by staff writers
VICTORIA’S political crisis will deepen, despite Premier aka comrade Dan Andrews’ attempts to exploit a so-called second wave in COVID19 infections, to deflect attention from it and buy time.
In addition to the scandal involving the foul, crooked Labor branch stacker and former Local Government Minister Adam Somyurek and two other ministerial resignations, the state has been caught in two massive fraud allegations involving the Dandenong City Council and the Department of Health and Human Services and the brazenly illegal “withdrawal” of taxi business licences in 2017.
Dandenong council, in the bullying manner typical of the bureaucratic, corporate monstrosities called “local government”, is accused of fraudulently shutting down a catering business named I Cook Foods 18 months ago.

The privately-owned family business just happened to be serious competition for another catering company, Community Catering, in which Dandenong council and others have financial stakes. This company was in financial difficulty and is being bought by the State Government.
Meanwhile taxi operators who were shafted by this same out-of-control China client state called Victoria, are now battling in the courts in order to get some justice after Andrews and company simply cancelled 5000 “pepetual licences” at midnight on October 9, 2017. So-called “transitional payments” of totally inadequate amounts, were offered with the new legislation.
The move smoothed the path for the entry of Silicon Valley tech giant Uber to the Australian market and no doubt paid off handsomely to Victorian Labor Party coffers.
One former taxi operator told Cairns News the government simply removed the word “perpetual” from the redrafted legislation and then let Uber into a now largely unregulated market.
“They reduced the price of the plates to zero. My business, superannuation, income and inheritance for my children is all gone.
“Licences used to cost hundreds of thousands of dollars per set of plates. That’s where the wealth was in the industry. But now people have a debt on something that no longer exists.”
Dandenong Council and Red Dan hand-in-hand for dollars
Comrade Dan’s crooked corporate state also works hand in hand with the council corporations.
I Cook Foods supplies packaged food for nursing homes, Meals on Wheels and hospitals, but was temporarily shut down by Dandenong council and the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). They used the death of an elderly woman initially attributed to listeria and linked it to I Cook Foods.
Ian Cook’s factory was later cleared of having contamination and documents revealed council officers knew within days of the closure that the listeria levels at the business were safe.
However, the council raised other “food safety” concerns, including a slug being found in the kitchen, and laid 96 food safety charges against Mr Cook and his company.
The closure resulted in 41 people losing their jobs and basically destroyed a $25 million business. It is still managing to survive on limited business.
A council health inspector is now accused of planting the slug on the property after video footage was reviewed.
Luckily for Ian Cook, his matter has now been widely publicized and was the subject of a parliamentary hearing this month (June).
Ian has also been given access to a commercial law process by a group of Geelong activists, which has enabled him to sidestep the courts and expensive legal obstruction by council solicitors.
He has also gained the voluntary help of two retired Victorian cops who have been supplied with extensive evidence of the misconduct.
It is hoped prosecutions may be undertaken in the near future.
They are without law…
They have no respect for legal principles or the accepted rules of jurisprudence.
They ignore Protocols such as Clearfield Doctrine and Palermo Protocols, out the window.
They enforce and cross-vest with immunity.
They use Local Government Regulations that have an equivalent effect of a “Bill of Attainder” a very repugnant form of Theft, theft of property derived from the times of King Henry the Eighth.
Brilliant article. I, too, am a former taxi license plate owner who, not only lost my husband in 2015, but then had my husband’s legacy of the taxi licence ripped away from me by Daniel Andrews and co.!! Thank you for daring to publish the truth.
Who is Dan Andrews really working for now that we know that Australia is a virtual Chapter 11 bankrupt controlled by Jewish bankers?
For how long have our politicians been running to the US for advice?
“……………..Following the 1975 Nugan Hand Bank/CIA coup against Australian Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, his British Crown-appointed successor Malcolm Fraser sped to the US, where he met with President Gerald Ford after conferring with David Rockefeller. [24]”
https://hangthebankers.com/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/
As I see it –
Karl Marx Communist Manifesto
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents
of land to public purposes.
.
The “rent” on your property in Australia is in the form of an illegal tax which if not paid over a period of 3 years the “Local Government’ is obliged to hold an auction sale for the recovery of the money owed. So who owns the house and land?
.
“The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is an Australian government statutory agency…..”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Taxation_Office
Where are the statutes to be found?
.
http://www.knowyourrightsgroup.com.au/files/TaxpayersCharter.pdf
.
Similarly where are the Commonwealth of Australia governments statutes authorising a 3rd tier of government?
.
Section 109 of the Australian Constitution states:
.
“When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.”
.
Because the Parliaments of Australia are subject to the Commonwealth Parliament and also subject to the Commonwealth Constitution, the states cannot lawfully impose a ‘Land Tax’, ‘only the Commonwealth Government holds such taxation authority’.
.
“The very same applies to local governments continuance and application of rates and taxes issued on their behalf”
.
(State governments cannot be awarded powers from the commonwealth that are not theirs to hand over)
.
Until the State’s of Australia can provide a legal authority either from the High Court of Australia; or from the Federal Government giving authority to raise taxes, to comply with your intentions would be in breach of the law itself, that you are bound to uphold. When you present such legal authority we will certainly provide the information you request.
.
All local government has been constitutionally illegal since 3-9-88 when there was a referendum to incorporate local Government into the Australian Constitution, and prior to the referendum, there has never been any implied legality.
