The reason for the crash of the Malaysian airliner is to blame Russia and start WW3

Within minutes of the crash of

MH17, the U.S. government and

the Western media pinned the

responsibility Russia, long before

investigators had time to even

arrive at the scene, much less

provide any actual conclusions.

The geopolitical implications of

this event are immense. Depending

on how much mileage Washington

can get out of it, the downing of

flight MH17 could end up being

pivotal.

Anyone who knows their history,

knows that media coverage of events

like these often lay the psychological

groundwork for war.

So who was REALLY responsible for

the downing of flight MH17? First let’s

start by asking some obvious

questions.

Why was flight MH17 routed over

directly over a War Zone? This was

not its normal flight path. In fact, it

was 300 miles off course. Normally,

planes this flight path is significantly

further south. The decision to allow

MH17 to fly over Donetsk was the

decision of the authorities in Kiev.

To fully understand the implications

of this decision, we have to realize

that for the past month and a half,

Eastern Ukraine has been an Active

War Zone.

In THIS context, Kiev’s decision to

route a civilian airliner 300 miles north

of its normal flight path, putting it

directly over an Active War Zone – a

War Zone where they, themselves

were the primary aggressor, wasn’t

just stupid – it was CRIMINAL.

Remember, the guys in Kiev are the

US-EU puppets, installed last Spring.

Eastern Ukraine became a War Zone

because they held referendum to

declare their independence from the

Western-installed government in Kiev.

They had a massive voter turn-out

(much higher, in fact than the official

elections that Washington endorsed).

Kiev responded by attempting to bomb

them into submission. The so called

"international community" has just

stood by and watched.

So let’s tread carefully and just ask a

few more questions that these so-called

journalists in the mainstream media are

neglecting to ask. For example: Why

hasn’t the US government released its

satellite pictures of the area right after

the event?

Russia has released many satellite

images. These first two images (seen in

the video, above) are dated July 14, and

according to Russia they show Buk missile

launch systems located about 8 kilometers

northwest of the city of Lugansk (an area

under the control of the Western-backed

Ukrainian military).

The next two images were taken on

July 17th. The first one shows that the

Ukrainian military’s Buk systems are no

longer in their previous position, and the

last image shows them in a new position

5 kilometers north of Donetsk.

Washington has not responded to this

information, and interestingly has

lowered its tone since.

On July 21 Russia also released a radar

image showing what they claimed to be an

SU-27 fighter jet in close proximity to

flight MH17. Ukraine had previously

denied that there were any military

aircraft near MH17, but they then

reversed their story and said that the

SU-27 was "escorting" the flight.

Investigative journalist Robert Parry, who’s

best known for his work exposing the Iran

Contra scandal in the 1980s has published

an article stating that one of his trusted

sources has informed him that "US

intelligence agencies do have detailed

satellite images of the likely missile battery

that launched the fateful missile, but the

battery appears to have been under the

control of Ukrainian government troops

dressed in what look like Ukrainian

uniforms."

Does this mean that we should just take

Robert Parry and his source at their word?

No, of course not.

But by the same token, why is the

Western media taking the US

government’s word at face value

without demanding evidence?

Washington is a den of pathological liars.

Their word is less than worthless, and it

certainly doesn’t count as proof. Robert

Parry’s account, on the other hand is

validated by the satellite images released

by Russia, and like it or not, this is the

strongest evidence that has been released

so far.

If Washington actually had evidence

to support their case, don’t you think

they would have released it by now?

You might be thinking, "If any of this is true,

why on Earth would the US go out of their

way to target Russia like this? This is really

extreme." Might it have something to do with

the fact that just this month, the BRICS

nations met and put together an international

development bank specifically designed to

rival the World Bank and the IMF? Could it

be because Russia is now openly pushing for

the de-dollarization of international trade?

Russia poses a threat to the dollar. That’s all

the motive the US government has ever

needed.

Video (just over 14 minutes):

Flight MH17: What You’re Not Being Told

http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/page/26572.html

– Alexandra