“It is time for the party membership to take back control of their Labor Party”
By CCP sympathiser, Lebanese-born Shaoquett Chaher Moselmane (above), who has been a member of the NSW Legislative Council since 2009. He was assistant president of the Legislative Council from May 2019 to April 2020.
Angry, frustrated, insulted – these are some of the expressions Barton locals have used to describe this sham National Executive ‘pre-selection’ process, imposing the Prime Minister’s pick, Councilor Ash Ambihaipahar.
After months and months of indecision by the NSW Labor branch and much rank-and-file frustration, a bogus pre-selection process was staged for public consumption. A process that ignored over one thousand members in the federal electorate of Barton and trashed the ALP’s ‘mighty’ NSW Sussex Street Branch.
As the president of Barton federal electorate council and as a candidate for Barton, I write for the record and for Labor and union members to understand the travesty that they called the National Executive preselection. As the president of Barton FEC, representing more than 25 branches in the federal electorate, I was kept in the dark as to what was happening with the preselection for Barton.
Neither I nor the FEC secretary were told what was happening following Linda Burney’s announced retirement. Like the rest of the party members in Barton, we felt irrelevant, mere election campaign fodder.
Labor members need to understand the skullduggery our party and union “elites” play in such a phony preselection process, a process that lacks legitimacy and transparency.
I therefore write with the hope that fee-paying, card-carrying union and party true believers can understand where power lies, and the shenanigans that union and party elites get up to at the expense of the party membership.
At its final meeting for the year, the NSW branch reported that the prime minister was about to make a captain’s pick. A pretend or make-believe ‘preselection’ process was then chosen by the PM for the benefit of the PM and the left of the party. Following the PM’s letter of 3 December to his left-wing national secretary Paul Erickson, copied to the general secretary of the NSW Branch, the PM requested that “the matter of the preselection of a candidate for Barton be determined by the ALP National Executive”, a process through which the prime minister called the shots.
https://www.pm.gov.au/media/doorstop-interview-sydney-18
This infuriated certain right-wing union leaders, firstly because they neither controlled the process nor the outcome, and secondly because this time, the prime minister and his Left faction pulled the strings.
Thirdly, they wanted to appear to be on the side of party members by seeking to give members a free rank-and-file preselection vote. In reality, though, the Right faction union leaders wanted to use their power to influence local branch members. I know, as a matter of fact, that the leadership of the AWU, for instance, had a paid former state MP lobbying key branch executives to sway local preselectors away from me and onto their candidate, flown in around the time Linda Burney announced her retirement. …
I personally wanted a rank-and-file process because it gave our members the right to have a say in who would represent them in Barton. For years now, members have become sick and tired of being ignored and having candidates imposed on them.
On a personal level, I had support of my Labor locals, with whom I worked for decades, and so I was confident of a chance of winning a free and transparent rank-and-file vote.
Unfortunately, the PM wanted intervention for his own reasons, perhaps because he controlled the National Executive (thereby the outcome) or perhaps he feared the potential impact of losing one Left caucus vote in the Federal Parliamentary Labor Party.
So not only were the rights of the local rank-and-file hijacked, but this National Executive “preselection” was at best a pretend process, at worst an utter sham. So much so that, as a candidate, I faced difficulties in being provided with information about the preselection and the preselectors, facing hurdles at every turn.
Trying to obtain the contact details of the voting members of the National Executive is one example of such hurdles. …
So, how was I supposed to talk to or at a minimum email the preselectors about who I am and what I stand for? The denial of access to information was an obvious and fundamental breach of the right of access to the preselectors. In any event, I learnt that most National Executive preselectors on the list are usually proxied…
Twenty-one members of the National Executive were entitled to a vote – 10 from the Right faction and 10 from the Left faction, with the prime minister making the 21st, giving him the casting vote or the tie-breaking vote to install his left-wing pick. …
At the close of nominations, only two candidates were in the race: one was the prime minister’s pick, a “cracker of a candidate,” and myself.
Neither Left faction nor Right faction leaders wanted to support me, even though “many considered former NSW MLC Shaoquett Moselmane had the branch numbers”.
Why was I not supported by my own right-wing faction? As a vocal politician, I was subjected to many attacks and even an ASIO raid in which I was declared OK, leaving no blemish on my name.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaoquett_Moselmane
So, what led to their decision not to support me? The answer lies in the fact that I stood for justice for the Palestinian people, and that irked the lobby. Both Left and Right didn’t want to face the wrath of the Lobby by preselecting me to a federal platform.
According to The Australian, Alexi Demetriadi’s 9 December 2024 article stated: “Mr Moselmane would have caused headaches for federal Labor – particularly given his vocal support for Palestine.” There you have it in a nutshell. Nothing else.
I am honoured to have stood for and continue to stand for justice for all people dispossessed, whether the Aboriginal people of Australia, the Rohingya, the Kashmiri people, the Palestinian people, and many others oppressed around the world. I know I continue to pay the price for my position. I see it as a matter of principle and so I have never, nor will I ever, wavered from this position.
I see no other reason why I would not be supported for Barton. In my 42 years of involvement in the ALP, I had never broken caucus ranks. I have always followed faction and party decisions. Always a team player.
So much so that in 2015 I was appointed as Opposition Whip and served for four and a half years, enforcing caucus rules and decisions in the State Parliamentary Labor Party and votes in the Legislative Council until 2019, when I was elected Assistant President of the Legislative Council of NSW.
As a youngster in the party, I never thought of unions as right-wing. I believed all unions represented justice for their workers. I never believed unions could be against matters of justice, especially justice for people oppressed or dispossessed.
I was right. Union and Party members support justice and a fair go for all. But what I didn’t know was that there is a real disconnect between union membership and union leadership.
Union members want their rights protected, while certain union leadership had other agendas. In any event, that will be a discussion for another day.
I am, to say the least, disappointed with the Right-wing, my Centre Unity faction, spitting the dummy and boycotting the National Executive vote and then going on a media rampage, attacking the prime minister for “meddling” and “disrespecting” the rank-and-file to install his preferred Left-faction candidate. (See The Australian, Alexi Demetriadi’s 9 December 2024 article.)
Any member of the Labor Party behaving in such a manner would have been expelled for bringing the party into disrepute. But of course, who dares, and secondly, such rules don’t seem to apply to powerful Right faction union leaders or, for that matter, to elites in the ALP who regularly leak and openly speak to the media with a deep sense of impunity.
They went so far as to even threaten the prime minister, according to James Massola, in the SMH, on 23 December, that there was talk in the right-aligned unions such as the powerful Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association to potentially “withhold election donations from the party’s national office” and redirect funds to state divisions ahead of the federal election.
Furthermore, it was reported that the Right abstained from voting, a silent protest to Albo to say “f— you for interfering in preselection”, one MP, who asked not to be named, said.
While the heavyweights bickered, nominating for me was a matter of principle to stand for the rank-and-file and to expose the “preselection” sham. Of course, the outcome was a fait accompli. I knew I would receive zero from the 21 National Executive votes.
My nomination further exposed the divisions within the National Executive, with the entire Right-wing union representation on the National Executive boycotting the vote they knew they couldn’t win. Anthony Albanese and his Left defeated the lot of them, leaving them howling with their tails between their legs.
Powerful Right-wing union leaders, who usually dictate policy and politics at the NSW Branch and across State branches throughout the country, were not used to being defeated.
The NSW general secretary, on behalf of the Right-controlled administrative committee, which includes Right factional elites, wrote to the national secretary protesting the Prime Minister’s intervention, noting that “the administrative committee places on record its concern about the foreshadowed use of the National Executive to preselect a candidate”.
It concluded by announcing that “the administrative committee calls for a thorough review to take place after the federal election into how the plenary power has been used in recent times and the role of the National Executive in state branch preselections”.
I support the administrative committee’s call for a thorough review of the role of the National Executive in the preselection process, with the view that the body with the right to preselect federal members in both houses should only be the party’s rank-and-file.
Through branch motions, I will campaign to encourage branches and members to call for the immediate removal of all powers of intervention in preselections by the State Administrative Committee, the National Executive, and union leadership.
A good starting point for this review is for Labor to remove from the National Constitution the extraordinary interventionist plenary powers given to the National Executive.
