Thales group moving into Australia
by Alison Ryan
The Thales Group has placed the illuminati eye in the triangle symbol in its name. Australia is right in the thick of the Thales Group, along with the five-eyes – Canada, NZ, USA and Britain. There is some proof.
From a page showing the history and chronology of Thales, two of its Principal Subsidiaries are ADI (Australia) and Thales Information Systems (Russia). Principal Divisions of Thales are Aerospace, Defence, Information Technologies and Services. Thales changed its name in 2000.
The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) records show that in 12 March 2002 Thales acquired the remaining shares in ADI Group Holdings. ADI Holdings is the holding company for a number of ADI subsidiaries. The main operating company in the group is Australian Defence Industries Limited. In 1999 the ACCC considered and did not oppose the acquisition of ADI by a joint venture comprising Thales (a French owned company then known as Thomson CSF) and Transfield. Thales now wants to increase its stake in ADI Holdings to 100% by acquiring the 50% of shares in ADI Holdings that are currently owned by the Transfield Group of companies.
Are hospitals worldwide running a euthanasia program against our elderly people with the drug midazolam?
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
CAIRNS News has been alerted to the possibility that elderly Australians in care institutions are being given a dangerous sedative that may be killing them as part of the COVID treatment protocol.
The drug Midazolam has choking side effects that are eerily similar to the symptoms of severe SARS-Cov-2 infection. Attempts being made to find out if the drug is actually part of the approved treatment protocol in Australia.
The drug was rolled out by the UK government after a mass evacuation of hospital patients to care homes, allegedly to free up space in hospitals for “pandemic patients”.
A lengthy report in the European Union Times speculates that the drug may be be part of a mass euthanasia program using “COVID-19” as the cover. Cairns News cannot confirm that is the case, but given the criminal nature of the main players in the “plandemic”, it is not beyond the realms of possibility. Much evidence points to it.
Cabal players include the eco-fascist Peter Daszak, a member of the so-called Eco-Health Alliance, who reportedly helped finance the gain-of-function corona virus work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and worked with Shi Zheng Li, aka Bat Lady, the director of Bio-Safety. Daszak’s father Bogdan was a Nazi death camp guard and former member of the Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists. He ended up in Britain as a POW.
But population control and culling is not just a Nazi hangover, it is in fact a stated aim of the high-level “global health” network including the WHO and the Gates and Rockefeller foundations.
The EU Times article cites data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showing that during April 2020, 26,541 deaths occurred in care homes, an increase of 17,850 on the five-year average. This is half the amount of alleged Covid-19 deaths during the same period.
So why did so many people die in care homes when hospitals were far from overwhelmed (as frequently claimed by media)? Surely if they have developed serious complications due to Covid-19 they would require urgent medical attention and hospital treatment?
“Because don’t forget we’re told that serious illness in Covid-19 presents pneumonia and accompanying respiratory insufficiency. Therefore typical symptoms include breathlessness, cough, weakness and fever. We’re also told that people who suffer deteriorating respiratory failure and who do not receive intensive care, develop acute respiratory distress syndrome with severe breathlessness.
“Why were these people in care homes and not in hospital? They were in care homes because Matt Hancock (Secretary of State for Health and Social Care) gave the order to put them there. The directive meant that people who required medical treatment and attention were discharged into care homes in the thousands.
“But Matt Hancock’s abandonment of the elderly and vulnerable didn’t end there. Whilst the NHS was busy discharging patients who required medical treatment into care homes under his directive, Matt Hancock and the Department of Health were busy trying to source them all a certain drug known as midazolam.”
Midazolam has been used in executions by lethal injection in the USA combined with two other drugs. It acts as a sedative to make the prisoner unconscious. The other drugs then stop the lungs and heart working. However it has been the source of controversy as several prisoners took a long while to die and appeared to be in pain when midazolam was used.
The drug can also cause serious or life-threatening breathing problems such as shallow, slowed, or temporarily stopped breathing that may lead to permanent brain injury or death.
UK regulators state that you should only receive midazolam in a hospital or doctor’s office that has the equipment that is needed to monitor your heart and lungs and to provide life-saving medical treatment quickly if your breathing slows or stops.
A doctor or nurse should watch you closely after you receive this medication to make sure that you are breathing properly because midazolam induces significant depression of respiration. Your doctor should also be made aware if you have a severe infection or if you have or have ever had any lung, airway, or breathing problems or heart disease.
Knowing all of the respiratory side effects, why would you use midazolam to treat people who were suffering pneumonia and respiratory insufficiency allegedly due to Covid-19?
“Why on earth would the United Kingdom need to purchase two years worth of Midazolam, a drug associated with respiratory suppression and respiratory arrest, to treat a disease that causes respiratory suppression and respiratory arrest?” EU Times asks.
Indeed, could the criminal cabal behind the 4000 corona virus patents also be involved in a human culling operation? They would if there was profit involved and as pointed out by Dr David Martin, this cabal controls 100% of the cashflow from all the patents associated with corona virus identification, measurement and treatment.
LNP suspends federal parliament so Cabinet can create a police state unimpeded
from Sunshine Coast Daily
Boris Johnson’s House of Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg has no time for those who believe the coronavirus pandemic is a reason for sidelining parliament.
“Parliament’s role of scrutinising government, authorising spending and making laws must be fulfilled,” he said recently.
The only question for Rees-Mogg is how parliament can sit in the current circumstances. To that end, he is now “considering every technological solution available”.
PM Scott Morrison sees the role of the Australian parliament very differently. He’s dismissed the need for regular parliamentary sittings during the current coronavirus crisis on the basis that MPs “have got a bigger job to do out
there in their communities than they would have [in Canberra]”.
His Attorney-General, Christian Porter, has gone further, declaring “we’ve got better things to do” than “set down a regular sitting schedule”.
But parliamentarians serve their communities by representing them in parliament; there is no bigger job. It is through the parliament that MPs can ensure that the needs and interests of their communities are being addressed by the Government.
Fundamentally, that is the job they are elected to do.
When the parliament sat on 23 March, Mr Morrison shut it down for five months. He was forced to reconvene parliament again after reversing his position on wage subsidies but if he has his way, we won’t sit again until August.
That is not how parliamentary democracies work. Parliament is more than a group of MPs who are brought together whenever the government of the day needs approval for its latest legislation, however worthy that legislation may be.
It is not the Parliament’s job to serve the interests of the Australian Government. Its job is to serve the interests of the Australian people. That vital function must not be placed into hibernation during a time of crisis.
Disturbingly, Mr Morrison does not appear to think that his decision to shutdown the parliament is particularly significant.
But it is a momentous and unprecedented decision. Our federal Parliament continued to sit during World War I, the 1919 Spanish flu, and World War II. The mother of our parliament, the British House of Commons, even found ways to sit during the Blitz.
And as research produced by the Parliamentary Library has confirmed, Mr Morrison’s decision to shut down our parliament is not a decision that is being replicated in similar democracies such as the UK, New Zealand, Canada and the USA.
Over the next five months, the Morrison Government will make decisions that will have extraordinary repercussions for millions of Australians and for the social and economic fabric of Australia for at least a generation.
The parliament passed extraordinary powers to respond to the current public health crisis. It is absurd and dangerous to suggest that the parliament now has no role in ensuring that these emergency powers are being exercised in the best interests of their constituents and of our nation.
Of course the national parliament may need to alter the way it sits to protect the health of its members and the general public. There are many ways this can be done, such as by having reduced numbers of MPs attending in person and through the use of technology.
The sheer scale the current crisis should also prompt us to consider the adoption of additional accountability mechanisms.
The New Zealand parliament, for example, has tasked a special cross-party parliamentary committee with scrutinising the actions of the Government during the current crisis. The committee is chaired by the Leader of the Opposition, sits remotely and its proceedings are live-streamed to the public.
A number of prominent Australian judges have called for a similar model to be adopted here and this is certainly worthy of debate – in the parliament.
When parliament does reconvene to consider the Government’s proposal on wage subsidies, Mr Morrison should not try to shut it down again after he gets what he needs.
Instead, the Prime Minister must allow the parliament to continue to perform its vital democratic functions during the current crisis.
Birmingham UK is alive with Muslims. This is indicative of the downfall of the UK. Islam now controls much of the country. Will we allow Bill Shorten to do this to our country?
If he gets control he already promised to open up the borders. Will you vote for the ALP/Greens?
The UK Surveillance State should be targeting cows
The United Kingdom long been the fascist nation. Australia is not too far behind, having its strings pulled by MI6 and the CIA.
April 18, 2016 “Information Clearing House” – British citizens are now watched by Big Brother more closely than any other people in the world. All activity by British people on the web or on the phone is now monitored and stored. The British government employs more secret police – GCHQ, MI5, MI6 and SO15 – per head of population than Russia. Let me repeat that. The British have more secret police per head of population than Russia. British people are watched on closed circuit television more often than any other people in the world. Under the Prevent programme, “radicals” like me can only speak in universities under monitoring so intense and conditions so onerous that organisers give up, as I can personally witness.
The Prevent strategy provides for informants in every governmental institution who report any expressions of dissent. The UK has effective levels of surveillance – and a far higher volume of intelligence reports on their own citizens – than were ever achieved by the Stasi in Eastern Germany.
But of course, it is all “essential” to protect the citizens from the “threat” of Islamic terrorism, which is a fundamental threat to our existence, right?
So how big a threat is Islamic terrorism?
Since 2000, 57 people have been killed in the UK by Islamic terrorism.
Since 2000, 74 people have been killed in the UK by cattle.
So cows are actually a more potent threat to our personal society that terrorism.
Or more seriously – since 2000, 15,612 people have been murdered in the UK. Of whom only 57 were murdered by terrorists. You have in fact almost a 300 times greater chance of being murdered by someone else than by a terrorist. Indeed you have over 200 times a greater chance of being murdered by your partner, a family member or a close friend, than a terrorist.
The surveillance state has fundamentally changed society in response to a “threat” which is statistically miniscule.
It has greatly increased the power of the state, at a time when the state is both facilitating and protecting the greatest growth in wealth inequality in human history.
That is not a coincidence.
Craig Murray is an author, broadcaster and human rights activist. He was British Ambassador to Uzbekistan from August 2002 to October 2004 and Rector of the University of Dundee from 2007 to 2010.https://www.craigmurray.org.uk