The tragic fatal shooting of a senior constable in Tasmania, during the enforcement of a court-ordered property repossession order, has again highlighted the unacceptable and dangerous use of armed police in civil property disputes—a practice widespread across rural Australia.
In Western Australia, this has become alarmingly routine. ANZ Bank and other Rural Lenders have repeatedly engaged WA Police, including the heavily armed Tactical Response Group (TRG), to intimidate and forcibly remove farming families from their properties—at gunpoint—under the pretext of enforcement to get consent. These traumatic incidents have been captured by Channel 7 and Channel 9, with images of weapons drawn on innocent landowners seared into the public conscience.
Former WA Senator Rod Culleton has long warned of this growing crisis. Through Senate inquiries and public campaigns, he exposed the coordinated abuse of civil enforcement by banks and police—actions that have led to false arrests, assault, property damage, suicides, and unlawful dispossession.
The unlawful use of “pretended orders” by banks—unsupported by proper foreclosure, writs of possession, or binding court orders—has now escalated into a nationwide scandal.
“Under the Torrens Title system, the registered proprietor holds indefeasible title to the land. At the time police consider entering private property, they are legally obligated to verify the registered ownership and any valid instruments on title. If the proprietor remains unchanged and no registered instrument affects that title, any police action undertaken without this verification may be unlawful. The land is not subject to unregistered interests, and the registered owner retains a lawful excuse to protect their property,” Mr Culleton pointed out.
“The title is paramount in all these actions because you are the owner by registration.
“Because police cannot lawfully operate in civil procedures their uniform disappears and the TRG arrives hoping to provoke the matter so it turns to criminal giving them power to act. This sort of conduct does not help the situation when the person is under threat of losing his life’s work through aggressive nature and heavy handedness of banks.”
However, what has been deliberately concealed is this: in many of these cases, the owners were still the registered legal proprietors under the Torrens Title System, and were therefore protected by indefeasibility of title. The orders relied upon by police and banks do not bind the land, meaning the landowners had not lawfully lost possession, and that police, by executing forceful removal, were in fact trespassing with weapons. These are not civil evictions—they are armed hold-ups under the cover of authority.
“Bank lawyers racking up thousands of dollars of legal fees is not necessary when the banks hold a legal right to the land they can exercise a power of sale through the transfer of land act to reclaim their right having a private, peaceful sale that does not involve police,” he said.
Hundreds of complaints and evidentiary filings of fraud on title are now being submitted to the State Commissioner of Titles. The weight of this evidence is beginning to fracture the system—Landgate employees in WA are reportedly taking extended leave as the legal implications mount. The State(s) are now facing the real prospect of massive liability claims for systemic failures that enabled fraudulent land transfers, violations of the Transfer of Land Act, and abuse of Crown-backed certificates.
The financial damage is only beginning to emerge.
In 2017, then-Premier Mark McGowan sold the WA Land Registry (Landgate) to a Canadian-led private consortium—Australian Registry Investments (ARI)—for $1.41 billion. This asset sale was rushed through without public consent, and reports at the time confirmed that much of the proceeds were allocated to help fund the Redress Scheme for victims of institutional child sexual abuse. While compensation for victims is morally just, the sale of a core public legal institution to fund it represents a deep structural compromise.
The registry—now privatised and digitised—no longer provides landowners with a physical, parchment Certificate of Title, severing the guarantee of “title by registration” that defined the Torrens system. We now face the reality of title without form, ownership without certainty, and enforcement without lawful cause.
The public must ask:
What else will the WA Government be forced to sell next to cover its exposure to what may be the largest title fraud scandal in Australian history?
Crown land? Water rights? Mining royalties?
The State is not only at risk of trading insolvent—it is at risk of trading without legitimacy.
Call to action
We demand the immediate suspension of Police involvement in civil enforcement of property disputes. Police are not debt collectors for banks. Their participation in these matters is endangering lives, violating property rights, and implicating the State in criminal conduct.
This must stop. Now!
Mr Caltrop,
There can be no doubt that the Monarch has been only a mascot or figurehead for the “Crown Corporation” ever since Henry VIII traded the Kingdom for the Throne. Ollie Cromwell (and many other sycophants of the “money power”) left little doubt about who, or what, owned the Kingdom.
