By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
“HOW is this not front-page news everywhere?” asked Los Angeles-based anesthetist Dr Margaret Aranda, in response to a video featuring DNA scientist Dr David J. Speicher showing fraudulent “safety protection” around mRNA “vaccines”.
The media, of course, had something else to fixate upon – the so-called hanta virus – which of course broke out on a cruise ship ensuring that a multinational “health crisis” could be created to justify the global health bureaucracy and their minions parading around in space suits.
And despite their assurances the media is now reporting the “suspected generation 3 hantavirus mutation” as causing the death of a woman on a KLM flight who apparently sat beside an infected Italian man, who is now in quarantine. Stand by for more WHO hysteria fueled by global media.
Dr Margaret runs an online show and is a Stanford and USC-trained in critical care and traumatology, with a PhD in Forensics. She has more than 3000 Covid 19 patients.
“I am absolutely shocked – jaw on the floor after watching this video dropped today (May 9, 2026),” she posted on X.
She said Dr Speicher dropped the bombshells on the Joe Rogan show, revealing clear fraud in the mRNA shots, a situation that could blow up the manufacturers’ liability protection.
“They safety-tested one version made without DNA plasmids, then injected millions with a completely different product loaded with massive untested DNA contamination, including the SV40 promoter (a known carcinogen),” she said.
“Kevin McKernan’s sequencing of real injected vials confirmed plasmids everywhere. This explains the turbo cancer explosion. They lied saying genome integration was “impossible”. Criminal!”
“This is the smoking gun — Process 1 vs Process 2, residual DNA with SV40, turbo cancers. They KNEW. When does accountability hit? Repost if you’re furious. We demand the truth.”
Rogan asked Dr Speicher why should the manufacturers be worried if they were immune from prosecution because the medicine was classified as a vaccine.
“Well, they do. They do. The immunity from liability is dependent on there having been no fraud and there clearly was fraud,” he said.
[…] Source link […]