JOHN Ruddick MLC (Libertarian) has introduced the Public Health Amendment (Immunisation) Bill 2026 – the first major legislative push in NSW in more than eight years to restore parental rights and vaccine choice.
In 2017 the NSW Government quietly removed the conscientious objector exemption that had existed for decades and expanded the “no jab, no play” rules to every school and childcare centre in the state – aka a totalitarian “health care” system that violates informed consent at common law.
“Parents who had carefully weighed the benefits and risks with their doctor suddenly had the door slammed in their face. The state decided it knew better,” says Mr Ruddick.
“More and more parents are selective about vaccines after the dangerous and ineffective COVID vaccine was forced on the entire population. These parents are not extremists for wanting to make informed health decisions for their own children.”
Mr Ruddick says Libertarians don’t believe you should have to co-parent with the government, so this Bill reverses those 2017 changes and puts power back with parents where it belongs. Specifically, it does three things:
– Limits the immunisation enrolment requirements to pre-2017 rules.
– Fully restores the conscientious objector pathway from the schools it applies to, so parents who have weighed up the risks can still make the decision themselves.
– Keeps the medical objection pathway intact.
“Nothing in this Bill stops any parent from fully vaccinating their child. It simply stops the state from punishing parents who, after proper medical advice, choose a different path for their son or daughter.
“So it’s not an anti-vax Bill, it’s a Bill supporting parental rights and basic freedoms. Coercion is not health policy, it’s authoritarian overreach. Look out for the debate in the months to come.”
Cairns News also points out that the actions of the State Government in removing a long-entrenched right at common law, shows the ignorance and contempt that modern political thinking has for the law, and in particular, misuse of the “Supremacy of Parliament” argument.
When legislatures pass Acts that violate common law, that Act should become unlawful and sent back to the legislature until it complies with the law.
The Australian Law Reform Commission has long stated that “informed consent to medical treatment” is “a right at common law”.
“At common law, all competent adults can consent to and refuse medical treatment. If consent is not established, there may be legal consequences for health professionals. Under the law of trespass, patients have a right not be subjected to an invasive procedure without consent or other lawful justification, such as an emergency or necessity,” the ALRC states.
An essay on the Law Teacher website on the topic of parliamentary supremacy observes: “With regard to Geoffrey Marshall’s argument “the most obvious and undisputed convention of the British constitutional system is that parliament does not use its ultimate sovereign power of legislation in an oppressive or tyrannical way.
“That is a vague but a clearly accepted constitutional rule resting on the principle of constitutionalism and the rule of law.” Three fundamental questions arise. At first we need to consider as how this convention is “enforced” and secondly whether this convention is an adequate protection against oppression and tyranny, and finally how might such protection be strengthened. Though the writer argues that as “clearly accepted” in my view I partially agree and disagree with the writer for the reasons I indicate below.
“The doctrine of Parliament sovereignty establishes the supreme law making body of England which is the legislature. The statutes created by the parliament are non justiciable, which shows the capacity of Parliament as a retrospective law making body.
“Though this is the fact, it was different before the Glorious Revolution of 1688. The unlimited parliament legislative authority was not always being accepted in courts. In the case of Dr Bonham’s it is stated that the common law had the power to control Acts of Parliament and sometime declare them to be void and similarly in Day v Savadge the view was expressed that if an Act was against natural equity in that it made a man a judge in his own case the Act would be void in it self.
“After the Glorious Revolution Parliament asserted the supremacy over the monarch which made Parliament hold the purse strings and which now had the legislative power.”
[…] READ MORE AT CAIRNS NEWS […]
They want to create a vaccine for everything, it is their business model.
Those who should know better completely ignore the most basic principles around the value of one’s own innate immunity as well as hygiene, and diet and all the factors that make a person vulnerable to disease in the first place.
“Ebola Fever” has been around for a long time. It was written in tropical health textbooks even before the 1980’s.
It was claimed at the time to be spread to man from rats and put in the category with Lassa Fever, and Marburg. There was no specific cure for the disease – a patient would be ‘kept alive until his body can make enough antibodies to kill the disease – and he will probably recover” Ebola Fever can also look like – have a differential diagnosis of “malaria, septicaemia, leptospirosis, typhus or acute severe hepatitis”
Management is mainly of the haemorrhage, and in the 1980’s the recommended treatment was DDT! insecticide. 10% DDT powder on the patient ad their clothes and bedclothes!
The person was treated for faliparum malaria in case.
That’s it.
No vaccine program – just management.
With any haemorrhagic fever – the person may have body aches and pains, rash, bleeding and shock in a worse case scenario in these tropical Countries with limited access to care.
Reference: “Common Medical Problems in the Tropics” C R Schull 1987 Formerly Specialist Medical Officer PNG.
They’re pretending their so-called vaccines cocktails will destroy non existant viruses etc.
