By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
IN 2021, Scott Morrison’s Coalition government, fresh from carrying out the Australian side of the global Covid bioterrorism operation, kicked along another less obvious little global operation – the eSafety Bill, giving Australia’s eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant extended powers to shut down online child porn, “terrorist” and “hate” content.
According to Wikileaks, Inman Grant, after graduating from a US university in the early 1990s, was offered a position as a case agent with the CIA, but declined as it meant “I wouldn’t be able to tell my friends and family what I was doing”. It’s not every day that a random American girl is offered a spot on the CIA, so obviously our Julie had something special going for her.
Instead she took up another public sector job as a policy adviser for the late US Congressman John Miller, a Yale graduate and Republican from Washington state who had worked in an anti-human trafficking department in the US State Department.
From 1995 to 2000, Inman Grant worked as a government affairs manager for Microsoft then in 2000, moved to Australia to become head of corporate affairs at Microsoft until 2004. There’s no doubt that our gal Julie was a fast-rising corporate star, obviously with all the right connections, and not just good looks.
In 2005 she moved even higher, becoming Microsoft’s Asia-Pacific director of internet safety, privacy and security until 2009 when she progressed to global director for safety and privacy policy and outreach. Our girl Julie had surely reached the summit, no doubt sitting in the board room with the likes of Bill Gates and others.
But Inman Grant was not going to stop there. In 2014, she became director of public policy in Australia and south-east Asia at Twitter then in 2016 moved to the role of director of government relations in the Asia-Pacific region at Adobe. There was no stopping this go-getter extraordinaire. Those CIA guys really must have regretted not taking our Julie on board.
And sure enough, Adobe, a name in every PC, laptop and phone, wasn’t the end of the line for Julie because a prime spot on the Australian Public Service, or more accurately the Australian Special Executive Service as an eSafety Commissioner, came up in 2017. And who, might we ask would be better qualified?
Meanwhile, things were hotting up in the online world. In 2019 an Australian man prone to globe trotting and mercenary work, ended up in New Zealand with a “special job” in mind. He created global shock by going on a shooting spree against the Moslem community in the city of Christchurch and live-streamed the entire event. In a bizarre kind of way, this was fortuitous for eSafety Commissioner Inman Grant.
In the “public mind”, shocked by the terrorist event, controlling online content was an acceptable thing and after-all, New Zealand’s caring, sharing and compassionate PM Jacinda Ardern “quite rightly” made posting of the online content from that massacre a criminal offence.
Enter Scott Morrison and his Coalition government who came up with the idea of greater powers to target online child sexual abuse content. It was good politics for Morrison, as it would keep his conservative Christian backers at the Australian Christian Lobby and Family First happy.
So Morrison and his Canberra team touted a “world first scheme to tackle cyber bullying among adults” enforced by $555,000 fines. The adult entertainment industry freaked out, thinking Scotty and the Christians had worked out a scheme to send them out of business.
Inman Grant however, soon reassured the “adult entertainers” that they weren’t targets. Nor would gays, trannies and the rest of the LGBTQ+ spectrum. Only kiddie porn pushers would be targeted, which would seem to narrow her target down to pedos, as we are to believe they are entirely different to the others. Also targeted would be material that “incited, instructed or promoted terrorism or violent crime.”
So Inman Grant and her eSafety Commission could now give the global transgender movement a ready and real form of protection with real teeth. Sorry about that, Christians, and others who dared suggest that this is the same LGBTIQ+ lobby that is targeting children with pornographic content through the “progressive” education programs we see in the Labor states. These dissidents should know that it’s now dangerous for people to speak out against the LGBTQ+ spectrum in angry, derogatory terms.
So, some four years down the track from Morrison’s 2021 eSafety Bill, Inman Grant, is threatening an $800,000 fine against Elon Musk’s X platform for posting content by Canadian man Chris Elston, aka Billboard Chris, a campaigner against child mutilation and drugging in the name of “gender reassignment”. Elston’s “misgendering” comments were “deliberately degrading” of transvestite Teddy Cook, according to Inman Grant’s office.
X has since announced plans to pursue legal action against the Australian government in the name of free speech. Elston refused to remove his post, even after a judge ruled against him.
The eSafety Commissioner says it is “hate and vilification” to speak out against the idea that children struggling with emotional upset need to understand they may have been “misgendered” and should consider “transitioning”. Some Aussies think this is all very warped, but others would suggest that’s what happens to values in a cultural revolution.
Comments by Billboard Chris about the transgender lobby and what he calls the greatest medical scandal in history were picked up by transgender activists and conveyed to Inman Grant, who by this time is being mischievously labeled a censorship commissar. The eSafety office launched an immediate “hate speech” action against Musk and the Canadian, demanding the “offending words” be taken down.