I suggest that the bods who drafted our Constitution were furtively looking over their shoulders and trying not to provoke those (mostly Irish) bishops to go consulting their philosophers and theologians which might be a catalyst to instigate a nationwide “Eureka Stockade”, then of fairly recent living memory.
The Constitution proper mentions the Monarch many times with the “Crown” mentioned only in some “add-ons” like the prologue and addendum. The Monarchy is the institution with sworn obligations to God and Man but the “Crown Corporation” has no obligation to anything but its own ambitions of global power and profit. The daft Pommy aristocracy and Masonic Intelligentsia enthusiastically embraced the notion of Anglo-Judaic global supremacy under the title “British Israel World Federation”, “Pax Britannica” and all that; “novus ordo seclorum” as the Yanks boast on their Dollar Bill.
Ibrahim Traoré to World Bank Chief: “Your Plunder Ends Today — We’re Taking Back What You Stole!”
h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLWq9yDSO18
Commenter oldavid –
The Joos RBA is sovereign
Acts Interpretation Act 1901
16 References to the Sovereign
In any Act references to the Sovereign reigning at the time of the passing of such Act, or to the Crown, shall be construed as references to the Sovereign for the time being.
Deah Rod,
You are pissing into the wind if you imagine that the Crown Corporation of the parasite city state of the “City of London” is going to provide any reprieve from the “governmental”, “judicial”, and “media” perversities that are currently extolled as the wonder of the age, spreading “freedom and democracy” all over the Globe as the Judaic Anglo-American Empire of “British Israel”. Yair, I know that anyone who might not support Anglo-Judaic supremacism is automatically an “enemy of the (New World) State”.
If section 44 of our very reasonable Constitution would specifically mention (although it is already implied) that any allegiance to the parasite city state, their agencies, like the BAR Association, Fleet
Street media oversight, Tavistock Institute psycho-warfare research, the 6 eyes “secret service” and all that, we could go some way to a little bit of national sovereignty and integrity.
Unfortunately, Rod and his Crown Corporation mates equate the Crown Corporation with the Monarchical duties and responsibilities, roughly described in the “Coronation Oath”. But the Crown Corporation has no allegiance to anything but its own megalomaniac ambitions.
In the USA if you want to become a law enforcer you have to pass an IQ test. If your score is too high you fail. I wonder what the criteria is in Australia?
The Religion of Slavery –
This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the largest banks? Ho-ho! The Communism of Marx seeks an enormous centralization of the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank (Reserve Bank of Australia), and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which profiteers from the labour of others, will always find a way to prevail. In reality, for the proletariat, this would be a barrack regime, under which the working men and the working women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work, and live at the beat of the drum.” ~ Bakunin (1814-1876)
…………
These pro-Israel people like pledges: they tried to force me to sign a pledge of loyalty to Israel. When I refused, it was trench warfare, hand to hand combat every day I was in the Congress, and the U.S. people never knew that I was fighting to remain independent for them. To make real peace and to find real justice. Here, they have the whole of the U.S. government making pledges to them!!! Unbelievable. ~ Cynthia McKinney, PhD
………………..
“It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” ~ Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter 11
Steven said – “… The situation is far worse than most realise. In-depth research by a number of diligent truthseekers has discovered much, and the following is but an overview:
1. There is no lawful government at any level for ‘Australia’. None…”
I know, right? Some of us keep crying “Wolf!” but it seems no-one wants to listen.
And Steven said – “… 15. The truth evinces treason at all levels of so-called government…”
Sturdy ropes and lamp posts, Dude, sturdy ropes and lamp posts.
Steven also said – “… 17. The banks have no lawful authority. Fraud vitiates everything…”
And don’t look now, but it’s getting worse, they’re going FULL RETARD, now the blood-sucking banks now have the stupid audacity to claim that the so-called “government” has delegated POLICE POWERS to the banks through the utter BS “Know Your Customer” legislation slipped in the back door when no-one was watching.
