From Pauline Hanson
Polling this week shows something remarkable. Men are swinging behind One Nation in numbers unimaginable. Men are cracking open the two-party system. And for good reason.
As Christmas approaches, it is a good moment to recognise the blokes in our families, our mates, and the men who keep this country running.
Men shoulder enormous loads. They are still, more often than not, the ones bringing home the larger share of the income. That usually means work that is labour-heavy, dirty, dangerous or bone-weary. Even the office jobs carry long hours, high stress, and expectations that land squarely on men.
Aussies blokes are raised to be tough, to swallow emotion, and to just get on with it. It’s overwhelming. Men account for about 75% of all suicides a year.
Yet look at what men create. The airports that bring families together for Christmas. The shopping centres we rush through in comfort. The skyscrapers that define our cities. The air conditioning keeping our factories and classrooms cool. They build the backbone of Australia.
Every study shows boys and girls with an active father in their life do better. They earn more as adults, have healthier relationships, and raise stronger families of their own. Dads complement the work of mums in raising the next generation.
But the voices in the woke crowd want men scrubbed out. They push taxpayer-funded services that target men negatively, treat masculinity as a flaw, smear blokes as toxic, and have manipulated a family law system that wipes fathers from the story.
Pollsters this week say men especially in their forties and fifties are turning to One Nation. No surprise. At that age, the runway shortens. Mortgages soar thanks to out-of-control migration. Rents smash household budgets. Marriages strain. Industries collapse under Labor’s sky-high electricity prices and economy wrecking policies. Paul Murray talked about these issues on Sky this week.
Men have had a gutful. They are not just parking their vote with One Nation, they’re cementing it in. Women who rely on men in partnerships and households are watching as society takes everything from their husbands, partners, brothers and fathers, and they are in equal measure feeling exasperated.
The treatment of Aussie men will be a central theme in Pauline Hanson’s new animated film, “A Super Progress Movie”. Many will see it less as its intended satire and more as a documentary about what men face today. One Nation has the policies to give men, and by extension all Australians, a fair go. Family tax splitting to ease the pressure. Cheaper beer and spirits at the pub. Major cuts to electricity costs.
I would like to ask Caltrop about part 32. He/she mentions internal loans. What does this mean exactly? Does this mean borrowing from banks in your country? Please explain.
Promoting gender equity through advocacy for men. Bettina’s 2020 honours award led to a feminist campaign to have her cancelled.
After a long, very successful career, in early 2020 Bettina Arndt was subjected to a vicious media pile-on, following the award of an honours award from the government. This was an orchestrated attack, led by a prominent feminist activist who had long been working to damage Bettina’s reputation.
This activist, Nina Funnell, had founded an organisation responsible for the establishment of Australia’s campus kangaroo courts for adjudicating sexual assaults. Bettina had long been speaking out about the unfair treatment of accused men in these courts.
The honours award gave Funnell the opportunity to circulate maliciously edited material designed to discredit Bettina and recruit high profile people to attack her. After a huge furore Bettina ultimately received her award but Funnell’s campaign succeeded in having her deplatformed, effectively destroying her career in mainstream media.
The internet is now full of untrue, damaging material about her.
Her Wikipedia page is captured, with editors refusing to allow correction of misleading information about her.
The background
Continue >
https://www.bettinaarndt.com.au/
Control of the issue of money to be taken out of private hands –
From chapter 18 of Commander Steveo’s link-
“……….B. Monetary controls: The electors must insist that the issue of money, and the control thereof, be placed back in the hands of the government where it rightfully belongs. By government is meant the top-level executive body chosen from the elected representatives because of their qualifications to conduct the affairs of the nation in an efficient and businesslike manner, basing their decisions on democratic justice and Christian charity……”
https://ia801004.us.archive.org/23/items/PawnsInTheGameWilliamGuyCarr1958/Pawns%20in%20the%20Game%2C%20William%20Guy%20Carr%20%281958%29.pdf
I would love to see Pauline make this happen, but I cannot see her or any other politician having a go. They are too concerned with their own welfare.
Opps Correct link FYI https://archive.org/details/PawnsInTheGameWilliamGuyCarr1958 from pgs 1116
Caltrops right, heres the earlier, 1773, Protocals ie Rothchild 25x Strategic PLan for World Domination. Read it, know it, its been inplemented World Wide since 1773, some say earlier, source…. begins page 116…https://dn790000.ca.archive.org/0/items/pawns-in-the-game-carr-1955-bookmarked/Pawns%20In%20The%20Game%20-%20Carr%20%281955%29%20Bookmarked.pdf
While Hanson’s One Nation might seem to be an antidote to the uniparty, the reality is that she is just another politician saying the things that might make her party more attractive to voters. Currently she has four members in parliament. Without a landslide, she is never going to have enough members to form government. Maybe, in alliance with one side of the uniparty, she might be able to push some of her ideas, much like the Greens do with Labor. But the political system in Australia is a closed shop that tolerates only a small number of non-uniparty members, to create the illusion of democracy. Power and control still reside with the uniparty, which will continue to destroy society and the country regardless of Hanson.
