Unarmed, murdered mother of two defenceless against yet another violent home invasion

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-27/woman-killed-in-alleged-home-invasion-north-lakes/101809984

A mother of two was murdered in a violent home invasion yesterday in the Moreton Bay region north east of Brisbane.

The 41-year-old woman, Emma Lovell, suffered fatal injuries, while 43-year-old Lee Lovell survived with non-life-threatening wounds.

Emma and Lee Lovell were defenceless against four violent home invaders, but could have had a chance if they had access to a gun

As first respondents this couple had little chance of defending themselves but could have protected themselves if they had a firearm, a proposition that Queensland Police and the Labor Party rally against as more frequent home invasions and assaults occur on a daily basis throughout the state.

Whether the assailants are black or white the only way they will be deterred is by the possibility that the homeowner has a gun.

Queensland Police Union President Ian Leavers once stated on the ABC that the only people in this state who should own guns are the police.

The Corporate Queensland Police Service is an integral part of Queensland Labor Party Inc and are tied at the hip with policies that are not suitable for the good people of the sunshine state.

Now that the socialist Premier has handed over the state electoral roll to Konnech China there will be no chance of ever removing the corrupt ALP at the ballot box.

Two teenagers charged with woman’s murder:

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on December 27, 2022, in ABC, ALP, Annastacia Palaszczuk, Anthony Albanese, gun control, Gun Control Australia, guns, Rebecca Peters and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. 28 Comments.

  1. Joe was at the massacre sitting on a verandah we believe. Editor

    Like

  2. Port Arthur was indeed a false flag event designed to remove all semi automatic firearms from Australian society.
    Read the report by Joe Vials titled “Deadly Deception of Port Arthur”
    Joe was a Nato Officer and thoroughly investigates what actually happened.
    This should be a concern to all Australians and especially the families of those who lost loved ones to know the truth.

    Like

  3. Hi Blisskitt, You know what? I’m not sure either – so either we’re both losing our minds?!! or……? Some bizarre stuff here though. Appears like a targeted rather than random attack? And the youth crime – which as you say has been getting a lot of extra coverage recently. It’s been the new normal here in Cairns for ages!
    Very unorthodox they performed a thoracotomy on her at the scene. Truly horrific.

    Like

  4. FWIW mainstream media is saying the husband has spoken out about this. I get the emotions he would be feeling but why can’t the media leave well alone? I have read many other headlines re : youth crime in recent days. I not saying it not happening but seems now the last week a consistent or trend. II not sure this story the whole truth either.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Check out America’s home and business invasion figures in states with licence to carry vs forbidden ownership. The licenced to carry states have massively lower figures than those who don’t.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. The lighter side of gun control debate in the US – a public debate which needs to be conducted here, I might add.
    “Archie Bunker on Guns vs VD”

    Like

  7. questionit21 – the Lying Rodent was PM at the time of the PA busineess not Rhodes’ man, Hawke. Hawke was the boss on 9/8/1987 the day of the Hoddle Street event and 8/12/1987 the day of the Queen Street event.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. I have been following this story on BigJew media. The operative code word is ‘teens’ and ‘youths’. If the teens / youths arrested in relation to this home invasion/assault/murder (allegedly committed) had been White males – their racial and gender profile would (of course) been published.

    The ‘teens’ and ‘youths’ profile tells you immediately that Black Entitlement to crime, specifically Black on White crime, is being facilitated. Those arrested were Black males.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. You don’t need a fire arm to protect yourself from these pieces of crap , improvised weapons other than fire arms are just as lethal , you have plenty of them in the home

    Like

  10. Unfortunate;y we don’t have any legitimate courts or laws they disappeared decades ago. Under common law defending
    one’s home and self is justifiable. Ed

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Woops should be Brigadier Ted Sarong. Ed

    Like

  12. What is the use of voting? Our little old PM was travelling to sign Australians up to the Cabal before the votes were finished counting.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. truthtellertonni

    Don’t be an idiot.
    If our votes counted, they wouldn’t let us vote.
    And, there is more than one way to skin a cat.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. The only way to deter home invasions (and the violence / murder which goes with it) is an armed homeowner. Never mind beware of dog. Beware of owner. The police might be only minutes away [if they aren’t running CoVID Compliance or a Black OP on community]. But when seconds count, home protection is security and firearms.