They’re using Ebola atm, which likely was created/ resulted from one of their previous cocktails (https://old.bitchute.com/video/qY2D2FfCtMRB/)
How many ignorant will be begging & willingly lining up for their next TOXIC injections to save them from a victious boggieman etc.
h ttps://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-02/ebola-vaccine-amid-outbreak-in-democratic-republic-of-congo/106748244
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT – SECT 51 :1946
Legislative powers of the Parliament.
The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:–(xxiiiA.) The provision of maternity allowances, widows’ pensions, child endowment, unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services >(but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription),…
Any ‘fix’ starts above and lets not forget what else needs fixing. After all, the Australian Government passed Martial law on its population, restricted access to work, travel, dying relatives and those other ‘off limits’ activities they pronounced. This was all illegal despite all their CV19 bills and BS, proving referenda’s just a labor smoke and mirrors act and charade show now that they completely ignore.
My deep cynicism of our ‘Governments’ legitimacy and its lackeys low morale fibre convinces me the only reason they left brothels open was for their own needs and possibly some pimping money on the side. Supermarkets and servos did so well they now have dominant monopolies, the former expanding into block housing and rent grift. Thousands of small businesses that folded under the lockdowns fate still never addressed to date.
I experienced Martial Law first hand whilst in Manilla in 1980 and the only difference was their police and army all packed M16s they could happily use with full impunity. Here those two million that rallied in Canberra just tasted our Fascist ZOG Governments new ‘non-lethal’ martial tools and microwaves. Marcos was only removed by people power and the fact that 16 million of them lived in Manilla. The true turnout never made national news on their mouthpiece the ABC (Absolute Bastards & C_nts).
Our other sacred human right they removed was our right to medical confidentiality they still have ready for another attempt at our genocide. No one has mentioned it since but without it the mRNA jabbery and ‘medical conscription’ would never have been possible.
I expect this bill will go nowhere as it opens the CV19 rabbit hole of all their deceit, complicity and betrayal of the people they are only meant to serve. That or block doing any further reform for ever. They are criminals after all now or at least 95% of them without a doubt in my mind anyway. Hanging all involved for their crime against humanity is a definite possibility or if not life no parole at the least first, then fix it or like Marcos, they will just come back and do it again. Emergency bill 2.0 is updated and ready to go in WA and SA and now its ‘no jab we jab you’ and we are all still conscripted.
Thank goodness for John Ruddick and the others standing up for basic common sense and freedom.
After the Amendment passes, maybe a non-brain dead msm journo could seek comment from ATAGI.
Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunization
06 April 2022 ‘ATAGI advice on use of sedation for COVID-19 vaccination’:
“Aim – To provide an overview of the principles for the use of sedation as one of a range of measures to assist in the safe administration of COVID-19 vaccines.”
They wanted to inject a bio-weapon into the non-compliant.
I couldn’t find a direct link on the ATAGI website. Try this –
[ https://reignitedemocracyaustralia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/atagi-advice-on-use-of-sedation-for-covid-19-vaccination_1.pdf ]
Then there is that anti-human piece of 2021 WA legislation written by insane maniacs.
“PUBLIC HEALTH ACT 2016 (WA) – INSTRUMENT OF AUTHORISATION – AUTHORISATION TO SUPPLY OR ADMINISTER A POISON – [SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) VACCINE· AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE] – (No. 7) 2021”
No direct link found and I don’t use google.
The internet is being nuked of useful info.
𝙑𝙞𝙧𝙤𝙡𝙤𝙜𝙮 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝙁𝙧𝙖𝙪𝙙𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙋𝙨𝙚𝙪𝙙𝙤𝙨𝙘𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝘿𝙮𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙁𝙞𝙚𝙡𝙙
Uᴘ ᴜɴᴛɪʟ 1952, ᴠɪʀᴏʟᴏɢɪsᴛs ʙᴇʟɪᴇᴠᴇᴅ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴀ ᴠɪʀᴜs☣ ᴡᴀs ᴀ ᴛᴏxɪᴄ ᴘʀᴏᴛᴇɪɴ ᴏʀ ᴇɴᴢʏᴍᴇ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴘᴏɪsᴏɴᴇᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴅʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ɪᴛ sᴏᴍᴇʜᴏᴡ ᴍᴜʟᴛɪᴘʟɪᴇᴅ ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴅʏ ɪᴛsᴇʟғ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴏᴜʟᴅ sᴘʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴅʏ ᴀs ᴡᴇʟʟ ᴀs ʙᴇᴛᴡᴇᴇɴ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀɴɪᴍᴀʟs.
Hᴏᴡᴇᴠᴇʀ, ᴛʜᴇsᴇ sᴜsᴘᴇᴄᴛᴇᴅ ᴠɪʀᴜsᴇs ᴄᴏᴜʟᴅ ɴᴏᴛ ʙᴇ sᴇᴇɴ ᴅɪʀᴇᴄᴛʟʏ ɪɴ ᴅɪsᴇᴀsᴇᴅ ᴛɪssᴜᴇ ᴜsɪɴɢ ᴇʟᴇᴄᴛʀᴏɴ ᴍɪᴄʀᴏsᴄᴏᴘʏ.
Iᴛ ᴡᴀs ᴀʟsᴏ ᴀᴄᴋɴᴏᴡʟᴇᴅɢᴇᴅ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ʜᴇᴀʟᴛʜʏ ᴀɴɪᴍᴀʟs, ᴏʀɢᴀɴs, ᴀɴᴅ ᴛɪssᴜᴇ ʀᴇʟᴇᴀsᴇᴅ ᴛʜᴇ sᴀᴍᴇ ʙʀᴇᴀᴋᴅᴏᴡɴ ᴘʀᴏᴅᴜᴄᴛs ᴅᴜʀɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴄᴏᴍᴘᴏsɪɴɢ ᴘʀᴏᴄᴇss ᴛʜᴀᴛ ʜᴀᴅ ᴘʀᴇᴠɪᴏᴜsʟʏ ʙᴇᴇɴ ᴍɪsɪɴᴛᴇʀᴘʀᴇᴛᴇᴅ ᴀs “ᴠɪʀᴜsᴇs”.
Fᴏʀ ᴅᴇᴄᴀᴅᴇs ᴠɪʀᴏʟᴏɢɪsᴛs ғᴀɪʟᴇᴅ ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴀᴛᴛᴇᴍᴘᴛs ᴛᴏ ᴘᴜʀɪғʏ ᴀɴᴅ ɪsᴏʟᴀᴛᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴀssᴜᴍᴇᴅ “ᴠɪʀᴜs” ᴘᴀʀᴛɪᴄʟᴇs ɪɴ ᴏʀᴅᴇʀ ᴛᴏ ᴅɪʀᴇᴄᴛʟʏ ᴘʀᴏᴠᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇxɪsᴛᴇɴᴄᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴀᴛʜᴏɢᴇɴɪᴄɪᴛʏ ᴏғ ᴛʜᴇsᴇ ᴘᴀʀᴛɪᴄʟᴇs. Vɪʀᴏʟᴏɢɪsᴛs ᴏɴʟʏ ʜᴀᴅ ɪɴᴅɪʀᴇᴄᴛ ᴇᴠɪᴅᴇɴᴄᴇ ᴏғ ᴅᴇᴄᴀʏ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴜᴍᴀɴ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀɴɪᴍᴀʟ ᴛɪssᴜᴇ ᴄᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴇ ᴇxᴘᴇʀɪᴍᴇɴᴛs ᴄʟᴀɪᴍᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴄᴀᴜsᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ “ᴠɪʀᴜs” ɪɴ ᴏ̨ᴜᴇsᴛɪᴏɴ.
📌 https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/virology-is-a-fraudulent-pseudoscience-and-is-a-dying-field-according-to-biomedical-scientist/
If everyone was to bother to learn about Common Law and the original Australian Constitution, you would realize that it has been fully USURPED.. on purpose.. by ALL AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT PARLIAMENTS.
They replaced them without referendums.
Common Law was replaced with fake LAWS OF THE HIGH SEAS FOR ANCIENT SHIPPING.
ADMIRALTY MARITIME LAW IS ON THE DOORS OF YOUR COURTS.
THAT IS WHY NOTHING WORKS IN LAW AND ORDER.
CORPORATE BUSINESS LAW IS USED AS IF IT IS COMMON LAW.
THE GOVERNMENT ITSELF IS FAKE AND FRAUD… A BUSINESS FOR PROFIT.
WAKE THE **** UP AUSTRALIA, YOUR CHILDREN NEED YOU.
The Vaxxx companies like to put about the story that everyone has to accept their product being injected into them and their kids for “herd immunity”, moo !!! moo !!! but obviously this is the best outcome for sales.
Individuals can be treated for whooping cough with monoclonal antibodies and they have a 90% chance of not going to hospital. With the injections they are rated as an 80% chance. So the mAbs are TWICE as effective as “herd immunity” but obviously much cheaper. Now J&J is marketing their particular branded type of MA’s, all they do is change one atom or something like in the molecule and patent it, to zap one thing or another. All the variations of mAbs have the suffix -mab. So you can use various ones but you may have side effects ( ill effects ) from one type or another.
mAbs are being touted as the cure for just about everything but you have to catch the disease first.
So I asked the bot if they have mAbs for Ebola and bot said yes. But all you ever hear from our crooked M$M is they have no va666ine for Ebola. So your choice in Africa is maybe get mRNA’d or die waiting. Goodbye Africans, I am not very interested in you but I have nothing against you. Maybe it’s in your best interest to “storm Swissyland” and end the UNBS.
YES!
[…] Source link […]