The other aspect the Party must curb is the interventionist powers of the industrial wing of the party in the preselection of members of local government as well as state and federal parliaments.
Currently, union leaders determine the outcomes of so-called “preselections” of state and federal candidates in both houses of Parliament, and they also control the election of party executives who naturally become subservient to the beck and call of union elites.
Unions have a significant role to play in the ALP, and they do a great job in fighting for the rights of workers – absolutely. I pay a fee to support them in this mission.
However, the elites in the unions must be prevented from being involved in the preselection processes or have the power to impose their union hack mates in parliamentary staffing and parliamentary representative positions. Their excessive power holds the party captive to their dictates and that must stop.
Similarly, the power of party executives to determine appointments must also cease. The state rules giving them such powers must be removed if the rank-and-file want the party to stop appointing party hacks into state and federal positions. The entire system is skewed to the powerful.
The party’s administrative role should only be to protect the rights of party members and to put in place a free and transparent rank-and-file process to select local, state, and federal members from its membership, including its multicultural membership.
Given my experience, I now agree with Premier Chris Minns when, in his inaugural speech, he called on the party to curb union power. Where he stated: “That will mean taking steps to reduce union control on the floor of our conference and increasing the representation of ordinary members of our Party to have more diverse voices echoing through the halls of this 124-year-old institution.”
It is time for the party membership to take back control of their Labor Party.
Joe Bogan: “I paraphrase your paraphrase. “They don’t know or not”
It means your claim is unverifiable, it’s fantasy, wishful thinking. Nonsense. Non factual.
Sheesh! Don’t move a muscle, in case you smack yourself in the face by accident.
I paraphrase your paraphrase
“They don’t know or not”,
I have a safe and effective booster for you
“Makes no difference. It seems Albosleazy will not win one Queensland seat. Everybody is over porkbarrelling. Ed”
I have a dream! Neither Albonese NOR Lurch win a single Qld seat!
NOW THAT WOULD BE A MESSAGE TO REMEMBER, if only we Aussies had the mettle to do it. 🙂
Joe Bogan: “In a typically dull witted assertion you have directed me to ask the robbers the details of their crimes, really you are a lost cause, but no doubt I will continue my efforts ( struggle ) to provide you with reasoning skills another time.”
Of course, that’s your usual diversion and evasion tactic when confronted with objective reality. You really should avoid such FALSE characterisations, they’re terribly transparent. The assertion is NOT mine, it’s by the Swiss themselves.
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/culture/why-charlemagne-s-legacy-lives-on-in-zurich/37577796
Inspect the link address in order to remedy the comprehension failure on your part. And go home and do your homework better next time before hitting us with any more of your strategically placed fantasies. lol
And guns in every household. Ed
Makes no difference. It seems Albosleazy will not win one Queensland seat. Everybody is over porkbarrelling. Ed
Commenter dd2
In a typically dull witted assertion you have directed me to ask the robbers the details of their crimes, really you are a lost cause, but no doubt I will continue my efforts ( struggle ) to provide you with reasoning skills another time.
“Writing electoral reform, who will be the first candidate to seal their seat by championing, one human – one mark – no preference and ballot papers be cleansed of party political affiliations or groupings?”
A champion idea! Well worth spending $50 million of our hard earned on. If the Voice cost was worth $350-$400 million this one’s gotta be worth 10 times that!
Real electoral representation as per our Constitution instead of fake party representation. And preferential voting dies in the arse!
I won’t even object if it’s made “compulsory”, but only as the rarest of exceptions. 🙂
@Joe Bogan
hehe…reward yourself with a bit of reality instead of fanciful speculation and fantasy….
“But it is not known whether Charlemagne really was the Grossmünster’s benefactor or whether he even came to Zurich, – even if he did visit other parts of Switzerland – as written sources from the time are scarce.”
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/culture/why-charlemagne-s-legacy-lives-on-in-zurich/37577796
That places your contention as yet another entirely imaginary fabrication consistent with your fantasies! And perfectly in line with your usual pretentious waffle. Straight from the Swiss themselves it is!
