want the Voice?”
If it isn’t ,we know that there are hidden nasties in it, just like they fooled us with SSM!
Give up, Albo…the majority of us know what is behind YOUR Voice…your masters won’t be happy with the result but too bad, they don’t rule us, and NEVER will!
LikeLike
Our Sodomite Prime Minister is shortly to give a speech on ABC about “The Voice”.
I note that with 3 flags on display behind him the aboriginal flag takes centre place. Are they trying to tell us something?
Switch to ABC now
LikeLike
I could not have said it better myself, Rusty, you nailed it!
How can we change it though, when the government make it impossible to do so.
If a good politician brings up the fact that changes need to be made to our voting process, he/ she is howled down, in parliament, by both major parties
.
Looking at the primary votes in our last few elections …state and Federal…Labor should NOT be in government anywhere.
Libs and Nats do not seem to have the brains to see that IF THEY VOTED IN CHANGES TO ELECTIONS ,they would probably win.( not that I would be voting for them, but they might be a little bit better than what we have!)
I shake my head in disbelief….we have brain dead creatures….apart from a few honest decent ones….running our country, and it’s going to get worse!
LikeLike
It is obvious that the voting system is not representative of the people. This needs to be investigated
.
LikeLike
70% of the Australian population would rather have someone else in government other than Labour. So why is Labour in government? By mistake or by design?
Now let that sink in, folks!
LikeLike
Compulsory Preferential Voting in Australia… the “democratic” way of ensuring a minority gets to screw the majority.
Always vote for the Duopoly/Greens parties, make sure you get screwed every time.
LikeLike
Brilliant Rusty
I vote for you.
LikeLike
Well said Rusty
I vote for you.
LikeLike