By Dr Dan Mealey, who served in Afghanistan
How Australia’s media, police theatre, and institutional cowardice have spent a decade turning Ben Roberts-Smith into a pre-trial symbol of disgrace, danger, and presumed guilt.
Another ANZAC Day approaches, and with it will come the familiar pageantry of top brass solemnly reciting “Lest We Forget” from the pulpit of performative reverence, feigning support for the Australian soldier while betraying the very spirit those words are meant to honour.
Excuse my cynicism.
Credit where credit is due: the top brass has become exceptionally performative in their concern toward soldiers suffering from PTSD, a label that conveniently shifts the focus and the locus of 1,800 veteran suicides away from their leadership failure, toward their soldiers’ mental problems.
Excuse my cynicism, once again. But the wounds borne by Australian soldiers run deeper than PTSD, and Ben Roberts-Smith’s ordeal is emblematic of those deeper injuries.
For the last decade, Australia has watched something sinister in motion. It has watched the manufacture of guilt – a guilt assembled in headlines, repeated in media introductions, fused into imagery, and then fed to the public until a man’s legal status becomes almost irrelevant beside the public identity constructed for him.
The contamination has not been subtle. The ABC, The Guardian and countless other news outlets have for the last decade introduced Roberts-Smith, as “Disgraced War Criminal, Ben Roberts-Smith,” with this accusation preceding a criminal court process.
These are not neutral descriptions floating harmlessly above a pending criminal process. They are branding tools. They are cues. They tell the public not merely that allegations exist, but what moral conclusion it is expected to reach before the criminal trial has even begun. They tell the country what sort of man he is supposed to be. Importantly, they tell potential jurors what emotional posture to adopt before evidence is tested in the only forum that is meant to matter.
This is the poison of media contamination. Once a man is introduced for years as disgraced, criminal, fallen, toxic, and morally finished, the ritual disclaimer about the presumption of innocence becomes little more than wig-and-robe judicial pageantry. Officials still mouth it, journalists still occasionally nod at it. But presumption of innocence is not preserved by muttering the phrase after you have spent a decade salting the earth around it.
Police media offices were never created primarily for some romantic ideal of transparency. Scotland Yard’s first formal press office was about control, and the logic has endured: control the first version of events, suppress rumours, maintain confidence, assist investigations, deter wrongdoing, and protect the institution. Some of those purposes are legitimate. Some are deeply uncomfortable. All of them sit in tension with the presumption of innocence when the machinery of publicity is unleashed before a person has even stood before a court.
Criminal Lawyer, and former Police Prosecutor James Glissan offers a detailed legal analysis of how criminal law proceedings really work, explaining the court procedure from arrest to court hearing, and clarifying the nuances of a lawsuit explained in plain English.
The point made in Criminal Lawyer James Glissan’s linked analysis above is devastating because it is true in practice: once the first story is out, once the images are released, once the name is everywhere, the damage is done. The first statement becomes the headline. The correction, if it ever comes, becomes a much less sensational (and hense an entirely unnoticed) footnote.
And in the Roberts-Smith case, the visual theatre was not incidental. The official AFP and Office of the Special Investigator media release stated: “Images of the arrest and the press conference is available via Hightail.” That line is chilling. It reveals the modern architecture of criminal publicity in its rawest form. Before a criminal trial has begun, before a jury is empanelled, before the accused has had his day in court, the State is already packaging the imagery of guilt for distribution. The law may still speak of innocence. The image does not.
And images are everything.
The point made in Criminal Lawyer James Glissan’s linked analysis above is devastating because it is true in practice: once the first story is out, once the images are released, once the name is everywhere, the damage is done. The first statement becomes the headline. The correction, if it ever comes, becomes a much less sensational (and hense an entirely unnoticed) footnote.
And in the Roberts-Smith case, the visual theatre was not incidental. The official AFP and Office of the Special Investigator media release stated: “Images of the arrest and the press conference is available via Hightail.” That line is chilling. It reveals the modern architecture of criminal publicity in its rawest form. Before a criminal trial has begun, before a jury is empanelled, before the accused has had his day in court, the State is already packaging the imagery of guilt for distribution. The law may still speak of innocence. The image does not.