Just in case you still don’t get it I’ll paraphrase it for you: “It is NOT KNOWN whether Charlemagne even came to Zurich”!
Albanese is throwing $50 million of your hard earned back at you Cairns and Northern Queensland, will you bend over for your share?
Creating a housing crisis by unchecked immigration is not enough; vote 1 for ALP and support a YES vote for a third referendum attempt at your expense, to extend the damage done by uni – party skulduggery from 3 to 4 years terms?
Will Australians of Lebanese heritage support Albo and the ALP after Shaoquett‘s resignation after many years of service to the Australian Lebanese community and the purported party of the people; or will they vote for one of the other internationally controlled UN/WEF infested puppet parties?
Writing electoral reform, who will be the first candidate to seal their seat by championing, one human – one mark – no preference and ballot papers be cleansed of party political affiliations or groupings?
https://www.pm.gov.au/media/albanese-labor-government-delivering-far-north-queensland
Commenter dd2
You are a stubborn and very, very dull student and your unfunny twaddle is irritating but I will explain to you that fortress Zurich was established by Charlemagne and Confed. Hellvatika by the Templars long before the British infiltration, it’s not going anywhere but I am, going out the door shortly to somewhere more rewarding
cataclysmic duck: “but even they the product of Droit du seigneur gather in the village squares once a year to have input in the state’s affairs.”
lol Yes, it gives them a sense of being loved and desired, a fleeting sense that their fathers care.
But I was actually referring to the Swiss collectively, avec les seigneurs. Point being that if you Switch logistical operations to another location the Swiss become irrelevant, except for chocolates and Swatches and Swiss army knives. 🙂
Joe Bogan: “Count yourself lucky if I read your twaddle once, I’m not going to catalog it for you.”
Of course you can’t catalogue any twaddle from me, twerp, you’ve never read any twaddle from me. lol I don’t do twaddle. That’s your specialty, not that you’d realise it.
Let us know when you reach the end of your tunnel to Zurich. We’re all waiting with baited breath to hear your experience. Will your granny be meeting you there with the bloodline chart you claim she has in her possesion? rotfl
Commenter dd2
Count yourself lucky if I read your twaddle once, I’m not going to catalog it for you.
Here again for your edification is the tunnel from Lugano to Zurich
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Gotthard+Base+Tunnel+opening+ceremony
@daviddd2
“The SWISS themselves control nothing!”
I’m presuming you mean the round headed native yodellers, but even they the product of Droit du seigneur gather in the village squares once a year to have input in the state’s affairs.
The Swissy Role (apart from being used as a diversion) … Of course, they go easy on the faux “anti-Nazis” who actually traded with the Nazis. As if no one knew that Swissy’s accepted role of neutrality and banking secrecy was to facilitate such “illicit” trading between the most unlikely bedfellows.
Only a fool believes Swissy is where the buck stops! It’s where the buck quietly and secretly gets shuffled along to where it’s meant to go. Note for Bogan simpletons …
“One of Switzerland’s largest banks, Credit Suisse, withheld crucial information about its links to the Third Reich from investigators, the Wall Street Journal has reported, citing an ongoing US Senate Budget Committee inquiry.
“Previous investigations during the 1990’s into Credit Suisse and UBS failed to uncover the full scale of the banks’ cooperation with the Nazis, the outlet said in an article on Saturday.
“According to the outlet, the US Senate probe has discovered a cache of client files marked ‘American blacklist,’ a designation for those financing or trading with Nazis or their Axis partners, in Credit Suisse’s archives.”
Joe Bogan: “I can’t be bothered with your old man style of argument where you take the last comment, put a little twist in it then kick it back”
he, he… Oh dear! Yet again you cannot produce any evidence for the lies you claim and manufacture. So go ahead, run with your tail between your legs again, try to hang on to even a vestige of self esteem to which you know you have nil entitlement.
No wonder you’re bored, it’s clearly not much fun for you being confronted and exposed as a troll every time you pluck something out of your arse.
Divert us to something else now. Expunge your embarrassment of being challenged and not being able to live up to your lies. You’ve taken us to Lugarno, Zurich and Trentino, now take us to Sion.
We’re dying to meet your Egyptian and Roman mover and shaker ancestors and see the blood line chart you claim your grandmother is in possession of. I trust it might be in colour at least. rotflmao.
Commenter dd2
Well it’s no wonder you didn’t know about Lugano you seem to be in denial, good to see you are amused though constantly rolling around the floor laughing.
I can’t be bothered with your old man style of argument where you take the last comment, put a little twist in it then kick it back, it’s too boring, see if you can come up with something more original next time
Joe Bogan: “You are in denial about tunnel information, even as I kindly ignored your re-parroting of the idea I taught you, not to conflate random people with Zionists by maliciously calling your targets by the contrived term “jews”.
rotfl Either give me an example of where I make such conflations or eat your own excremental words and formally apologise for being a total troll. You have your opportunity to stand by your word or to sit quietly buttsore, wallowing in the sht you invent. Go on, give it your best shot, Gabby! rotfl Then give yourself a few little licks of self approval. lol
Commenter dd2
You are in denial about tunnel information, even as I kindly ignored your re-parroting of the idea I taught you, not to conflate random people with Zionists by maliciously calling your targets by the contrived term “jews”. In your re-parroting you claimed Swissy was equivalent to the Swiss commoner and Swissyland was equivalent to Switzerland aka Confereration Hellvatika. You are not capable of argument, you simply provide a series of inane contradictions, you are effectively a dead parrot.
Joe Bogan: “I am not here to personally deal with you on a “one-up” basis but it is within my scope to learn you good”
rotfl Nice cheap deflection again, sonny. Last time you went from Venice to Lugano via Trentino in the Alps. Now you want to go to Zurich? You might find Trentino more convenient again in case someone ambushes you in the Lugano to Zurich tunnel. rotfl
Anything will do you as long as you steer everyone clear of the High Priests and the Money Merchants. Next you’ll be bringing in the Eskimos too! lol
PS… learn some proper English first. That would be more in your scope. Oi vey, eh! 🙂 Now run along, you’ll be late for your train.
Yes Swissyland is full of holes and the holes are full of gold bars, but also train tracks. Recently oh superficial commenter dd2 you had some luck, I learned you about Lugano of which you previously had no concept. I will take the trouble here to learn you good, with some more hitherto unknown facts.
The longest ever tunnel goes from Lugano to Zurich and the Gotthard Base Tunnel opening ceremony which dragged on for what seems like hours featured all sorts of occult symbology including devil-goats, egyptian scarab beetles ( part of Horus religion ), I can’t remember half of it and I can’t explain symbology to you in 100 words or less you’ll have to figure it out yourself and get back when you claim to be fully informed which I suppose will take you about 3 seconds or one google search on past performance. Just remember I am not here to personally deal with you on a “one-up” basis but it is within my scope to learn you good.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Gotthard+Base+Tunnel+opening+ceremony
cataclysmic duck: ” I understand you’re referencing others Crisscross, but have you considered that maybe the SwiSSy bandits holed up in their mountain stronghold are Nasties.”
Of course they’re nasties (so are the nasties in England, US, France, Germany, China, Russia, Italy, Spain…).
Swissy is merely a safe haven created of them, for them and by them. It’s one of several others around the globe.
It permits access to the global financial clearing house and settlement centre to those who have business interests but are politically and officially unpalatable and “on the nose”.
That’s why it is designated as NEUTRAL and has A HIGHLY FAVOURABLE FINANCIAL CLIMATE FOR CAPITAL INFLOWS.
Being tiny and compact makes it highly controllable. No less so than the City of London, for example.
The SWISS themselves control nothing! They’ve never controlled anything. They’re financial administrators and caretakers paid handsomely to look after the European Mercantilists and Bankers.
But the “Swissies” are being portrayed here as scapegoats for the global High Priest-Money Merchant Syndicate which operates them from numerous Temple complexes around the World, including from the Swiss one.
“Swissies” is just another of those deflection labels thrown around because some people actually manage to stumble on the correct one. And that’s a big no-no!
You can even ask Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Beria, Kaganovitch, Yagoda and their sponsors if you doubt it. They even instituted the death penalty for those who got onto the right scent. 😉
The “Swissy” story is full of holes. Good luck if you buy it, but don’t get lost in the Alps chasing it. 🙂
So the rabble don’t like the candidate we gave them? No problem, we’ll put up a donkey next time. They’ll love it, it’ll give the “donkey vote” expression a real meaning for them.
I understand you’re referencing others Crisscross, but have you considered that maybe the SwiSSy bandits holed up in their mountain stronghold are Nasties.
There is an agreement signed in 1987 between BIS [Hitler Bank] and the Swiss Federal Council of seven, (lucky for some)
“The Swiss Federal Council acknowledges the international legal personality and the legal capacity within Switzerland of the Bank for International Settlements (hereinafter referred to as “the Bank”).”
Seems to me SwiSSy has partly answered a question posed by a disgruntled land owner on the abolition of slavery, when African Americans were rightfully recognised as human on receiving their freedom from ownership by other humans, ‘Can corporations be classed as human?’
“1. The buildings or parts of buildings and surrounding land which, whoever may be the owner thereof, are used for the purposes of the Bank shall be inviolable. No agent of the Swiss public authorities may enter therein without the express consent of the Bank. Only the President,3 [🦆++… as of 2005 no longer applies to the President] the General Manager of the Bank, or their duly authorised representative shall be competent to waive such inviolability.
2. The archives of the Bank and, in general, all documents and any data media belonging to the Bank or in its possession, shall be inviolable at all times and in all places.
3. The Bank shall exercise supervision of and police power over its premises.”
A lot of tax exemptions, privileges and immunities including some even when they’ve ceased to be Officials of the Bank,
“(e) exemption for themselves, their spouses and children from any immigration restrictions, from any formalities concerning the registration of aliens and from any obligations relating to national service in Switzerland;
(f) the same facilities as regards monetary or exchange regulations as those granted to the representatives of foreign governments on a temporary official mission;
(g) the right to use codes in official communications or to receive or send documents or correspondence by means of couriers or diplomatic bags.”
“Article 25 Security of Switzerland
1. Nothing in this Agreement shall affect the right of the Swiss Federal Council to apply all appropriate safeguards in the interests of the security of Switzerland.
2. Should the Federal Council consider it necessary to apply the provisions of the first paragraph of the present Article, it shall, as promptly as circumstances permit, establish contact with the Bank in order to decide jointly upon such measures as may be necessary to protect the interests of the Bank.
3. The Bank shall cooperate with the Swiss authorities to prevent any prejudice to the security of Switzerland on account of any activity of the Bank.”
I’m guessing that could mean if a bank loan is granted to say, the EU, and the money is passed on to a warring country, then that country only receives the loan on condition that they or their axis doesn’t attack SwiSSY, being the neutral country it is said to be, blah, blah, blah….
Existing privileges and immunities prior to WW2,
“The present Agreement shall not be deemed to affect in any way the privileges and immunities granted to the Bank pursuant to the Convention of 20th January 1930 respecting the Bank for International Settlements, the Constituent Charter and Statutes of the Bank, or the immunities set forth in the Brussels Protocol of 30th July 1936.”
You are on the ball Joe 👍
Recently, after 10 years of negotiations SwiSSY was mighty pleased to reach some agreements with the EU; still to be approved by the people.
https://www.bis.org/about/headquart-en.pdf#:~:text=Agreement%20between%20the%20Swiss%20Federal%20Council%20and%20the,Swiss%20Federal%20Council%20of%20the%20one%20part%2C%20and
Commenter Ju*fish
Because there is no anti-swiSSism thanks to the brainwashing of Heidi, William Tell, Nestle chocolate bars and “Milo”, processed baby food, alpine meadows full of eidelweisses, alpenhorns, etc, and hand-on-heart activities of UN and agencies such as WHO and UNICEF hell bent on forcibly injecting and boostering everyone in the world. Yes that’s what those treaties are all about.
You can buy your own patch of Swissyland if you have enough $$$ and get a private army do whatever you want just have to pay. Basically a Mafia stronghold and a base camp for any sort of well-heeled Global crime gang. You can even choose your national sector !!! Anglos have the NY-Lon axis.
The finance and crime organisations use Jewish agents everywhere because they can run to Israel if they get caught out, but they are also good smart focussed administrators for business projects good or evil. The Ju-fish could learn from “Jews”, not to be evil but the other attributes, to attain a modest level of personal success and satisfaction.
“I personally wanted a rank-and-file process because it gave our members the right to have a say in who would represent them in Barton. For years now, members have become sick and tired of being ignored and having candidates imposed on them.”
Let us hit our heads against a brick wall again and again and…expect an insanely different result.
I see a gut full of sour grapes causing a brief moment of understanding of what useless grazers experience every election.
Will Shaoquett fully wake, to realise he and all parties’ faithful are mere grazers, useless eaters in the minds of the parties’ elite inner circles, themselves, useful well compensated slaves of the pharaohs.
Surely Shaoquett wouldn’t enslave his family, friends and fellow Australians, or piss on the land that has given him safety, opportunity and a quality of life not experienced by the majority of humankind….would he treasonously support Albanese and acquaintances in the construction of one world government’s digital prison and UN standardised universal rules of law; a dag on Uncle Sam’s and the Crown’s butts.
What’s to not rule out history repeating, the excuse for the rebuttal of the people’s democratic vote by TikTok induced judicial intervention and foreign NGOs’ interference like in Europe, of future eliminations of nationalist leaders by a night of long knives, or assassination of central committee – members, of Nazi and Russian like slave labour camps repurposed from regional COVID accommodation facilities, catering for any grazers not consenting to government offers of contract; seen as diseased, drunks, informed non – contributors to the agenda, left, central and right wing nationalists….Australians.
Shed you party skin Shaoquett, you are not elite, the people make their mark next to the names of individuals not parties.
Stand as an individual and represent your electorate on real, local electoral issues; e.g. a broken education system that for fifty plus years has failed to eliminate illiteracy in competent young minds, but succeeded in propagandising and crystallising UN utopian ideologies, weaponising and dividing society on minority fronts, normalising genital mutilation the cut and tuck of children, of full term abortions, the war on testosterone, continual fears and distractions of computer generated global catastrophic failures and epidemics, uptake of standards and consumables manufactured by billionaire corporates to line their own pockets.
Welcome to the real world grazer.
CC767 – I’m SOOO confused!!
Why would the Swiss want to ban ‘antismitism’ and not ‘antiswissism’?
Hitler on the the Swiss (Thomas Dalton)
https://archive.org/details/htlrj/Hitler+on+the+Jews
Adolf Hitler Speeches on Democracy : Vault1933 : Free…
https://archive.org/details/Adolf-Hitler-Speeches-on-Democracy.
Adolf Hitler on Democracy and the international jewry that controlled and still control the democracies of the time.
……………………
Switzerland Seeks to Ban `Nazi’ Symbols Amid Surge in Antisemitism
AFP
h ttps://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/3290767/switzerland-may-ban-nazi-symbols-amid-surge-antisemitism
Switzerland is looking to ban the swastika, Hitler salute and other Nazi signs due to a rise in antisemitism, the federal government announced on Friday. The Federal Council said in a statement that “banning symbols linked to the Third Reich has taken on a particular urgency due to the sharp increase in antisemitic incidents.” It proposes an immediate ban on “the use of Nazi symbols in public” and imposing a fine of about 200 Swiss francs ($224) on anyone who breaks the law … Switzerland also wants to go further than banning the most well-known Nazi symbols, extending it to more cryptic signs of recognition used by supporters of Nazi ideology. As such, use of the “18” — the first and eighth letter of the alphabet signifying Adolf Hitler’s initials — and “88” — for “Heil Hitler” — will also fall foul of the proposed law.
Adolf Hitler Speeches on Democracy : Vault1933 : Free…
https://archive.org/details/Adolf-Hitler-Speeches-on-Democracy.
Adolf Hitler on Democracy and the international jewry that controlled and still control the democracies of the time.
