Letter to the Editor
Being a veteran surveyor, I know bulls..t when I see it. (Qld Aboriginal polling results back a Treaty, https://cairnsnews.org/2023/03/27/some-more-treaty-double-speak-from-labor-premier-annastacia-palaszczuk-and-her-30-media-spin-doctors/)
There is no way those results would flow from a questionnaire survey of a full demographic. I reiterate, “bulls..t”. This is pure ALP propaganda.
Now let me make a comment that attacks claims of Aboriginal culture in Queensland. First, when we use the word ‘culture’, we are referring to the values and way of life that differentiates the subject (in this case Aborigines) from surrounding mainstream culture.
The first element is language. The primary expression of any culture is its language. I lived and worked across much of Queensland and I never met one person who spoke an Aboriginal language. Most of my family is Aboriginal so I do look out for possible extended family.
The next element is family structure. What has people in the North and Centre scratching their heads in puzzlement is this constant east coast reference to ‘uncle’ and ‘auntie’. How the hell can everybody be only uncle and auntie? What about all the other relationship names, of which in Aboriginal culture there are about 50 or so, all named. Likewise talk of elders, There are no elders. There are, however, names for people who are Law Authorities, both men and women. I don’t know all the rules for this but I sure as hell know who is authority over what and there are none in Queensland. All that died out a century ago.
So who are these people representing Aboriginal culture to the ALP? All they can possibly lay claim to is brown skins. Most are more European than Aboriginal, which leaves them with one single distinction, they are less likely to get sunburned than most of us. That is not an element of ‘culture’.
But because all this bullshit takes place 2000 Ks away from me and mine, I would not care. Let them play their silly games. Let them pretend to be what they so obviously are not. Their mental health will suffer in the end.
But I do care, because these neurotic and ignorant muppets insist on speaking for Aborigines across the nation when, in fact, they have zero understanding of real-world Aboriginal issues. The cause of premature death and endemic illhealth in the North and Centre is refusal by government to recognise Aboriginal languages and Law. Because people cannot understand English, they cannot find out about toxic foods and malnutrition. The supermarkets and community stores sell them poison as food and they have no way to discover this. That is why they are dying. This is where diabetes, coronary heart disease, and cancer have their genesis.
These east coast pretenders drown out their voices, which is why I want them to shut up. East coast pretend-Aborigines are killing our people and the ALP is helping them.
From Tony Ryan
Arnhem Land, NT
@won’tbedenied. I am not talking about the Oath of the Supremacy (Henry VIII) passed by Act 1534 (which laid the axe to the root of Magna Carta btw), I am not talking about Protestant Succession (guaranteed by Act 1701), I am not talking about the English Civil War 1642 wherein the English Parliamentarians and the Scottish Convention of Estates fought Charles Stuart I in the Union of the Two Crowns for the Supremacy. In Ireland, then under penal colonial law, this was called the Irish Confederate Wars 1650.
So. Logistics of civil war. As the Whigs, Puritans and what have you in the English Parliament and the Scottish Convention of Estates decided to fight the standing national army of the Union of the Two Crowns – where are they going to go for an army? How are they going to equip it? How are they going to supply it? Money. Where are they going to go for the money to raise the New Model Army on the continent and ship it back to England?
They went to the Nasi of the Great Synagogue of Mulheim an der Ruhr and the put up as collateral on those loans the original / allodial title of all estates including that of ‘The Crowne’ – at that time the Monarchy of the Two Crowns. And that loan was monetized to them through the Amsterdamsee Wisselbank – of credit issue by the Synagogue. They fought the war of 1642 and the rest is history.
Until. It came time to settle the debt.
And James II would not sign off on the Parliamentary Bill that was essentially the draft for the Bank of England (later chartered 1694). He would not have a bank of credit issue like the Amsterdamsee Wisselbank, later the Bank of England that would essentially make usury the basis of the economy.
So, James II and his court was forced to flee for his life. A successor William of Orange was duly installed by the Nasi who came over with him. The Glorious Revolution was proclaimed. The War of the Succession 1688 – 1746 (Culloden), sometimes called The War of the Three Kingdoms, commenced in order to settle the debt of the Parliamentarians over the three nations which now had all estates in original allodial title forfeit on the Parliamentarian debt. Three nations of people had not exactly surrendered the land upon which they were living in the Civil War 1642. They were still in occupation. And when that war was lost to those three nations, there remained the question of what to do with large pockets of people who had still not laid down arms. Like in the Highlands. Those would be cleared of course – by fire and musket – to make way for new titles and new landlords.
So what might The Crown – which since 1688 has been the owners of the consols of the Bank of England (allodial and udal titles of all estates of three nations) decide to do with these populations? These would actually be the natural aristocracy of those the nations – the most robust and resistant to being turned out of the Highlands, closure of the Commons in England, impressment into the UK Navy and collieries etc. And of course the ones who were not going to pay all the penal taxes in Ireland and have decided to make life hell for the new landlords.
What solution to these folk might The Crown of the UK have hit upon?
Whatever your opinion @won’tbedenied, you have no idea what you are talking about in your rants on this messageboard. And the story I have just narrated is now being re-enacted today in Australia.
I have a pretty bloody good comprehension of Our History and for you to suggest otherwise means naught to i;
I also know of the fight in England prior to the launching of the First Fleet between the protestant and the catholic; Or the fight to stop The City Of London (VAT-i-CAN) taking over (USURPING) The Bank Of England (The Trust) of The (Victorian) Crown if you will;
Again, what has the succession got to do with it?
@won’tbedenied. Well, actually I have on several posts. The fact that populations were transported from the UK nations to Australia as convicts and that waves of settlement followed these transports from the same nations is so well known a historical fact, I just assumed that all readers of CN would be familiar with this topic. Not all apparently. You know, you could make use of Google – why not just type: England Ireland Scotland transport Australia penal colony. Oh. Look. 21,000,000 results starting with Wikipedia and the National Museum of Australia.
Australian shearers on the move singing Botany Bay
You have fried nothing in bacon fat….matter of fact, you still have stated nothing on what the War Of Succession has to do with “Convicts of the Empire” being sent to this land;
Blow your own Trumpet often?;
I don’t know if you have ever wandered into the city or suburbs in the last 10 or so years, but all those wonderful cultures you mentioned have all but disappeared and have been replaced with a very different, very violent, very anti-Australian “culture” that has no respect for life or the land
@ won’t be denied. There is nothing wrong with English or Celtic language/s, heritage and civilization. The populations transported here from England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland after the War of the Succession brought their culture and civilization with them and created a new version of this confluence that in Australia we have come to like. And this just fries your bagel in bacon fat. Too bad.
Meanwhile Labor, the Greens and Pocock are going to wrangle and weasel the Safeguard Mechanism Bill through. These Red Shitbags have decided that Australians have too much stuff. We should have nothing and we would be a lot happier with our carbon credits and reduced CO2 emissions.
Senator Malcolm Roberts explains
LikeLiked by 1 person
Australia now has about the same culture as a Pizza with the Lot…it’s all over the place and none of it belongs together;
“transplanted to this continent after they lost the War of the Succession 1688-1746”
Can i ask how many moons are on your planet? Seeing as you have obviously forgotten or did not know in the first place, Cook didn’t land here on this continent until 1770 and from what i can garner, all members of The Royal Navy of the time were British Subjects;
This succession clap trap you keep on about has FA to do with Australia;
Who are you and where do you come from?
“The only culture in Australia is in the yogurt”. @Rebecca. Get real.
Australia, a young nation, has a wonderful culture with many Anglo-Celtic customs from the nations which were transplanted to this continent after they lost the War of the Succession 1688-1746. And it has developed many customs unique to itself. There is too much of the worst of American TV, I would grant you. But then people should not be watching TV anymore than they should be getting injections with a bioweapon.
The fact that the Marxists of the Communist Revolution are conducting their Long March through every institution of social influence / control has not changed fundamental Australian ways of life especially in the rural communities.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The only culture in Australia is in the yogurt.
Even though The Owners of Australia Inc are working assiduously to deliver Black Minority rule overseen by the Chinese Communist Party, let us not lose sight of the fact that : demographics is destiny for any population.
And how many of those migrants will be from populations which fought for a Communist takeover and are now streaming into the West from their failed Marxist state – read shithole? How many of those migrants will be from populations that can make a contribution to Australia in terms of our way of life, our social order and values? Or will the demographics be cherry picked for the least able to assimilate and contribute? This translates into more degrading customs that we have to respect, more asinine laws to conflict with ours, another religious food tax we have to pay, I would expect.
In England, ponies that are picketed on the green outside the pub are now without recourse if a sexual emergency arises and the offending gender also has a racial entitlement to crime. And this in a nation which pioneered laws against cruelty to animals.
How a population is racially composed in its nations (as in NT ethne), is always going to be a decider in terms of social order, in terms of jurisprudence that incorporates and delivers on human and civil rights (such as the 1901 Constitution), in terms of a Marxist State at Stage 6 load shedding and Chinese Communist Party supervision of a government that can not manage even the basics of social order.
On the occasion of a state of a union address in the SA parliament – now taken over by a Communist Party and Black Rule, the red suits and Zuma are the ones who think that genociding the Boer will somehow provide water and power to the major cities.
Has anyone actually ESTABLISHED that the Aboriginal populations themselves think a “Voice” is a good idea? Or is it just something the WEF and its agents want and our politicians are happy to oblige?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sounds pretty spot on
Get Outlook for iOShttps://aka.ms/o0ukef ________________________________