Plastic COVID nannies torture toddler with PCR test


PUSHING a stick up a child’s nose while holding that same child down by force is abuse, even torture. And that’s just what two callous, plastic covered female goons did on a short video that’s gone viral and which has been received by Cairns News.

Forcing any object into any person against his or her will is assault. The child in this case appears to have a mother or carer (the short Asian woman) who seems to be clueless as to the gravity of the situation. That’s why in common law, we have this right called informed consent.

We don’t know where this atrocity took place, but the plastic covered health nannies both appear to be European. To make matters worse, after assaulting the boy they callously turn their back on him, appearing preoccupied with getting their precious sample ready to be processed.

Two other issues here are the well known fraudulent nature of PCR testing (or is it just DNA gathering for Chinese biotech firms?) and the needless testing of children who are the least vulnerable of any age group to corona virus infections.

God help the children if the COVID fascists start to vaccinate them with the vile mRNA concoctions. Incidentally, in common law jurisdictions like Australia, Canada, the US, UK and New Zealand, parents can exercise the right on informed consent on behalf of their children.

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on September 10, 2021, in Covid passport, Covid vaccines, Medical, One World Government, political spin and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 15 Comments.

  1. Only where there is an intelligent informed ‘public’ reading it. Sorry but they’ve ensured that we don’t have that.


  2. I have 2 Adult Daughters anything like that happened when they were younger watch out those Nurses would not lay a hand on my kids full stop! Parents need to look after their children with their lives that no harm comes to them period! With that child moving like that could have caused a serious injury with the Nurse using the PCR Nasal Swab.


  3. @comeinspinner

    “I recall the old saying, “The pen is mightier than the sword.” WelI I am not so sure anymore.”

    Origin of “The Pen is Mightier Than the Sword”

    The proverb “the pen is mightier than the sword” was first coined in 1839 by English author, Edward Bulwer-Lytton, in his play, Richelieu; Or the Conspiracy. However, this proverb has also got some Biblical and Islamic echoing but real use found in the above-mentioned book.
    Examples in Literature
    Example #1

    Richelieu; Or the Conspiracy by Edward Bulwer-Lytton

    “True, This! —
    Beneath the rule of men entirely great
    The pen is mightier than the sword. Behold
    The arch-enchanters wand! — itself is nothing! —
    But taking sorcery from the master-hand
    To paralyse the Cæsars, and to strike
    The loud earth breathless! — Take away the sword —
    States can be saved without it!”

    The above lines express the true meanings of this proverb. The speaker states that beneath the rules of great leaders, kings, and courts, communication or written words are more effective a tool than direct force. To elaborate his ideas even better, the speaker quotes the example of arch-enchanters and states that the arch itself does not perform any magical trick unless its master operates it with communication. Therefore, it is not necessary to win every battle with a sword; sometimes, the world can be saved without violence. The proverb has a denotative use, as it refers to the title of the poem, too…………..


  4. Yep some of us knew Tony and Pat great Aussies


  5. Thanks for the input..Ir seems nearly every one who reads and comments are of much the same mind. I recall the old saying, “The pen is mightier than the sword.” WelI I am not so sure anymore.I think you older people will recall Tony Pitt . he editored a newspaper, He begged people to join together, instead of being in little warring groups. At least thousands of people uare getting together, Mind you that would be about 15 years ago that he and his wife Pat died unfortunately. This is not about talking anymore. This is here and now. So what can we do that is better,This is not some airy-fairy dream We are living in a dangerous time.This is no conspiracy theory.It is just like Brad Hazzard and Cherry Chant said ,this is the New World Order. I suppose I will write another letter or two.But it is going to take a lot more than that. I do talk to anyone that will listen..


  6. I come back to Riccardo Bosi ……’tis the only way.


  7. And to think I would shed a tear back in the late seventy’s and into the eighties, when each of my four kids back then, would look at me, [ and I could hear them through their eyes whilst I cuddled them; WHY ARE YOU LETTING THEM HURT ME DADDY?] each time their Council supplied vaccination was due.
    I’m prepared to show that anger with the CRIMINAL, SOCIOPATHIC Governments we have had since I was eligible to vote!

    Liked by 1 person

  8. “there is an imminent danger of substantial damage to any person if the first mentioned person were to engage in conduct of that kind (s 124(1) of the Regulatory Powers Act).”

    Listen to the video carefully –

    The media’s control of the narrative –

    Same Fear, Different Year


    Dr. David Martin exposes the players and spike protein injection patents since 2002. Interviewed by Reiner Fuellmich. Read more…

    No Such Thing as a “Delta Variant”: It’s a Fallacy – Dr. David Martin


  9. I have to let people know that the often quoted “parents can exercise the right on informed consent on behalf of their children” is fine and has meaning – if, the corporate governments have not introduced legislation that makes the above statement worthless. News flash – they have, you just don’t know it yet.

    Really, they can do whatever they like, including just ignoring legislation / laws,. What are you going to do about it? Little or nothing, that is why they get away with what they are doing.

    And you will vote them back in next election. Sometimes I wish I was one of them so I could have a good laugh at the average (naive) Australian. Thankfully, I will never be one of them.


  10. Until recently I was employed in the Health system, I had to leave due to knowing they would soon mandate the jab.

    Most nursing staff are great they put up with a lot, work hard, they have my respect.

    But, there are more than enough who really do not respect patients such as in the video, the hero nurse (or whatever she is) obviously had not one bit of respect for the child. Likely the same person would force jab the kid with an experimental poison.

    No, not all those who work in the health systems are heroes, some should not be anywhere near a patient, for any reason.


  11. went already so far…! without words no and my only thought is now praying/meditating and ask that more people can see!


  12. They’re lucky that wasn’t my kid…. They’d be dead!


  13. We are all being abused by the state, the pharmaceutical companies and the medical establishment. The really shocking thing is just how few people are standing up to the psychopaths.


  14. The parental “informed consent” info does not apply in England. They have a precedent ruling over there (the precise name of which escapes me) that nullifies the parent’s right to veto any procedure that the child “could” agree to.


  15. Hi Editor Political Party* Treason.*

    *“That’s why in common law, we have this right called informed consent.”*

    The* Treasonous* Political Parties changed,

    *Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1988 *(Cth) Act No. 120 of 1988

    which amended *the Judiciary Act No 6 of 1903,*

    *Section 80, Common Law to Govern*

    replacing “common law of England” with “common law in Australia”.

    This is the Treasonous Political Parties abstract Australia created in 1973.

    By doing this the Political Parties removed *Common Law of England* which includes

    *King James Bible, **Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, Habeas Corpus*, *Separation of *

    *Powers* etc, etc, this removed every right we the people ever had.

    *Wake up people.*



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: