High Court belongs to political parties

Letter to the editor
I have the Doc to prove what I write.
The Political Parties changed the Constitutional and Official Definitions in 1973 without a Referendum. So now the word Australia is NOT the Australia or Commonwealth of Australia as established UNDER the Founding and Primary law, Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 as Proclaimed and Gazetted = TREASON
The High Court of Australia belongs lock stock and barrel by the Political Parties. It is NOT a Chapter 3 Court and was established in 1979 by and for the Political Parties under their own Party Constitutions and sealed by the Great Seal of Australia. That Seal (Great Seal of Australia) was established by and for the Political Parties in 1973.
The Judiciary of the Political Parties High Court of Australia sit there as a Coram.
Note: Butterworths Concise Australian Legal Dictionary
Coram /koraem/ lat – in the presence of: before. = TREASON
Therefore they have NO MORE Authority than you and me.
The Judges at times have told us
KIRBY J. : “ A legislature cannot, by preambular assertions, recite itself into constitution power where none exists. ”
DAWSON J. : “ It may be observed that a legislature wishing to enact a statute ordering that all blue-eyed babies be killed would hardly be perturbed by a principle of law which purported to deny it that power. ”
Chief Justice French
We do so against the backdrop of the supremacy of Parliament
Chief Justice French
A new kind of common law evolves derived from many decisions applying the same broad statutory language.
Dick Yardley
Babinda
Advertisements

About cairnsnews

Patriot activist publishing information to Australians government do not want known

Posted on November 4, 2017, in Courts, High Court Australia, International Treaties, Liberal National Party and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 11 Comments.

  1. Can I get a copy of that document?

  2. What Dick Yardley wrote is fact set in concrete. Dick is one of the formost researchers in Australia on this subject so every one, when you see a document that has Dick Yardley written on it, please take careful note of it.

  3. copy for me as well thanks people need to wise up and take back the country from the scum bags that have infested it ban all the current main stream political parties give the independents a go.

  4. And what else happened in 1973…. Whitlam signed the UNIDROIT Treaty of Rome, dealing with Private Law, in other words, leaving Australia and entering into the private “foreign” contracts of Rome, but when was the public ever informed?…

    I often wonder if the UNIDROIT Treaty of Rome, had anything to do with the death of Kennedy in the United States? … the Us signed the UNIDROIT private law system just after Kennedy was killed in 1963… The US signed in 1964.

  5. I have heard this before from different sources a few times, it’s true – I have been in favour of a new constitution for many years – one that actually relates to the 21st century, not to the 19th. http://www.lifesupportinternational.org has a few PDF downloads – short and sweet – that are of relevance. I have been writing on this topic for a long time. Now it is a matter of harm minimisation – too late to stop the shit hitting the fan pretty soon.

  6. I find it very difficult that you would even publish this rubbish.

    This is embarrassing shit or did you not see that and you actually believe what he has said.

    Greg T

    ________________________________

    • Why don’t you take it up with Dick Yardley? He signed he letter. ED

    • Greg T, when you express your name in all capitals, suggest look up Blacks Law for Capitis Diminutio Maxima [Latin]. Do you really consider yourself in this manner and form?

      In your opinion the Editor is publishing rubbish! Exactly which part do you refer too?

      In regards to “This is embarrassing shit”. Why should you be embarrassed Greg T?

      You have only written two lines devoid of any real meaning other than to create a negative comment on what otherwise is clear statement of facts.

  7. @G.J.Tudehope << I find it very difficult to believe you wrote that rubbish comment regarding Mr. Yardley's findings. He is a very highly regarded and knowledgeable man of the highest integrity. Dick has been studying law for some years now and knows what he is talking about. You, on the other hand, obviously work for 'the other side' and cannot be trusted. Go elsewhere Tudehope. You are embarrassing yourself here.

  8. Dick, you could add to that list the Late Sir Harry Gibbs comments regarding the Constitution and Fitzgibbon v HM Attorney General [UK].

    They are not going to go quietly and they will cling tenaciously to power, they have built empires for themselves at the expense of the poor and aged. The disrespect shown to our aged is disgusting. Particularly when we consider that these people have worked their whole lives with a legitimate expectation of being able to live as an aged pensioner in modest comfort only to find that the swill within the government seek to reduce their standard of living to below the poverty line or to force them to sell up to live in retirement.

  9. Indeed you are correct. We have slept on the job or to be more realistic we have been kept ignorant and misinformed about our rights under the Commonwealth constitution 1900-1901. The political parties and their factions have high jacked the lawful government, which is the people (you and I). All politicians’ need to go to school and learn about the constitution. Learn that the people are the highest authority and parliament is its servant. Not only have the political parties high jacked government but they have given allegiance to a foreign power, named the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION, registered in Columbia, Washington US; accountable to US law and the US revenue department. The government is also unlawful as so many politicians are disqualified from sitting in parliament, making it one of the most corrupt governments we have ever had. Also it needs to be brought to public notice Part 4 s46 Until the Parliament otherwise provides, any person declared by this Constitution to be incapable of sitting as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives shall, for every day on which he so sits, be liable to pay the sum of one hundred pounds to any person who sues for it in any court of competent jurisdiction.
    In addition, sitting while disqualified raises the question of validity of any law, legislation etc. that any of these MP’s have been part of the voting, as a result may be deemed invalid.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s