.
This means that all local government authorities now operate without a lawful head of power. The legal bind is that states cannot retain legislation that condones any form of local government.
.
Thus all levels of government are operating illegally ignoring the instructions of the people. If the government will not obey the Constitutional Will of The People and thus democratic law, why should the people obey parliamentary law? The precedence has been set.
.
FURTHERMORE Local Government Rates are deemed a tax thus no GST is applicable.
.
Clearly in sections 51 and 52 of the Constitution and from the Constitutional Commission (1985 – 1988) report that the power of taxation is held exclusively by the Federal Parliament. No states have authority under the constitution to impose a tax. Clearly in sections 51 and 52 of the Constitution and from the Constitutional Commission (1985 – 1988) report that “The power of taxation is held exclusively by the Federal Parliament.” Thus Local Government Rates being a tax are unlawful and in breach of the constitution.
.
4. Unless we receive a “Rates Notice” from the ‘Commissioner for Taxation it is INVALID and UNLAWFUL.
.
BUT – The ATO is an agency of the Commonwealth.
.
STATEMENTS
.
Attorney-General – George Brandis
.
Database
.
Senate Hansard
.
Monday, 28 November 2016
Page: 3323
.
“………..Nevertheless, because a constitutional issue had been raised, a notice under section 78B of the Judiciary Act went to the Commonwealth, as well as to the states and territories, asking if the Commonwealth wished to intervene in the proceedings. It is important to point out that although the ATO is an agency of the Commonwealth it is a different legal personality. It nevertheless represents the interests of the Commonwealth in protecting the revenue. It is not automatic that the Commonwealth intervenes in proceedings every time it receives a section 78B notice. Every section 78B notice is assessed according to its own particular facts………………”
.
http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1011/11RP10
.
http://www.markmaldridge.com
.
https://markaldridge.wordpress.com/2012/11/04/the-australian-constitutions-validity-local-government-and-law/
.
….Relatively low key but highly symbolic Commonwealth support of local government continued during the Howard Liberal–National Government (1996–2007). A significant local government initiative of the Howard years was the Roads to Recovery program, which provided funds direct to local governments to upgrade, construct and maintain local roads. Begun in 2000, some $1.2 billion dollars was spent on Roads to Recovery grants by May 2005, and a further $1.23 billion was subsequently committed for the 2005–06 to 2008–09 fiscal period.[45] This program benefited many rural and regional councils, a reflection, perhaps, of an old national ideal identified by political scientist Judith Brett:
.
Built into the notion of what it was to be an Australian was an idea of shared access to basic services, a shared minimum standard of living, no matter where you lived.[46]
,
The rhetoric behind the Roads to Recovery scheme included a slightly ‘Whitlamesque’ concern for fostering local ‘agency’ and expeditious outcomes without state involvement: ……
,
http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1011/11RP10
Public Service Act 2008 Section 24 Chapter 1 Introduction Part 2 The Queensland Public Service
.
What is a government entity
.
1. (a) a department or part of a department; or
2. (b) a public service office or part of a public service office; or
3. (c) an agency, authority, commission, corporation, instrumentality, office, or other entity, established under an Act or under State authorisation for a public or State purpose; or
4. (d) a part of an entity mentioned in paragraph (c); or
5. (e) another entity, or part of another entity, declared under a regulation to be a government entity; or
6. (f) a registry or other administrative office of a court of the State of any jurisdiction.
.
(2) However, each of the following entities is not a government entity— (a) a local government; etc
.
Therefore IMO Local government is like the ATO which has no Commonwealth Constitutional authority and is therefore an agency of the Commonwealth and States. Local Government and ATO Acts are only statutes, and only apply to the employees of that private company (Corporations Act 1990 Sec 8)
.
https://youtu.be/6uDYx8qEiuA toe to toe rise up f… the government
.
Big noses globalist elites puppet
While the Editor claims that the political parties have taken over our constitutional system reality is that only if you accept them to have that legal power can they have done so. I for one do not and will not accept so because regardless of what was done it all is and remains unconstitutional and as such this incorporation essentially has no legal basis. Nor so the purported Australia Act. As I proved on 19 October 2006 in both appeals comprehensively defeating all Attorney Generals in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka on compulsory voting and numerous other constitutional issues that you can defeat them if you do to say do your homework and use the constitution appropriately to succeed. You are only defeated if you concede being defeated. Hence, any legislation in violation of the constitution, including any incorporation, remains unconstitutional as long as anyone continues to oppose it. I have canvassed this issue to great extent at my blog at http://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati. So, if you desire to fight for your constitutional rights then maintain your objection against anything that violates our constitutional rights!
A major problem within the Commonwealth of Australia is that as I view it we have a High Court of Australia which has set itself above the constitution albeit unconstitutionally and causes that many seeking relief on basis of the true meaning and application of the constitution are in some manner denied this. The States are created in s106 “SUBJECT TO THIS CONSTITUTION” and as such the legal principle embedded in the constitution is that the States also are required to provide appropriate compensation where it directly/indirectly acquire the property of someone. In my view the cancelation of perpetual taxi license rights is an acquisition that should be properly compensated. As for “I Cook Foods Supplies” (or something to this nature of the name) I view that where there is a conflict of interest then the decision must be deemed unlawful. We always should keep in mind that politicians are to serve the community and not the other way around. See also my extensive writings at my blog at http://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati.