By Martin Armstrong
Something very strange is happening around the United Kingdom, and the political establishment would be foolish to dismiss it. President Donald Trump has now openly endorsed the reunification of Ireland, describing it as one of the “naturals” of all time and saying he would “love” to see it happen. Then he was asked about Scottish independence and suddenly became much more careful, replying, “That one I won’t talk about yet.” Yet? That is an interesting word because Trump did not reject the possibility. He simply declined to discuss it NOW, precisely as separatist pressure is again rising across the United Kingdom.
Separatist movements in Australia have been pushing the secession button for years in particular Western Australia which has considerable public support for a divorce from socialist Australia. A North Queensland state also has substantial support from voters who say they have had enough of being dictated to by Brisbane, 1000 klms to the south.
The timing for UK could hardly be more remarkable. Within days of Trump’s comments, the nationalist leaders of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland came together in Cardiff and declared that “Westminster’s time is coming to an end.” Scotland’s SNP, Wales’ Plaid Cymru, and Sinn Féin in Northern Ireland are now coordinating around the principle that their nations should determine their own constitutional futures. For the first time in the era of devolution, all three governments outside England are led by parties committed either to independence or Irish reunification. These events should not be viewed separately because they are manifestations of the same declining confidence in centralized political authority.
Northern Ireland is especially significant because unlike Scotland or Wales, there is already a legal mechanism for leaving the United Kingdom. The 1998 Good Friday Agreement provides for the possibility of a border poll if it appears likely that a majority would favor a united Ireland. That means Irish reunification is not some theoretical constitutional fantasy. There is an internationally recognized political path through which Northern Ireland could eventually leave Britain and join the Republic of Ireland.
Brexit itself was driven partly by precisely that desire to reclaim political sovereignty. Britain told Brussels that decisions affecting British citizens should be made in Britain. Fine. Scotland can now turn around and make precisely the same argument toward Westminster. Northern Ireland can make it toward London. Wales can eventually make it as well. Once you establish the principle that political sovereignty belongs closer to the people, you cannot simply declare that principle legitimate when Britain uses it against Brussels but illegitimate when Scotland uses it against Britain.
Trump appears to recognize that the political map is not carved in stone. He has long approached geopolitics much more transactionally than the traditional diplomatic establishment. Borders, alliances, trade relationships, and political structures are not sacred merely because politicians have become accustomed to them. His willingness to discuss Irish reunification so casually therefore reflects something much larger than Ireland itself. The assumption that the United Kingdom will remain permanently united is no longer universally taken for granted.
His refusal to discuss Scotland is perhaps even more revealing. Trump owns property in Scotland and has extensive personal and business connections there, so there are obvious reasons for him to tread carefully. But saying “That one I won’t talk about yet” is not the same as saying Scottish independence is impossible.
The SNP, Plaid Cymru, and Sinn Féin broadly envision their futures inside the European Union. They want independence from Westminster while simultaneously embracing political integration with Brussels. I have never understood how surrendering sovereignty to one capital after escaping another constitutes independence. Scotland should have the right to govern Scotland, but genuine independence means sovereignty, not simply exchanging London bureaucrats for European bureaucrats.
Nevertheless, their contradiction does not make the separatist trend disappear. The political pressure itself is real, and it extends far beyond Britain. Catalonia challenged Madrid. Nationalist movements remain active in Flanders, Corsica, and elsewhere. Giorgia Meloni is calling for a confederal Europe that restores greater authority to sovereign nations. Nationalist and anti-establishment parties are gaining ground because centralized political structures are increasingly colliding with local interests.
This is precisely what the Cycle of War and civil unrest models were warning about when I discussed Scotland years before the 2014 referendum shocked Westminster. Economic decline does not merely change stock markets and currencies. It changes POLITICAL STRUCTURES. When government can no longer deliver prosperity, populations begin questioning why the government itself should continue to exist in its present form.
Trump’s comments therefore should not be dismissed as another offhand remark. The President of the United States has publicly said he would “love” to see Ireland reunified while deliberately leaving Scotland unanswered. Within days, the nationalist leaders governing Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland were sitting together declaring that Westminster’s era is coming to an end. None of this means the United Kingdom disappears tomorrow, but anyone looking at the direction of the political cycle should recognize what is taking place.
I include the StClair family in my lineage
‘Full well do I know this, that many a knightly hand serveth the Grail at Montsalvash, and from thence, throughout all the land, on many a distant journey these gallant Templars fare, whether sorrow or joy befall them, for their sins they this penance bear!.’
.
‘And this brotherhood so gallant, dost thou know what to them shall give their life, and their strength and valour – then know, by a ‘stone’ they live.’ (Parzival. IX: 624-628).
.
⚜️
.
Have a read of this but more importantly are the sources
https://tinyurl.com/266l7vpb
Absolutely! – the Church taught this for centuries to conceal her real role. Not only did her marriage unite Israel’s two royal houses, i.e. the House of David (Jesus) and House of Hasmonean (Mary). In her spiritual role, she was actually the High Priestess of the Order of Dan. The Order of Dan were the uncircumcised Gentiles of Christ’s early ministry. Their symbol was the ‘fish,’ these were the original Gentile proto-Christians.
.
And who was Mary’s grandfather? He was of course, Jonathan Annas, who became High Priest in A.D. 37. He descended from Ira, the Jairite to King David. It was Jonathan and Jesus who were responsible for initiating the new Ministry. And moreover, it was Jonathan who assisted Jesus perform the ritual of changing water into wine – which referred to the rite of allowing uncircumcised Gentiles to receive Communion (i.e., initiation into the Ministry as a full-Jew) when they had only come for Baptism. This was the catalyst for the new Ministry, which eventually grew into the new Church: – Christianity.
.
There is actually a very good reason why the pregnant Queen Mary was forced to leave Judea in A.D. 44. It’s because she was exiled by the Romans. Immediately prior to the birth of her third child, and second son, she was personally involved in a political uprising against the Roman occupation. For her part, the Romans ordered her exile.
.
It was her friend, King Herod Agrippa II, who came to her assistance. The Herod family owned a large Herodian estate in Vienne, near Lyon in France (e.g. Antiquties of the Jews. Flavius Josephus. XVII: 342-4), so he arranged for Queen Mary and her entourage to go live there. The party consisted of Phillip the Apostle, Simon-Zelotes (Lazarus), Martha and others.
.
Simon-Zelotes became the first Bishop of Marseille, whilst Martha’s remains lie buried in a church dedicated to her near Vienne.
.
Queen Mary died in the spring town of Acquae Sextiae in Provence, later known as Aix (Acqs), or Aix-en-Provence. This is how the House of Acqs (Avallon) received its name and why the High Priestesses of Acqs were so important in Brittanic/Frank history.
.
At the same time as the Dutch Renaissance painters were pushing things further into the open, within the states administered by Rome, the patrons were the lavishly wealthy Papal courtesans, whose sins were absolved through their commissioning of paintings of the penitent Magdalene. This created two distinct styles of Renaissance artistic expression, whilst the underlying message remained clear and intact.
.
It is well known, that within the conservative Italian environment, many of the actual models for the Magdalene paintings were the courtesans themselves. One of these extremely wealthy patrons, a certain Fiametta – courtesan of Cesare Borgia (1475-1507), had along with other things, endowed a chapel dedicated to Mary Magdalene in the Church of St. Agostino.
.
The Papal Court inherited its court prostitution from the earlier courtesan culture of Imperial Rome, so, to justify its own activities, the Church transformed Mary Magdalene into a prostitute, which completely reversed her actual position in relation to the historical Jesus.
.
Her history outside of the Church is far more interesting. ⚜️
.
The roman catholic church described her as a harlot when I was very young we were taught this to be true . In my adult years only a few years ago they changed their tune and the then Pope ,apologised to the Jews for all their past sins
Oh yes, MM was the High Priestess, and supremely important as well.
.
I’ve got her genealogy here. Her father and mother were Matthew Syro, Jarius High Priest and Eucharia. The latter’s father was Menahem: the Essene founder of the Samaritan Magi in 44 B.C.
.
His father was Judas of Gamla, son of Hezekiah. His father was John Hyrcanus I, High Priest of Jerusalem (ca. 140 B.C.). There are another five ancestors going back to Asmonaeus (Hasmonean) the Aaronite.
.
There were always two lines: the Davidic succession (royal lineage) and Aaronite succession (priestly lineage). This order was established by Moses after the Egyptian order of succession, whence it came.
.
There was a very good reason why Queen Mary married into the Davidic succession.
.
Robert Cochrane was a favourite of James the 3rd so I expect that he would have known any important figure in that social circle .
Surprising to me is that James the 4th constructed the big hall in Stirling Castle .
I don’t know of Mary M being a high priestess but her grandfather curtainly was .
Yes, they should be the same person if its the Scottish reading. When the Stuarts became kings of England, they were designated as either King James VIII of Scotland, or James III of England. People sometimes accidentally mix these up. So was checking its the same person.
.
Why Knight Anselm Adornes might interest you was due to his seemingly close relationship with Jan van Eyck. As I previously wrote, he owned some of van Eyck’s paintings and gave two to his daughters upon his death. He spent a lot of time working for James Stuart III and was eventually murdered in Scotland. This would certainly mean, that he knew your ancestor Robert Cochrane. I would go as far to say, that at some point, they worked together. This was because Anselm also worked for James as a Flemish diplomat. I would also presume, that like Anselm, Robert Cochrane was also initiated and knighted within the Order of the Unicorn.
.
This would mean that like King James, Robert would have been made privy to the House of Stuart’s descent from the Unicorn and Grail. This was the same time when Jan van Eyck burst on the scene.
.
During the Renaissance, the newly founded Dutch school of art broke from the earlier medieval tradition through their depiction of Biblical events in contemporary Dutch/Flemish settings. For example, crucifixion scenes set among windmills with everyone wearing contemporary Dutch clothes, etc. Good examples are Pieter Bruegels, ‘Numbering at Bethlehem,’ or Rogier van der Weiden’s, ‘St. Luke Drawing the Madonna,’ etc.
.
As already mentioned, the Kilmore Church, stained glass window (1904) and the ‘Basel Tapestry’ (1480), depict Queen Mary Magdalene in the green garb. This was the colour traditionally ascribed to her during the Renaissance. Her earlier colour was red, or gold in wedding scenes.
.
Returning to Rogier van der Weiden, in his painting ‘Mary Magdalene Reading’ (1435), which is painted in the new Dutch style, Mary Magdalene is depicted in her symbolic green attire, but in keeping with the new Dutch school of art, Queen Mary is shown wearing contemporary Dutch clothes.
.
Probably the most enigmatic painting of them all is Jan Van Eyck’s so named ‘Arnolfini couple’ (1434). As we have seen, this legendary Flemish artist appears to have been associated with the Flemish knight, Anselm Adornes (1424-1483), diplomat to King James Stuart III and knighted within his Order of the Unicorn.
.
In the ‘so called’ Arnolfini double portrait [this is only a name given to it by museums – it’s actually untitled], here again, we see a married noble couple wearing traditional Dutch clothes. But just like van der Weiden’s, ‘Mary Magdalene Reading,’ van Eyck’s pregnant lady is also wearing the green garb and white headdress of the Magdalene. Van Eyck’s painting was 1434 and van der Weiden’s was 1435. This is exactly the same as her later depiction in Kilmore Church.
.
The attributed ‘Arnolfini’ title actually has nothing to do with anything that Van Eyck ever wrote about the painting. So, who was Giovanni Arnolfini? Well, he was an Italian merchant and banker who moved to Bruges in 1420.
.
In the history of art, this particular work is the first ever painting of a contemporary couple depicted within a contemporary interior. It is unprecedented. As was van Eyck’s ‘photographic quality’ painting style. It was finished before Leornarda da Vinci was even born. Up until then, pictorial art was concerned with either religious or royal subjects: not wealthy, but essentially everyday people.
.
Now, the fifteenth century Burgundian State archives record the marriage of the Arnolfinis in 1447 – that’s thirteen years after van Eyck painted the picture!, and moreover, – six years after his death! The date of the painting is easily confirmed as van Eyck incorporates his signature and date on the back wall as part of the painting: i.e. ‘Johannes de eyck fuit hic’ 1434 (Jan van Eyck was here 1434).
.
So, its safe to say, that this is definitely not a picture of Giovanni and Jeanne Arnolfini – as claimed.
.
So, who are they?
.
Those who commissioned the painting surely knew, as did Jan and Margaretta van Eyck. The patrons would have been reading the symbolic language of their own lineal descent.
.
The open window shows a tree bearing fruit. The chandelier is designed as Fleur-de-Lys, crosses and crowns. The chair at the back is carved with a woman triumphing over a dragon. The man’s hand is is raised in the gesture of his principal status and his wife is pregnant.
.
The Fleur-de-Lys is the royal flower of the House of Merovingian, the Frank royal house in which the House of David first came came to rule in Europe. But in the van Eyck painting the chandelier’s crowns are turned down, denoting an overturned dynasty and end of reign. The candle burning in daytime signifies a sacred event is underway. The dog symbolises fidelity. But its the red bed that points to heresy – from the Vatican’s viewpoint.
.
The woman carved into the chair is depicted triumphing over the dragon (Rome), reminiscent of the Desposynic persecution scene in Revelation.
.
But the couple are not actually the central focus of the painting, but the curved mirror in the background. This shows the whole scene in reverse. In front of the couple we can now see another couple entering the room. But then we have the mirror’s frame, and its here, that we find the scene’s connection to the Gospels.
.
Whilst the mirror image constitutes the central Gospel theme, we now have ten miniature paintings surrounding this painting. These images move clockwise depicting Christ’s Passion, i.e. [i]. The Gethsemane betrayal, [ii]. Jesus before Caiphas, [iii]. The scourging, [iv]. Carrying the cross to Calvary, [v]. The Crucifixion, [vi]. The Deposition, [vii]. The Entombment, [viii]. The Descent into Limbo, [ix]. The Resurrection, and [x]. The Sepulchre Garden. The latter is set squarely at the bottom centre, it is the scene outside the tomb, immediately prior to the ‘touch me not’ encounter between Jesus and Mary Magdalene.
.
The ‘Noli me tangere’ encounter, that is central to the Passion narrative is not shown in the ten miniatures. In the Baroque Renaissance tradition it was usual to Jesus in a wide brimmed hat for this scene: e.g. Lavinia Fontana, Giavanni Caracciolo, Rembrandt van Rijn, Bartholomeus Spranger, Albrecht Durer, etc.
