US cyber team busts Democrat manipulation of voter databases
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
US cyber sleuths using new technology employing fractal programming have uncovered the major method of election fraud used by the Democrats – database manipulation and of database latency in particular.
Jay Valentine, writing for the “fractal micro site” Omerga4America.com, explained that database latency, that is, data that was “late” and not up to date, or lagging actual changes, was behind the methodology.
For instance a non-latent or instantly updated database allowed police instant access to records, for instance, of a vehicle they pulled over, showing it being involved in some other crime only hours earlier.
He said the fractal team spent the past 20 months, assisted by Mike Lindell, Sheriff David Clarke and more than a dozen election integrity teams, advancing voter integrity analysis from latent data batches to current, real-time data.
“We learned the core strategy to fight ballot-gathering fraud in real time analysis of voter rolls and cast ballots,” he wrote. “It is also real-time analysis of ballot collection points like large apartment complexes and dorms where ballots gather because there is not an apartment number.”
Valentine said the Omega4America investigators discovered that county election managers in one state changed the zip code of 31,000 voters on September 3 just before ballots went out that week. With the zip or post code changed, the 31,000 ballots became undeliverable. Someone collected those valid ballots but then on September 15th, those addresses were quietly changed back.
The National Change of Address Database (NCOA) did not pick up those address changes because there was no history of the change, but ballots came into possession of parties ready to use them when needed.
After the switch back, the 31,000 citizens were getting their mail just fine except for ballots. Ballot addresses were driven by the county mail-in ballot database, the one that was changed, then changed back.
Valentine said many states send ballots to everyone and recipients are none the wiser that they never received one, so they vote in person. This is where they are told “You already voted!”. It’s likely many or most would shrug their shoulders and walk away and a minority seek remedy with the county office.
“Welcome to database latency,” writes Valentine. “Our bad guy pals know they can change voter rolls, take an action, then change them back. Who would know?
“A thousand voters are changed from inactive, voted, then changed back, and how would you ever know? With lots of complex footwork, you could eventually tell from their voter history file – months after the election.”
It is any wonder Joe Biden barely bothered to campaign. His campaign meetings were pathetic and limited to hundreds of a few thousand at best with people socially distanced, but mostly it was Joe talking on the TV from his basement. Biden is not quite as senile as many think.
Similary in Arizona, a key state for Democrats to win, the Democrat Secretary of State and candidate for Governor Katie Hobbs, simply refused to debate her high-profile Republican opponent Kari Lake. That would be electoral suicide for most candidates, and certainly for Hobbs who lacks character and personality. And Hobbs even refused to recuse herself from her Secretary of State job, which oversees the county election systems. This was the same election system whose vote counting machines failed massively in some 70 locations on election day.
Democrats know they are almost guaranteed to win with their crooked systems in place. They also know that reversing an election result trumpeted all over the media is almost impossible. Kari Lake, however, is not giving up. She is challenging the result in the courts. Perhaps she will find a judge not appointed by the Democrats.
“The new, and current ‘ballot gathering strategy’ mandated by the almost universal mail-in ballots adds pretty cool database games – exploiting database latency,” Valentine notes. “Database latency, as you likely gathered, is when current reality lags the underlying record. We all experience it in our electronics-driven society. The ballot gathering scammers know about latency — it’s their ground game!”
Valentine says the bad guys are happy to give up a few “retail-level ballots” to hide the wholesale-level ballot-gathering apparatus. “They count on it. Here’s the fraud equation taking place across the country:”
- Count the in-person votes on election day.
- Count the early, in-person votes.
- Shut down the system (Atlanta ‘water leak’, Maricopa County ‘everything’).
- Bring in undeliverable ballots gathered when you changed voters’ names, addresses, or zip codes, then changed them back.
- Determine the votes you need to win. Press the “WIN” button.
- Wait for the Republicans to file a lawsuit months later.
“Floating ballots are the lifeblood Democrats need to win and win they do.”
Valentine says Republicans use dumb technology like relational databases and others like NCOA – all non-real time, highly latent systems. “Bad guys are happy to watch Republicans waste time finding ones and twos, while the real action takes place by the thousands — invisible to these batch, latency-prone systems.”
The Republican National Committee also “helps” with its antiquated “big data” system which is equally blind to anything that happens within a month. Valentine pointed to the future of how to fight ballot gathering with technology.
“We know an election commission is going to do anything possible to make the Democrat win. Wisconsin Election Commission, Arizona’s Maricopa County, seven states in 2016, for instance.
“Rather than wasting time on batch NCOA, we get a daily copy of the election roll. That’s expensive! The list in Wisconsin is $12,000! But did you know your Democrat friends bought it 28 times before the 2016 election?
“What is a governorship worth? How much does a contested Senate seat cost? Maybe $50 million? What is a presidential campaign worth?”
Valentine said Omega4American investigators took election rolls with about 15 million voters e.g. Florida or Texas, and compared every voter against every other voter and address, down to the cell level, and note any differences, every day.
“What do we find? In a real-life example, this month, we found a county that changed 31,500 zip codes, yet the voter remained at the same address. Curious? That means the voter did not change their address, continued to receive all their mail, except one item – a ballot sent from a voter commission.
“Our teams in Wisconsin and Florida are discovering this scam by the truckload – do not email me that it is not real! And NCOA and Melissa? They are totally blind to this – because the addresses are changed back!
Meanwhile Kari Lake has filed another lawsuit against Maricopa County election officials contesting the 2022 election results, alleging voter disenfranchisement and suppression. Lake has called for a forensic audit of the printer-tabulator problems, an inspection of ballots and voter registration records, including signatures, disqualification of illegal votes, and redoing the election as well as other relief.
The lawsuit alleges that between 15,603 and 29,257 Republicans were disenfranchised who would have voted for Lake, according to a calculation performed by data analyst Richard Baris of Big Data Poll.