How did illiterate Arabs learn to fly sophisticated Boeing 767's in a few weeks when it takes three years for a trained pilot to get an endorsement?
Pilot sitting in the cockpit of an aircraft, smiling at the camera.
Renowned, accomplished test pilot John Lear has flown all over the world for years in many different types of passenger jet aircraft was adamant no planes hit the Twin Towers as “fraudulently alleged by the government”

By Jim O’Toole

John Lear, the grandson of Learjet founder Bill Lear, is a retired airline captain and former CIA pilot who has flown over 100 different types of aircraft during 40 years of active flying. He holds more FAA airman certificates than any other FAA certified pilot. He has flown covert CIA missions in Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe and the Middle East.

John Lear says no Boeing 767 hit either Tower. It is physically impossible for such an aircraft to operate safely at that altitude.

“No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity. The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed,” Mr Lear said.

Regardless, and amazingly, mainstream media fact checkers such as USA Today continue to push the ridiculous “Arabs did it” narrative while “debunking” all sorts of red herring stories around the event.

John Lear continued, throwing the then Obama, US administration, former President George Bush Jnr and the Jewish media into a frenzy, after realising their lying narrative had been exposed:

“No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors. Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons:

In the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun ‘telescoping’ when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center.

The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground. The engines when impacting the steel columns would have maintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building.

No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity. The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.

Cairns News checked that speed claim and found it substantiated. “The maximum operating speed for a Boeing 767 at 1,000 feet is 360 knots indicated airspeed (about 414 mph or 667 km/h), though standard aviation rules restrict routine low-altitude flight,” Gemini AI reported.

It added that the regulatory limit was 250 knots indicated airspeed. “Aviation authorities like the FAA require commercial jets to stay at or below 250 knots when flying under 10,000 feet, unless an emergency or special clearance applies.”

Lear continued: The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed at over 500 mph. It would have crumpled.

No significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine could have penetrated the 14 inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground.

The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC.

Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.

It takes a highly skilled pilot to interpret the “EFIS” (Electronic Flight Instrument Display) display, with which none of the hijacker pilots would have been familiar or received training on, and use his controls, including the ailerons, rudder, flaperons, elevators, spoilers and throttles to effect, control and maintain a descent.“

https://cairnsnews.org/2016/01/27/aircraft-designer-and-pilot-john-lear-says-911-was-bullshit/

A Washington District Court action in 2022 filed by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth pled WTC 7 collapsed not from fire but from a “controlled demolition[,] ” id. ¶ 94, involving “pre-placed explosives and/or incendiaries” in the building, id. ¶ 12.

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2021cv02365/235302/22

Before proper forensic investigations could be carried out on the debris and the collapsed steel structure, an Australian scrap metal contractor, Sims Metal was appointed. The area was fenced off and the steel was salvaged.

Initial forensic investigations revealed the existence of explosives, a fact official investigators swept under the table.

Any half-intelligent person observing the footage of WTC7 crumbling at the material time as I did, clearly showed explosive charges detonating from the top down in a controlled demolition.

It is pure nonsense to claim Jet A1 fuel burns hot enough to melt steel especially 36 inch structural beams. There have been suggestions by some researchers that DEW’s which allegedly started the Maui fires, were used but there is no real evidence that laser beams were used on the Twin Towers.

Video and photographic evidence indicates that thermite was used to weaken the buildings steel infrastructure.

Today the footage has not changed. What about the television footage of aircraft appearing to hit the buildings. Has anyone ever watched the New Years celebrations at Sydney Harbour?

Laser imagery and halograms dominate the sky.

This writer finds it hard to accept such advanced technology could convince television viewers that aircraft flew into a building 25 years ago but as most journalists are aware when researching for answers, acknowledged technology is always five to 10 years or more behind reality.

Hollywood mastered science-fiction movies of alien spacecraft and Star Wars started the journey decades ago.

https://www.vividsydney.com/event/light/lighting-of-the-sails-opera-mundi

https://archive.org/stream/project-blue-beam-revival-of-the-fake-alien-invasion-technology-serge-monast/Project%20Blue%20Beam%3B%20Revival%20of%20the%20Fake%20Alien%20Invasion%20Technology%20-%20Serge%20Monast_djvu.txt

A person interacting with a digital tablet, displaying a 3D model of an airplane amidst a network of blue data points and lines.

No Arabs flew these sophisticated aircraft anywhere around New York on that day.

Pilots we have spoken to since 9/11 find it ludicrous to even suggest that a few desert Arabs could fly a Boeing 767 when it took them three years to be endorsed for the high tech aircraft.

It was the same deal with the Pentagon. A SCUD missile hit the Pentagon. An inside job. This scribe received a photograph taken by a female Navy officer with a digital camera within two hours of the missile hit, clearly showing a gaping round hole in the wall with zero plane wreckage anywhere to be seen.

The Navy officer said in her commentary the Pentagon had been hit by a missile.

Who benefitted from the 9/11 attack? As always follow the money trail. World Trade Centre Jewish owner Larry Silverstein collected $4.5 billion from an insurance payout and it was widely believed at the time the George Bush family got their share.

Who created the entire operation? Who set the explosive charges? Were Mossad and the CIA involved? Almost certainly.

https://cairnsnews.org/2016/08/01/us-businessman-larry-silverstein-profited-by-a-4-5-billion-insurance-payout-from-destruction-of-his-own-building-in-911/

Share Everywhere !

Shares

By cairnsnews

From the land of Australians

19 thought on “SCUD missile hit Pentagon, no aircraft went near it or Twin Towers, Sept 11, 2001”
  1. A SCUD missile? rotfl A little bit of fiction always casts a lot of doubt about a little bit of reality. Mission accomplished, no doubt.

  2. “Donald Trump, 9/11, Case Closed – By Johnny Gat (Parts 1 & 2)”
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/vRpcSgZer2Cy
    (you may have to reload the page more than once or look for a different uploader, there seems to be a “problem” with this video playing on bitchute)
    +
    What’s so funny?
    https://www.tori.ng/userfiles/image/2025/jan/10/Obama%20Trump.jpg
    +
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9fa585e5fb97315bd8d99e84202abdd1ae92057caf43873eba4f4054cfc6ebc1.jpg
    +
    “We will rule by terror and make believe…we will teach them theories and ideas that we ourselves know to be false…”
    http://www.whale.to/c/WatersFlowingEastward.pdf
    +
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6a481fd83e66c0f229fbff9895dcba53a375e4c694a7d7d5028205e11885e16d.jpg

  3. Here we go.
    The US just admitted that they have Space Weapons.
    https://www.twz.com/space/u-s-admits-it-has-weapons-in-orbit
    That’s why Trump took control of that in a corporate way (keep the best weapons for his mates)
    This aligns with the ‘Aliens’ attacking from space next phase of their plan.
    They want to control the ‘Alien’ scenario.
    I don’t think that the real Aliens will care about that ruse. They’ll do whatever they want, just as they have done for thousands of years.
    So if the yanks are talking space weapons that has to mean that there is a big shift in there operations.
    Space wars, Aliens, Alien Virus, shut down everything and line up the sheep to get their final shot.
    Depopulation is high on the agenda don’t forget.
    Imagine the social ramifications of their plan.
    Religion gone.
    Financial collapse.
    Hospitals overflowing.
    No food on the shelves.
    Green skinned hybrid humans pretending to be Aliens with laser weapons running around blowing holes in people on the nightly news.
    People frozen in fear.
    Full military control of societies.
    1984 has nothing compared to this possibility.
    Well that is their plan by the looks of it.
    Sounds bad doesn’t it.
    BUT.
    I don’t think that their plan will work out some how.
    Because they haven’t managed to stop Iran and China’s anti-gravity vehicles as yet.
    It’s going to get real interesting real soon.

  4. re: “That would not happen in America unless they let it happen.”
    .
    Well, they did have to shut down Norad and send the Air Defense squadrons on a few wild goosechases to make it believable. But how many flying lessons did Tom Cruise have to have for TopGun compared to the Saudi Stanley Knife Ace Pilot Squad members?
    .
    What still puzzles me is how they made the mistake of bringing down Building 7 before they brought it down Not to mention how quickly they managed to wire it for demolition because its content was too toxic for anyone to access..

  5. For those who haven’t seen it, James Corbett video ‘9/11 Conspiracy Theory Explained in 5 Minutes’:
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCzy9i4tIHU] The damage to the Pentagon and the field where a United Airlines crashed are similar. Whatever hit the building or field had a wingspan a fraction of any commercial jet and left not much in the way of general debris. It was a deadly scam to push an agenda.

  6. I got home that day in time to see the second plane hit. When my housemate told me that what was on the TV was real and not a movie I instantly said to myself: “That would not happen in America unless they let it happen.”
    Looks like I was right.]I indulged in a bit of the post event analysis but did not bother with it for too long, but did find out that SERCO had the security contract for the Towers and that they would have had ample time to install the thermite that was alleged to have caused the controlled demolition that many believe caused the Towers to come down.

  7. The real marvel is, how is the fake news M$M still in business, spreading disinformation 24-7 from vast numbers of orifices

  8. Max Igan recently said; “if things were perfect all the time it would get boring”…
    Yeah, and no child would be brutalized and sacrificed ever either.
    So, quit complaining Max, that’s the trade-off.
    Methinks Max doesn’t really comprehend “perfection”…he doubts that it is actually “perfect”.
    Hehe…how do you’all think we got into this world?

  9. This is the world where you get to learn the value of “deceit” and “evil”.
    This is the world where you get to learn the meaning of the word “despicable”.
    And “worthless”.

  10. Gaslighting galore! The real perps must be laughing their heads off at the display of public stupidity and sheepishness they are witnessing.

  11. > There is a security video showing the explosion at the same floor without the plane and without the extra special effects…

    I’ve seem some as well, but we also have to be careful to check that those videos haven’t been altered to remove the planes, to create disinformation. But I absolutely agree that how the alleged planes hit looks suspicious.

  12. I’m a carpenter/stonemason and I’ve watched quite a lot of demolition videos, some good jobs, some were bad…The WTC buildings were demolished, properly, falling within their own ‘footprints’…due to their massive height, I’d reckon I’d give the demolitionists a 9/10. It wasn’t anything else, plenty of people were reporting at the time of ‘bombs going off in the basement’. That is what demolitionists do.

  13. There is a security video showing the explosion at the same floor without the plane and without the extra special effects…You know you are seeing the real deal. there is also security footage of the missile that hit the Pentagon. One of the MSM news was reporting on that with not a single bit of an aeroplane anywhere to be found…reporting with a straight face too.
    .
    Who benefits? There some Netanyahu quotes I read the other day that do suffice to answer that one…Not a secret a few thousand Jews didn’t turn up to work on 9/11 at the WTC…

  14. Before each building demolished office workers complained of structural jackhammer work being carried out on the floors they worked on

  15. The fake 9/11 planes shown on TV were CGI (computer-generated imagery) as they went “through the steel building like butter”. Dr. Judy Wood, a former professor of mechanical engineering, has written extensively on the events of 9/11 and her most recognized work is “Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11”, and presents her theories on pulverization of the buildings (dustification). Which leaves another piece of the puzzle to be found – were the DEWs from a satellite, or elsewhere, by whom? Not only did it forever change America, it also dragged Australia into an unnecessary war against (faked) terrorism.

Leave a Reply

https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v7.0&appId=https://www.facebook.com/groups/cairnsnews

Discover more from cairnsnews.org

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading