Comment by Lyndesy Symonds
Well. Well. These types of events tend to happen when the right person is in charge so he can manage both the event and the cover-up.
I would say the NZ police chief who presided over the Christchurch mosque massacre psyop would be the ideal choice for VicPol police chief to preside over the Sovereign Citizen/white supremacist/gun nutter psyop. What a pity they didn’t also recycle some of those crisis actor Muslims – especially the ‘shock victim’ giving the essential talking points to the media. He was great value.
When official psychological operations are in play, the Corporate Media always has the script before the event (WTC7 Effect) the perp is quickly identified and labeled for brand association in the public mind.
And is it any coincidence this event happens right on the eve of the Aug 31 march of an emergent nationalist movement? The political class has signally failed use Controlled Opposition Right to corral the Australian nationalists and the Marxist cadres have failed to smear as ‘far right extremists?’
Maybe the VicPol chief can come up with some nazis and get them in heil hitler tee shirts and swastikas. May have to send them in come Aug 31.
Editor: Most people involved in the freedom network know that ‘sovereign citizen’ is an oxymoron.
Briefing Note: Misuse of the Term “Sovereign Citizen” in Australia
Background
The label “sovereign citizen” originated in the United States during the 1970s tax protest movements. It was later adopted by U.S. law enforcement as a catch-all term for individuals rejecting government authority. In Australia, the term has been imported by police, media, and agencies, but it is misleading: “sovereign” and “citizen” are contradictory, and most Australian dissenters do not identify with the phrase.
Issue
The indiscriminate use of “sovereign citizen” risks delegitimising peaceful dissenters and equating them with extremists. This erodes democratic traditions of protest, civil disobedience, and political speech.
Legal Protections for Dissent
Implied Constitutional Freedom of Political Communication
• Australian Capital Television v Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106 – recognised implied freedom, struck down ban on political advertising.
• Nationwide News v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1 – struck down law restricting criticism of the Industrial Relations Commission.
• Lange v ABC (1997) 189 CLR 520 – clarified implied freedom as limitation on legislative/executive power.
• Coleman v Power (2004) 220 CLR 1 – upheld protection of offensive political speech.
• Brown v Tasmania (2017) 261 CLR 328 – struck down anti-protest laws as burdening implied freedom.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
Ratified by Australia in 1980, the ICCPR protects:
• Article 19 – Freedom of expression.
• Article 21 – Right of peaceful assembly.
• Article 22 – Freedom of association.
• Article 25 – Right to take part in public affairs.
The High Court in Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 recognised that ratification can create a legitimate expectation of compliance with international obligations.
Conclusion
Genuine dissent and civil disobedience are protected under Australian constitutional law and international law. Authorities should avoid mislabelling peaceful dissenters as “sovereign citizens.” More accurate terms include “lawful dissenter,” “civil resister,” or simply “political protester.” – contributed
Yes massacres and psyops in the US and Australia. Our government is not useful and just so incredibly expensive. Without constant infusions from Swissy’s reserve banking system and the consequent inflation they would not survive.
This phsyop has been completely botched.
Major damage control as the majority of people see it now. Definitely not going well for them. 💥🍿
Team Propaganda use the oxymoron ‘sovereign citizen’, then add the term ‘conspiracy theorist’ in the same breath, and viola – a hypnotist’s spell. More than a few of the audience fall pyschically sleep.
These last 5 years the govt & msm have shown their true colours.
Why their coercion and application of bad medical practices? They seem to want a violent reaction and anarchy. What will they do if they get anarchy without violence? They are screwed in time. They will all end up as footnotes in a Museum built to the Great Democide of the 2020s.
Just to clear up who is who, how about a public enquiry into the status of all of the members of the BAR and all politicians. Make it clear to the public that they are actually public servants. Require they each swear a new public oath, recorded in HD, wherein they declare that they have no superior oath that over-rides their public oath.
Put their assets on the line.
The unlawfully operating pretend corporate ‘Australian government’ that stole the position of The Commonwealth of Australia without a referendum is not a legitimate government, and it’s corporate Police are just privately owned security guards that are not legitimate police of the Commonwealth or States.
So they have “NO AUTHORITY TO ASSAULT WE, THE PEOPLE’ for any reason they can conjure up.
There is coming an reckoning for them, which will be called treason, and for which some will lose their lives.
It is not far off.
When Parramatta Local Court Magistrate David Price in May 2024 didn’t like my Challenging the Jurisdiction of the Court, he ordered the Police Officers in attendance take me for a “Mental Assessment” and when the psychiatrist asked me, “Are you a sovereign citizen?”, I answered, “No. I am a sovereign human being.” She diagnosed me as “A lovely elderly male” and sent me on my way. The case has been finally re-listed for 3 September, next week, and I wonder what other sly tricks he/they might use to try to deflect my whistle-blowing.
It is repeated all across this country. Here is a non-crime for which again sits in prison. You will see the body-worn camers show that no crime was committed yet this jail sentence is derived from his arrest and the subsequent court actions. https://youtu.be/2qMs6tkHNWQ
Good write up, and yes the brown paper club needs all the ducks in one line to achieve the propaganda and the desired outcomes for the person distributing the stuff in the brown paper bags, however when there are toooooo many ducks feeding from the brown paper bags the ducks become useful idiots…… psyop?