    Liked by 3 people

  15. I’ll lend you the Port Arthur book I have, Ed. Picture on the way.

    Like

  16. Brigadier Ted Sarong in charge of special forces. Remember the gunsmith who told investigators Bryant was unable to remove
    the magazine for the Colt AR-10 and had no idea how the rifle even operated. Ed

    Liked by 2 people

  17. geoffrey mcmaster

    what would have happened if the parents had resisted the attackers and killed or seriously wounded them would they be justified in an australian court of law of defending them selves and their children or would the courts rule that they used to much force and therefor guilty of manslauter of the home invaders?

    Liked by 1 person

  18. As the Little Horn (Popus) said, “No private person should possess a gun.”

    Like

  19. Yes, Questionit21: That military sharpshooter was jack Sarong, best shot in the army at that time. He said the kill ratio was extraordinary, and the work of highly-skilled shooters; and he said he could not possibly have done what those shooters did.
    All shots, he said, were head shots, so the accuracy was phenomenal.
    A friend went to the Melbourne suburb of Armadale, some time later-a couple of years at least, and spoke to a shop-owner who was shot through the cheek at Port Arthur.
    He said it was not Martin Bryant who shot him.

    Liked by 2 people

  20. The right to defend yourself is God given

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Thank you Magda: see this, and tell me why the police and other “authorities” should not be held liable for the $20 million I mentioned, when Khalif Shire Ali, like Lames Gargasoulis and others, was on the police radar?
    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/nov/23/melbourne-cafe-owner-sisto-malaspina-died-in-arms-of-a-stranger-in-bourke-street-attack

    Liked by 2 people

  22. No one ever raped a 38

    Liked by 1 person

  23. We all have the right to self defence, and if that right is not acknowledged, then maybe the police might like to accept liability-maybe $20 million-for every victim of crimes like this article deals with?
    And that is:$20 million-each!- for every affected family member and loved one.

    Liked by 3 people

  24. I’m getting quite depressed. It seems the cabal have full control. I the only person with this opinion? If not, please tell me why they have not. And don’t say your god is looking after us.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. I saw a newspaper article recently where a policeman mentioned the term “lawful weapon” in relation to someone not having such a thing.
    The question I might put to the local Head Copper is: “What, then, is a “lawful weapon?”
    I wouldn’t want to be guessing now, would I?

    Liked by 3 people

  26. I saw a newspaper article recently where a policeman mentioned the term “lawful weapon” in relation to someone not having such a thing.
    The question I might put to the local Head Copper is: “What, then, is a “lawful weapon?”.
    owouldn’t want to be guessing now, would I?

    Like

  27. We all remember what happened at Port Arthur it was a red flag event to eliminate guns in Australia and Bob Hawke believe was responsible for it all and Martin Bryant was the escape goat blamed for it all. Even though a military expert stated that the amount of head shots committed in quick fashion that even a marksman would even struggle with the headshot kill ratio.

    Yes there have been a lot of home invasions of late and a guy just in his underwear stopped 5 Teenagers with his home invasion. Could this increase of home invasions be related to the mRNA Inoculations that something that 5G changes these peoples mindset to do crazy things.

    I agree that if people still had guns to protect their family and home that be less home invasions attempted. Then on the flip side if a home invader is killed by a gun due to protecting the family and home would that person be done for manslaughter? Remember what happened with Kyle Rittenhouse even though was acquitted on all 5 accounts that still many believe he is still a murderer. It would be a catch 22 situation for sure still had access to guns to protect our family and home I would do what ever it took to stop my home being invaded..

    Liked by 2 people

  28. The only solution to bad government is to STOP VOTING FOR THEM. The threat of a $20 fine for not voting as laughable as it is easy to overcome. If the AEC threatens you with a fine, write back and tell them you did vote, but your name was not on the electoral roll when you arrived. So, one of the workers wrote your name down in pencil on a piece of paper. They must have lost it. How will the AEC ever disprove that?
    Governments only exist because people keep on voting for them. We all know they are corrupt. STOP VOTING FOR LIARS, THIEVES, CRIMINALS AND TRAITORS!
    It’s not rocket science!!!

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: