Coronavirus testing probably inaccurate

Virus testing  by Criss Cross

The CDC program immediately raises two problems: why bother testing for a virus if it isn’t really causing human disease; and what kind of test is being done?

In this article, I’m focusing on the type of test, and whether it’s accurate, even if you assume the coronavirus is causing disease.

Reading through CDC literature (see also here), I believe the two most prevalent US testing methods are: antibody, and PCR.

Antibody tests are notorious for cross-reactions. This means factors in no way relevant to a given virus can make the test read positive. In that case, the patient would be falsely told he “has the coronavirus.” But it gets worse. Traditionally, antibody tests reading positive were taken as a good sign for the patient: his immune system had contacted a germ and defeated it. Then, starting in 1984, the science was turned upside down: a positive test was, astoundingly, taken to mean the patient was ill or would soon become ill.

The PCR test (which requires excellent technicians who will not make any number of possible mistakes) takes a tissue sample from a patient which might contain a tiny virus particle(s) much too small to be observed—and blows it up many times, so it can be seen. However, the test says nothing reliable about HOW MUCH virus is in the patient’s body. Why is that important? Because millions and millions of replicating virus in the body are necessary to even begin talking about actual illness. A positive PCR test, nevertheless, will be taken to mean the patient “has the epidemic disease.” —An even deeper issue: where is the PRIOR PROOF that the PCR is testing for a virus that actually causes disease?

The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) Begins Testing Americans for the Coronavirus—But How Reliable Are the Tests?

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on March 1, 2020, in General and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 5 Comments.

  1. Nothing changes until those who secretly rule US are prosecuted (Locked up & Imprisoned) for 9/11, JFK, OK City, 5G, Chemtrails, Vaccines + (War Crimes)…

    FACT: This bioengineered coronavirus is transformed into a much more powerful bioweapon when released into an environment that has an activated 5G power grid, specific chemtrail formulations are being systematically sprayed, the populace has been vaccinated with flu vaccines and everpresent industrial pollution has compromised the respiratory systems.


  2. Peter Lockwood

    The world easily forgets DR Royal Raymond Rife over 100 yrs ago he made (invented) a SUPER OPTICAL Microscope.
    He could see in REAL time LIVE VIRUS in the blood.
    Ed its worth reading.In short, he describes how Viruses ” Hides inside Bacteria” to avoid been detected!
    Not unusable look up “Herpes Virus” that hide for year even “decades” , then springs to life when triggered.
    With GM Warfare………. the possibility’s are endless!!

    Viruses ALSO change from day to day (mutating )

    Dr Rife Killed 100% using Mechanical means, NOT DRUG’S.
    Science has very short memory …till its suits them……….


  3. Thanks Peter its time we did a review of Raymond Rife’s work. We are aware of his Rife machine and how it cured many cases of cancer. Editor


  4. I’m with you Danny,
    This short vid arrived in my inbox this morning. This lady is clearly not a flibertyjibbet, and her words make a lot of sense.
    To all, please watch.


  1. Pingback: Coronavirus testing probably inaccurate |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.