PROTOCOL No. 20 TYRANNY OF USURY
30. What also indeed is, in substance, a loan, especially a foreign loan? A loan is – an issue of government bills of exchange containing a percentage obligation commensurate to the sum of the loan capital. If the loan bears a charge of 5 per cent, then in twenty years the State vainly pays away in interest a sum equal to the loan borrowed, in forty years it is paying a double sum, in sixty – treble, and all the while the debt remains an unpaid debt.
31. From this calculation it is obvious that with any form of taxation per head the State is baling out the last coppers of the poor taxpayers in order to settle accounts with wealth foreigners, from whom it has borrowed money instead of collecting these coppers for its own needs without the additional interest.
32. So long as loans were internal the GOYIM only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich, but when we bought up the necessary person in order to transfer loans into the external sphere, all the wealth of States flowed into our cash- boxes and all the GOYIM began to pay us the tribute of subjects.
33. If the superficiality of GOY kings on their thrones in regard to State affairs and the venality of ministers or the want of understanding of financial matters on the part of other ruling persons have made their countries debtors to our treasuries to amounts quite impossible to pay it has not been accomplished without, on our part, heavy expenditure of trouble and money.
Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin that Was and Now is Not
“I am writing for humanity in a world eaten by usury.” Ezra Pound
From Michigan-based economist Daniel Krynicki:
“Monetary reformers dot our landscape, the majority of whom consider that Christian faith is an evil that works against society’s best interests. They consider that the outlawing of interest in moneylending would be a legal practice that will actually be the act of an all powerful state…I once had been active in their ‘Google Social Credit’ forum. At the time many of my own ideas were still in a formative stage. But after reading Michael Hoffman’s book Usury in Christendom, it became obvious that an all-knowing super intelligent being informed us three and a half millennia ago that the only way to administer a financial system that will benefit all is without the usury.”
Unforgettable revelations abound in this indispensable study of the rise of the Money Power. Usury in Christendom provides the reader with a detailed understanding of how a den of thieves robbed the followers of Christ of their patrimony. It is grounded in an extensive study of rare and primary sources and represents a landmark revisionist history of how the breeders of money gained dominion over the West.
For most of the first 1500 years of Christianity usury, the lending of money at interest, was unanimously condemned by the Fathers of the Early Church, and by popes, councils and saints, as a damnable sin equivalent to robbery and even murder. Any interest on loans of money, not just exorbitant interest, was defined de fide as a grave transgression against God and man. …….”
https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2025/
h ttp://www.lasttrumpetministries.org/tracts/tract4.html
The True Meaning Of Christ-Mass
“………………”Mass” is strictly a Catholic word and thus, so is “Christ-Mass.”
It would stand to reason, that since all of these denominations love and embrace “Christ-Mass”, that December 25th is the great homecoming day, when all of the Protestants become Catholic for a day. It would seem that all of the so-called “wayward daughters” of the Romish church return to their mother, the scarlet harlot. Thus, all of the so-called Protestant churches could sing to the Pope that popular song “I’ll be home for Christmas.”
As previously stated, the word “Mass” in religious usage means a “death sacrifice.” The impact of this fact is horrifying and shocking; for when the millions of people are saying, “Merry Christmas”, they are literally saying “Merry death of Christ!” Furthermore, when the fat man in the red suit laughs boisterously and says, “Ho ho ho, Merry Christmas”, he is mocking and laughing at the suffering and bleeding Saviour, who died for our sins. He does this while parents place their little children into his waiting arms to hear his false promises of gifts that he says he will give them. Consider what you are saying when you say “Merry Christmas.”…………………”
Blaspheming Mary and the Birth of Jesus in the Talmud
By Michael Hoffman
https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2019/12/blaspheming-mary-and-birth-of-jesus-in.html
Legalized theft
Giving back miniscule amounts of tax for beer and electricity won’t compensate for the price inflation of the last few years which has effectively driven wages down, as it was designed to do, by about 30%. Every possible job has been offshored and you can consider international workers on “fly-in fly-out” visa arrangements to be job offshoring. The banks and government are pouring in credit like never seen outside of places like Zimbabwe, Argentina, Weimar Republic. Now you can get 5% deposit and suddenly you are a millionaire at the auction. Notice how Elbow deliberately injects cash instead of houses into the economy. The banksters are laughing all the way to themselves.
Get the job done
Pauline Hanson gets the attention, Malcolm Roberts provides the solid backbone, so this is where it’s going, the alternative micro-parties need to shut up and get on board. Rennick should move to WA or NSW, wherever there is a vacuum, and team up with Malcolm Roberts. He needs to win a seat, not split hairs about whatever it is. The only upside to all this ridiculous procrastination is that we get to see just how bad the UnaParty governments and fake news M$M are. Rennick needs a quick ice-bath and a “reset”, he is an asset in the senate, he is not much use on the sidelines.
HANSON’S SRATEGIES MIGHT JUST WORK TO GET RID OF THE COMMIE POLIS AND IF THE HOODWINKED ARE AWAKE AT VOTING TIME IT CAN BE BE PLAUSABLE.