……………………
Switzerland Seeks to Ban `Nazi’ Symbols Amid Surge in Antisemitism
AFP
https://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/3290767/switzerland-may-ban-nazi-symbols-amid-surge-antisemitism
Switzerland is looking to ban the swastika, Hitler salute and other Nazi signs due to a rise in antisemitism, the federal government announced on Friday. The Federal Council said in a statement that “banning symbols linked to the Third Reich has taken on a particular urgency due to the sharp increase in antisemitic incidents.” It proposes an immediate ban on “the use of Nazi symbols in public” and imposing a fine of about 200 Swiss francs ($224) on anyone who breaks the law … Switzerland also wants to go further than banning the most well-known Nazi symbols, extending it to more cryptic signs of recognition used by supporters of Nazi ideology. As such, use of the “18” — the first and eighth letter of the alphabet signifying Adolf Hitler’s initials — and “88” — for “Heil Hitler” — will also fall foul of the proposed law.
Before he was murdered Aaron Russo said “democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep deciding who is for dinner, you gotta have your rights”.
Post-Greek style democracy was re-invented as part of horizontal rule by all the 2nd sons who did not inherit ( the vertical rule was first sons got everything ).
The 2nd, 3rd etc sons said let’s have the public choose one of us as their leader, then we will form secret committees and do whatever the hell we want.
Commenter ajnz
What do you mean “maybe” a bill of rights.
I am always interested in the fate of the original 13th amendment and here it is all spelled out, anyone interested in the US civil war and bill of rights:
https://x.com/TheQNewsPatriot/status/1871702287116296410?t=zD_s-UrBI1s5_vvMiyOlTw&s=35
This is what the Party system was set up to do.
The monarchies of France and Russia executed.
The Party system was introduced in the name of democracy.
Originally set up as a two party system now expanded.
Left and Right wings of the same bird.
Dutton replacing Albanese will achieve nothing.
Australia needs a whole new parliament.
A fascist system supported by a constitution and maybe a bill of rights would work just fine.
Add on referendum, veto and recall, people in control, problem solved.
We thought we could give Albo a hand up at the election. Ed
What the hell is this article all about? The ALP branch choosing a communist foreign Muslim against Albone choosing a different communist foreign Muslim? Give me a break. Judgement has been decreed against Australia and it’s a downhill journey to NWO hell.
All getting exposed now – sorting them out. Australia might survive this after all.
Question: Is Wong Islamic – being Malaysian & never having proved her eligibility under Section 44 to be an MP – leaving Malaysia because of her ‘preferences’? How strong is sharia law there?
and how about the communist faction in Malaysia – AND Australia’s crime minister’s sympathies for Chayna?
He doesn’t do the selecting – Liebler does – as he did when Rudd was tossed out. Doesn’t he also represent Stokes’ pets from @fghanistan – accused of war crimes? The deeper we go, the more in the mire we get. How is the average Aussie who would sooner be watching the cricket or the footy, cope with all this?
If I skim-read the story correctly Elbow wanted to stop the ALP from becoming the Palestine Party, well he could have tormented Chromedome with that for a while and got away with it but I guess Chromedome is his best buddy with the red-blue duopoly crumbling.
But what other motivations could Elbow have. Unless he comes up with a better story than “my father was a purser on the cruise ship my mother took to get to her new life as a single woman slash mother in Australia” then my best guess is he is an illegitimate offspring of Soros. This Bad Seed has done a photojournalism “reunion” with his fake father which I haven’t seen anyone follow up on. Creatures like Hawke and Beezley and Keating sold their souls to the devil to get where they went. What did Elbow ever do.
TBH, I could give a Rat’s Arse about the internal ructions of the so-called Labor Party. If we really want to influence their activities and policies, maybe give Klaus and Smeagol a call. Or perhaps get into creepy Bill’s ear, we all know AnAL’s butt is still sore from Bill’s stopover at Kirribilli House.
But from the article, this…
“For years now, members have become sick and tired of being ignored and having candidates imposed on them.”
Why stop now? This is a universal feature of the Australian corporate political ecosystem, behoven as it is to it’s foreign owners. There’s zero distinction between Lurch and AnAL in this respect, so suck it up and enjoy.
If you want to play their game in their sold-out treasonous sandpit, then don’t complain about their rules, because it is their baby-eating Globalist sandpit after all.
[…] Go to Source on cairnsnews.org Follow altnews.org on Telegram Please donate now! 00 […]
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]