First Postmortem Of Covid-Vaxxed Patient; Body Riddled With Viral RNA Published on June 17, 2021 Written by halturnerradioshow.com
The first-ever autopsy of a person vaccinated against COVID-19, who tested negative 18 days later upon hospital admission but at 24 days after the VAX, has revealed viral RNA was found in almost every organ of the body. The vaccine, while triggering an immune response, DID NOT STOP the virus from entering every organ in the body. The viral RNA was found in virtually every organ in the body, which means the spike proteins as well.
There are antibodies (like the “vaccine” is supposed to create) but they’re irrelevant because, based on a study from Japan, we now know that the spike S1 protein is what does the damage. We spoke to one Infectious Disease specialist from a hospital in New Jersey this morning. We sent the actual autopsy findings to him and asked for his thoughts. When he called back a while later, he was clearly shaken-up. He told us “You cannot quote me by name, I will get fired by the hospital if you do.” We agreed to conceal his identity.
He then told us: “People think that only a MINORITY of people get adverse effects from the vaccine. Based on this new research, it means that everyone – EVENTUALLY -will have adverse effects, because those spike proteins will be binding to ACE2 receptors everywhere in the body.
That mRNA was supposed to stay in the injection site and it’s not. That means the spike proteins created by the mRNA will be in every organ as well, and we now know it is the spike proteins that do the damage. Worse, the viral RNA being found in every organ despite a vaccine, indicates either: 1) The vaccine doesn’t work at all, OR; 2) The virus is enjoying Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), meaning it actually spreads FASTER in vaccinated people. This is a GLOBAL TIMEBOMB.”
According to the published postmortem report, the vaccinated man was 86 years old and tested NEGATIVE for COVID-19 when first admitted to the hospital with severe gastro-intestinal trouble and difficulty breathing.
Here is what the reports describes: We report on an 86-year-old male resident of a retirement home who received vaccine against SARS-CoV-2.
Past medical history included systemic arterial hypertension, chronic venous insufficiency, dementia and prostate carcinoma. On January 9, 2021, the man received lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine BNT162b2 in a 30 µg dose. On that day and in the following 2 weeks, he presented with no clinical symptoms (Table 1). On day 18, he was admitted to hospital for worsening diarrhea. Since he did not present with any clinical signs of COVID-19, isolation in a specific setting did not occur. Laboratory testing revealed hypochromic anemia and increased creatinine serum levels. Antigen test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 were negative. The report of the postmortem makes clear tests showed “no morphological changes associated with COVID” in his organs. “ (Morphological” means structural.)
COVID infection is now known to cause very specific structural changes to the places it infects. THOSE CHANGES HAD NOT APPEARED in the vaccinated man before he died. The now dead vaccinated man was in a room where another patient ultimately tested POSTIVE for COVID, and the report states they think the dead vaccinated man caught COVID after he was admitted, from the other patient in the same room. So the damage to the organs of the now dead vaccine recipient, took place BEFORE he was infected with COVID by the other hospital room patient.
Worse, once the vaccinated man actually got COVID, it spread so fast within his body, he apparently never stood a chance.
URGENT REQUEST FOLLOWING RESEARCH SHOWING THE “S PROTEIN” IN THE PFIZER JAB IS A TOXIN
June 4, 2021
From: Sue Grey email@example.com
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021, 23:33
Subject: OPEN LETTER No 2- An URGENT REQUEST FOLLOWING RESEARCH SHOWING THE “S PROTEIN” IN THE PFIZER JAB IS A TOXIN
To: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern firstname.lastname@example.org, Hon David Parker email@example.com, Hon Andrew Little firstname.lastname@example.org, Hon Chris Hipkins email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Chris James Chris.James@health.govt.nz, email@example.com
Dear Prime Minister, Attorney-General, Minister of Health, Minister of Covid, Minister or Seniors, Director General of Health and Chris Hipkins.
I attach below some new and very important research which I must assume your advisors have not yet provided to you, or the experimental Pfizer injection rollout would surely already have been suspended.
It is now clearly established that the SProtein is a toxin that causes the harmful symptoms known as “Covid”.
Lawyer and Microbiologist Sue Grey (below) warns PM Ardern of criminal charges should Covid jabs continue
I surely don’t need to explain the legal, ethical and human rights consequences of a government knowingly promoting a program which intentionally injects a life threatening toxin into healthy people.
I also attach a report indicating that injected nanoparticles (and the SProtein) do not remain in the arm muscle but instead circulate throughout the whole body.
The combined effect is that the Pfizer jab injects mRNA to take over cells to manufacture the deadly SProtein toxin and this spread throughout much of the body, manufacturing the SProtein toxin for days and in some cases many weeks.
This explains why even the limited available research from the two months of study as summarised in the Comirnaty Data Sheet identifies possible harm to many different parts of the body including the heart, blood, brain, musculoskeletal system, nervous system, fainting and dizziness etc.
This is no longer just a shocking experiment. Everyone involved is now on notice of this “injection roulette” which may result in death or serious injury to previously healthy people. The health and safety implications for employers and those who push this jab, are significant.
No post injection death can legitimately be ruled out as being caused or contributed by the injection, at least not without a full coroner’s report. Certainly any post vax stroke, heart attack, other blood disorder, nervous system disorder or even suicide or car accident (known overseas as “vaccidents”) must prima facie be assumed to be caused or contributed to by the jab, at least until a full coroners report is undertaken.
Similarly it is not good enough to claim that our seniors who die post jab were frail and likely to die. Surely if they were that frail they should have been spared from the jab. Anyway, surely “deaths post Jab” should be treated consistently with “deaths post Covid”.
Despite the secretive, flawed and very passive official post jab injury reporting process ( CARM), and as a result of the more active community led follow up, you are already on notice of a number of deaths and life threatening and life changing harm from this injection. The deaths and harm will inevitably continue if there are any further injections. Perhaps initially you had an excuse that you thought the SProtein was “safe”. However now you are on notice that it is not “safe” by any definition.
Further, although you in privileged position are on notice, many members of the public who you were elected to represent remain deceived by misleading claims in crown propaganda that the jab is “safe and effective”. In these circumstances there can be no “Informed consent”., Each jab without Informed consent is in breach of the Health and Disability Code and is an assault.
In these circumstances, the ongoing program is surely criminal, and indeed may result in Homicide as defined by the Crimes Act:
Homicide is the killing of a human being by another, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever.
Compare: 1908 No 32 s 173
Anyone who aids, abets or otherwise incites homicide is a party to that homicide.
I note that the Director-General of Health has shared his view in sworn evidence that Covid is the most serious health issue for New Zealand in 100 years.
I invite you all to consider that claim very carefully and critically. Please put Covid in perspective against the many other challenges which we face, including for example heart attacks, strokes, cancer, suicide accidents and diabetes and the nitrate and other contamination of much of our water.
Surely you must agree that the harm is not from “Covid” but from the “Response to Covid”.
The best expert evidence is that the risk from Covid is similar to the risk from influenza. Many experts are now saying that Covid is simply a rebranding of influenza and colds, supported by PCR testing that was never intended as a diagnostic tool. The WHO says that PCR testing should not be used beyond 20-25 cycles. OIA responses indicate that in NZ PCR tests use up to 45 cycles, which simply multiplies any contamination.
Our government is about to enter dangerous new phase if it proceeds to inject more healthy New Zealanders with an injection that experts have established is toxic.
Apart from the direct harm to those who choose, or are bullied to accept this injection, there is considerable peripheral harm. This includes the contamination of our Blood Bank with SProtein. We can only speculate on the risks for vulnerable people who receive blood contaminated with this toxin.
Please stop and reflect. Please listen to international experts who are independent from Big Pharma and who are not invested in the Covid paradigm.
Please listen to the New Zealand scientific and medical experts who have put their careers and reputations on the line out of extreme concern.
Please correct the misinformation that this injection is “safe and effective” and “approved by Medsafe” when in fact it did not meet the statutory criteria that “benefit exceeds risk”.
There is no imminent health risk from suspending the program. Dr Bloomfield’s sworn evidence was that the risks were mainly financial and reputational.
Please find the courage to challenge whoever is driving this, and any who act on dogma rather than evidence, reason or ethics.
The future of New Zealand depends on your courage to step up and make this critical call for our people.
I urge you to listen, engage and act in the public interest.
Please put aside your pride and the dogma, and suspend this program.
I am happy to assist however I can.
Sue Grey LLB (Hons), BSc (Biochemistry and Microbiology), RSHDipPHI
Co-leader NZ Outdoors Party firstname.lastname@example.org
Letter to the Editor
Hello fellow Australians,
Government responses to COVID 19 are often said to be “led by science.” However what we are seeing is the widespread censorship of science to support a narrative. It seems anything that challenges the orthodox view is ignored, banned or undermined. While this persists no government can claim their polices are “led by science.”
We contrast the statements about COVID 19 of four eminently qualified scientists. Dr Mike Yeadon, Sir Patrick Vallance, Chris Witty and Dr. Roger Hodkinson. All four should be heard but only two are. While Patrick Vallance and Chris Witty are given the maximum public exposure, Dr’s Yeadon and Hodkinson are almost completely ignored by the politicians and the mainstream media and heavily censored on social media.
Watch here to find out why:
Science invites critical debate. There is no such thing as unquestionable science. Every attempt by corporations and the politicians to limit freedom of speech, deny expert opinion, hide published science and censor all who highlight it, adds to the growing evidence that their policies are utterly divorced from science.
May you find peace, ease, and well being,
from Courier Mail
A defiant Gold Coast hairdresser is standing by her decision to ban COVID-vaccinated customers from her salon, despite being slammed by experts and social media critics.
Yazmina Adler (below), owner of the Khemia HI Vibe Frequency Salon at Palm Beach, unleashed a storm of controversy when she announced on Instagram this week that clients who had received the jab were not welcome in her shop because of the vaccine’s ‘unknown health effects’ and reputed ‘unusual signs and symptoms within the menstrual cycle’.
The decision was slammed as ‘ill-informed to the point of being dangerous and irresponsible’ by Dr Bruce Willett, Queensland chair of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.
While other health experts labelled it as “absurd, ridiculous and causing a public health risk”, and Dr Sonu Haikerwal, of the Upper Coomera Respiratory Clinic and Haan Health called it a “slap in the face to the health workers who’ve ensured the community remains free of COVID-19”.
But Ms Adler, 30, who has been a hairdresser since before leaving school at 15, told The Courier-Mail on Thursday she was ‘standing by my convictions’.
She said that while she had copped plenty of abuse – forcing her to remove her business address online and screen calls – she had also received ‘thousands’ of messages of support.
“It’s intense, people (critics) are going hard, but it takes a lot of courage to stand up against the so-called norm,” she said.
“It (concern about the vaccine) is out there and all I’ve done is brought it to the surface. There are many people that I know of that feel the same way.
“This is a very controversial topic so it’s going to draw out a lot of haters, but the support is outweighing the criticism 100 per cent.”
Brainless Australians lining up for Covid mRNA gene therapy shot
Open letter to Minister Greg Hunt from Australian Vaccination Network
The Honourable Greg Hunt MP
Federal Minister for Health and Ageing
PO Box 647
Somerville, Vic 3912
May 30, 2021
Dear Mr Hunt,
On behalf of the tens of thousands of members and supporters of The Australian Vaccination-risks Network (AVN), we are writing to you with the many concerns we have around the COVID-19 vaccination roll-out. We demand, based on the precautionary principle, that the current mRNA and viral vector vaccination experimental trial be immediately halted until independent scientific safety and efficacy evaluations can be unequivocally established. We understand that Queensland has, as of 21st May 2021, abandoned the AstraZeneca viral vector vaccination program due to injuries and deaths following vaccination.
We are very concerned that the COVID-19 vaccines have only been given provisional approval by the TGA under the State of Emergency declaration and that the decision to vaccinate the Australian public has been made on the basis of short term efficacy and safety data. It has been conceded by the TGA and AHPRA that there is no longitudinal scientific data relating to risk/benefit profile. Why is our government coercing Australians to have experimental injections which have been developed, marketed and distributed in less than a year while previous vaccine development took between 10-15 years?
In an interview on Insiders you stated:
“The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever, and we will have enormous amounts of data.”
As you have publicly admitted, these injections are still in clinical trials, and anyone who gets the shot is now part of an experiment.
Why haven’t you given instructions to health professionals to inform every person receiving the shot that they are participating in an experiment? Informed consent is essential for any medical procedure as per the Australian Immunisation Handbook and the Nuremberg Code.
These Covid vaccines are not necessary. According to the CDC’s current best estimate, “the infection fatality rate” (IFR) for Covid-19 is less than 1 percent for people aged 69 and younger. Vaccine manufacturers claim that COVID-19 vaccines are 95 percent “effective,” but the FDA is allowing companies to define effectiveness as “prevention of mild symptoms.” The studies are not designed to detect a reduction in outcomes such as severe illness, hospitalization or death. For individuals who develop severe symptoms, the vaccine is not a remedy. Instead, nutritional and oxidative support can help keep the illness from going into “overdrive.” Peter Doshi from the British Medical Journal has concerns that the current trials are not designed to show whether the injections will save any lives. In fact, reports since the commencement of the rollout in countries around the world are showing the vaccines are causing deaths and injuries.
Participants in every COVID-19 vaccine trial reported adverse reactions including high fever, chills, muscle pains and headaches. Some even reported severe reactions that required hospitalization and invasive treatment. According to the FDA, potential long-term effects may include Guillain-Barré syndrome, brain swelling, muscle weakness and paralysis, convulsions and seizures, stroke, narcolepsy, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), shock, heart attack, autoimmune disease, arthritis and joint pain, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and death.
Some UK health workers have experienced anaphylactic shock after receiving one dose of the approved vaccine and the UK government has warned those with severe allergies to avoid the Pfizer injection. Manufacturers have been granted complete indemnity, freedom from liability even though all previous attempts at creating coronavirus vaccines caused harm and never advanced to regulatory approval.
Sadly, we are seeing the devastating results of these government-sponsored and unnecessary, untested experimental injections on people all over the world. As of May 14, 2021, the number of reported US deaths following COVID-19 vaccines was 4,201 according to data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The data comes directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). A US Harvard Study concluded that “fewer than 1% of injuries were reported” to the database. Every week, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date.
Between December 14, 2020 and May 14, 2021 there have been a total of 227,805 adverse events, including 4,201 deaths. This is alarming but not surprising as there is no data to suggest safety for the following groups of people: Anyone younger than age 18 or older than age 55, pregnant or lactating mothers, those with autoimmune conditions and immunocompromised individuals. The safety for other age groups is inconclusive as the clinical trial for Pfizer, and AstraZeneca will not conclude until 2023.
In Australia, the reported adverse events were over 19,598 on May 20, 2021 according to the report on the TGA website. We are also hearing that thousands of women around the world are reporting disrupted menstrual cycles after receiving the COVID-19 vaccines. The U.K.’s government vaccine adverse event reporting system has collected more than 2,200 instances of reproductive disorders after coronavirus injections, including excessive or absent menstrual bleeding, delayed menstruation, vaginal haemorrhaging, miscarriages, and stillbirths.
Two prominent doctors, including the ex-head of Pfizer’s respiratory research, had warned that Covid-19 vaccines contain a spike protein called syncytin-1, vital for the formation of the placenta. If the vaccine triggers an immune response to this protein, then female infertility, miscarriage or birth defects could result.
On Monday 22 February 2021, COVID-19 vaccinations began in Australia. By May 12, the TGA had received 6 reports of Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) following the injection of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. There have also been reports to the TGA of 18 cases of Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), a devastating condition that leaves the patient with low platelet levels and a tendency to bleed at the same time, and which has a fatality rate of 25%. Reports as at May 2 show that there are approximately 20 cases of anaphylaxis reported in Australia per million doses of the Comirnaty vaccine. How many reactions to vaccination are actually reported to the TGA’s database of adverse reactions? Do frontline medical staff know that they can and should report a suspected adverse event following a vaccination? We know that according to the study performed by Harvard less than 1% of all adverse reactions are submitted to VAERS, so we can only assume (as no such study has been performed by the Australian government) that the percentage would be similar in Australia.
Informed consent is being bypassed. According to the Australian Immunisation Handbook on the TGA website, informed consent is essential. It states:
Valid consent is the voluntary agreement by an individual to a proposed procedure, which is given after sufficient, appropriate and reliable information about the procedure, including the potential risks and benefits, has been conveyed to that individual and it must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation.
According to the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners:
Informed consent is the process whereby a patient makes a voluntary decision about their medical care with knowledge and understanding of the benefits and potential risks involved. A patient should only agree to the proposed treatment if he or she has been provided with sufficient information including the benefits, associated risks and alternative management options, so they are able to make an appropriate decision about their own health care.
Clearly, we are not able to make an informed choice unless we have the full information to do so. This clinical trial we are engaged in does not meet the requirements of full disclosure and so this vaccination program must cease immediately. Many Australians are being coerced and pressured into taking the vaccine against their will due to the ongoing discussions by the Australian government around restrictions being imposed on those who do not consent to the Covid-19 vaccine. This goes against the values of Australia as a free country where the citizens are entitled to make their own informed medical decisions.
We look forward to receiving a written reply to our concerns and we request urgent action in response to the above information, ensuring a halt to the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines for the safety of all Australians.
Ms Meryl Dorey
President, Australian Vaccine-risks Network (AVN)
On behalf of the Members of the AVN and our supporters
Cc:/The Hon Mark Butler MP, Shadow Minister for Health and Ageing
Letter to the Editor
I had COVID for one day on June 26, 2020. My doctor prescribed Hydroxycholoroquine, Zinc, Vitamin D3, Chlorella, Collagen, Damiana Leaf Extract, and Astralagus, and I tested NEGATIVE within 24 hours. But my doctor was actually sane.
On the other hand, the Lethal Injection results in the following adverse events:
1. Known injury and deaths from Messenger RNA prions, which in the case of cattle, results in “Mad Cow Disease,” and in the case of human beings, results in the manifestation of brain dysfunction and hysteria;
2. Known injury and death from anaphylactic shock resulting from the infusion of Messenger RNA through the vaccine;
3. Known injury and death from toxic lung, heart, and brain paralysis resulting from the infusion of Messenger RNA through the vaccine;
4. Known injury and death from toxic blood clotting resulting from the infusion of Messenger RNA through the vaccine; and:
5. Known injury and death from toxemia arising from infertility complications resulting from the infusion of Messenger RNA through the vaccine.
6. Known injury and death from mitochondrial cancer from lipid nanoparticles causing cytokine storms of spike proteins which deprive the heart, lungs, and brain of oxygen.
7. A phenomenon known as Frequency Transmissibility Shedding caused by 5G Electromagnetic Transmission Nanoparticles which cause UNVACCINATED people to be harmed if they are in direct proximity with VACCINATED people; and:
8. THERE IS NO CURE for the Experimental Use Authorization Injection. 80% will die within the first five years, and 100% will all die within ten years, due to the replication and proliferation of oxygen-depriving spike proteins.
So what choice makes more sense for your survival, I ask respectfully?
from Steven Fishman
Letter to the Editor
A leading South Australian immunologist has urged Australians not to ask questions about the COVID-19 vaccine and just simply take the jab when it is offered to them.
“We’re in the privileged position that we can be hesitant, we’ve done so well in coping with COVID the last 12, 14 months,” Professor John Hayball of University South Australia told Sky News.
“But I would encourage everybody out there offered a vaccine, don’t ask any questions really, please take it.”
from Richard Noakes
Will someone contact this genocidal quack and ask him if he has had his gene therapy shot yet.
A reader has supplied the good Professor’s contact details:
Phone 08 8302 1202
Fax 08 8302 2389
Letter to the Editor
Immune-induced thrombocytopenia: AstraZeneca issues red-hand letter warning of common autoimmune disease caused by vaccination (in Europe)
European Medicines Agency’s (EMA): Vaxzevria (previously COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca): link between the vaccine and the occurrence of thrombosis in combination with thrombocytopenia:
European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen: link between the vaccine and the occurrence of thrombosis in combination with thrombocytopenia. (Janssen not available in Australia)
“While further evidence is being collected, the PRAC has recommended an update to the product information of Vaxzevria to reflect the current knowledge of the safety issue.
One of these updates is in section 4.8 of the SmPC to reflect thrombocytopenia as an adverse
reaction, with a frequency of common (Note: “common” is defined as 1% to 10%), based on data from clinical trials and to include thrombosis in combination with thrombocytopenia with frequency of very rare.”
The following are all Interesting read regarding this issue and the problem with the spike-protein better explained.
Some are in German (use auto-translate):
AstraZeneca warns of common autoimmune disease from vaccination via red-hand letter: (Ger)
Problems with thrombosis and blood clots with vaccination and infection: (Ger)
A study and publication of PEI Institute (Paul-Ehrlich-Institute) Germany (PEI = Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines Germany, similar the TGA). (English).
Measure What Fuses – Tissue Damage through Cell Fusion in COVID-19 and the Role of the Spike Protein:
Was a dangerous side effect of vaccination omitted by the Paul Ehrlich Institute? (Ger)
Study on the role of thrombosis in Covid-19 and the problems with the AstraZeneca vaccine (Ger)
Common autoimmune disease in people vaccinated with AstraZeneca? (Ger)
Frequent blood clotting disorders in people vaccinated with AstraZeneca and Janssen – reason autoimmune disease? (Ger)
Why are the COVID vaccines so toxic? (Ger)
THANZ advisory statement, May 6 2021: Suspected Vaccine Induced Prothrombotic Immune Thrombocytopenia (VIPIT)
Moderna does supply deal and to start manufacturing in Australia for just 25 million population?
from New Daily
American pharmaceutical firm Moderna has done a deal to supply the Australian government with 10 million doses of its COVID-19 vaccine this year and a further 15 million in 2022.
The deal, announced by the company late Wednesday night, adds another Pfizer-style mRNA vaccine to the arsenal for Australia’s vaccine rollout this year.
The vaccination programme has been hit hard by its early reliance on the non-mRNA AstraZeneca vaccine, which has been restricted because of a low risk of blood clotting in patients under 50.
The Moderna jab was 94 per cent effective in its first trials and shares the same mRNA technique to protect patients from the coronavirus.
The supplies remain subject to the regulatory approval of Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration, which Moderna said it would apply for shortly. Vaccines from AstraZeneca and Pfizer are already being rolled out, while a vaccine from Novavax is still being trialled.
Local manufacturing possible
Moderna said it was already in talks about establishing production in Australia.
“We appreciate the partnership and support from the government of Australia with this first supply agreement for doses of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine and our variant booster candidates,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a statement.
“As we seek to protect people around the world with our COVID-19 vaccine and potentially our variant booster candidates, we look forward to continuing discussions with Australia about establishing potential local manufacturing opportunities,” he said.
There have been 2.7 million doses administered in Australia, including 400,000 AstraZeneca doses.
Moderna’s vaccine has been authorised in Canada, Israel, the European Union, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Singapore, Qatar, Taiwan, the Philippines, Brunei and by the World Health Organisation.
Letter to the Editor
WHO says No Evidence That COVID-19 Vaccines Will Prevent Spread of Disease
The WHO has warned it does not have evidence COVID-19 vaccines prevent people from catching the virus or passing it on to other people.
A close look at the research released by Pfizer and Moderna shows the studies haven’t actually tested whether the vaccines actually prevent infection or transmission of the virus.
A spokesman for the W.H.O has stated in an interview that – “I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.”
Mind you, that is the entire purpose behind a vaccine in the first place – to prevent the spread of disease. The present COVID “vaccines” do not do this, according to the W.H.O.
All this current COVID “vaccination” is doing is spreading the virus to places where it is presently non existent e.g remote parts of Australia, especially the tropics.
Do we really need a vaccine for an illness with a 99.7% recovery rate?
There is a real chance it may introduce the virus into a previously clean environment.
Has anyone dispensing this poison thought this one through?
Letter to the Editor
“We now have unambiguous evidence that coronavirus sequences can integrate into the genome,”
“SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has genes composed of RNA, and Jaenisch, Young, and co-authors contend that on rare occasions an enzyme in human cells may copy the viral sequences into DNA and slip them into our chromosomes.”
If that is true, it would be better to prevent the illness with Ivermectin rather than inject SARS-COv-2 mRNA sequences into the human body, where they could become integrated within our DNA.
What does this say about world wide mass vaccination?
What does this say about only a couple of months clinical testing before being foisted on the public?
This may be the biggest mistake in all of human history.