And images are everything.
A man is arrested in public. Cameras are present. Police uniforms fill the frame. Police cars, lights, handcuffs, urgency, spectacle, force. The message this sends to the public is not quiet, not restrained, and not procedural. It is thunderous. This man is dangerous. This man is criminal. This man is a flight risk. This man is already, in some deeper public sense, guilty. That is what spectacle does. It bypasses the intellect and colonises the imagination. Most importantly, it colonises the imagination of the very citizenry from which jurors are drawn.
Which brings us to the most disturbing feature of all.
It is one thing, already bad enough, for police and prosecutors to use pre-arranged media architecture for the institutional purposes set out in policy logic.
It is another thing entirely when police and prosecutors serve the very journalist at the heart of the Roberts-Smith defamation saga, by giving that journalist the scoop.
On the day of the arrest, ABC’s 7.30 immediately turned to Nick McKenzie, describing him as one of the reporting duo who revealed the allegations, and asked for his response to “those images we just saw.”
Whether every operational detail is ever forced into daylight or not, the appearance is grotesque enough. The journalist whose career and Walkley Awards have been inseparable from Roberts-Smith’s destruction, was preferentially given a front-row seat by the AFP to report on the arrest in real-time, while the State distributed the imagery. That is not the clean separation of institutions. It is a grotesque convergence of State power and media appetite.
And that’s the point that should enrage every Australian who still cares about fairness.
Because once the media class has spent years defining a man with terms like “disgraced” and “war criminal”, and once cameras are rolling as police lights flash and handcuffs appear, the practical message to the world is no longer merely that charges exist. The message is much louder than that. The message is that this man has already been morally sorted. That he is not just accused, but marked. Not just charged, but dangerous. It is a message directed to the public, to employers, to neighbours, to families, and most dangerously of all, to potential jurors, that this man is guilty.
That’s why this is bigger than Ben Roberts-Smith.
This is about whether Australia still understands the difference between reporting and conditioning. Between justice and theatre. Between due process and public ritual humiliation.
And Australia should know better, because Australia has already lived through a catastrophic warning. On 7 April 2020, the High Court of Australia unanimously allowed Cardinal George Pell’s appeal and quashed his convictions. Unanimously. Seven to zero. Before that, Pell had been subjected to years of sustained and fevered media condemnation, then imprisoned for more than 400 days before the High Court overturned the case. This lesson should have been seared into the national mind: media frenzy is not truth, moral certainty is not proof, and institutions can be swept along by the passions of an aroused public circus.
That’s why the comparison matters. Like Pell, Roberts-Smith has become the unwilling centrepiece of a collapse in moral and judicial restraint. In both cases, there’s the same foul blurring of truth and “public interest”, the same risk that prosecutorial or investigative judgment becomes infected by a media culture that mistakes social engineering for reporting. The more serious the allegation, the more easily the phrase “public interest” becomes a weapon in the hands of journalists who imagine themselves not as reporters of fact, but as conductors of national morality.
The Prosecution Policy of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) holds the position that “the more serious the alleged offence is, the more likely it will be that the public interest will require that a prosecution be pursued.” That said, here lies the Achilles heel of the DPP, because it’s not the public defining what is in the “public interest.” “Public interest” is in the toolkit of journalists. And too many of them have abused that privilege, using it not to inform the public but to pre-define what the public should feel, fear, and condemn.
“Public interest” has become a mask behind which journalists pursue narrative dominance, professional glory and ideological malice. Once that happens, the distinction between fact-reporting and social engineering collapses. What remains is a press class that has confused its role with that of a national conscience.
And when this goes wrong, when journalistic impropriety is exposed, when courts reveal how much of public understanding has been shaped by appetite, omission, insinuation, theatrical framing, and selective moralism, what consequences follow? Usually none. No genuine remorse. No proportional accountability. Certainly no equivalent suffering to the suffering inflicted on those they have publicly branded for years.
That is why the Roberts-Smith affair is not merely about one soldier. It is about the sickness of a culture.
This sickness has many fathers: a media class intoxicated by its own righteousness, institutions more interested in controlling narratives than protecting fairness, and a broader national envy that delights in cutting down men who are conspicuous, decorated, physically imposing, inconvenient, or difficult to fit into fashionable ideological scripts.
Australia has not simply scrutinised one of its most decorated soldiers. It has culturally stalked him. It has permitted envy, moral vanity, and bureaucratic self-protection to merge into a campaign of destruction.
And the people who carry the heaviest part of that burden are not the editors, not the police media units, not the commentators, not the prosecutorial bureaucrats, and not the journalists collecting prestige, ratings, and awards from the carnage.
It’s Ben’s family.
It’s those who love him.
It’s his parents.
It’s his two teenage daughters reduced to hysteria watching their Dad arrested with calculated and premeditated malice.
It’s the people forced to watch a son, a father, a human being turned into a national symbol of disgrace while the legal process that is supposed to test guilt has scarcely begun.
They are made to absorb not only fear, but humiliation by proxy.
This isn’t justice. This isn’t a fair go. This is not Australia.
And the final obscenity is this: once a nation gets used to this process, once it accepts that loaded labels, strategic imagery, police-media choreography, and years of narrative conditioning are simply how high-profile justice now works, then the presumption of innocence is dead in everything but name. It survives only as a phrase spoken by officials while the cameras roll and the Hightail links circulate.
Australia should be ashamed that it has come to this.
Ashamed that so many journalists are no longer capable of restraint.
Ashamed that a criminal trial can be prefaced by a decade of branding and an arrest presented like an episode finale.
Ashamed that so many people now seem unable, or unwilling, to recognise the difference between an equitable court process, and a town square lynching.
And most of all, ashamed of the leaders who will soon stand at ANZAC Day podiums intoning “Lest we forget,” while having long since forgotten their own soldiers, their dignity, and their right to fairness before the law.
A nation that permits this cannot credibly claim to honour service. It merely exploits soldiers in war, abandons them in peace, and then wraps their betrayal in self-serving ceremony.
An Analytical Briefing (Version 6) Pre-arrest Publication is an IT forensic investigation report undertaken by the legal defence team which found Channel 9 Reporter Nick McKenzie filed his story about the arrest of Ben Roberts Smith at Sydney Airport the day before the arrest clearly showing he had been tipped off by the AFP.
The Finding
Nick McKenzie — the Nine Entertainment investigative journalist who has
reported on Ben Roberts-Smith for almost a decade, was a named defendant in
Roberts-Smith’s defamation proceedings, and has an admitted history of ethical
misconduct in this specific matter — filed an article on the Sydney Morning
Herald’s systems on 6 April 2026.
Roberts-Smith was arrested on 7 April 2026.
The article was titled: ‘ben-roberts-smith-arrested-over-multiple-war-crimes’
The arrest had not yet happened when the article was filed.
This means someone with advance knowledge of a classified AFP operational
arrest — flight details, timing, airport location — provided that information to
McKenzie before the arrest occurred. McKenzie is not a neutral journalist in this
matter. He is a direct participant in the preceding civil litigation with a
documented personal and professional stake in the outcome of this prosecution.
Cairns News has a complete copy of the forensic report which will be published shortly.#
I am amazed that until now while on this subject of injustice, and criminal behavior Martin Bryant has not been mentioned. Thirty years ago he was falsely accused of several murders and has been in jail ever since, without a trial of any sort. Thank you John Howard you insanely criminal excuse for a human being, along with your mercenary AFP & ASIO and criminal legal profession.
When these so-called security safe guards along with the courts are compromised what chance has the ordinary person in the name of law. Some will say, Bryant was only an intelligently handicapped person, so it doesn’t matter him being locked up for 30 years. Oh yeah, what if it was you and you were only 70% intelligent?