X has also faced action by the Australian Muslim Advocacy Network (AMAN) who were allegedly offended by “a far-right conspiracy group posting a range of Islamophobic commentary about Muslims being ‘an existential threat’ to the world.”
The Moslems had earlier lodged a complaint with the Queensland Human Rights Commission. How dare any Australian insult a Moslem! As Inman Grant’s office will tell you, that’s “hate speech” aka “Islamophobia”, which apparently is something as sinful as “homophobia” or “transphopbia”.
Lawyers for X fought back but when the matter went to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal, it ruled in favour of AMAN. Some are suggesting that all of this is akin to George Orwell’s world of enforced Newspeak, the official Ingsoc language of Oceania.
Inman Grant and her eSafety Commission are not alone on the global stage. The aforesaid Ardern is up to her neck in “eSafety” censorship with her Christchurch Call organisation. In recent times there has developed an entire global network of eSafety offices taking action against wrong speech that offends the global narrative.
It must be hard for our Julie, seeing this entire thing degenerate into something we can only call a global censorship war. There’s even an Institute for Strategic Dialogue, to counter “climate disinformation”. Oh, how dare people think that the “climate science” is a cover for some “globalist” political agenda! Such subversive thoughts must be exposed and countered, an perhaps even made illegal.
Meanwhile, sarcasm aside, Wikileaks’ 2008 warning about potential political abuse of an anti-child porn site blacklist released in Denmark has come to fruition. An upstart Australian internet censorship commissar employing global information control to enforce cultural Marxist ideology, has led the way. Congratulations Ms Inman Grant. We’re sure you’ll go down in history, somehow.
How curious that this corporate “power lady” who came out of the highest ranks of US big tech should take up a job in the boring Australian public service while flouting totalitarian views around Davos. One might ask whether she really is some sort of CIA operative. After all the CIA is a major partner in Big Tech.
But maybe the CIA connection really is innocent, and she’s just another overpaid, “progressive” corporate narcissist, full of her own self-importance and drunk on the power given her by legislation? The way she flouts herself online also might lead one to that conclusion she has ego issues.
So what’s next Ms Inman Grant after you have fully ingratiated yourself with the global power elite? A spot on the WEF management board with your puppet masters or perhaps an upper management role with the CIA? Dare we speculate how high a 21st Century power woman can go?
Robert F Kennedy Jnr said
“The worst thing that you can do in a democracy is to censor speech … If you have a government that can silence its critics, it has license for any atrocity”.
“EU member calls for bloc-wide age restriction on social media use — RT World News” via CN pinger CNBS NEWS.
From the article:
“Denmark’s PM says Brussels should impose a 15+ age limit to protect children from adverse content and screen addiction”
“The report presented by the experts found that excessive screen time substantially damages children’s health, impacting sleep, causing child obesity and increasing risks of anxiety and depression.”
Rings a bell?
I wonder if the symptoms are a flow on effect from lockstep Covid lockdowns by government bureaucrats, where healthy children were house bound, glued to their screen for schooling while heavy breathing through useless, soggy, bacteria infested face nappies.
Bad habits are hard to break, even for adults, lockstep this, lockstep that, lockstep censorship to control public actions.
https://cnbsnews.live/world-news/eu-member-calls-for-bloc-wide-age-restriction-on-social-media-use-rt-world-news/
“eSafety monitors what you say about Julie Inman Grant online: Is that a problem?” reads the headline in a May 27 2024 article by Rebekah Barnett in the Canberra Daily.
Some takes from the article:
🦆“Censorship and surveillance crosses the line when it tries to police content that is outside of Australia’s jurisdiction, and when it tries to police opinions and hurt feelings,” said Lowenthal, (++ founder and director of digital and civil liberties non – profit liber-net.)
🦆On the former point, Justice Geoffrey Kennett, the Federal Court judge who refused eSafety’s application to extend an injunction against X, concurs.
“Apart from questions concerning freedom of expression in Australia, there is widespread alarm at the prospect of a decision by an official of a national government restricting access to controversial material on the internet by people all over the world,” wrote Justice Kennett in his decision.
🦆“I don’t think Julie Inman Grant has any real influence except to ensure the speech she doesn’t like is magnified by her authoritarianism,” remarked Elston wryly in an email to Dystopian Down Under. As mentioned above, Elston has initiated appeal proceedings against eSafety over the censorship of his social media post on X, and has repeatedly thanked Inman Grant for the attention she has brought to his activism in the process.
Article referenced:
https://canberradaily.com.au/esafety-monitors-what-you-say-about-julie-inman-grant-online-is-that-a-problem/
Maybe Elston’s quip is on the mark.
The position of Commissioner on the organisational structure linked below, is shown as lacking line management, sitting all alone above a rather flat, self managed organisational structure.
“Except for the Commissioner, all staff employed to undertake the functions of eSafety are staff of the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), and are covered by ACMA entitlements, protections and obligations.”
h ttps://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/our-structure
How is it that this Satanic harlot from the other side of the planet deigns to specify what Australians can and cannot see?
In much the same way as that OTHER Satanic harlot, Jane Halton, also from the other side of the planet, was engaged by serial paedophile and mass-murderer Scotty from Marketing to manage Australia’s BIOWEAPON GENOCIDE.
Yes, folks, they ARE Satanic harlots, and yes, they DO eat babies and drink their blood. All in a day’s work for the Luciferian Globalists at the World Economic forum, where sacrificing and eating children and selling your soul to Satan is a condition of membership.
Not unlike the fake corporate Australian “government”, who are all employed by the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION registered in Washington DC with majority shareholders Blackrock and Vanguard. Employed, we should add, under contract to carry out creepy Bill’s wet dream of killing us all.
♫ You better watch out
You better not cry
You better not pout
I’m telling you why, Inman Grant is coming to town.
She’s making a list
And checking it twice
She’s gonna find out
Who’s naughty or nice, Inman Grant is coming to town.
[Pre-Chorus]
She sees you when you’re sleeping
She knows when you’re awake
She knows when you’ve been bad or good
So be good for goodness sake.
https://cairnsnews.org/2024/05/26/christchurch-mosque-shooting-the-indisputable-facts/
Deliberate confusion and BS in social media comments and government censorship turn people off from the bleeding obvious to hide the truth of criminal government activities.
The internet has given the plebs a voice that must become louder, ears that burn and actions that expose the crims
This is the face that only global digital tyranny could love.
https://x.com/NoticerNews/status/1772941654564938019
And while we are there, check out the Brit who was talking to his priest about the Bishop Mar Mari stabbing in Australia. He commented ‘Christians need to stand up’. Well. Rather as one would say, lifting the pinkie over English breakfast tea, proper strength. Pass the scone.
Bet you any money that the Muslims who are demanding intifada and jihad and Sharia publicly in the streets of every British town and city do not raise so much as an eyebrow from the UK police. But for the British man and his comment:
Knock. Knock. Who’s there? The police? Police Who? Two Police “with just a few concerns” and a mental health nurse in tow.
If you don’t think this is coming to your town and suburb here in Australia, you are a dreamer. Follow how the Brit in his castle speaks to them. Observe how quickly he retrieves the moodle or the shih-tzu or whatever it is from the young female officer who just wants to pat the pooch and chat about ‘concerns’. Look at how quickly he starts filming and gets down to business with them. Great clip.
https://x.com/NoticerNews/status/1780954062869123222
The author has clearly shown how these spiders weave their webs. Slowly but surely.
Perhaps the internet just needs to implode on itself because this is the tool they have used to control us.
That and the tele-vision.
Their tools of media.
We know that because those who lived by their (propaganda) sword are now dying by it.
The world wide web (www) was created for such a time as this.
If we can resist it’s trap, maybe, just maybe, we get to survive.
I do hope it all goes down. All of it.
Then we can start again.
Hoodah Thunket said – “Why is our govt letting a WEF stooge tell us what to do?
Isn’t that treason?”
No, it’s just corporate policy. Controlled by the World Economic Forum stooges who’ve “PENETRATED THE CABINETS”.
Because it’s NOT “government”, and hasn’t been for DECADES now. It’s the foreign-owned COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION with majority shareholder Vanguard and Blackrock.
Australia HAS NO lawful “government”. Period. Full stop. How long will it take for the reality to sink in? Will it EVER sink in?
Christchurch Massacre…was completely faked. If New Zealanders were not threatened with 10 years jail for watching it…they would only need to watch it to know it was all faked. There is a documentary which points out the ‘Three Faces of the Christchurch Killer’ (my old link to it no longer works, it is called something like that).
The guy doing the ‘shooting’ accidentally put the camera on his own face for a few seconds…that was not the guy who plead guilty via video link…neither of them two men were Brenton Tarrent (who is much larger, bulkier than the 2nd guy, who was thin and not Tarrent). He has been set up and jailed for life for a crime that never happened!
Firstly, it was not live streamed as special effects were added in. It was done the day before. Muslims have Freemason Lodges! The bullet shells pop out and fall to the ground, some bounce and disappear, some disappear before they hit the ground at all! Slowed down, the scenes of shootings saw no bullet holes in anybody, none in the walls, no blood except a couple of burst fake blood packs, plenty of dummies…In the car he shoots at someone with what looks like a shot gun, was actually a slug gun, which just chipped the windscreen instead of blowing it out! There is way more, like a video from a mobile that shows the end of filming, as all the ‘dead’ and ‘injured’ rise, chatting and laughing…There is probably a lot more, it is so obviously faked it is ridiculous and absurd.
Government, Media and Freemasons worked together in a problem, reaction, solution scenario. Laws were changed, guns were taken away from law abiding citizens, right before covid too. Lockstep people…
Julie Inman … Somebody should explain to the commissioner, when her/his/its/their tenure finishes, the difference between e-safety and censorship.
The former is protective, the latter destructive. But that may not be of interest to her/him/it/them when it comes to political agendas and people control and manipulation.
Julie appears to have a thyroid goitre,or maybe a male Adams Apple, not to mention a dark elf pointy right ear and a right hand thumb which appears simian. Other than that and what she says and does…and who she works for…she’s ok.
Labor’s new hate speech laws will criminalise ‘vilification’ based on race, sexuality, gender, religion and disability.
https://www.noticer.news/labor-hate-speech-laws-criminalise-vilification/
The pro-Palestinian protests and the ‘intifada’ / ‘from the river to the sea’ messaging has been used as the springboard for Australia’s Labor government to prepare a hate speech bill that will criminalise serious vilification based on race, sexuality, gender, disability and religion.
Terms like ‘serious’ and ‘vilification’ will of course be very semantically fluid. Like Humpty Dumpty in Alice in Wonderland, these words will mean whatever some odacious egg in a wig on a bench who has sworn an extra-judicial oath to the Masonic Lodge says they mean.
Even if no violence has been incited by some ‘serious vilification’ of twitter opprobrium, the person who can play the race card, the sex card, the gender, disability or religion card and decided to take offense and feel ‘vilified will be able to call upon federal protection under the criminal code.
I can absolutely guarantee it, the White Australians, the White heterosexual males, the women who have been disabled playing womens’ sporting codes with trannies, the Christians based on Biblical and political truth or traditional Church teachings will discover very quickly that it is their speech which will invoke the new laws. Why? because this speech is invariably offensive to the Judaic ADL Humpty Dumpties.
Minorities with a sacred Marxist oppression narrative will be always be guaranteed a seat on the holocaust bus. Neither their anti White hate speech or crimes will matter F* All under the Dreyfus law.
She is beautiful, and I detect jealousy from detractors. She is just needy for love. Did you not know that love is the answer? Seriously.
Who voted for Ingman – Grant?
Nobody!
And if she’s so keen on censoring child porn and e safety then why are pedophiles still able to traffic?
But we’re not allowed to see a crazy Muslim extremist attempt to murder a Christian priest in his own church?
Why is an American born, bred and suckled in the US corporate and govt swamp have any power over what we can or can’t see online?
Why is our govt letting a WEF stooge tell us what to do?
Isn’t that treason?
I didn’t see the WEF mentioned in our constitution?
This is that slimy Elobows disinformation bill that he couldnt get through parliament being rammed through the back door.
Just the way he likes it.
The whole lot of them with their compromised bureaucrats have got to go.
Lamp post.
With the unhappy troika of child porn , terrorism and ‘hate content’ I think we can be confident that child trafficking/abuse/sacrifice/porn and state terrorism [which go together like ham and beans] will get a pass. from the government. They won’t be publishing that list of elite pedos from the Woods Royal Commission anytime soon.
Hate content is the steak and potatoes here. And this will be what the United [Communist] Nations CoVID Regime in Australia is really after. The definition of ‘hate’ will be kept purposely vague so the Eye of Sauron can focus on its targeted groups and persons, the ones deemed to offend Nibelheim and the ZOG overseer powerstructure here. Yes. I am using Nibelheim as a precise Wagnerian term for the Judaic racial collective and its world power.
In focus for ‘hate content’ will be the racial heritage and founding stock of the Australian nation state, the identity of its majority demographic as a nation and interests. Blacks, Browns, Asians all get to have ‘racial interests’ [of course this should go without saying] as so many of these in explicit terms are enabled and funded by all tiers of the captured state.
The White Australian nation is the one the Gang of Four hates and the political / overseer class of the captured state (all tiers of gov’t) will bring ‘hate content’ down on its communications and activities through the office of the new eSafety Karen.
Think White European ethnic nation and the picture will become clear.