NZ judge and health establishment scum refuse unvaxxed blood for baby
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
A NEW Zealand mother who wanted unvaccinated blood used in her baby’s heart operation has had her request refused by the High Court, ruling in favour of a children’s hospital, the NZ Blood Service and NZ Health (health department).
Some 30 unvaccinated people with compatible blood who are supporting the mother’s request, offered to donate blood but the big pharma lackeys of the “health” establishment ganged up together to get the court and a misinformed judge, to rule in their favour.
Lawyers for the health bureaucrats admitted in court they were worried about the precedent such a situation would present, not the concerns of the mother about a potential threat to the six-month-old infant from mRNA vaccine-induced spike proteins in the blood.
To label the health establishment “corrupted” in respect of their Covid-19 response is not just a cheap shot at authority. Health departments worldwide signed up to a corrupt Covid-19 agenda that violated its own pandemic response rules, covered up the origin of the SARS-Cov.2 virus, pushed half-tested but highly-profitable vaccines and banned the safe, inexpensive, non-vaccine treatments hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin that showed positive results when used by doctors.
All the time, these same health authorities, operating under guidelines set up by the World Health Organisation and endorsed by the CDC, FDA, US health chief Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates and others, told us only these vaccines were safe and would stop the virus in its tracks – which, as it turned out, was not entirely true. And mistruths about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine continue, notably in regard to the lingering effects of the genetically-altered spike protein from the mRNA vaccine versus the wild spike protein from the virus.
Is it any wonder then, that the mother (identity protected) whose baby boy needs a heart operation, should be concerned about spike proteins in blood donated by vaccinated donors. She turned down the operation until the Starship Childrens Hospital in Auckland could operate with blood free of contamination from the genetically modified spike proteins carried by mRNA shots.
Starship, backed by NZ Health and the Blood Service, would not come to the party because they do not delineate between vaccinated and unvaccinated blood, regardless of whether is was voluntarily offered. And to add insult to injury, they took the mother to court to gain intervention authority to take custody of the child and carry out the operation and transfusion without the mother’s consent.
High Court Justice Gault said he “accepted that the parents had genuine concerns about vaccinated blood” but then sided with the medical establishment, claiming the evidence of Canadian viral immunologist and associate professor Byram Bridle did not overcome the evidence of Dr Sarah Morley, chief medical officer of the New Zealand Blood Service. So, it appears that the concerns of an independent viral immunologist are subjected to the predictable opinion of a paid employee of a blood supply business that is a client of public and private hospitals.
Judge Gault made the following misinformed and flawed ruling: ”Dr Morley’s evidence (including her reply affidavit) is that there is no scientific evidence there is any Covid-19 vaccine-related risk from blood donated by donors previously vaccinated with any New Zealand approved Covid-19 vaccine, and there are no known or suspected harmful vaccine-related effects of blood from a vaccinated individual to a recipient of any age, after millions of transfusions around the world. There is no evidence that trace amounts of vaccine in blood or blood products could cause myocarditis. If there is any spike protein at all in blood, it will be in the picogramrange (one trillionth of a gram).”
In another “concession” to the baby’s parents, the judge ruled they remain his legal guardians aside from the medical matters covered in the order. He ruled two Starship hospital doctors “to at all times keep the parents informed of their baby’s condition and treatment”. The ruling was full of half-truths and red herrings and based on controversial, incomplete and ongoing research. The precautionary principle would clearly support the mother’s request for unvaccinated blood.
We don’t know if the defence lawyer cited academics apart from Prof. Bridle, but there are a number of studies cited by other prominent scientists and doctors who are concerned about lingering spike proteins in vaccinated people. Claims are made that because the messenger RNA in the vaccine produced a genetically altered and neutralised spike protein, it is safe, unlike the spike protein of the virus, but this is doubted by experts such as Dr Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA technology.
Prof. Bridle, who is a member of the Canadian COVID Care Alliance doctors’ group, has raised concerns over mRNA vaccines being given to pregnant and breastfeeding mothers. Data has shown the vaccine spike protein being transferred to the infants and because more mRNA spike protein is produced in metabolically-active cells, it multiplies more in the cells of growing infants.
Prof. Bridle told Rebel News conclusions should not be drawn about the safety of the spike protein in infants, nor was there proper scientific backing for recommending breastfeeding babies within the first 48 hours after vaccination. “We have no empirical data to declare that as as safe cut-off whatsoever, but hey, this is how we treat science theses days. We assume it’s safe until proven otherwise.” He said this completely reversed the entire principle of ‘do no harm’ and assuming a procedure was unsafe until proven otherwise.
About a year ago Cairns News reported on the alert raised by Dr Malone, who appeared on the web broadcasts Dark Horse (hosted by biologist Brett Weinstein) and TrialSite News. He told Dr Erin Stair from TrialSite “it might be that the known toxicities associated with the wild-type spike protein might be also associated with the engineered spike protein that is used as the antigen in these vaccines, and right now we don’t know if that’s the case for sure, but it kind of looks like it might be”.
Malone stressed earlier in the interview that reported serious adverse events (at that time) only occurred in a “small subset” of people and he also believe that the vaccine worked effectively for many people. “These vaccines work, they are saving lives, but in some people they’re having these adverse events and the odd thing is those adverse events seem to overlap with some of the symptoms of the disease caused by the (wild) virus.” However Malone, who received a Moderna vaccination, has stated he is suffering long-term, negative side-effects from it.
Malone told Dr Stair that the critical experiments on the bio-distribution of mRNA injections were not done to the usual high standards. “In regulatory talk they were ‘non-good’ laboratory practices as opposed to the normally required good laboratory (GLP) practices.” He said non-GLP practices were normally not acceptable and these ones were based on outdated Japanese data that was not rigorous and based on rodents.
“To say to the public no corners were cut isn’t really true, and that’s where I start to have problems with all of this,” Malone said. “I think the government owes it to their populace to be open and transparent about what’s true, known and what’s unknown because they are obligated, and the pharmaceutical companies are obligated to fully disclose all risks because this is a fundamental precept of bioethics in human subject research.”
And then there are the concerns of world-leading cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough who, in an article cited a study by Helene Banoun, pharmacist, biologist, hormer Inserm (National Reseaarch Institute of France) researcher, and member of the Independent Scientific Council, Marseille. The study showed that lipid nanoparticles that carry the mRNA spread throughout the body and “have been shown to be able to be excreted through body fluids (sweat, sputum, breast milk) and to pass the transplacental barrier.”
McCullough also cited the paper by Fertig and colleagues, that found messenger RNA circulating in blood for at least two weeks. “And the curves were not going down. That’s as long as they looked,” he told an interviewer. “Röltgen and colleagues has found messenger RNA in the vaccinated in lymph nodes for months,” McCullough explained further. “It looks like the body’s not clearing it out.”