.
In the van Eyck masterpiece, the couple’s hands are not actually touching.
.
During the sixteenth century, when Margaret of Austria, Regent of the Netherlands, owned other works of van Eyck, she records in her inventory about the painting of the couple, – ‘Hernoul le fin’ (Hernoul the end).
.
Hernoul, or variously Hernault, Arnold, etc, was a high ranking court official kings Theodebert II of Austrasia and Clotaire of Neustria. He was tutor to Clotaire’s son, Prince Dagobert prior to assuming tho office of Bishop of Metz in 626. It was Hernoul who led to the downfall (le fin) of the Merovingians. This eventually led to the fraudulent Donation of Constantine.
.
Margaret of Austria’s inventory entry ‘Hernoul de fin,’ was not the title of the painting, but a recognition of its allegorical meaning. And especially for the French branch of the Royal House of David.
.
It now seems highly probable, that Robert Cochrane would have known Anselm Adornes, hence, it seems equally probable, that along with King James Stuart III himself, Robert would have been made privy to this royal tradition – as it was the Stuart inheritance.
.
[P.S. you are also correct that MM was a High Priestess [and Queen of the Royal Hasmonean House of Israel]. Her High Priestess regalia of office was accurately described in Revelations description of her as touched upon above].
Mary Magdalene lineage was of High Priests ,if that is of any help to you . I asked my mother if she knows of Anselm Adornes and she replied she has about 18000 names in her ancestry .
I expect they will be the same James the 3rd
Now I understand why concert goers wear gum boots to Glastonbury music festival ‘
.
I’d never thought about that? Nice one, I reckon your spot on. Never near Hadrian’s Wall. A few years in Wales: the Welsh Dragon is a Pendragon symbol. Llandaff Cathedral has this interesting ‘seed of David’ altarpiece.
.
Yes the Holy Grail is a symbol. In its primary role it referred to the vessel that carried the blood of Christ: meaning the Messianic royal bloodline. This blood was variously symbolised via grapes or wine. Medieval art makes it quite clear who this Lady was. This is why the White Unicorn and Chalice were often depicted together within medieval art. Those who commissioned the art were descendant
family members or supporters.
.
A fine example of this particular symbolism can be seen in ‘The Basel Tapestry’ (1480). Here we see the White Unicorn (Jesus) being pierced with a spear [symbolising the Crucifixion]. To his right, the Virgin Mary holds his horn. But the most important person is the lady below, who’s holding the Grail (vas uterus) to capture the Davidic king’s royal blood. The lady’s green garment’s tell us who she is. She is the Grail-Queen, Mary Magdalene: the royal carrier and propagator of the Messianic bloodline.
.
The earliest written account of Le Seynt Graal (The Holy Grail) dates from the year A.D. 717. This was composed by a little known British hermit, called Waleran.
.
But once again, its Scotland, that boasts the earliest depiction of the Magdalene’s arrival in France with the Grail-Child, Josephus (A.D. 44-?). It was via Josephus, that the Royal House of David continued in Europe following the family’s evacuation of Judea in A.D. 44. The arrival of the Royal mother and son (Jesus succession) and the boy’s uncle (James succession), symbolised by the overseeing cloud, was first depicted in the 12th century emblem of Scotland’s, Port of Leith. Josephus eventually became the Bishop of Saras.
.
By the Renaissance, when Vatican power was waning, the emboldened patrons and sponsors pushed the artists further. This is when we see the phenomenal works of the Dutch masters, and especially, Jan van Eyck. Those involved within this tradition have noted the unmistakable symbolic similarities that exist between Van Eyck’s bed chamber masterpiece and the stained glass window scene of Scotland’s Kilmore Church, Dervaig, Isle of Mull.
.
I don’t know if you’ve heard about him?, but there was this Flemish knight, Anselm Adornes (1424-1483), who constructed this Jerusalem Chapel in Bruges. In his will he left his two daughters two Van Eyck paintings. On top of that, King James Stuart III (1451-1488) had him knighted into the chivalric Order of the Unicorn. These people were all in on the secret.
.
Was this the same James III that your ancestor was affiliated with?
.
There was a Robert Cochrane who was advisor to King James the 111, it was he who designed The Great Hall in Sterling Castle .
Now I understand why concert goers wear gum boots to Glastonbury music festival .
Have you ever resided near Hadrian’s Wall ?
Something you may find interesting is that the Holly Grail is an empty box , it holds no spiritual artifacts as it was only ever designed as a symbol.
Right now I’m stationed in the South-West of England. This is actually a very important location with regards to the early Scots. Its misinterpretation has caused a fair bit of historical confusion over the years.
.
For example, everyone knows that James, the titular ‘Joseph of Arimathea,’ was buried at Glastonbury, whose land was gifted to him by King Arviragus of Siluria (South Wales): another brother of the reigning Pendragon, King Caractacus. But at the same time, the Cistercian ‘Estoire del Saint Graal’ claims he was buried in the Abbey of Glais, Scotland.
.
This is not actually as contradictory as it seems, because at the time of James/Joseph’s death, the Scots Gaels had not yet settled in the Western Highlands (Dalriada), but instead, they constituted a tribe of Northern Ireland. At this time, the tribe had infiltrated the South-West of Britain. These West Country areas settled by the early Scots were often referred to as Scotland (Land of the Scots), whilst at the same time the far north of Britain was called ‘Caledonia’ (modern Scotland).
.
The common Scots word ‘glais,’ comes from the Irish Goidelic, which means ‘stream’ or ‘rivulet.’ For example, the name Douglas derives from ‘dubh glais’ (dark stream).
.
Because the early Glastonbury was situated amid wet marshland, it was originally known as the ‘Isle of the Glais.’
.
When the later Scottish accounts mention James/Joseph burial at the Abbey of Glais, what they were actually referring to was the Abbey of Glastonbury in the South-West.
.
Typo error – ‘From Caractacus, the succession descends to the later Pendragon, King Arthur mac Aedan of Dalriada.’
.
Should have been – ‘from Caractacus’s brother’
.
Yes, if memory serves correct there is a strong Viking connection. Primarily concerning the Isle of Man, whose Viking ‘swastika rune variant’ still exists as the island’s Coat-of-Arms, the Orkney’s and Norway itself. The latter via the ‘Maid of Norway,’ I think she’s the girl? Can’t remember off the top of my head?
.
I think the Norse ‘Jarls’ are synonymous with the British ‘Earls.’
What is your approx location ?
Mum found a Viking connection and that I expect would be from when their land mass was connected to Scotland
PS. In the European system of heraldry the House of David was depicted by the White Unicorn, symbolising purity and Christ’s male virility in perpetuating the Royal House of David within Europe.
.
The following medieval painting provides an excellent example of a zoomorphic representation of Christ as the White Unicorn. The symbolism of the lady is equally important. Never ignore the designs on their dresses or the background details. Here we see the Fleur-de-Lys design, the symbol of royalty dating back the House of Merovingian: the Frankish royal house in which the House of David first came to rule in France.
.
https://thechurchco-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/sites/4887/2023/04/9789004409422_webready_content_m000011.jpg
.
Heraldry also symbolised the House of David by the Red [or gold] Lion of the Tribe of Judah, or the Raised Hand: either red or white.
.
Both the White Unicorn and the Red Lion emblazon Scotland’s Coat-of-Arms, whereas the Red Lion and Raised Hand are depicted on Northern Ireland’s County of Antrim heraldry. The Raised Hand also appears on the heraldry of the Province of Ulster, County of Tyrone, County of Derry. So strong links there. We also find the Red Lion of Judah emblazoned on the country Coat-of-Arms of the Netherlands and Luxembourg.
.
The Raised Hand also appears on the Coat-of-Arms of the O’Byrne, O’Neil, MacBain and McGuiness families.
.
Probably best stop here.
Just checked the Roman branch of the vine. You are also correct that King Arthur of Dalriada can trace part of his lineage back to the Roman occupation of Britain. This is known as the Scots Imperial Descent.
.
This particular succession starts from Julia, sister of Julius Caesar, and her marriage to Senator Atius Balbus. Their daughter, Atia, married Emperor Augustus Caesar (Octavian). From there, the succession descends by Octavia minor and Mark Anthony, to Antonia minor and Nero Claudius Drusus, to Emperor Cladius Caesar and Valeria Messalina. It is then, that their daughter, Genuissa (Venus Julia) marries the British king, Gwenivyth of Siluria (South Wales): brother of the Pendragon, King Caractacus of Colchester/Camulod.
.
From Caractacus, the succession descends to the later Pendragon, King Arthur mac Aedan of Dalriada.
.
So yes, following Julius Caesar’s occupation of Britain, links were formed, which eventually resulted with a marriage alliance with Britain’s Pendragon kings.
.
As just mentioned, it was the British royal houses that provided the first Bishop of Rome and the introduction of the Royal House of David into the Roman imperial families via the marriage of Princess Elaine of Colchester to Emperor Constantius.
.
N.B. Later Roman accounts that St. Helena came from a ‘poor family’ in the Balkans, or wherever?, was merely later Roman propaganda when the uncomfortable truth no longer fitted Rome’s post-imperial narrative.
‘What is your interpretation of A Chosen One ?’
.
I’ve never really thought about it?, but according to the ancient initiatory traditions of the Grail Orders, that would be the immortal One that resides at the Crown.
Neville
.
If you want to go back to the beginning of the Scots Kings, then you have to go back to the Royal Scyths of Scythia. It was the Scythian-Egyptian marriage alliances from whence the ancient Pendragons (Head-Dragons) descend. The Pendragons were the northern European branch of the Egyptian Dragon-Kings: the Sobek-Kings (Messianic-Kings). Their complex matrilineal descent stems from the Dragon-Queen, Nin-banda (ca. 3000 B.C.).
.
The Scots most ancient origins are actually in Scythia. Indeed, they were converted by St. Andrew in Scythia. This is standard fare within the Scottish Chevalier Orders.
.
Following the marriage of King Fenius Farsaidh of Scythia to Tadukhipa of Mittani, it was their son, Prince Niud of Scythia who married Princess Meryaten: daughter of Pharaoh Smenkhare (ca. 1360 B.C.) and Queen Meryaten of the Egyptian Dragon-Court.
.
Following her marriage, Princess Meryaten became known as Princess Scota of Sythia.
.
The son of Niud and Princess Scota was King Geadheal Glas: founding ancestor of the Scots Gaels..
.
There was also a second, but later Princess Scota, daughter of Pharoah Nekau (Nechonibus. ca. 610-595 B.C.). She married Prince Galamh of Scythia: a descendent of the earlier Scythian-Egyptian marriage alliance. It was their son, Eire Ahmon, who married Tamar, daughter of Zedekiah of Judah. It was King Eire Ahmon who became the ancestral forebear of the Scots Kings of Ireland. It was this branch that eventually founded Scotland in northern Britain, where the Dragon-Kings now emerged as the Pendragons.
.
Although we can follow the conjoining of the Messianic (Sobek/Dragon) lines of succession within the Pendragons during the Dark Ages, the process can actually be traced back much further, but that’s beyond the scope of the Scots succession.
.
Bringing things closer to your Campbell ancestors, the following book should interest you greatly.
.
For centuries people wondered where the Templar Fleet went following Phillipe le Bel’s persecution of the Order? In the 1990’s some researchers followed some Scottish gossip, only to discover it was true. What they discovered was astounding, due to some of the local church cemeteries being chock full of original Templar gravestones. That’s Clan Campbell territory: Arthur’s Kingdom of Dalriada.
.
The French Templars fled to the lands of their relatives in Scotland. Fascinating history.
.
https://ia601807.us.archive.org/25/items/TheTempleandtheLodge/The%20Temple%20and%20the%20Lodge%20-%20Michael%20Baigent%20%26%20Richard%20Leigh.pdf
.
You are also correct about the Roman connection. I’m looking at the genealogy now.
.
The first Bishop of Rome was Britain’s Prince Linus (r. A.D. 67-78), son of the Pendragon, King Caractacus (r. A.D. 46-54). But it was the marriage alliance of Princess Elaine of Colchester (Camulod/Camelot) of the ‘Arimatheac succession,’ i.e. St. Helena (A.D. 248-328) and Emperor Constantius I (A.D. 250-306), that finally united the Judean Messianic succession with Rome.
.
What is your interpretation of A Chosen One ?
Templier : The coat of arms of Clan Campbell is the boars head ; I cannot find any reference to Unicorns other than the Scottish Coat of Arms .
My mother told me today that the Cochranes are related to King Arthur and what you have informed me what my mother had researched is that I am a descendant of the first King of England & The first King of Ireland .
Our bloodline is also connected to the Pics who did not have a coat of arms until they amalgamated with Scotland under King McAlpine .
I originally thought that King Arthur had been Roman
Nevillle
.
I wouldn’t be sure what Gemini is sourcing its information from? Or what era? Personally, I still don’t think Gemini, or whatever, can match examining the old Clan Campbell manuscripts themselves. During the Dark Ages there were a number of British royal houses. The Pendragons were regarded as the supreme ruler, but numerous competing kingdoms existed simultaneously.
.
The House of David was only one royal house. It has been married into the royal households of the British Isles since the first century A.D. and remains to this day. As the Campbells and Cochranes are both Scottish, I would presume these refer to Scottish royal houses? Or maybe Scots-Irish with the Cochranes?
.
As I previously mentioned, the old Campbell manuscript [e.g. ‘Ane accompt of the Genealogie of the Campbells.’ ca. 1776] claim their descent from the Pendragon, King Arthur (559-603). This was King Arthur mac Aedan of Dalriada (Argyll & Bute).
.
So, during the Dark Ages, the Campbells were related to Britain’s leading royal house: the Pendragons. The ancestors of the Pendragons had intermarried with the House of David since the mid-first century A.D.. The Campbells claim in descending from Arthur Pendragon, shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise as Clan Campbell are the Earls of Argyll, – i.e., King Arthur’s Kingdom of Dalriada.
.
This alone, means that certain Campbells were related to the Royal House of Stuart, as the Stuarts were also descendants of the House of David.
.
As previously stated, the second time the twin Davidic successions conjoined was via Arthur’s father (James succession) and mother(Jesus succession). The third and last conjoining resulted with the Royal House of Stuart. Because certain high ranking Campbells belonged to both the Pendragons and Stuarts, this would confirm their royal pedigree. Moreover, as the Stuarts were the rightful kings of Scotland, Ireland, England and France, this extends their royal influence further.
.
I haven’t examined it myself, but the “Duncansone’s Genealogie” of the Campbell family (dated to 1670/76), suggests that the parts recording their descent from the late-13th century may be historically accurate. This might be worth examining?
.
It is also worth remembering, that the Davidic ‘Arimatheac succession,’ descending from Jesus’s brother, James, was not only responsible for the founding of the Royal House of Colchester (Camulod), but also, the Princely House of Wales. Take a look at the latter’s Coat-of-Arms, notice the White Unicorn? – that’s the ancient heraldic emblem of the Royal House of David. Now look at the ancient Coat-of-Arms of Lord Colchester: i.e. Lord Camulod/Camelot. Three White Unicorns.
.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a2/14/85/a21485b9ac97e87aa05cee77af01e666.jpg
.
As for the Cochrane’s, I can’t say I know anything about them. The name doesn’t seem to appear in the medieval primary sources at my disposal? Were they in Ireland at that time?
.
Templer: When I enquired to Gemini AI the connection of the Campbells & the Cochranes it replied that these 2 Clans are Royal Houses so I am wondering if that has any bearing on what you wrote of King David lineage ,there of 2 Royal Houses producing a King ?
Interesting Neville.
.
None of that would surprise me? The post-Stuart British monarchy know the deal. They know who they are.
.
Thirty years ago I was holed up in the Welsh mountains. We had this tough Welsh guy who was hiding low. The secret service wanted were looking for him. He said it was something to do with the Princess Di car crash. That’s all I remember. So I don’t doubt you.
.
Your father’s Campbell name is much easier to verify within the primary source material. The medieval records confirm that the Campbells were listed among the untitled nobility.
Most modern researchers, regard Balfour Paul’s (The Scots Peerage) reconstruction of the early generations of the family with caution as some of his conclusions are inconsistent with the original documents.
.
Among the secondary source material, one particular manuscript entitled, ‘Ane accompt of the Genealogie of the Campbells’ (ca. 1776), relates that the Cambells trace their descent to King Arthur. While many scholars regard Arthur as legendary, it is now almost certain that the person of legend referred to King Arthur (559-603) of Dalriada (Argyll & Bute).
.
The mother of King Arthur of Dalriada was Yrgerna del Acqs: the royal descendant of King Jesus I of the House of David, whereas his father, the Pendragon, King Aedan of Dalriada, descended from Jesus’s brother, James. Why King Arthur was so important was because the twin lineages of Jesus and James were reunited for the first time in around three hundred and fifty years. This was the marriage alliance between the King Aminidab (French) and Princess Eurgen (Britain) respectively. Unfortunately, Arthur was killed in battle shortly after. It would then take another five hundred years before the twin lines conjoined again.
.
The third time the twin lineages of the Royal House of David conjoined was via the union of the Emma (b. ca. 1070), daughter of Alan, Hereditary Steward of Dol and Commander during the First Crusade, and Walter, Thane of Lochaber (1045-1093). The child of Emma (i.e. Jesus lineage) and Walter (i.e. James lineage) was Alan of Lochaber (1088-1153). He became the source of the Royal Stuart Dynasty. The family of the Unicorn – the heraldic emblem of the Royal House of Judah.
Templer: What the 10th Earl of Dundonald did in Naval battles against enemies with larger battle ships was incredible ; He is buried under the floor of Westminster Abbey; It was he who invented mustard gas to be used against the French when Napaleon was making a nuisance of himself ,it was solely for use for the Navy ; It was a deemed by the English Naval Board to be too cruel to use .
A Cochrane invented the first tunnel shoring framework that was used to tunnel under the Thames River .
For some in Australia who know my family blood line think that I could become the next King so they are doing what they can to kill me and that is why I have a military grade audio assaultive device implanted in my eardrum to burn my brains with high frequency radio waves to remove the likelyhood of me being a threat to them .
They have camera’s and listening devices in our house that I know the location of ,but cannot pinpoint them exactly to remove them ,and they are controlled from a neighbor’s home about 50 metres away .
Our computers are not safe to contact the AFP nor are our phones as I have tried and had no result as I have never been replied to by the Head of the AFP seeing this is a Qld & NSW Police matter that only the AFP can solve .
What bugs me are all the Cops who subscribe to the Richardson Post who ignored all the evidence I posted , I suppose they all thought it was a good laugh .
Yes your correct, most people simply do not have access to the private family records: why would they need them? Unless people had a personal involvement with the families, which is usually professional, there is little chance of anyone gaining access to the archives. They are private legal deed titles after all.
.
It was this researcher who lived about five miles from where I lived decades ago, who was probably the first genealogist to put everything together. He originally worked in The City. He was a Chevalior in some of their Chivalric Orders, as well a Grand Prior or something similar within the Celtic Church. On top of that, he was also employed in a professional capacity as a genealogist.
.
It was his privileged position within the Celtic Church that allowed him access to the Church archives. Few people have this privilege. This opened his eyes to the early Holy Houses of the British Isles.
.
It was during his employment as a genealogist for many British noble houses, when he discovered batches of family archives which hadn’t been opened in two centuries. What people fail to realise is that professional genealogists are employed to trace family lines for one single reason, – and that’s land inheritance. To his surprise, he found they weren’t even interested who their ancestors were. They only interest was if the family relationship made them eligible for the inheritance of some contested land. The family records were always about this. This is what historians fail to understand.
.
During his research into these family archives, he couldn’t help but notice how the House of David was tied into their own houses. When he brought this to their attention, they said, yes we know about that, but what did you find out about the land deeds?. They were simply not interested. He said to them, but historians would really be interested in this. They couldn’t understand why, it just wasn’t important to them.
.
When he asked their permission to reconstruct their different family trees for the public historical record, they all agreed, but couldn’t understand why any one would be interested. Their family records were just ancient legal documents. These genealogies are now used in British universities by those studying Britain’s medieval and Dark Age history along with the origins of Christianity in the British Isles.
.
My primary interests were those of
Dark Ages and medieval era. This period coincided with the founding of the British and Frank noble houses following the withdrawal of Imperial Rome. These are Royal Houses which interest me.
.
According to the medieval Church records and chronicles, e.g., The Pictish Chronicle (Cronica de Origine Antiquorium Pictorim, 10th C), or Chronicle of the Scots and Picts (1177), Cronica Regum Sottorum (12th C), etc, these provide no mention of the name Cochrane within the ranks of the medieval Scottish titled or untitled nobility. Its the same with the British medieval nobility. This would make them a post-medieval addition to the Scottish or British aristocracy.
.
In this sense, I’d guess?, that entry into the nobility was due to services rendered during the post-Elizabethan period?
.
As for the Royal House of David which intermarried into the Holy Royal Families of Britain, its worth remembering, that if the Romans had not chosen to deify one its kings – for whatever purpose, then it seems almost certain, that along with many of their contemporaries, this particular royal family would have been forgotten to history during the Dark Ages. Their survival was a chance of fate.
.
That Russell Crowe movie was great.
Templer : My mother researched her family lineage maticulousy and found we are related to most all of the Royal families but she did find many mistakes other people have made by including in their ancestry claiming to be members of our family line when there is none .