So now if you don’t hand over your Driver’s Licence and Medicare Card ON DEMAND for them to scan and store away on their computers, they’ll LOCK ALL YOUR ACOUNTS and KEEP ALL YOUR MONEY – because it’s not YOUR money, it’s THEIRS, you’re just a lowly unsecured creditor and your “deposits” are just unsecured investments in the bank (yes, folks, more BS secret legislation slipped in the back door by Snuff Scotty when no-one was watching, way back in 2018).
Never mind the blood-sucking banks sending packs of ruthless utterly remorseless heavily armed shit-for-brains guns-for-hire to rape all your animals and kill your family and take over whatever piece of land you THOUGHT was yours.
How many times has it been said, folks? Get your money OUT of the blood-sucking banks while you still can, because you’re gonna wake up one Monday morning and it’ll all be GONE.
And I’ll be buggered if Steven didn’t say – “… 20. The so-called police certainly have no lawful authority…”
Obvious as dogs’ balls, hidden right out in the open in PLAIN SIGHT.
Those ARMIES of utterly shameless shit-for-brains granny-bashing child-molesting drug-dealing pig-raping mass-murdering hired mercenary thugs are all WITHOUT EXCEPTION employed by COMMERCIAL COMPANIES which TRADE under the registered business names of the “police services” in each Australian state and territory, each with its own ABN.
Those psychotic mongrel bastard arseholes all prowling our streets and waving their big throbbing willies in our faces have no more authority than the local Coles security guard, who just BTW is an absolute SAINT, an ANGEL by comparison in every conceivable respect, because every last one of those TREASONOUS gangsta-wannabe retarded pieces of low-life corporate dog-shit masquerading as “police” are going to the deepest pits of HELL.
The situation is far worse than most realise. In-depth research by a number of diligent truthseekers has discovered much, and the following is but an overview:
1. There is no lawful government at any level for ‘Australia’. None.
2. There has not been lawful government for Australia for some 106 years (and counting).
3. What passes for government at supposed local councils, states or territories, or nationally is an illusion. A massive scam.
4. Many still falsely believe either the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK (as amended by referendum), or the corporatised version political parties prefer, is the valid constitution for Australia. This false belief has no evidence to sustain it.
5. Many know about the feats ANZACs wrought in WWI. Remember, Australian and New Zealand Army Corps? Did Billy Hughes cite the ANZACs, their feats and sacrifice?
6. In Australia’s context, what was the result of the Peace Conference sessions and the Treaty of Versailles in 1919?
7. Read Hansard: on 1st October, 1919, the Senate ratified the Treaty of Versailles and Australia ceased being a colony or dominion of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and became an independent sovereign nation.
8. In short order, Australia then joined the International Labour Organisation.
9. On 10 January, 1920, Australia became a founding member of the League of Nations. Only independent sovereign nations could join those organisations.
10. Note: ‘The Covenant of the League of Nations was signed on 28 June 1919 as Part I of the Treaty of Versailles, and it became effective with the rest of the Treaty on 10 January 1920. Australia was granted the right to participate as an autonomous member nation, marking the start of Australian independence on the global stage.’
h ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Nations
11. Read Chapter 4 of the Executive Summary to ‘Trick or Treaty? Commonwealth Power to Make and Implement Treaties’: h ttps://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed_inquiries/pre1996/treaty/report/b02
12. There are many issues for the people of the commonwealth to resolve. Here are just two: first, read clause 8 on page 2: of h ttps://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/63-64/12/enacted/data.pdf and note the words ‘…but the Commonwealth shall be taken to be a self-governing colony…‘, then second, search in Hansard for the Constitution Conventions Bill 1920. It seems the intent of then Prime Minister Billy Hughes and his supporters was to enable the people to attend or contribute to Constitution Conventions to devise a whole new system of government for the (independent) people of the commonwealth. Read some speeches by Hughes from that the time. There was some criticism of the bill. It was frustrated by those with conflicts of interest. This bill did not get up. It seems clear political parties chose to keep the power for themselves, and keep the people in the dark.
13. The constitutions of the various states are also found lacking. For example, what are the ramifications if a constitution has never been put to the people via a referendum to gain their consent to be governed?
14. Alternatively, if a constitution was valid for a time, then historical events caused the constitution to lapse or become unwarranted, i.e., no longer valid, would that mean that every purported piece of legislation, act, rule and regulation made after the lapse is ultra vires? That is certainly my comprehension.
15. The truth evinces treason at all levels of so-called government.
16. That said, and appreciating the many other factors impacting upon us today, may I suggest we prepare for the absolute worst, and get our proverbial acts together and sort this out before they sort us out (which is their plan).
17. The banks have no lawful authority. Fraud vitiates everything.
18. Read the memorandum by Carmel Butler: h ttps://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmtreasy/478/47813.htm
19. The land titles registries have no lawful authority. The records are likely inaccurate. Look at the ‘name’ on the Certificate of Title, the Deed if you have it, and the Rates Notice. What do you really see? Remember to use proper English grammar.
20. The so-called police certainly have no lawful authority.
21. Legal is not lawful. Legal is made by man. Legal is removed from Almighty God.
22. In such a situation, James 2:8 applies, and it actually applies to all people of the commonwealth (‘…under the blessing of Almighty God…’). Read ‘The royal Law – Source of our freedom today’ by L.L. Blake: ISBN 0 85683 191 3. There is so much more.
I wonder if these are foreign militaries patched as Australian police and employed by the corporate state in league with the bank.
The author said – “…We demand the immediate suspension of Police involvement in civil enforcement of property disputes…”
For starters, they’re NOT “police”, they’re hired thugs, utterly remorseless shit-for-brains corporate mercenaries employed to enforce the hostile foreign corporate occupation of our country. They even have their own ABNs in every Australian state and territory to prove it.
And who are WE to “demand”? We’re not shareholders, we have no say in this or any other matter of corporate “governance”.
And the author said – “… Police are not debt collectors for banks…”
Oh yes they are, Dude, they really are.
The author also said – “… Their participation in these matters is endangering lives, violating property rights, and implicating the State in criminal conduct…”
Why stop now? And just BTW, “criminal conduct”, you say? What does the State have to say about it – because THEY decide, not us. And they’ve got the armies of shit-for-brains granny-bashing child-molesting pig-raping mass-murdering hired mercenary thugs and hordes of kiddy-fiddling lawyers, bum-bandit barristers and paedophilic judges to prove it.
It’s what I heard.
[…] GO HERE […]
That “armed so-called authority threatening civilians with weapons” is so unAustralian, inHuman and downright dumb.
Remember, they don’t own you, and you don’t work for them, they work for you. You the taxpayer is paying for those servants, that’s what they are supposed to be, just servants.
Their ‘authority’ should only be clerical for the convenience of us civilians. Other than that, they don’t have any power, because they shouldn’t.
So those who think that they have any power over you, just because they have been issued a uniform to wear to do their paid job, are really really dumb thugs with power-trip wannabe illusions.
Don’t y’all ever forget that, and always stand your ground.
Always stand tall, but never say you understand because you don’t stand under them, they stand under you. Say that you comprehend, but never say understand, because that’s their demonic word trick.
OK kids, Cheers!
This site tells you a lot about how governments bind you, and has a good section, down the page, on the proper role of the Police, and how in his country the cops swear two oaths:
https://capillarywave.com
[…] READ MORE AT CAIRNS NEWS […]
Interesting in Commonwealth-v-NSW HCA [1923] HCA 34; 33 CLR 1 Isaacs J ruled on the definition of ‘fee simple’ and what it entitles. This reference was tabled in the Mabo case and has been referred to in numerous other land issues. https://jade.io/j/?a=outline&id=63068
Editor
[…] Date: June 19, 2025Author: cairnsnews23 Comments […]
One of the changes that has been made as consequence of digital land titles, not in the Torrens Title system any more, is that under the old system you were recorded as owning the land “estate in fee simple”, and that you owned the land to a depth of 15.24m(50ft) under the surface. Under the new digital titles, you now own the land as only “estate fee simple”. The “in” has been left out, and that is a very significant omission
There is set of books titled “Halsbury’s Laws of England” and in Volume 24 on page 166 it states
“31st December, 1881,an estate in fee simple can be limited by the words “in fee simple”. If the word “heirs” or, since such date, the phrase “in fee simple,” is not used, the limitation creates only an entity for life.
Than there is the case law of Tucker v Vowles, 1893, in which the ruling says
“The reader may be reminded that, although a contract for the sale of land, without defining the estate to be sold therein, is intended to mean a sale of the freehold in fee (r), this rule has no application to a conveyance on sale, in which the estate to be taken by the purchaser must be duly limited or marked out, either by the use Of the words necessary to convey the fee at common law, or by the exact expressions mentioned in 51st section of the Conveyancing Act. 1881 (s). If, therefore, an estate in fee simple were sold, the land must be conveyed either to the purchaser and his heirs or to him in fee simple, and no other words will suffice to effect this or (excepting the words proper to confer an estate tail) will avail to convey a greater estate than for the grantee’s life (t). And it must not be forgotten that where the land sold is to be conveyed to a grantee to uses, it is equally necessary to limit to him an estate in fee simple in express and proper terms, otherwise he takes an estate for his own life only in the land conveyed, with the consequence that the same legal estate and no more will pass under the Statute of Uses (u) to the person or persons to whose use it is expressed that he shall hold the land(r). But if the purchaser should, through a mistake of this kind, acquire by the conveyance a less estate at law than he was entitled under the contract to have assured to him, he will nevertheless be entitled in equity to such an estate as he actually purchased in the land, and will be entitled to have the conveyance rectified accordingly (y). This consideration has an important bearing on cases where an equitable estate in lands is limited in a deed by words which would be insufficient to convey the fee if the estate were legal, but indicate an intention to pass the entire equitable estate. It is settled that equity follows the law to this extent, that a grant by deed of an equitable estate in lands to the grantee Simply, without any words of
limitation or any other words indicating an intention to pass tie fee, will confer an estate for the grantee’s life only (z).”
So when you consider the changes, you areonly a leasor until you die, then the land reverts back to the giver of the title.
Can’t pass it on to your heirs or successors, and people don’t realise how true it is that you will own nothing and be happy!
Under the original constitution ( Bill of Rights ) of the USA, royals and members of the BAR were not allowed to run anything in the USA, but this was switched out after the civil war when the 13th amendment was changed to some bunkum about freeing the slaves, a 2nd or 3rd order issue at the time, but pushed by the British because they didn’t want the competition from the new USA. They didn’t use slaves in Britain, they had a caste system, with full child labour, no rights etc.
Next year the Declaration of Independence is 250 years old. The Princes thought it would be a good idea to hide behind frontmen, Rotschilds put their hand up “We’ll do it sir” they said. A few decades later Swissy’s man N’apollyon was keeping US supporters France and Russia busy in 1812 so Britain slipped in to burn the US capitol down. The guy in this video is referencing the original, true, constitution.
https://www.tiktok.com/@lawfultruths/video/7517700518806834454
The RBA is a foreign owned entity –
PROTOCOL No. 21
1. To what I reported to you at the last meeting I shall now add a detailed explanation of internal loans. Of foreign loans I shall say nothing more, because they have fed us with national moneys of the GOYIM, but for our State there will be no foreigners, that is, nothing external.
2. We have taken advantage of the venality of administrators and slackness of rulers to get our moneys twice, thrice and more times over, by lending to the GOY governments moneys which were not at all needed by the States. Could anyone do the like in regard to us? …. Therefore, I shall only deal with the details of internal loans.
3. States announce that such a loan is to be concluded and open subscriptions for their own bills of exchange, that is, for their interest-bearing paper. That they may be within the reach of all the price is determined at from a hundred to a thousand; and a discount is made for the earliest subscribers. Next day by artificial means the price of them goes up, the alleged reason being that everyone is rushing to buy them. In a few days the treasury safes are as they say overflowing and there’s more money than they can do with (why then take it?). The subscription, it is alleged, covers many times over the issue total of the loan; in this lies the whole stage effect – look you, they say, what confidence is shown in the government’s bills of exchange.
4. But when the comedy is played out there emerges the fact that a debit and an exceedingly burdensome debit has been created. For the payment of interest it becomes necessary to have recourse to new loans, which do not swallow up but only add to the capital debt. And when this credit is exhausted it becomes necessary by new taxes to cover, not the loan, BUT ONLY THE INTEREST ON IT. These taxes are a debit employed to cover a debit …. [NOW WE NOW OF THE PURPOSE OF THE BULLSHIT CRY FOR BALANCING THE BUDGET!]
5. Later comes the time for conversions, but they diminish the payment of interest without covering the debt, and besides they cannot be made without the consent of the lenders; on announcing a conversion a proposal is made to return the money to those who are not willing to convert their paper. If everybody expressed his unwillingness and demanded his money back, the government would be hooked on their own files and would be found insolvent and unable to pay the proposed sums. By good luck the subjects of the GOY governments, knowing nothing about financial affairs, have always preferred losses on exchange and diminution of interest to the risk of new investments of their moneys, and have thereby many a time enabled these governments to throw off their shoulders a debit of several millions.
6. Nowadays, with external loans, these tricks cannot be played by the GOYIM for they know that we shall demand all our moneys back.
7. In this way in acknowledged bankruptcy will best prove to the various countries the absence of any means between the interest of the peoples and of those who rule them.
Creepy TV personality Chalmers is trying to talk up “consensus” instead of whatever his policy position is, so he won’t rule out an increase to GST.
If you’re a creator of anything of value you are already supposed to add 10% GST, this amounts to an extra flat income tax on top of everything.
Your income tax rate might be down to 30% after you paid for your basic living essentials but add on medicare and GST and you are up to 42%. But wait there’s another trick. The medicare and GST is a flat tax starting from $1 income so you are paying 12% on your basic living essentials funds too. 12% of $18,200 works out to an extra $2184 out of your basic living expenses, if you previously got sucked into charging GST. Now creepy Chalmers has got off the hotline to Keating and they are going to work out how to screw everyone down some more. Over in Fiji I see the small traders are begging for their GST to be reduced from 15% back to 10%. All the restaurants will die unless they sell only white bread, white rice, noodles etc with sauce, there is no money left for actual food to go on top of the starch and sauce. Why does government hate restaurants so much ? I think they are getting kickbacks from developers who specialise in Coles & Woolworths. In Asia it’s normal to go out and eat, they can live on $10 a day because eating out only costs a dollar or two, everyone does it, it’s more efficient, the only one that suffers is the supermarkets and the banksters who run the supermarkets.
Income tax rebels in NZ, California and … here
https://privatememberunion.org/
CRIMES ACT 1958 – SECT 9A
Treason
S. 9A(1) amended by Nos 37/1986 s. 9, 49/1991 s. 119(1)
(Sch. 2 item 6(a)(i)).
(1) A person who—
(a) kills the Sovereign, does the Sovereign any bodily harm tending to the death or destruction of the Sovereign or maims, wounds, imprisons or restrains the Sovereign;
S. 9A(1)(b) amended by No. 60/2013 s. 6(Sch. 2 item 1).
(b) kills the eldest child and heir apparent, or the Consort, of the Sovereign;
(c) levies war, or does any act preparatory to levying war, against the Commonwealth of Australia;
(d) assists by any means whatever, with intent to assist, an enemy at war with the Commonwealth of Australia, whether or not the existence of a state of war has been declared;
(e) instigates a foreigner to make an armed invasion of the Commonwealth or any Territory not forming part of the Commonwealth; or
(f) forms an intention to do any act referred to in a preceding paragraph of this subsection and manifests that intention by an overt act—
shall be guilty of an indictable offence, called treason, and liable to—
S. 9A(1)(a) inserted by No. 37/1986 s. 9, amended by No. 49/1991 s. 119(1)
(Sch. 2 item 6(a)(ii)), substituted as s. 9A(1)(g) by No. 48/1997
s. 60(1)(Sch. 1 item 7).
(g) level 1 imprisonment (life); or
S. 9A(1)(b) inserted by No. 37/1986 s. 9, amended by No. 49/1991 s. 119(1)
(Sch. 2 item 6(a)(iii)), re-numbered as s. 9A(1)(h) by No. 48/1997
s. 62(1).
(h) imprisonment for such other term as is fixed by the court— as the court determines.
S. 9A(2) amended by Nos 49/1991 s. 119(1)
(Sch. 2 item 6(b)), 48/1997
s. 60(1)(Sch. 1 item 8).
(2) A person who—
(a) receives or assists another person who is to his knowledge guilty of treason in order to enable him to escape punishment; or
(b) knowing that a person intends to commit treason, does not give information thereof with all reasonable despatch to a constable or use other reasonable endeavours to prevent the commission of the offence—
shall be guilty of an indictable offence.
Penalty: Level 3 imprisonment (20 years maximum).
(3) On the trial of a person charged with treason on the ground that he formed an intention to do an act referred to in paragraph (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) of subsection (1) of this section and manifested that intention by an overt act, evidence of the overt act shall not be admitted unless the overt act was alleged in the indictment.
Pt 1 Div. 1 Subdiv. (2) (Heading and s. 10) amended by Nos 9576 s. 11(1), 49/1991 s. 119(1) (Sch. 2 item 7), 48/1997 s. 60(1)(Sch. 1 item 9), 7/2008 s. 7(3)(b), repealed by No. 58/2008 s. 9.
To Dennis, you said “All private properties that were purchased using bank loans were already paid for fully out of the mankinds unlawfully established strawman’s account created at his birth by the corporate government.”
If people are using that as their argument even if it is/was true, it will not fare well for them.
You can’t dance with the devil (the Banksters) and not get burnt.
The claims of a ‘strawman’s account’ has to be mainstream and acknowledged before it holds any water.
What Government could do is legislate that if a mortgagee defaults to the Banks then all the money they had paid (which is theirs from their earnings) less the interest, is given back to them first.
That is only fair.
They should be able to walk away with what portion of money is theirs.
The idea that a Bank makes up a loan based on figures on a sheet without anything real about it, then still claims the property as theirs until the fake numbers are paid off is a SCAM.
Don’t let your children do it.
But if you want to help your children then you have to do it 5 years before pension age otherwise the Government do one of two things;
1. make you wait 5 years before you can get the pension as that money is counted as a gift
2. make you wait until the loan is fully paid off if as it is counted as a loan.
They get you both ways.
Good information to be aware of but there is no Title of Deed given until the mortgage is released.
When the mortgage is released and the last drop of blood (money) has been handed over to the Bank including the ‘transfer fees’, then there is a ‘written release’ from the Bank (people need to ensure this has occurred).
The Bank are no longer the Secured Creditor with any interest in the property and the property has nothing to do with them.
The step of releasing them in writing is important
If the farm ‘owner’ still had a debt to the Bank (which is likely) then he was not (yet) fully the owner. He would not have had a Title Deed.
What this incident can highlight is the vulnerability that people have when they share a debt with a Bank.
They see it as their hard earned home, but it isn’t. It can be a traumatic experience to have that rug pulled out from under them.
Remember: A Bank (private business) is the only Secured Creditor (as far as I understand) and if they decide to take property (in the future) to balance their books, they may well bring in the thugs to do so.
Having a mortgage is very risky in these unstable times.
You don’t own the property until there is no mortgage, and even then when you have poured thousands of dollars of interest into it (a scandalous con) then ownership (outside of the Crown if still true) may now just be a distant reality.
Yes, it will get ugly if and when the only Secured Creditor (the Banks) decide to call it all in.
Re: “Going to get VERY ugly soon. People will not accept criminal police activities.”
Yeah, sooner or later somebody will start up a protection racket of some sort, like internment camps where we can be safe and sound and free from the fear and uncertainty of freedom and normality.
We need to reach as many farmers as possible to inform them they can settle all government bills, fines, rates, electricity, water, etc, with a Bill of Exchange. It’s easy. We provide full support, training and answer through my weekly Zoom chats and our websites:
https://cirnow.com.au/how-to-create-a-bill-of-exchange/
Join the weekly Zoom chats to ask questions, meet others doing it, and you can get one-on-one help by booking a call with me…. all available here:
Join the podcast and review them online here as well:
https://mikeholtshow.com
Of course, the corporate government business for profit will assist corporate banks against the public using their corporate police force to attempt to steal the private properties of private mankinds.
All private properties that were purchased using bankloans were already paid for fully out of the mankinds unlawfully established strawman’s account created at his birth by the corporate government. The bank then charges you again for the capitol and again for the interest/usury. and fees and charges.
No wonder people are standing up for what is already paid for out of their own beneficiary account. This is fraud of the highest degree supported by pretend government.
That policeman deserved what he got as do any of them in protecting fraud and theft.
[…] ANZ Bank employs police Tactical Response Groups to conduct armed hold-ups under cover of authority […]
The author said – “… the unacceptable and dangerous use of armed police in civil property disputes…”
They’re NOT “police”, folks, they are literally CORPORATE ARMIES of utterly remorseless shit-for-brains granny-bashing child-molesting pig-raping mass-murdering HIRED MERCENARY THUGS. They are EMPLOYED by COMMERCIAL COMPANIES trading under the registered business names of the so-called “police services” in each Australian state and territory.
As for the “tragic fatal shooting of a senior constable”, hey, this is EXACTLY what HIRED MERCENARIES sign up for, folks, waving guns in people’s faces and grinding the innocent population down into the gutter IN SERVICE TO THE CORPORATIONS.
If the bully-boy constables asserting their “AUTHORITAH” and terrorising Australians all across the country are just too F*CKING BRAIN-DEAD STUPID to comprehend that’s what they ARE, that they’re just HIRED MUSCLE for the HOSTILE CORPORATE STATE, then I for one have ZERO sympathy when they reap the consequences of their TREASON.
And here’s a news flash, folks, the F*CKING BLOOD-SUCKING BANKSTERS are the EPITOMY of the foreign-owned HOSTILE CORPORATE OCCUPATION of our country.
OF COURSE the shit-for-brains hired gun-slinging gangsters do the Banksters’ dirty work, folks, because that’s WHO THEY WORK FOR. There is NO separation between “civil” and “criminal” matters, folks, because these SHITHEAD HIRED MERCENARIES are the ENFORCEMENT ARM of the HOSTILE CORPORATE OCCUPATION of our country.
I know, I know, all very harsh words for a sticky situation. But then, as we’re all slowly, tediously, excruciatingly learning the hard way here in the Land Down Under, life’s a real bitch ain’t it?
This is what and why the government does not want citizens to owne firearms. So they can do their corrupt business by implying police to bully the people into anything they want.
The law does permit self defence when fearing for the life.
By thugs coming to your property arms drawn it would easy be possible to feel the life is in danger.
The law says equal or less force in a self defence case is allowed. The gov knows that and is clearing the way for such thuggery and corrupt actions
It’s astounding that there have not been more such provoked accidents.
The police and any group of people that uses this tactics need to be called to account for the destruction they make. And not leased the government
IMHO
Is there something we are not being told.
The bank gives a mortgage to someone who is not the owner of the farm and that person now claims the farm.
Surely there is more to the story.
Thanks Jews… GTVFlyers . com
Western Australian government bankrupt?
How much tax do the likes of Andrew Forrest not pay.
He buys ranches and R M Williams.
Is anyone aware of the Arms Length Company where a miner can take the product to a port and sell the product to his 2nd though Arms Length Company which in turn sells the product to the customer. Guess which company – which I imagine is registered in a tax haven – has all the profits and which one has all the tax deductible costs.
The promoters of such fall out from material policy decisions of the gov must be brought before the courts on the most serious charges possible, Mclown and the minister’s responsible for this land theft have to face the harsh music, the prime minister must immediately bring on a royal commission or face the gov general exercising the right to call a double dissolution of parliament. The gov attempts to decenserti this massive fraudulent arrangement and perpetrate this vile crime against zAustralians must be investigated by the highest office in the land , no buts or maybes .
I have the answer to everything !!!
It’s a clownshow
OMG This is absolutely terrifying and no wonder the banks are allegedly referred to as Banksters, and they have the gall to claim that motor cycle gangs are criminals! They allegedly make motor cycle gangs look like quoir boys…… They are all in lockstep globally to force people out of their properties Now we ask just who are the terr0r1sts?
Going to get VERY ugly soon. People will not accept criminal police activities.
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]