This entire fiasco sickens me..🤮.. McKenzie is not a journalists’ bootlace.. he’s corrupt, lying & conniving in order to promote his own career whilst denigrating the truth.
Don’t look here, look over there. What are the corporate aus grubberment cooking up while you are looking in the direction that they pointing to?
This uniparty bs has well and truly charcoaled their goose.
All Polistitutes are required to be tested for Drugs before they enter the Canberra Federal Chambers.
Time to inhibit/shutdown this aus treasonist and traitorist uniparty faction.
Just something to think about : A month ago someone hacked Pauline Hanson’s internet and got everything ,and she only found out from a staffer who was informed by someone else .
Harry and his missus are arriving in Australia shortly and their itinerary has been leaked to media outlets .
The AFP arranges for the media to be there when Ben Roberts-Smith is arrested .
It is the politicians who sent these soldiers to places such as Afghanistan and, in recent years, to the Donbas who should be locked up.
Here is a photo I took in the summer of 2019. It was taken from the top of the famous Potemkin Stairs of Odessa. You can see a Canadian warship. Behind it is a British warship. In the streets, I saw US naval officers in uniform strutting about with their Ukrainian counterparts. It was pretty obvious that they were planning a war on Russia.
Australia should stay out of this shit. Nothing is more dangerous than being an ally of the USA and the UK. Ask the Gulf Sheikdoms.
The USA is deliberately bringing down the world economy so as to hurt China. Australia will be among the “collateral damage”
https://fv5-6.files.fm/thumb_show.php?i=ekxk5xpphh&view&v=1&PHPSESSID=743c1bc890a031ea40b4de3092450e1f7b1185d3
Your Quote:”Lets not forget our Government* has put Zionism over us at all costs and always will unless the cucked ADF puts its balls back on and do a coup or something.” Unquote.
Exactly like the US Government* Trump is bending over backwards to please Netanyahu/Israel.
Another lynching was of Bradley Murdoch being accused of Peter Falconio’s murder even though his body was never found and there had been eye witness account of his likeness elsewhere afterwards as was reported by the ABC .
If Falconio’s body had been placed under a cattle grid as expected after what Murdoch had said publicly how to depose of a body while in conversation with others ,there would have been hawks and crows circling the decomposing body and birds waiting each side waiting their turn to pick the body clean of its flesh and the horrendous smell would have been noticeable 100 yards or more either side of the grid or the burial site .
Murdoch maintained his innocence to his death of lung cancer in prison .
What a great article. Thank you for the thoroughness and thoughtfulness taken. I do hope readers wake up to how dangerous this is – for all of us.
Since the trial by media of Lindy Chamberlain, I have to acknowledge Darren Hinch for his moderate views at the time, maintaining a sense of fairness and open mindedness regarding the daily display of evidence.
I learnt then that only the jurors in the court room who hear all the evidence are capable of making the right decision. Anyone else is just giving their opinion and without hearing all the evidence this can be very wrong.
A fair trial is not possible in todays world with such manipulation of the media and over stepping by the police and judiciary. How can 12 peers or a judge be found who are unaffected by such public window dressing? This case should be dismissed on the grounds that no trial could be fair and equitable.
The fact is those in power must hate the jury system because it is left up to ‘the people’ to decide and they can’t have that.
Fair justice is crucial to freedom; we cannot have freedom without justice.
Well, Trevor Sullivan. What are you going to do about it then? I have given, in my last post here, some choice info. So here’s another one about the frsud of the courts using a name that is not yours to entrap you.
From a former Alaskan Supreme Court Justice: http://annavonreitz.com/twocrimesusedmostoften.pdf
Perhaps not so much for BRS’s trial but for others possibly facing the dodgy court system, a couple of things.
The great Adriana Estevez, who makes judges stand down for not divulging their pecuniary interests in the private, for profit prisons these judges send peopel to:
https://odysee.com/@AussieFighter:8/PRIVATE-ATTORNEY-GENERAL,-ADRIANA-ESTEVEZ-ON-THE-RISE:3
And the Twelve Presumptions of the Court-from Dawn Kelly, a great Aussie:
https://dawnkelly.com.au/the-twelve-presumptions-of-court/
The Courts are all corporate administrative courts hell bent on making as much money out of you as they can. ZSo watch out.
About the Bonds they place on you: it is the same BAR Association everywhere, so this article sticks:
http://annavonreitz.com/courtbond.pdf
Jo, my thoughts EXACTLY as I read this article. The shame was, that back then the film taken of her clearly showed by body language that she was innocent but People did not listen or look at her body language. The listened to the media. They listened to police. And she spent years behind bars having her new born daughter taken away from her. Everything was made up to make her guilty from the get-go. Even down to the spraying of red paint in the car.
A good read, but like many exposes, it only exposes enough dirt to make the average reader extremely angry and frustrated, which arguably, only furthers the original (Vatican/U.N.) cause, of breaking down our nation – not giving one iota of a solution to the problem. It does not get to the bottom of the issue, and ends up being basically a whinge against corrupt media and police, which I agree with as far as it goes.
Here’s the real issue:
A Vatican-serving Globalist ‘Australian government’ (so-called), with its Vatican-serving AFP and carefully-selected Vatican-serving Media friends, all propaganda-gorging, bottom-feeding dregs of society, haters of all Truth and equity, amoral and immoral misfits in any lawful, good, or godly institution (if there is any such thing left – though our very Commonwealth Constitution was framed, “humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God,” creating in 1901, this “indissoluble Federal Commonwealth,” “under the Crown of the United Kingdom” – which is by law, Protestant, founded entirely on and entirely subject to the Authorised King James (Protestant) Bible in all things!).
“Public interest”, mentioned in the article, is just another Vatican/U.N. propaganda tool, brainwashing the mindless masses into accepting a fluid system of raw-sewage-rhetoric, which somehow, causes all, “that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast” (Revelation 17:8).
The first step in solving this Global problem, is to realize that all nations are ruled by the Roman Antichrist and “beast” (according to Scripture), who pretends to be Christian, but, “Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God” (2 Thessalonians 2:4), whom Christ “shall destroy with the brightness of his coming” (V. 8).
The second step is for Australia to repent of its gross and deliberate wickedness, and get right with God.
You are either with Christ or against Him, as He said Himself!
No amount of politics or journalism will solve this problem. Not even preaching Jesus Christ will suffice, for those who deliberately reject Him and ride roughshod over His every Word. THIS is Australia’s ONLY problem.
Eternity is a long time. Sadly, most people will spend it in a place where, Jesus said, “their worm dieth not and the fire is not quenched” (Mark 9:44,46,48).
Sincerely in the service of Christ, Crown, and Constitution, and all those who genuinely love the Word of God (Authorised Version),
Trevor W. Sullivan,
Minister, Nanango Christian Faith Centre (A Reformed & Protestant Church).
RECESSIVE GENETIC DISORDER and BEN ROBERTS SMITH
Few if any in government or bureaucracy here, understand that Muslim populations inbreeding for over 1,000 years has created a society of irrational lunatic fringe people, to the extent their governments so concerned at the high number of miscarriages, high level of deformed babies, very serious crippling lifelong health problems, low IQ and insanity in high numbers in their populations, leading to the degeneration of their society with radicalisation and brutal primitive behaviour with reduced national development and economic advancement — they commissioned medical sciences studies to find the cause — 16 Muslim governments all reached exactly the same conclusions — INBREEDING.
IRREFUTABLE MEDICAL STUDIES
From 19 listed countries clearly identified the identical base causative factors: 1. Qatar, 2. Morocco, 3. Saudi Arabia,4. Iran,5. Kuwait, 6. Lebanon, 7. Bahrain, 8. Egypt, 9. United Arab Emirates, 10. Sudan, 11. Jordan, 12. Oman, 13. Tunisia, 14. Palestinian Arabs, 15. Arab Newborns In Jerusalem, 16. India, 17. Norway, 18. Europe & 19.America — 47+ studies from 19 countries all found the same causative base factors. I can provide the full studies if required.
RECESSIVE GENETIC DISORDER — THE MEDICAL REASONS
These studies all identified the same medical problem of ‘Recessive Genetic Disorders’ (RGD) from consanguineous inbreeding over generations causing these genetic diseases: chromosomal disorders, mental retardation, schizophrenic illness, spinal muscular atrophy, cystic fibrosis, physical handicaps, hydro-cephalus, Down syndrome, heart diseases, blood diseases of thalassemia a potentially fatal haemoglobin deficiency, sickle cell anaemia, amenorrhea, mucopolysaccharidosis, sensorineural deafness, neurodegenerative disease, diabetes, limb anomaly, epilepsy, cleft palate, inflammatory bowel disease, familial multiple sclerosis, bronchial asthma, autosomal recessive disorders, morbidity and mortality, congenital malformations, ambiguous genitalia, multiple congenital anomalies, stillbirths, high infant mortality.
The resulting mental retardation and low IQ results in many being antisocial, belligerent and being easily taught antisemitism hatred from their peers with religious accolade promise of paradise and 72 virgins, take them wherever their leaders direct.
These ‘Recessive Genetic Disorders’ make many unemployable due to inability to learn new social norms, respectful customs, new laws or language and assimilate into new environments, low intelligence leads to violent over reactions-crime-radicalization and terrorism — and high long-term medical costs being a huge lifelong financial and social burden upon Medicare and the government for life as well as long term custodial sentences, plus their offspring who carry their Recessive Genetic Disorders into their future children for generations of additional costs upon Medicare, police, courts, jails and the taxpayers of billions.
Mandatory Blood Tests For Recessive Genetic Disorders Must Be Applied To All Migrants — Without Exception (one drop of blood only, like a diabetes test). This would eliminate most terrorists on medical grounds
Australian immigration prohibits anyone who has a serious health problem from entry on the grounds they will become a lifelong future burden on Medicare and the taxpayers, they must have a clear Certificate of Health — That should include being free from RGD.
Having identified the problem, we have to understand our troops fighting in Afghanistan were in the midst of irrational lunatics, they were in a kill or be killed situatiuon. We previously had those who were trusted turn on western troops and kill them, therefore someone had to make a decision of safety of the greater over the lesser.
No one who has not served on the front-line should ever be in a position of judgment against military action — Such should only be the prerogative of Military Tribunals and Courts, and only presided over by those who have actively served at least one mission on the front line — and none other.
The charges against a ‘National Hero’ will see greater reductions in our Defense Personnel and our national defense weakened further.
[…] Source link […]
Putting BRS’s main detractor at the scene of his undignified public arrest was also for its psychological harm on him. Finally ‘losing’ to a similar demonic type of soulless enemy he had fought so well in the wars against psychotic jihadis must have had an effect. Jihadis didn’t fight by ‘Kings rules’ either more like execute torture kill. His ‘Aussie’ foe made equally deadly with AFP support/assistance and privileged info in pursuing his final destruction and fall. Yet there was only one warrior in the ‘gotcha’ frames, a prestitute and the mindless probably masonic ZOGbots. He has been virtually publicly condemned tried and executed. Any shade of ‘innocence’ removed by his final ‘perp walk’ before our media whores. So a VC means FA now? They had better not try the Abo smoking ceremony next ANZAC day, its not for that.
The ‘enemy’ finally won a victory over a cornered and still potentially innocent man. The psyop type negative effects of all this include his removal from his young children adding more destruction to their faith and love for him and fear for his safety for all their immediate future by this ‘win’, the legal fiasco and potential ongoing detention.
Its no surprise here anymore when our soldiers get thrown under the political circus bus of our dirty Government trying to hide their own complicity in recent wars. I am still waiting for any word on how they intend to restore the dignity and peace of the poor dead diggers who got double tapped in their cemetery in Gaza by the Chosen and destroyed? in the ethnic cleansing there that ‘we’ support. Lets not forget our Government has put Zionism over us at all costs and always will unless the cucked ADF puts its balls back on and do a coup or something. If that ever happens Mr Rope and Mrs Lamppost will be very busy with those MSM execs and the Covid19 prestitutes just for starters. OzGov has form on this. Harry ‘Breaker Morant’, who now gets a special mention at the AWM. Wars are never pretty and guerilla wars always the most bloody, vicious and cruelest as it goes with the territory. Along with Government said need for ‘political correctness’ in war when what is really needed is beyond any civil court. A court of his peers alone should be all that qualify to judge the pagan type butchery operations of an insurgent war and our involvement in it because history is just repeating.
‘In August 1901 Hunt was wounded on patrol and his body was later found stripped and mutilated. Morant, now in command, led a revenge patrol that resulted in his ordering a prisoner to be shot. He later ordered a separate group of prisoners be executed. These killings were followed by the shooting of a German missionary who had spoken to the doomed prisoners. Shortly after that, Morant, Lieutenant Peter Handcock and others shot another group of Boer prisoners.
Morant, Handcock and other officers were arrested on 22 October and, in January, were court martialed for the killings. On one occasion, while the trial was taking place, the accused helped fend off a Boer attack on Pietersburg. Acquitted for murdering the German missionary (it later emerged that Handcock did kill him at Morant’s instigation), Morant was convicted on all other charges and sentenced to be shot along with Handcock. The sentence was carried out on 27 February 1902. Morant became something of a folk hero and his memory was revived with the film Breaker Morant in 1980. The evidence, however, suggests that he was guilty of the crimes for which he was tried even if his execution resulted from political pressure after the death of the German missionary.’
htt ps://www.awm.gov.au/collection/P10676773
Our system of government has been crumbling for many years, and now it is completely broken. Our legal system works like a lucky dip. The main-stream media are criminals in suits.
The majority of Australians are loud and clear about their support for Ben Roberts Smith and are calling out for this witch-hunt and travesty of justice to end.
Where are all the lawyers in this country? Why haven’t we seen any of these trained people put their hands up in the last 6 years to do a bit of pro-bono work in the name of freedom and justice?
Journo Nick McKenzie, of the House of Misinformation and Gaslighting, appears to be driven by a strange combo of revenge, jealousy and naive. Nick has never faced the nightmare situations of being a frontline soldier in a war zone. He seems to have no real idea of what can or might guide the individual psyche under duress. Mr Armchair Expert has shown he is experience-poor and lacking in imagination, so why would his opinion matter?
Is the AFP on a mission to white-ant the base of the ADF?
Why not look at the biggest crime that started in 2020, still ongoing?
Investigate MPs, medical ‘experts’ and slaves of media re Plandemic 1.0.
Dr Dan Mealy hit the nail fair square & smack bang on the head with his use of the words, town square lynching. That is exactly the case in this instance & Elbow proves himself to be a complete flop in every way for not publicly speaking out & putting a stop to this truly insane miscarriage of Law. This is nothing short of diabolical, & the unrestrained & clearly orchestrated actions of the main key players involved in this totally unjust & criminally motivated aberration of justice is preposterous. It is utterly clear from those who have followed this case ,if even from just a cursory manner, that something is irrevocably wrong & deeply and perniciously flawed with our so called Governing bodies who allow this wickedness to continue. The retarded actions of those behind this abomination are fuelled with a relentless & rapacious hatred towards anything representative of Righteousness. Shame on them for the continued persecution of this innocent man.
McKenzie & several others should be in jail as clear as day. Ben Roberts Smith is absolutely not guilty in iany way shape or form & these ludicrous charges are inspired by crooked political nutjobs. What a disgrace. Fortunately the unseen hand sees all. God Bless Ben Roberts Smith.
I expect there will be some resignations of AFP Commissioners in the not too distant future for various reasons .
Remember the witch-hunt by the media that resulted in a bereaved mother being jailed. Lindy Chamberlain.
[…] Source link […]