Something interesting is what the Cochrane’s got up to with their inventions and their Naval history ; have a look at the 10th Earl of DunDonald Thomas Cochrane who Napaleon described as the sea wolf ; Russell Crowe depicted him in the movie Master & Commander.
@Neville.
.
‘Margaret Cochrane daughter of Sir James Cochrane married Charles Spencer before he became an Earl’
.
This is the Spencer line which we’ve just looked a (comment 19 September, 6:39 am). As it joins with the line of John Stewart, 3rd Earl of Lennox branch (comment 17 September, 8:07 am), you can follow your line of descent as presented.
.
Let me know If you want the names of the generations of the John Stewart line of descent?
.
Looking at the Scottish medieval genealogical records, the Cochrane name doesn’t appear among the names of either the titled or untitled nobility. I scoured the medieval marriage records and haven’t noticed any Cochrane. As we previously discussed, it was a pretty closed circle. The further back you go the tighter it gets.
.
Margaret Cochrane’s later marriage into the Spencer family [a late addiction to the nobility] explains your situation.
.
So, pretty interesting family history.
.
As your probably somewhat aware, blood is only the one part of the inheritance, the second part is the initiation. The sacred rites of initiation activate the blood and the ancestral memories contained within. This is why the old families maintain their private chivalric Orders of initiation.
.
re “That has zero to do with what I was referring to.”
.
No problem. Simply give it a miss then . I won’t be offended.
Forget this year .
Approx 1887
Margaret Cochrane daughter of Sir James Cochrane married Charles Spencer before he became an Earl
‘Actually it points to the widely popularised myth of . . . ‘
.
That has zero to do with what I was referring to.
.
re: ” That has zero to do with what I was referring to.”
.
Actually it points to the widely popularised myth of ‘Royal’ bloodlines and the Nobility being a farce for the masses.. One need only observe the Power of Wealth in diverse personages granted noble status, in the House of Lords, or the Church of England or Rome or The Temple of Emmanuel or Mohammed, as an example. Many from entirely different races, hence little chance of bloodline links unless one wishes to wind the story back ad absurdum to Adam and Eve.
.
The acquisition, preservation and consolidation of power and wealth has always been THE major determinant of “bloodlines”. Not sangreal chastity.
.
Sangreal chastity merely serves as a veneer of respectability for the “divine” power and “God given” privileges of the powerful and wealthy. It’s what maintained the rich and powerful so called ‘royals’ in reverence by the poor and hapless commoners. Next to sliced bread It made them ‘gods’ in the eyes of the serfs.
.
It’s mere gaslighting by them. Even the most intelligent commoners fall for it by prioritising ideology over intelligence..
‘Templar ; Historically Scotland is closer to France than it is to England as they were until about the 17th century allied against England.’
.
Couldn’t agree more Neville.
.
As my previous post touched upon, the original Stewards, came from Brittany. Dol if memory serves correct?
@Neville
I’ve just looked up the Earl of Spencer line. I’ve never examined this before as the title was introduced post-Middle Ages, so a late addition. But I can see what you were saying now.
.
Where the succession gets interesting, and a bit tricky, is where the 1st Earl of Spencer’s father, the Honourable John Spencer (1708-1746) marries Lady Georgina Carteret.
.
Her parents were John Carteret, 2nd Earl of Grainville and Frances Worsley. From here, the line goes back eight generations to Princess Mary Tudor (1495-1533). Her sister was Princess Margaret, wife of King James Stuart IV of Scotland (1488-1513). So, the Spencer line also traces back to the House of Stuart. Interesting? I didn’t know that.
.
The granddaughter of King James IV was Mary Stuart, Queen of the Scots. Now, if we recall our previous conversation about John Stewart, 3rd Earl of Lennox, well, it also transpires, that it was his grandson, Henry Stewart, Lord Darnley, who married Mary Queen of the Scots as her second husband.
.
So maybe Diana was a mare?
.
Do you know the name of the Cochrane who married into the Spencer line?
.
[P.S. Typo error to previous post, – ‘John Stewart (1490-1526), 3rd Earl of Lennox, son of Sir John Stewart ( -1429).’ This should have been great-grandson of Sir John Stewart]
.
Commenter Thompson, you will agree the video is showing something extremely dodgy, including Melania with “spy” hat.
How about the Trump, Melania and White Rabbit performance on the balcony. It’s like open day at the nut factory.
The “Sign of the Master of the Second Veil”, from the bot –
George Washington: America’s first president was painted with his hand tucked inside his coat years before Napoleon made it popular.
The Marquis de Lafayette: The famous French aristocrat and hero of the American Revolutionary War was captured in multiple portraits sporting the pose.
The Duke of Wellington: Ironically, Napoleon’s fierce British rival who defeated him at Waterloo also used the exact same pose in his own portraits.
Joseph Stalin: Moving into the era of early photography, the Soviet dictator frequently posed for formal photographs with his right hand tucked firmly into his military tunic.
Karl Marx: photographed with hidden hand in 1875
These days it’s more popular to do the “hidden eye” or eye of horus, whatever, with performers, hollywood types etc.,
Templar ; Historically Scotland is closer to France than it is to England as they were until about the 17th century allied against England
Honour-able Joe : Do you mean the bloke standing between Melania & Donald with the striped tie with his right hand inside his coat his eyes looking everywhere as though he is communicating with someone to Donalds right side ?
‘Correct. The story goes that the sephardic Borja merchant family . . .’
.
That has zero to do with what I was referring to.
.
@Neville
.
Yes, Diana’s brother has just published his book. Yesterday’s front page news had Charles’s quip following her death.. . . ‘Diana will be forgotten soon enough.’
.
The book is causing quite a stir.
.
Its quite ironic actually, insofar as the House of Hannover is embedded within the British throne, whilst the House of Stuart is embedded within a dormant German throne? WWI’s capitulation of Kaiser Wilhelm had royal implications unbeknown to the lay historian.
Templar: As you write about females being sought to continue Royal lines that is how Diana Spencer became married to Prince Charles for her Royal bloodline is purer than Charles and that is why she was chosen to be the Royal mare to breed Royal children , and she worked that out and wrote about it ; I am related to Diana from when a female Cochrane married into the Spencer family a few hundred years ago
Commenter Thompson
I back you on Trump in the rubble, he would have been there right away as hi-rises in NY were his thing. My default position is to not automatically believe anything whether the mainstream or the Alt-mainstream or the whacked out theories, no matter how elaborate or how widely accepted, the works of “Moses” being a prime example. My position comes from way back, not some epiphany like the scamdemic. For example more than 50 years ago Johnny Rotten came out with some instructive lyrics such as “she’s not what she seems” and “the written word is a lie”, some more similar stuff here: https://gumshoenews.com/future-legend/
Donald Trump no matter how wonderful his intentions for domestic policy is bound by limitations like any of us. Zionism is like an overlay which the banksters have appropriated from the crusaders, St George and co., Trump is not bigger than them. He is also not bigger than the secret societies. In fact the system of two-terms rather than the royal prerogative of indefinite power, is a massive limitation on power and in “benign” Trump’s case, effectiveness. I already posted this the other day but in light of the mid-terms it is even more compelling, just check at 10:00 I presume majority leader of the house Steve Scalise doing the hidden hand [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09F0a43VA6o ] watch out commoners, they want you dead
re “Cesare Borgia’s mistress and her papal courtesan companions, along with their Dutch contemporaries exposed the whole Davidic saga in full view of the non-initiated.”
.
Correct. The story goes that the sephardic Borja merchant family from Spain bought the Papacy in the 15th century and installed the sephardic Loyala’s Jesuit Army of Christ as its secular enforcers. They and their tribe are also considered founding members of the so called “Dutch” (Burgundian) merchants in Western Europe who migrated from Spain, and together with the Portuguese, colonised the World as the Dutch and Portuguese East India Cos before consolidating into the British East India Co and the British Empire..
.
Further North and across Europe the Khazarian branch owned the Muscowy and Nordic branch which formed the Swedish East India Co and the Danish East India Co which handled regional trade via Central Europe, Russia and the East. The Russian Czars didn’t let them set up openly in Moscow and Petersburg because they knew the populace rejected the Khazars were playing the Christian Russians against the Turkic Muslims.
.
So Europe was already well and truly squeezed in the hands of the Merchants who conquered it from the West and the East and the South via the trade routes which were opened up. It didn’t need another post Roman military invasion, the Merchants simply financed the locals into killing each other while the winners became their debt slaves and offered inter-marriage as a form of debt relief. Hence the established tradition of aliases that mask the real ethnicity of many operators.
.
They got pretty good at it, over many centuries. And each time they consolidated more and more power despite being banished from various places as locals discovered how they were being screwed. Nowadays, they are even powerful enough to successfully finance their own self redemption and our sympathy.
‘ . . . to carry on that bloodline because they could only breed with others deemed royal lineage.’
.
This is correct. It was customary for the ancient royal families to maintain an extremely small gene pool. This is no different to breeding pedigree horses where only the stud inseminates its female descendants. The nobility’s renowned passion for thoroughbred breeding is also educational for their own breeding purposes. European nobles were traditionally expected to strictly breed within their own ranks, or the rank directly above or below.
.
What was previously presented was the ‘direct line’ descending from John Stewart, 3rd Earl of Lennox. Nothing more. It is but one of many branches of the vine. It is not the most direct ‘royal line,’ but one of many auxiliary branches spreading over many British and French noble houses, all of which, at some point, intermarried with the royal line.
.
Like wealthy dynasties today, where blood and wealth inheritance are typically invested into the best deserving offspring, who are married accordingly. Those with weaker genes and capabilities were pushed out from the royal line of descent into the minor nobility or monasteries. This aspect of the royal blood did in fact dilute. And then we have the royal custom of mistresses, or the Scottish Lairds right to the newly wed virgin brides. The latter practice did in fact upgrade the people in line with their nobility, where even the most humble clan member carried the blood of their king.
.
Through these means the direct royal line was kept as a very small and undiluted gene pool, whereas the common folk were prone to dilute their blood within the wider genetic ocean.
.
As the Royal House of David posed an existential threat to the authority of the Roman Church, during the eighth century, the Church fabricated the fraudulent Donation of Constantine. This single document changed everything about the old royal order of pure blood succession.
.
From this point on, it was the Pope, who became the maker of Europe’s Catholic kings. This papal fraud completely overruled the traditional customs of royal blood succession. The Donation of Constantine instigated the deliberate elimination of the genuine royal blood lineages, and more specifically, – the problematic Royal House of David. It was this act which placed Charlemagne on the imperial throne, – much against his own wishes. Despite this papal usurpation, Charlemagne and every other Church authorised monarch actively sought out females of the original royal lines to marry and sire children. Even they knew, that only that provided legitimacy to the papal fraud.
.
Cesare Borgia’s mistress and her papal courtesan companions, along with their Dutch contemporaries exposed the whole Davidic saga in full view of the non-initiated.
.
Honour-able Joe: Ask your BOT the likelihood of children surviving to carry on that bloodline because they could only breed with others deemed royal lineage and the survival rate of infants was quite bleak
The next day or the day after, I saw on TV Donald Trump being filmed by the media in the rubble looking shocked
Trusting the Don to bring down the Deep State:
“For nine months, rescue and recovery crews worked day and night on the site. I want to just thank my people; I took a lot of my me(n) — I was building a big building in New York, and I took the whole crew down there right after this happened,” he said. “And they were — they had no hesitation — everybody went down with me. We went down, it was a big group of people. Wasn’t too much we could do, I’ll be honest — it was, you know, it was raw, and nobody’s seen anything like it, ever. We had other buildings; the United States Steel building was creaking, really creaking, and we thought it was going to fall down; the truth is it creaked a lot, it creaked. It still creaks. But it never came down, and I re(member) — I’ll never forget two firemen. We thought it was coming down on top of us, and two firemen — big, strong guys — and I’m not the smallest guy in the world — they grabbed me under the arms, said, ‘Gotta get out of here.’ And they literally lifted me up. This is not easy to do. I’m big. They lifted me up and they started running with me. I said, ‘Fellas, I can run myself.’ But they were amazing, but they thought it was coming down; it didn’t come down. US Steel.”
Yet another WHOPPER of a lie by Donald Trump, who wasn’t anywhere close to the World Trade Center during the “attack” or later that day.
https://dollarvigilante.com/blog/
Cochrane’s rebuilt Paisley Abbey after a fire had engulfed it 300 years before and Margaret Cochrane is buried under the floor .
When my Mother and I visited , we were treated as Royal for that is the respect Paisley has for the Cochrane name .
Honourable Joe : Equate a dozen offspring to each pair of Jesus parents .
If Jesus had 2 kids and they all had 2 more when aged 20 then this repeated for 2000 years,
The bot gave me 2 to the power of 100
= 1,267,650,600,228,229,401,496,703,205,376
That’s approximately 1.27 × 10³⁰ — about 1.27 nonillion.
( roughly 1 million trillion trillion )
So there could be a lot of people in the Jesus bloodline.
We see Trump has learned from the JFK experience, don’t interfere with the secret societies.
In fact he is almost 100% certainly part of one and Melania looks like his minder.
Not quite as weird as the Macaron “wife” who is reportedly an old Rotschild.
Trump, like any leader of the world’s 180+ countries, is merely a puppet obeying the orders of the Jesuit General residing at 35 Piazza del Gesu, Rome, connected by a tunnel to the Vatican.
Trevor Sullivan is the only one who understands the situation.
In deference to Martin, the author of this story. View the incidence of dividing land & resources so regions can dominate each other rather than share. Although absolute centralised totalitarian control isn’t exactly an ideal situation. But it’s what we’ve got at present!
The Blueprints for Wo/Mankind however resonate with relationships at a family & other local levels. That is, NOT to be Dependent (government welfare is dis-empowering) nor Independent (what’s mine is mine & you can’t have it), but Interdependent where each & every participant contributes, & benefits in return, to the whole.
Instead of mega-cities (consumers), tribal collectives (producers) can be far more productive, & interdependent, with a vast number of collectives locally, & worldwide. De-centralising need not be funded by taxes, nor loans, not even gold, but by Treasury allocating the funds for say, Greening the Desert. May cost billions, but is not inflationary as the funds are for the project, not merely currency. The Terra Australis landmass is ideal for a prototype, is it not?
Other items shared in recent times may help:
Net Zero is based on fraudulent, politicised science rather then TRUE science, where Carbon is ESSENTIAL to LIFE & NOT a POLLUTANT.=
https://cairnsnews.org/2025/10/22/trump-dismantles-un-deep-state-net-zero-carbon-tax-scheme-worth-12-billion/#comment-529516
Globalists desire a LAWLESS world so that they can do what they like, NO RULES suits them VERY nicely.=
https://cairnsnews.org/2026/01/25/is-donald-trump-really-creating-some-sort-of-new-world-order/#comment-538863
At THIS stage we are NOT invited as we are simply too primitive with endless wars & 15,000 doomsday nuclear warheads world-wide.=
https://cairnsnews.org/2026/01/25/is-donald-trump-really-creating-some-sort-of-new-world-order/#comment-538953
Producers instead of Consumers, is a far cry from “useless eaters”.=
https://cairnsnews.org/2026/01/25/is-donald-trump-really-creating-some-sort-of-new-world-order/#comment-538888
Lots More on this Onederful Forum!
The Goths, the Visigoths and the Ostrogoths… the pincer movement and the conquest of Europe, via Iberia and the British Isles in the West and Assyria and Khazaria in the East. The western Habsburgs meet the Eastern Habsburgs as the “Guardians of the Holy ‘Roman’ Empire” which took over Rome.
The Holy Land Crusade in a nutshell! Its true purpose was securing the conquest of Europe, global penetration and the destruction of the Byzantine High Priests whose existence threatened the legitimacy of the Holy Roman Empire’s operators.
If President Trump is descended from John Stewart (1490-1526), 3rd Earl of Lennox, son of Sir John Stewart ( -1429), 1st Seigneur d’Abigny and Elizabeth of Lennox. This Stewart line traces back five generations to Alexander Stewart ( -1283), 4th High Steward and his wife, Joan of the Isles. The paternal line traces back three generations to Walter Fitz Alan ( -1177), 1st High Steward, Benefactor of the Knights Templar and founder of the Paisley Priory. The maternal line goes back to Somerled ( -1154), Thane of the Isles.
.
From Walter Fitz Alan, the Stewart succession goes back three generations to the important Stewards of Dol (Brittany), namely, Alan, Hereditary Steward of Dol and Commander during the First Crusade. From his father, Alan, Seneschal of Dol and Dinard (ca. 1045), the succession traces back fifteen generations to both Bors and Ban le Benolc de Bretagne and their wife, Vivenne II del Acqs, dynastic queen of Avallon of the Fisher Kings lineage, i.e., the direct royal Davidic succession from King Jesus I and Queen Mary. Bors and Ban both shared the same father.
.
From Vivienne II, the succession can be traced back via her second husband, Ban le Benolc, fifteen generations to King Aminadab: the first of the Fisher Kings, i.e., the re-titling of the Messianic Kings following their relocation to Gaul. From Aminadab, the Davidic succession goes back three final generations to his grandfather, King Jesus I of the Royal House of David.
.
A strange and interesting article! An article which seems to justify great evils:
Firstly, that every man and his dog thinks he can solve the world’s problems, and often, it’s all about finance. He cannot. This concept is as Anti-Christian as could be – “The love of money is the root of all evil” (1 Timothy 6:10 – Authorised/KJV).
Secondly, that every man and his dog thinks he is free to overthrow government, all on his own whim and conceited wisdom. He cannot. And this concept too is as Anti-Christian as could be – “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s” (Mark 12:17 – Authorised/KJV).
Both these concepts, (of focusing on money and power, and of rebelling against government), are natural to fallen, sinful man, as natural to a pig as rolling in its own muck, and are exploited by God’s appointed sewer system of the world: i.e., the “antichrist” (1 John 2:18); the “man of sin” (2 Thessalonians 2:3); the “little horn” (Daniel 7), which rules the world from the end of the Roman Empire till the end of the world; the “beast” the “dragon” (Revelation 12-20); the Roman Church, “the great whore,” “with whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication,” the “MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH,” “the woman drunken with the blood of the saints,” “17 For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled. 18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth” (Revelation 17).
All nations on earth, though some are better than others, are part of this “beast” – they are NOT of God, but of the world. That includes Donald Trump, as much as I agree with him on many things. This is revealed in the fact that he has been pro-Israel and pro-Irish unity (You CANNOT mix Judaism and Christianity or Protestant and Catholic). What escapes most readers and commentators is that unity against Jesus Christ (against Protestant/Bible religion) is, by definition, and by nature, unity with the Antichrist! The Bible is FULL of warnings about this!
The more ‘ideas’ and ‘innovations’ half-smart men come up with, the more mankind is fed into God’s sewer. All this is “strong delusion”: 2 Thessalonians 2, “10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.”
God loves His own, but hates His enemies – His enemies are all who rebel against Him, His Words, and His Only Begotten Son, Who is the true Ruler and King of all creation.
The author is obviously pro-Rome, pro-Popery, anti-British, and anti-Protestant, i.e., anti-Bible (King James that is). Not smart! Not even half-smart!
You have to be either, really think, really ignorant, or really cunning, and Bible-illiterate, to think that a united Ireland is a good thing! Northern Ireland has been the stronghold of the Protestant faith in modern times, the last stronghold against Popery in the world.
Clearly this article is Popish propaganda, whether the author realises it or not. “By their fruits ye shall know them” (Matthew 7:20). It only multiplies the confusion and carnage of mankind, instead of offering the only solution God has provided for His people – Psalm 2:12, “Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.”
Sincerely in the service of Christ, Crown, Constitution, and Commonwealth,
Trevor W. Sullivan,
Nanango Christian Faith Centre.
“When government can no longer deliver prosperity, populations begin questioning” and then usually nothing.
However we are in the wake of Barbault’s basket July 19 and political certainty is being shattered in WA, in England, Venezuela, ( middle east everything normal ) and most of all now Germany where the AfD led by their version of Pauline Hanson is taking over. The Germans finally worked out they need Russian energy or all their industries shut down and they go broke. A bit like Melbourne is going broke with ALP energy policies and progressivism instead of pragmatism. When Germans stop agreeing to send military aid to Ukraina the war is over. Zelenskyy is killing tens of thousands and somehow is still a free man hoovering up money from his sponsors, which takes me back to the original premise “When government can no longer deliver prosperity, populations begin questioning” – and then what. What have they ever been good for.
Karnala : My mother’s Cochran ancestry came from the 1st King of Ireland & the 1st King of England .
My fathers bloodline is that of Clan Campbell of Scotland .
My second name is Campbell as was my father’s and his father and his father .
It is interesting to find the blood lines follow the females most likely because their males were dying in battles brought on by the Catholic Popes .
As per what you wrote of the Irish ,King David connection there is a Jesus bloodline our bloodline merged with , the Jesus lineage took 2 directions , one to Ireland and the other to northern Europe to what I suspect to be The Khazar Empire who became Jewish .
The Irish flag is the only one in the world with the Biblical harp of King David (lineage) on it 👑 Also noteworthy was the revelation last year that President Trump is the distant 15th cousin of King Charles, who “share a common ancestor in the 3rd Earl of Lennox, a Scottish nobleman … Lady Jane wed the chief of the Scottish Highland Clan Mackay, and together they had a son, Donald Mackay. As this bloodline continued through successive generations, passing through both the Mackay and MacLeod families, it eventually leads us to Mary Anne MacLeod. In 1930, Mary departed for a fresh start in the United States, where she married property magnate Fred Trump, who went on to father five children, amongst them the current US President, Donald Trump”.